Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
⚡️ Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s answer to a question from the Moscow. Kremlin. Putin programme (July 14, 2024)
❓ Question: Many have noticed that tragedies happen in Ukraine [on schedule] ahead of important talks or NATO summits, and that they are publicly blamed on Russia.
💬 Sergey Lavrov: The Defence Ministry and the Foreign Ministry have made many comments on this. Your colleagues regularly raise this subject, keeping it from expiring. It is those who orchestrate these provocations that would like it to expire.
I will travel to New York next week. Russia holds the Security Council presidency this month. We will discuss multilateral cooperation and ensuring equal and indivisible security. Of course, we will also raise the issue of the West trying to manipulate everything and everyone.
I would like to hear their answer to a question we have asked dozens of times: Could we take a look at the list of people whose bodies the BBC showed in Bucha? It is a shame when an elementary question is left unanswered, just like the question about progress in investigating the terrorist attack on the Nord Stream gas pipelines. We should ask simple but concrete questions about everything else the West is blaming on us to send the ball back to their “court.”
❓ Question: Many have noticed that tragedies happen in Ukraine [on schedule] ahead of important talks or NATO summits, and that they are publicly blamed on Russia.
💬 Sergey Lavrov: The Defence Ministry and the Foreign Ministry have made many comments on this. Your colleagues regularly raise this subject, keeping it from expiring. It is those who orchestrate these provocations that would like it to expire.
I will travel to New York next week. Russia holds the Security Council presidency this month. We will discuss multilateral cooperation and ensuring equal and indivisible security. Of course, we will also raise the issue of the West trying to manipulate everything and everyone.
I would like to hear their answer to a question we have asked dozens of times: Could we take a look at the list of people whose bodies the BBC showed in Bucha? It is a shame when an elementary question is left unanswered, just like the question about progress in investigating the terrorist attack on the Nord Stream gas pipelines. We should ask simple but concrete questions about everything else the West is blaming on us to send the ball back to their “court.”
👍1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova’s answer to a media question on toughening restrictions on Russian fishing vessels by Norway
❓ Question: On July 5, Norwegian authorities announced additional toughening of Russian fishing vessels’ entry regime in three ports in the North of Norway: Tromso, Batsfjord and Kirkenes, which remain open for them amid anti-Russia sanctions. The new measures will concern the duration of ships’ stay in the ports, the frequency of calling at the ports, the mooring area and provide for stricter police control. How could you comment on this?
💬 Maria Zakharova: These restrictions undermine one of the few areas of practical interaction still existing between our countries. Those responsible for adopting such decisions should remember that currently preservation of fish resources of a “fundamental interest” for Norway is only possible in cooperation with Russia.
Continued pressure on our fishing fleet will inevitably have unfavourable consequences both for the Norway’s population employed in this sector and for the sustainable decades-old system of managing biological reserves in the Barents and Norwegian seas.
The novelties were preceded by an information campaign of Norwegian special services, which accused Russian maritime ships of carrying out “reconnaissance and subversive activities” in Norway’s economic zone and territorial waters.
We have come across such primitive stories many times of late also in other Russophobic European countries, where trumped-up espionage charges are used as a pretext for persecuting and eliminating everything related to Russia.
☝️ We will not leave another unfriendly step by Norway unanswered and are going to take relevant measures to secure the interests of the Russian fishing industry.
❓ Question: On July 5, Norwegian authorities announced additional toughening of Russian fishing vessels’ entry regime in three ports in the North of Norway: Tromso, Batsfjord and Kirkenes, which remain open for them amid anti-Russia sanctions. The new measures will concern the duration of ships’ stay in the ports, the frequency of calling at the ports, the mooring area and provide for stricter police control. How could you comment on this?
💬 Maria Zakharova: These restrictions undermine one of the few areas of practical interaction still existing between our countries. Those responsible for adopting such decisions should remember that currently preservation of fish resources of a “fundamental interest” for Norway is only possible in cooperation with Russia.
Continued pressure on our fishing fleet will inevitably have unfavourable consequences both for the Norway’s population employed in this sector and for the sustainable decades-old system of managing biological reserves in the Barents and Norwegian seas.
The novelties were preceded by an information campaign of Norwegian special services, which accused Russian maritime ships of carrying out “reconnaissance and subversive activities” in Norway’s economic zone and territorial waters.
We have come across such primitive stories many times of late also in other Russophobic European countries, where trumped-up espionage charges are used as a pretext for persecuting and eliminating everything related to Russia.
☝️ We will not leave another unfriendly step by Norway unanswered and are going to take relevant measures to secure the interests of the Russian fishing industry.
👍2
Forwarded from Россия в ОБСЕ
⚡️ The Kiev regime and its armed formations continue targeted terrorist attacks against civilians in Russian regions. They are being carried out with the use of weapons supplied by NATO countries, which are de facto involved in attacking the population of our country.
The goal is obvious: to intimidate the civilian population and destroy civilian infrastructure.
❗️Accountability for the crimes committed by the Ukrainian armed formations and military units of Ukrainian neo-Nazis is provided for by the legislation of the Russian Federation and will inevitably follow.
💬 Rodion Miroshnik, Ambassador-at-Large of the Russian Foreign Ministry on crimes of the Kiev regime, continues his thorough work to systematize data on the terrible tragedies that were caused by the use of weapons by the formations of the Kiev regime against the civilian population.
👉 We bring to your attention the thematic digest regarding the most heinous crimes committed in June 2024
🇷🇺 The Russian Permanent Mission to the OSCE presented this digest to all OSCE participating States, the OSCE Secretariat and OSCE specialized institutions.
