Forwarded from Beorn and The Shieldmaiden
On December 24, 1943, the Dnieper-Carpathian operation of the Red Army began
The operation began on December 24, 1943 and ended with the defeat of Army Group South, the destruction of 1 million 100 thousand Nazis, the liberation of Right-Bank Ukraine and the entry into the territory of Romania, Southern Poland and Czechoslovakia.
The length of the front was about 1300-1400 km, the depth - 250-450 km.
Troops from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th Ukrainian and 2nd Belorussian Fronts took part in the operation.
The strategic operation included the following stages: Zhitomir-Berdichev, Kirovograd, Korsun-Shevchenkivska, Rivne-Lutsk, Nikopol-Krivoy Rog, Proskurov-Chernivtsi, Uman-Botosha, Bereznegovato-Snigirevskaya, Polesie and Odessa operations.
The Red Army learned to master the art of encircling and defeating the enemy.
Source
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
🚀 Boost🚀
The operation began on December 24, 1943 and ended with the defeat of Army Group South, the destruction of 1 million 100 thousand Nazis, the liberation of Right-Bank Ukraine and the entry into the territory of Romania, Southern Poland and Czechoslovakia.
The length of the front was about 1300-1400 km, the depth - 250-450 km.
Troops from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th Ukrainian and 2nd Belorussian Fronts took part in the operation.
The strategic operation included the following stages: Zhitomir-Berdichev, Kirovograd, Korsun-Shevchenkivska, Rivne-Lutsk, Nikopol-Krivoy Rog, Proskurov-Chernivtsi, Uman-Botosha, Bereznegovato-Snigirevskaya, Polesie and Odessa operations.
The Red Army learned to master the art of encircling and defeating the enemy.
Source
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Communism
These people evidently think that socialism calls for equalisation, for levelling the requirements and personal, everyday life of the members of society. Needless to say, such an assumption has nothing in common with Marxism, with Leninism. By equality Marxism means, not equalisation of personal requirements and everyday life, but the abolition of classes, i.e., a) the equal emancipation of all working people from exploitation after the capitalists have been overthrown and expropriated; b) the equal abolition for all of private property in the means of production after they have been converted into the property of the whole of society; c) the equal duty of all to work according to their ability, and the equal right of all working people to receive in return for this according to the work performed (socialist society); d) the equal duty of all to work according to their ability, and the equal right of all working people to receive in return for this according to their needs (communist society). Moreover, Marxism proceeds from the assumption that people's tastes and requirements are not, and cannot be, identical and equal in regard to quality or quantity, whether in the period of socialism or in the period of communism.
There you have the Marxist conception of equality.
Marxism has never recognised, and does not recognise, any other equality.
To draw from this the conclusion that socialism calls for equalisation, for the levelling of the requirements of the members of society, for the levelling of their tastes and of their personal, everyday life—that according to the Marxist plan all should wear the same clothes and eat the same dishes in the same quantity—is to utter vulgarities and to slander Marxism.
It is time it was understood that Marxism is an enemy of equalisation. Already in the Manifesto of the Communist Party Marx and Engels scourged primitive utopian socialism and termed it reactionary because it preached "universal asceticism and social levelling in its crudest form." 11 In his Anti-Duhring Engels devoted a whole chapter to a withering criticism of the "radical equalitarian socialism" put forward by Duhring in opposition to Marxist socialism.
". . . The real content of the proletarian demand for equality," said Engels, "is the demand for the abolition of classes. Any demand for equality which goes beyond that, of necessity passes into absurdity." 12
Lenin said the same thing:
"Engels was a thousand times right when he wrote that to conceive equality as meaning anything beyond the abolition of classes is a very stupid and absurd prejudice. Bourgeois professors have tried to make use of the concept of equality to accuse us of wanting to make all men equal to one another. They have tried to accuse the Socialists of this absurdity, which they themselves invented. But in their ignorance they did not know that the Socialists—and precisely the founders of modern scientific socialism, Marx and Engels—said: Equality is an empty phrase unless equality is understood to mean the abolition of classes. We want to abolish classes, and in this respect we stand for equality. But the claim that we want to make all men equal to one another is an empty phrase and a stupid invention of intellectuals" (Lenin's speech "On Deceiving the People with Slogans About Liberty and Equality," Works, Vol. XXIV, pp. 2 9 3 - 9 4 13).
Clear, one would think.
Bourgeois writers are fond of depicting Marxist socialism in the shape of the old tsarist barracks, where everything is subordinated to the "principle" of equalisation. But Marxists cannot be held responsible for the ignorance and stupidity of bourgeois writers.
J. V. Stalin
Report to the Seventeenth Party Congress on the Work of the Central Committee of the C.P.S.U.(B.)
January 26, 1934
@Communism
There you have the Marxist conception of equality.
Marxism has never recognised, and does not recognise, any other equality.
To draw from this the conclusion that socialism calls for equalisation, for the levelling of the requirements of the members of society, for the levelling of their tastes and of their personal, everyday life—that according to the Marxist plan all should wear the same clothes and eat the same dishes in the same quantity—is to utter vulgarities and to slander Marxism.
It is time it was understood that Marxism is an enemy of equalisation. Already in the Manifesto of the Communist Party Marx and Engels scourged primitive utopian socialism and termed it reactionary because it preached "universal asceticism and social levelling in its crudest form." 11 In his Anti-Duhring Engels devoted a whole chapter to a withering criticism of the "radical equalitarian socialism" put forward by Duhring in opposition to Marxist socialism.