❗️It is important not to allow the Kiev regime and its Western sponsors to silence the crimes by the Kiev regime and their dire consequences.
The goal is obvious: to intimidate the civilian population and destroy civilian infrastructure.
❗️Accountability for the crimes committed by the Ukrainian armed formations and military units of Ukrainian neo-Nazis is provided for by the legislation of the Russian Federation and will inevitably follow.
💬 Rodion Miroshnik, Ambassador-at-Large of the Russian Foreign Ministry on crimes of the Kiev regime, continues his thorough work to systematize data on the terrible tragedies that were caused by the use of weapons by the formations of the Kiev regime against the civilian population.
👉 We bring to your attention the thematic digest regarding the most heinous crimes committed in June 2024
🇷🇺 The Russian Permanent Mission to the OSCE presented this digest to all OSCE participating States, the OSCE Secretariat and OSCE specialized institutions.
❗️It is important not to allow the Kiev regime and its Western sponsors to silence the crimes by the Kiev regime and their dire consequences.
Forwarded from МИД России 🇷🇺
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🎙 Выступление С.В.Лаврова в ходе заседания Совета Безопасности ООН по многостороннему сотрудничеству в интересах формирования более справедливого, демократического и устойчивого мироустройства.
📍 Нью-Йорк, 16 июля 2024 года
💬 Сегодня испытанию на прочность подвергаются сами основы международного правопорядка – стратегическая стабильность и ооноцентричная система мировой политики. Урегулировать множащиеся конфликты невозможно, если не разобраться в их первопричинах и не восстановить веру в нашу способность объединять усилия ради общего блага и справедливости для всех.
Будем откровенны: далеко не все представленные в этом зале государства признают ключевой принцип Устава ООН: суверенное равенство всех государств. США давно устами своих президентов объявили о собственной исключительности. Это касается отношения Вашингтона к своим союзникам, от которых требуют беспрекословного послушания, даже в ущерб их национальным интересам.
👉 «Правь, Америка!» В этом суть пресловутого «порядка, основанного на правилах» – прямой угрозы многосторонности и международному миру.
Важнейшие компоненты международного права – Устав ООН и решения нашего Совета – трактуются «коллективным Западом» извращенно и выборочно – в зависимости от того, какая установка поступила из Белого дома.
Ключевые тезисы:
• Гегемонистская политика Вашингтона не меняется десятилетиями. Все без исключения схемы евроатлантической безопасности были основаны на обеспечении доминирования США, включая подчинение им Европы и «сдерживание» России. Главная роль отводилась НАТО, которая в итоге «подмяла» под себя создававшийся вроде бы для европейцев Евросоюз. Беззастенчиво приватизированы структуры ОБСЕ в грубейшее нарушение Хельсинкского Заключительного акта.
• Безоглядное расширение НАТО вопреки многократным, в течение долгих лет предупреждениям со стороны Москвы, спровоцировало и украинский кризис, начиная с организованного Вашингтоном госпереворота в феврале 2014 года для установления полного контроля над Украиной с целью подготовки наступления на Россию при помощи приведенного к власти неонацистского режима.
• Военная инфраструктура НАТО продвигается в регион Тихого океана с очевидной целью подорвать асеаноцентричную архитектуру, которая долгие десятилетия выстраивалась на основе принципов равноправия, учета взаимных интересов и консенсуса.
• Где все те атрибуты свободного рынка, к которым США и их союзники столько лет всех приучали? Рыночная экономика, добросовестная конкуренция, неприкосновенность собственности, презумпция невиновности, свобода передвижения людей, товаров, капиталов и услуг – сегодня всё это отправлено в утиль.
• Ключевым элементом реформы ООН должно стать изменение состава Совета Безопасности, <...> в Совбезе явно перепредставлены страны «коллективного Запада». Давно назревшим шагом является достижение максимально широкого согласия о конкретных параметрах реформы, призванной укрепить представленность Азии, Африки и Латинской Америки.
• Необходимы перемены в кадровой политике Секретариата ООН, чтобы устранить засилье граждан и подданных стран Запада в административных структурах Организации. Генсекретарь и его сотрудники обязаны неукоснительно, без каких-либо исключений соблюдать принципы беспристрастности и нейтральности, как предписывает ст. 100 Устава ООН, о чём мы не устаем напоминать.
• Всё большую роль в построении справедливого многостороннего порядка на основе принципов Устава ООН играют #БРИКС и #ШОС. В них объединены страны, представляющие различные регионы и цивилизации, сотрудничающие на основе равенства, взаимного уважения, консенсуса и обоюдоприемлемых компромиссов – «золотого стандарта» многостороннего взаимодействия с участием великих держав.
❗️ Если все без исключения будут следовать его духу и букве, то Объединенным Нациям по силам преодолеть текущие разногласия и прийти к общему знаменателю по большинству вопросов. «Конец истории» не состоялся. Давайте вместе работать в интересах начала истории подлинной многосторонности, отражающей все богатство культурно-цивилизационного многообразия народов мира.
📍 Нью-Йорк, 16 июля 2024 года
💬 Сегодня испытанию на прочность подвергаются сами основы международного правопорядка – стратегическая стабильность и ооноцентричная система мировой политики. Урегулировать множащиеся конфликты невозможно, если не разобраться в их первопричинах и не восстановить веру в нашу способность объединять усилия ради общего блага и справедливости для всех.
Будем откровенны: далеко не все представленные в этом зале государства признают ключевой принцип Устава ООН: суверенное равенство всех государств. США давно устами своих президентов объявили о собственной исключительности. Это касается отношения Вашингтона к своим союзникам, от которых требуют беспрекословного послушания, даже в ущерб их национальным интересам.
👉 «Правь, Америка!» В этом суть пресловутого «порядка, основанного на правилах» – прямой угрозы многосторонности и международному миру.
Важнейшие компоненты международного права – Устав ООН и решения нашего Совета – трактуются «коллективным Западом» извращенно и выборочно – в зависимости от того, какая установка поступила из Белого дома.
Ключевые тезисы:
• Гегемонистская политика Вашингтона не меняется десятилетиями. Все без исключения схемы евроатлантической безопасности были основаны на обеспечении доминирования США, включая подчинение им Европы и «сдерживание» России. Главная роль отводилась НАТО, которая в итоге «подмяла» под себя создававшийся вроде бы для европейцев Евросоюз. Беззастенчиво приватизированы структуры ОБСЕ в грубейшее нарушение Хельсинкского Заключительного акта.
• Безоглядное расширение НАТО вопреки многократным, в течение долгих лет предупреждениям со стороны Москвы, спровоцировало и украинский кризис, начиная с организованного Вашингтоном госпереворота в феврале 2014 года для установления полного контроля над Украиной с целью подготовки наступления на Россию при помощи приведенного к власти неонацистского режима.
• Военная инфраструктура НАТО продвигается в регион Тихого океана с очевидной целью подорвать асеаноцентричную архитектуру, которая долгие десятилетия выстраивалась на основе принципов равноправия, учета взаимных интересов и консенсуса.
• Где все те атрибуты свободного рынка, к которым США и их союзники столько лет всех приучали? Рыночная экономика, добросовестная конкуренция, неприкосновенность собственности, презумпция невиновности, свобода передвижения людей, товаров, капиталов и услуг – сегодня всё это отправлено в утиль.
• Ключевым элементом реформы ООН должно стать изменение состава Совета Безопасности, <...> в Совбезе явно перепредставлены страны «коллективного Запада». Давно назревшим шагом является достижение максимально широкого согласия о конкретных параметрах реформы, призванной укрепить представленность Азии, Африки и Латинской Америки.
• Необходимы перемены в кадровой политике Секретариата ООН, чтобы устранить засилье граждан и подданных стран Запада в административных структурах Организации. Генсекретарь и его сотрудники обязаны неукоснительно, без каких-либо исключений соблюдать принципы беспристрастности и нейтральности, как предписывает ст. 100 Устава ООН, о чём мы не устаем напоминать.
• Всё большую роль в построении справедливого многостороннего порядка на основе принципов Устава ООН играют #БРИКС и #ШОС. В них объединены страны, представляющие различные регионы и цивилизации, сотрудничающие на основе равенства, взаимного уважения, консенсуса и обоюдоприемлемых компромиссов – «золотого стандарта» многостороннего взаимодействия с участием великих держав.
❗️ Если все без исключения будут следовать его духу и букве, то Объединенным Нациям по силам преодолеть текущие разногласия и прийти к общему знаменателю по большинству вопросов. «Конец истории» не состоялся. Давайте вместе работать в интересах начала истории подлинной многосторонности, отражающей все богатство культурно-цивилизационного многообразия народов мира.
❤1👏1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
#HistoryDiplomacy
🌐 On July 17, 1945, a conference of the heads of government of the Soviet Union, the United States, and Britain opened in the Berlin suburb of Potsdam. It was the final WWII meeting of the leaders of the three Allied powers, Joseph Stalin, Harry Truman and Winston Churchill (later replaced by Clement Attlee).
The discussion focused on the principles of Germany’s post-WWII organisation in Europe. Decisions were adopted concerning complete disarmament and demilitarisation of that country, liquidation of the National Socialist Party, and prevention of Nazi propaganda. Nazi criminals had to answer for their atrocities before the law. The International Military Tribunal was established with its statute approved in August 1945. The first and the most important trial is known as the Nuremberg trial. Germany undertook to pay reparations and was divided into four – Soviet, American, British and French – occupation zones.
The universally recognised principles underlying the establishment of peace and security in Europe and around the world were developed at Potsdam, namely:
👉 preventing the revival of German militarism and Nazism as the main prerequisite for security in Europe;
👉 relations between countries should be based on the principles of sovereignty, national independence, equality and non-interference in internal affairs.
Establishing the Council of Foreign Ministers of the USSR, USA, Britain, France and China was the first resolution adopted at the conference. It was entrusted with preparing a peace settlement with Germany’s former allies and, following the establishment of an inclusive German government, a peace treaty with Germany.
The conference also dealt with a number of territorial issues related to the end of the war in Europe. Through the efforts of the Soviet delegation, which consistently adhered to the agreements reached earlier in Tehran and Yalta, the territory of Poland was substantially expanded, and the city of Koenigsberg (Kaliningrad) and the neighbouring area were transferred to the USSR.
✅ Thus, in Potsdam, the Allies succeeded in using international legal basis to consolidate the outcomes of common Victory over Nazis, to which the Soviet Union made a decisive contribution. The decisions adopted at the conference were of great importance for the post-war peace settlement in Europe and the eradication of German militarism and Nazism.
🌐 On July 17, 1945, a conference of the heads of government of the Soviet Union, the United States, and Britain opened in the Berlin suburb of Potsdam. It was the final WWII meeting of the leaders of the three Allied powers, Joseph Stalin, Harry Truman and Winston Churchill (later replaced by Clement Attlee).
The discussion focused on the principles of Germany’s post-WWII organisation in Europe. Decisions were adopted concerning complete disarmament and demilitarisation of that country, liquidation of the National Socialist Party, and prevention of Nazi propaganda. Nazi criminals had to answer for their atrocities before the law. The International Military Tribunal was established with its statute approved in August 1945. The first and the most important trial is known as the Nuremberg trial. Germany undertook to pay reparations and was divided into four – Soviet, American, British and French – occupation zones.