". . . The real content of the proletarian demand for equality," said Engels, "is the demand for the abolition of classes. Any demand for equality which goes beyond that, of necessity passes into absurdity." 12
Lenin said the same thing:
"Engels was a thousand times right when he wrote that to conceive equality as meaning anything beyond the abolition of classes is a very stupid and absurd prejudice. Bourgeois professors have tried to make use of the concept of equality to accuse us of wanting to make all men equal to one another. They have tried to accuse the Socialists of this absurdity, which they themselves invented. But in their ignorance they did not know that the Socialists—and precisely the founders of modern scientific socialism, Marx and Engels—said: Equality is an empty phrase unless equality is understood to mean the abolition of classes. We want to abolish classes, and in this respect we stand for equality. But the claim that we want to make all men equal to one another is an empty phrase and a stupid invention of intellectuals" (Lenin's speech "On Deceiving the People with Slogans About Liberty and Equality," Works, Vol. XXIV, pp. 2 9 3 - 9 4 13).
Clear, one would think.
Bourgeois writers are fond of depicting Marxist socialism in the shape of the old tsarist barracks, where everything is subordinated to the "principle" of equalisation. But Marxists cannot be held responsible for the ignorance and stupidity of bourgeois writers.
J. V. Stalin
Report to the Seventeenth Party Congress on the Work of the Central Committee of the C.P.S.U.(B.)
January 26, 1934
#Stalin #Lenin #Marx #Engels #Equality
@Communism
Lay down your weapons, you soldiers at the front. Lay down your tools, you workers at home. Do not let yourselves be deceived any longer by your rulers, the lip patriots, and the munitions profiteers. Rise with power and seize the reins of government. Yours is the force. To you belongs the right to rule. Answer the call for freedom and win your own war for liberty.
- Karl Liebknecht, Call for Revolution (1918)
❤1
Forwarded from Class Consciousness Project
Class Consciousness Project
Sharon Graham: The Illusion of Change at Unite the Union
Picture from leftfootforward.org We have been observing Sharon Graham’s stewardship of Unite the Union with some amusement. She ascended to the position of General Secretary amidst a plethora…
Forwarded from Russian Diplomat 🅉
Sinwar Jr. is about 50 years old. Like Yahya, he joined Hamas in his youth. The publication writes that, unlike his brother, Mohammed Sinwar did not spend “significant time” in an Israeli prison, so the Israeli intelligence services do not understand him as well.
He received the nickname “Shadow” because he preferred to act “behind the scenes” and managed to hide from the Israeli intelligence services for a long time.
Младший брат убитого Яхьи Синвара Мухаммед возглавил ХАМАС – WSJ
Синвару-младшему около 50 лет. Так же, как и Яхья, он присоединился к ХАМАС в молодости. Издание пишет, что в отличие от брата, Мухаммед Синвар не провел «значительное время» в израильской тюрьме, поэтому спецслужбы Израиля его не так хорошо понимают.
Прозвище «Тень» он получил за то, что тот предпочитал действовать «за кулисами» и ему долгое время удавалось скрываться от израильских спецслужб.
Boost | Support |
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from MT News
8 mansions owned by Ukrainian generals burnt in LA wildfires – reports
The properties were reportedly purchased with Western funds provided to Kiev as military aid
@MTodayNews
The properties were reportedly purchased with Western funds provided to Kiev as military aid
@MTodayNews
😁1
Nazism is being allowed to arise once more in Europe. Ukraine, Latvia and Finland all have a strong Nazi ideology still prevalent. It seems Moldova does too.
Forwarded from Beorn and The Shieldmaiden
Monument to Romanian nazi-collaborators opened in Moldavia
In the Moldovan village of Largutsa, a new monument to Romanian soldiers who fought in World War II on the side of the Nazis was officially opened.
This was reported by Alexei Petrovich, the head of the search movement and the head of the Moldovan national organising committee "Victory". Alexei Petrovich wrote the following on his Telegram channel "Soldier of Victory":
Source
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
🚀 Boost🚀
In the Moldovan village of Largutsa, a new monument to Romanian soldiers who fought in World War II on the side of the Nazis was officially opened.
This was reported by Alexei Petrovich, the head of the search movement and the head of the Moldovan national organising committee "Victory". Alexei Petrovich wrote the following on his Telegram channel "Soldier of Victory":
In the village of Largutsa in the Cantemir district, the Monumentum association, with the support of local authorities, opened another 'cemetery of Romanian heroes' - soldiers of the army of Ion Antonescu who died during the invasion of the Soviet Union in the summer of 1941.
The ceremony was held with military honours - an employee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs was spotted on guard, with the participation of clergy of the Bessarabian Metropolitanate (Romanian Orthodox Church - ed.), with the traditional violation of the Law of the Republic of Moldova on the state flag and with the obligatory involvement of children in the action to glorify Hitler's allies
Fierce battles raged in June and July 1941 in the vicinity of the village of Largutsa. Having multiple advantages in personnel and equipment, the Romanian-German fascist troops tried to defeat the Soviet border units. Despite the numerical advantage, the border guards and rifle regiments steadfastly held back the onslaught of the enemy, repelling attacks with colossal losses for the invaders. The whole "heroism" of the Romanians was that their officers drove their soldiers to slaughter, suffering terrible losses from the fire of the Soviet troops.
Source
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Hüseyin Dogru Journalist / red. media founder
106 years ago today, socialist revolutionaries Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht were executed in Berlin, Germany, following the unsuccessful Spartacist uprising. However, their words are as relevant today as they were over a hundred years ago: “What does “regression into barbarism” mean to our lofty European civilization? Until now, we have all probably read and repeated these words thoughtlessly without suspecting their fearsome seriousness. A look around us at this moment shows what the regression of bourgeois society into barbarism means.”
🟡 Join @theredstream 🟡 Support red. 🟡 X
🟡 Join @theredstream 🟡 Support red. 🟡 X