The universally recognised principles underlying the establishment of peace and security in Europe and around the world were developed at Potsdam, namely:
👉 preventing the revival of German militarism and Nazism as the main prerequisite for security in Europe;
👉 relations between countries should be based on the principles of sovereignty, national independence, equality and non-interference in internal affairs.
Establishing the Council of Foreign Ministers of the USSR, USA, Britain, France and China was the first resolution adopted at the conference. It was entrusted with preparing a peace settlement with Germany’s former allies and, following the establishment of an inclusive German government, a peace treaty with Germany.
The conference also dealt with a number of territorial issues related to the end of the war in Europe. Through the efforts of the Soviet delegation, which consistently adhered to the agreements reached earlier in Tehran and Yalta, the territory of Poland was substantially expanded, and the city of Koenigsberg (Kaliningrad) and the neighbouring area were transferred to the USSR.
✅ Thus, in Potsdam, the Allies succeeded in using international legal basis to consolidate the outcomes of common Victory over Nazis, to which the Soviet Union made a decisive contribution. The decisions adopted at the conference were of great importance for the post-war peace settlement in Europe and the eradication of German militarism and Nazism.
👍2
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
When the blitzkrieg plan failed, the Third Reich began planning a large-scale summer offensive. The main blow was to target the southern section of the Soviet-German front. The plan was to destroy the adversary west of the Don River, to subsequently capture the oil-bearing regions in the Caucasus and cross the passes over the Caucasian Range. Hitler’s strategy was to seize the most important transport and industrial centre, the city named after the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the USSR.
Colonel-General Friedrich Paulus, one of the masterminds of Nazi Germany’s plan of attack on the USSR, was assigned to command the offensive.
For 200 days and nights, the German forces unsuccessfully tried to break the morale of the city’s defenders, first on the banks of the Don and Volga, and then just outside Stalingrad and finally in the city.
The German occupiers are seeking to reach Stalingrad and the Volga, and are desperate to seize the Kuban and the North Caucasus with their oil and grain resources at any cost. The enemy has already captured Voroshilovgrad, Starobelsk, Rossosh, Kupyansk, Valuyki, Novocherkassk, Rostov-on-Don, and half of Voronezh. We have lost over 70 million people, more than 800 million poods of grain annually and more than 10 million tonnes of metal annually. We no longer have superiority in manpower or grain reserves. To retreat further means to ruin ourselves and lose our Motherland as well. Each new piece of territory left will further strengthen the enemy and profoundly weaken our defence, our Motherland.
All that considered, it is time to finish retreating. NOT ONE STEP BACK! That should be our main call now. Henceforth the solid law of discipline for each commander, Red Army soldier, and commissar should be this – NOT A SINGLE STEP BACK without order from higher command. This is the call of our Motherland. To fulfill this call means to defend our land, to save our Motherland, to exterminate and defeat the hated enemy.
One of the heroes of Stalingrad, Vassily Chuikov, has played a decisive role in the victory. He was always inventing new tactics for planning and conducting military operations, based on the current realities and prevailing circumstances. It was his initiative to set up assault groups in the city, which started tormenting the enemy day and night.
Commander of the 64th and later the 62nd Army, Chuikov had tremendous faith in his soldiers:
A soldier who is aware of the army’s current objectives can take his own decisions if he finds himself on his own fighting in a basement or under a staircase. There is nothing wrong with that. In street fighting, a soldier is sometimes his own general.
This approach inspired the defenders to perform heroic acts that went down in history. The most famous example of the valour of Soviet soldiers was the defence of the Pavlov House, which was held for 58 days under the onslaught of superior enemy forces. The Nazis attacked the building using aviation, artillery and mortar fire, but the defenders never retreated a single step.
☝️ The victory over the Nazi war machine in one of the most fierce and large-scale battles of all-time showed that it was indeed possible to match and overcome the Third Reich, thus strengthening the international standing of the Soviet Union and its armed forces, and further uniting the anti-Hitler coalition.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Statement by FM Sergey Lavrov during the UNSC meeting on multilateral cooperation in the interest of a more just, democratic and sustainable world order
📍 New York, July 16, 2024
💬 Today, the very foundations of the international legal order - strategic stability and the UN-centric system of international politics - are put to the test. We won’t be able to resolve the mounting conflicts unless we understand their root causes and restore faith in our ability to join forces for the common good and justice for all.
Let’s face it: not all countries represented in this chamber recognise the key principle of the UN Charter which is the sovereign equality of all states. Speaking through its presidents, the US has long declared its exceptionalism. This applies to Washington’s attitude towards its allies, whom it demands to be unquestioningly obedient even to the detriment of their national interests.
👉 Rule, America! This is the thrust of the notorious “rules-based order” which presents a direct threat to multilateralism and international peace.
The most important components of international law - the UN Charter and the resolutions of our Council - are interpreted by the collective West in a perverse and selective manner, depending on the instructions coming from the White House.
Key talking points:
• Washington’s hegemonistic policy has been the same for decades. Absolutely all schemes of Euro-Atlantic security were based on America’s domination, including the subjugation of Europe and the “containment” of Russia. The main role in this was assigned to NATO, which has ultimately tramped down the European Union that had been created to serve Europeans. The alliance has unceremoniously privatised OSCE bodies in brazen violation of the Helsinki Final Act.
• The unrestrained enlargement of NATO, which went on for years contrary to Moscow’s warnings, has also provoked the Ukraine crisis that began with the state coup organised by Washington in February 2014 to seize full control of Ukraine and use the neo-Nazi regime they brought to power to prepare an attack on Russia.
• NATO’s military infrastructure is moving into the Pacific with the obvious aim of undermining the ASEAN-centric architecture, which has for many decades been built on the principles of equality, mutual interests and consensus.
• Where are the free market attributes that the US and its allies have been telling everyone to follow for so many years? Market economy, fair competition, inviolability of private property, presumption of innocence, freedom of movement of people, goods, capital and services - all of these have been scrapped.
• The pivotal element of the reform of the UN should be the reshuffle of the UN Security Council, <...> which clearly has too many representatives of the collective West. A badly needed step is to reach the broadest accord possible on the concrete parameters of the reform, which should increase the representation of Asia, Africa and Latin America.
• The personnel policy of the UN Secretariat should be changed as well to eliminate the domination of Western citizens and subjects in the administrative UN bodies. The UN Secretary-General and his staff must faithfully and with no exceptions comply with the principles of impartiality and neutrality.
• #BRICS and the #SCO are playing an increasing role in the development of a just multilateral world based on the principles of the UN Charter. Their member states represent different regions and civilisations whose interaction is based on equality, mutual respect, consensus and mutually accepted compromises, which is the golden standard of multilateral cooperation involving great powers.
❗️ The UN will be able to overcome current disagreements and to reach consensus on most issues if everyone, without exception, honours its letter and spirit. “The end of history” has failed to materialise. Let us work together in the interests of launching the history of genuine multilateralism that reflects the entire wealth of cultural and civilisational diversity of the world’s nations.
📍 New York, July 16, 2024
💬 Today, the very foundations of the international legal order - strategic stability and the UN-centric system of international politics - are put to the test. We won’t be able to resolve the mounting conflicts unless we understand their root causes and restore faith in our ability to join forces for the common good and justice for all.
Let’s face it: not all countries represented in this chamber recognise the key principle of the UN Charter which is the sovereign equality of all states. Speaking through its presidents, the US has long declared its exceptionalism. This applies to Washington’s attitude towards its allies, whom it demands to be unquestioningly obedient even to the detriment of their national interests.
👉 Rule, America! This is the thrust of the notorious “rules-based order” which presents a direct threat to multilateralism and international peace.
The most important components of international law - the UN Charter and the resolutions of our Council - are interpreted by the collective West in a perverse and selective manner, depending on the instructions coming from the White House.
Key talking points:
• Washington’s hegemonistic policy has been the same for decades. Absolutely all schemes of Euro-Atlantic security were based on America’s domination, including the subjugation of Europe and the “containment” of Russia. The main role in this was assigned to NATO, which has ultimately tramped down the European Union that had been created to serve Europeans. The alliance has unceremoniously privatised OSCE bodies in brazen violation of the Helsinki Final Act.
• The unrestrained enlargement of NATO, which went on for years contrary to Moscow’s warnings, has also provoked the Ukraine crisis that began with the state coup organised by Washington in February 2014 to seize full control of Ukraine and use the neo-Nazi regime they brought to power to prepare an attack on Russia.
• NATO’s military infrastructure is moving into the Pacific with the obvious aim of undermining the ASEAN-centric architecture, which has for many decades been built on the principles of equality, mutual interests and consensus.
• Where are the free market attributes that the US and its allies have been telling everyone to follow for so many years? Market economy, fair competition, inviolability of private property, presumption of innocence, freedom of movement of people, goods, capital and services - all of these have been scrapped.
• The pivotal element of the reform of the UN should be the reshuffle of the UN Security Council, <...> which clearly has too many representatives of the collective West. A badly needed step is to reach the broadest accord possible on the concrete parameters of the reform, which should increase the representation of Asia, Africa and Latin America.
• The personnel policy of the UN Secretariat should be changed as well to eliminate the domination of Western citizens and subjects in the administrative UN bodies. The UN Secretary-General and his staff must faithfully and with no exceptions comply with the principles of impartiality and neutrality.
• #BRICS and the #SCO are playing an increasing role in the development of a just multilateral world based on the principles of the UN Charter. Their member states represent different regions and civilisations whose interaction is based on equality, mutual respect, consensus and mutually accepted compromises, which is the golden standard of multilateral cooperation involving great powers.
❗️ The UN will be able to overcome current disagreements and to reach consensus on most issues if everyone, without exception, honours its letter and spirit. “The end of history” has failed to materialise. Let us work together in the interests of launching the history of genuine multilateralism that reflects the entire wealth of cultural and civilisational diversity of the world’s nations.
👏1
https://nauka.tass.ru/nauka/21381817
Участниками исследования народов Севера станут 2 тыс. оленеводов и зверобоев
Маршруты экспедиций "Чистая Арктика - Восток - 77" и "Россия-360" проложены таким образом, чтобы ученые смогли лично встретиться с максимальным количеством представителей коренных малочисленных народов, ведущих традиционную хозяйственную деятельность в тундре и тайге, а также работающих в поселках и городах.
Участниками исследования народов Севера станут 2 тыс. оленеводов и зверобоев
Маршруты экспедиций "Чистая Арктика - Восток - 77" и "Россия-360" проложены таким образом, чтобы ученые смогли лично встретиться с максимальным количеством представителей коренных малочисленных народов, ведущих традиционную хозяйственную деятельность в тундре и тайге, а также работающих в поселках и городах.
ТАСС
Участниками исследования народов Севера станут 2 тыс. оленеводов и зверобоев
Маршруты экспедиций "Чистая Арктика - Восток - 77" и "Россия-360" проложены таким образом, чтобы ученые смогли лично встретиться с максимальным количеством представителей коренных малочисленных народов, ведущих традиционную хозяйственную деятельность в тундре…
👍1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Statement by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov during the UN Security Council meeting on multilateral cooperation in the interest of a more just, democratic and sustainable world order (New York, July 16, 2024)
💬 The actions of the US and its allies are hindering international cooperation and the creation of a more just world. They have taken countries and regions hostage, prevent nations from realising their sovereign rights declared in the UN Charter
<...>
I am confident that this situation can be changed if there is good will, of course. To stop the implementation of a negative scenario, we would like to propose to discuss a number of steps towards restoring trust and stabilising the international situation.
1. The root causes of the ongoing crisis in Europe should be eliminated once and for all. The conditions for restoring stable peace in Ukraine have been put forth by President of Russia Vladimir Putin.
A political and diplomatic settlement should be complemented with practical steps, to be taken in the West and the Euro-Atlantic community, to remove threats to the Russian Federation. The coordination of mutual guarantees and agreements should be based on the recognition of the new geostrategic realities on the Eurasian continent, where a continental architecture of really equal and indivisible security is taking shape. Europe risks lagging behind this objective historical process. We are ready to discuss a balance of interests.
2. The restoration of the regional and global balance of forces should be accompanied with active efforts to eliminate injustices in the global economy. There must be no monopoly in monetary and financial regulation, trade and technologies, by definition. <...>
3. Major fundamental changes are necessary in other institutes of global governance if we want them to work to the benefit of all. This primarily concerns the United Nations Organisation, which remains the embodiment of multilateralism against all the odds, with unique and universal legitimacy and universally recognised broad competencies.
An important step towards the restoration of the UN’s effectiveness would be the reconfirmation by all Member States of their commitment to the principles of the UN Charter, not selectively but in their entirety and as a whole. <...>
4. Regional associations have practical significance for the development of multipolarity, including the #CIS, the #CSTO, the #EAEU, #ASEAN, the Gulf Cooperation Council (#GCC), the Arab League, the African Union and #CELAC. <...>.
***
❗️It depends on member countries alone whether our world will be diverse and equitable. The Charter of our Organisation is our foothold.
👉 Read in full
💬 The actions of the US and its allies are hindering international cooperation and the creation of a more just world. They have taken countries and regions hostage, prevent nations from realising their sovereign rights declared in the UN Charter
<...>
I am confident that this situation can be changed if there is good will, of course. To stop the implementation of a negative scenario, we would like to propose to discuss a number of steps towards restoring trust and stabilising the international situation.
1. The root causes of the ongoing crisis in Europe should be eliminated once and for all. The conditions for restoring stable peace in Ukraine have been put forth by President of Russia Vladimir Putin.
A political and diplomatic settlement should be complemented with practical steps, to be taken in the West and the Euro-Atlantic community, to remove threats to the Russian Federation. The coordination of mutual guarantees and agreements should be based on the recognition of the new geostrategic realities on the Eurasian continent, where a continental architecture of really equal and indivisible security is taking shape. Europe risks lagging behind this objective historical process. We are ready to discuss a balance of interests.
2. The restoration of the regional and global balance of forces should be accompanied with active efforts to eliminate injustices in the global economy. There must be no monopoly in monetary and financial regulation, trade and technologies, by definition. <...>
3. Major fundamental changes are necessary in other institutes of global governance if we want them to work to the benefit of all. This primarily concerns the United Nations Organisation, which remains the embodiment of multilateralism against all the odds, with unique and universal legitimacy and universally recognised broad competencies.
An important step towards the restoration of the UN’s effectiveness would be the reconfirmation by all Member States of their commitment to the principles of the UN Charter, not selectively but in their entirety and as a whole. <...>
4. Regional associations have practical significance for the development of multipolarity, including the #CIS, the #CSTO, the #EAEU, #ASEAN, the Gulf Cooperation Council (#GCC), the Arab League, the African Union and #CELAC. <...>.
***
❗️It depends on member countries alone whether our world will be diverse and equitable. The Charter of our Organisation is our foothold.
👉 Read in full
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Statement by Deputy Director of Department for Non-Proliferation and Arms Control, MFA of Russia, Anton Mazur, at the 1084th Plenary Meeting of the OSCE Forum for Security Cooperation (July 17, 2024)
Key talking points:
💬 As soon as Kiev begins a real withdrawal of troops from those regions, and also officially notifies the abandonment of plans to join NATO, the Russian Side will immediately cease fire, guarantee the unhindered and safe withdrawal of Ukrainian units and formations, and begin negotiations.
• Having resolved the Ukrainian crisis, we could begin to create an indivisible Eurasian security system that takes into account the interests of all States of the continent without exception.
• The roots of the crisis associated with Ukraine are not in bilateral relations. The events in Ukraine are the result of the aggressive, unceremonious and adventurous policy that the West has pursued and is pursuing in recent decades.
• At the same time, NATO countries, on the one hand, declare their non-participation in the conflict, and on the other, they are doing everything they can to “inflict a strategic defeat on Russia on the battlefield.”
• The OSCE Forum for Security Co-operation, which once served as a platform for professional dialogue among participating States, albeit sometimes difficult and heated, but generally mutually respectful and constructive, has changed a lot, and not for the better. As a result of the destructive activities of our opponents, it has turned into a platform for confrontation.
• In the context of accelerating world order reorganization, it is equally in the interests of Russia and the majority of independent States of our continent that a system of bilateral and multilateral guarantees of collective security in Eurasia develops. It was also mentioned by the President of Russia on June 14. The time has come to begin a broad discussion on such a system.
Read in full
Key talking points:
💬 As soon as Kiev begins a real withdrawal of troops from those regions, and also officially notifies the abandonment of plans to join NATO, the Russian Side will immediately cease fire, guarantee the unhindered and safe withdrawal of Ukrainian units and formations, and begin negotiations.
• Having resolved the Ukrainian crisis, we could begin to create an indivisible Eurasian security system that takes into account the interests of all States of the continent without exception.
• The roots of the crisis associated with Ukraine are not in bilateral relations. The events in Ukraine are the result of the aggressive, unceremonious and adventurous policy that the West has pursued and is pursuing in recent decades.
• At the same time, NATO countries, on the one hand, declare their non-participation in the conflict, and on the other, they are doing everything they can to “inflict a strategic defeat on Russia on the battlefield.”
• The OSCE Forum for Security Co-operation, which once served as a platform for professional dialogue among participating States, albeit sometimes difficult and heated, but generally mutually respectful and constructive, has changed a lot, and not for the better. As a result of the destructive activities of our opponents, it has turned into a platform for confrontation.
• In the context of accelerating world order reorganization, it is equally in the interests of Russia and the majority of independent States of our continent that a system of bilateral and multilateral guarantees of collective security in Eurasia develops. It was also mentioned by the President of Russia on June 14. The time has come to begin a broad discussion on such a system.
Read in full
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Statement by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at a UN Security Council Open Debate on the Situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question (New York, July 17, 2024)
💬 The Middle East is facing unprecedented risks for the security, well-being and peaceful life of its peoples. The waves of violence surge far beyond the area of the Arab-Israeli conflict destabilising the situation in the Persian Gulf, Red and Mediterranean Seas, and in North Africa.
We need a frank and honest conversation about how to stop the bloodshed and sufferings of the civilians without delay and move towards a long-term solution to both long-standing and relatively new conflicts.
Our country has been historically maintaining good relations with all the countries in the region. The USSR was the first state to recognise Israel de facto and de jure, having established diplomatic relations shortly after it declared independence in May 1948. Meanwhile, Moscow invariably advocated the creation of an independent and viable Palestinian state and the realisation of the Palestinians’ legitimate and fundamental right to self-determination. In 1949, we supported Israel's application for UN membership, subject (I emphasise this) to the implementation of General Assembly Resolutions 181 and 194 on the Palestine Partition Plan and the right of return of Palestinian refugees. This was clearly stated when we voted in favour of Israel's admission to the United Nations. Likewise, today we support Palestine's admission to our Organisation. Its sovereignty as a state has already been recognised by nearly 150 countries that are UN members. <...>
Key talking points:
• Russia has consistently denounced all manifestations of terrorism. We implicitly condemned the terrorist attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. However, we regard the current developments in Gaza as unacceptable collective punishment of the civilian population.
• Gaza is in ruins today. Residential buildings, schools and hospitals have been turned into rubble, and the critical civilian infrastructure facilities have been knocked out of service. There is an epidemic of infectious diseases and mass hunger there. It is a real humanitarian disaster.
• The history of the colonial and mandated territories of the Middle East and North Africa has been and remains a heavy burden for the regional countries. The Sykes-Picot Agreement, the Balfour Declaration and the White Paper have planted the time bombs that have been exploding since then. The situation has been further complicated by new Western geopolitical experiments.
• It is the fourth time in the past 10 months that the UN Security Council is holding a ministerial meeting. It has adopted four resolutions, but the continuing bloodshed in the occupied Palestinian territories shows that all these decisions remained on paper.
• The situation in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is also dramatic, with military raids by the Israeli military and the settlers’ aggression, which leads to casualties on both sides. Contrary to UN Security Council Resolution 2334, Israel has not slowed but is accelerating the construction of illegal settlements.
• Our proposal regarding a meeting of all external players who have influence on various groups in Gaza and the West Bank, and who can help overcome the split in the Palestinian ranks provided they speak with one voice, remains on the table.
• Progress on the Palestinian track in full compliance with the UN resolutions, in the normalisation of relations between the Gulf countries, could be an important contribution to the ongoing process of forming a common Eurasian architecture based on the principles of indivisible security, equal collective responsibility, mutual respect and a balance of interests.
❗️ We advocate a permanent and all-encompassing ceasefire. This will make it possible to release 120 Israeli hostages and about 9,500 Palestinians who were arbitrarily arrested since October 7, 2023. We call for providing safe and adequate humanitarian access to all affected and needy people.
Read in full
💬 The Middle East is facing unprecedented risks for the security, well-being and peaceful life of its peoples. The waves of violence surge far beyond the area of the Arab-Israeli conflict destabilising the situation in the Persian Gulf, Red and Mediterranean Seas, and in North Africa.
We need a frank and honest conversation about how to stop the bloodshed and sufferings of the civilians without delay and move towards a long-term solution to both long-standing and relatively new conflicts.
Our country has been historically maintaining good relations with all the countries in the region. The USSR was the first state to recognise Israel de facto and de jure, having established diplomatic relations shortly after it declared independence in May 1948. Meanwhile, Moscow invariably advocated the creation of an independent and viable Palestinian state and the realisation of the Palestinians’ legitimate and fundamental right to self-determination. In 1949, we supported Israel's application for UN membership, subject (I emphasise this) to the implementation of General Assembly Resolutions 181 and 194 on the Palestine Partition Plan and the right of return of Palestinian refugees. This was clearly stated when we voted in favour of Israel's admission to the United Nations. Likewise, today we support Palestine's admission to our Organisation. Its sovereignty as a state has already been recognised by nearly 150 countries that are UN members. <...>
Key talking points:
• Russia has consistently denounced all manifestations of terrorism. We implicitly condemned the terrorist attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. However, we regard the current developments in Gaza as unacceptable collective punishment of the civilian population.
• Gaza is in ruins today. Residential buildings, schools and hospitals have been turned into rubble, and the critical civilian infrastructure facilities have been knocked out of service. There is an epidemic of infectious diseases and mass hunger there. It is a real humanitarian disaster.
• The history of the colonial and mandated territories of the Middle East and North Africa has been and remains a heavy burden for the regional countries. The Sykes-Picot Agreement, the Balfour Declaration and the White Paper have planted the time bombs that have been exploding since then. The situation has been further complicated by new Western geopolitical experiments.
• It is the fourth time in the past 10 months that the UN Security Council is holding a ministerial meeting. It has adopted four resolutions, but the continuing bloodshed in the occupied Palestinian territories shows that all these decisions remained on paper.
• The situation in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is also dramatic, with military raids by the Israeli military and the settlers’ aggression, which leads to casualties on both sides. Contrary to UN Security Council Resolution 2334, Israel has not slowed but is accelerating the construction of illegal settlements.
• Our proposal regarding a meeting of all external players who have influence on various groups in Gaza and the West Bank, and who can help overcome the split in the Palestinian ranks provided they speak with one voice, remains on the table.
• Progress on the Palestinian track in full compliance with the UN resolutions, in the normalisation of relations between the Gulf countries, could be an important contribution to the ongoing process of forming a common Eurasian architecture based on the principles of indivisible security, equal collective responsibility, mutual respect and a balance of interests.
❗️ We advocate a permanent and all-encompassing ceasefire. This will make it possible to release 120 Israeli hostages and about 9,500 Palestinians who were arbitrarily arrested since October 7, 2023. We call for providing safe and adequate humanitarian access to all affected and needy people.
Read in full
👍1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
On July 17, 1846, Nicholas Miklouho-Maclay, a renowned explorer, naturalist, discoverer, member of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society, was born.
🌏 Nicholas Miklouho-Maclay spent a large chunk of his life (23 years) travelling, exploring New Guinea, Southeast Asia, Australia, Oceania, South America, Africa, and Europe.
He wrote about 160 scientific papers and made 700 sketches on zoology, botany, ethnography, anthropology, oceanography, and geology.
Miklouho-Maclay paid a lot of attention to studying indigenous peoples, especially those living on the island of New Guinea, with whom he lived for several years.
🗺 During his expeditions, about 50 Russian toponyms were put on the maps, a significant part of which were later renamed by the colonisers.
The northeastern part of New Guinea, a river flowing into Astrolabe Bay, and a bay in Antarctica were named after him.
☝️ Unlike European colonisers, Miklouho-Maclay was a fervent defender of indigenous people and actively fought slave trade, violence, and racism, thus often putting himself into danger.
He condemned the followers of Darwinism, refuting their judgment that the Papuans are people at a lower stage of development:
👉 The online museum of the Miklouho-Maclay Foundation
You can find photos and videos about the great Russian traveller on the website, as well as about the Foundation’s current projects and expeditions, including those implemented with the support of the Russian Embassy in Indonesia.
🌏 Nicholas Miklouho-Maclay spent a large chunk of his life (23 years) travelling, exploring New Guinea, Southeast Asia, Australia, Oceania, South America, Africa, and Europe.
He wrote about 160 scientific papers and made 700 sketches on zoology, botany, ethnography, anthropology, oceanography, and geology.
Miklouho-Maclay paid a lot of attention to studying indigenous peoples, especially those living on the island of New Guinea, with whom he lived for several years.
🗺 During his expeditions, about 50 Russian toponyms were put on the maps, a significant part of which were later renamed by the colonisers.
The northeastern part of New Guinea, a river flowing into Astrolabe Bay, and a bay in Antarctica were named after him.
“The Maclay Coast I call a part of the northeastern coast of New Guinea approximately from Cape Croisilles to Cape Telyata (more than 300 km)… Thus, I call the coast of New Guinea by right of the first European who settled there, explored this coast and got scientific results.”
☝️ Unlike European colonisers, Miklouho-Maclay was a fervent defender of indigenous people and actively fought slave trade, violence, and racism, thus often putting himself into danger.
He condemned the followers of Darwinism, refuting their judgment that the Papuans are people at a lower stage of development:
“There are no superior or inferior race – all people are equal by nature!”
👉 The online museum of the Miklouho-Maclay Foundation
You can find photos and videos about the great Russian traveller on the website, as well as about the Foundation’s current projects and expeditions, including those implemented with the support of the Russian Embassy in Indonesia.
❤1👍1
Ответ официального представителя МИД России М.В.Захаровой на вопрос СМИ о пересмотре в Норвегии самоограничений на иностранную военную деятельность вблизи границы с Россией
Вопрос: В конце июня с.г. руководством оперативного командования «Финнмарк» Вооруженных сил Норвегии озвучена очередная инициатива, направленная на размывание норвежской политики самоограничений на иностранное военное присутствие и деятельность на территории страны. Предлагается, в частности, «для начала» отодвинуть границу ограничений на военную активность и учения НАТО на 65 км на восток, чтобы использовать для военно-тренировочной деятельности альянса более выгодные со стратегической точки зрения районы. Как Вы могли бы это прокомментировать?
Ответ: Мы неоднократно комментировали данную тему в контексте наращивания Норвегией собственных военных приготовлений, повышения интенсивности учений и оперативных мероприятий с подключением союзников, усиления присутствия НАТО в Арктике. Отмечали постепенное превращение северных регионов Норвегии, прилегающих к российско-норвежской границе, в хорошо вооруженный и укрепленный форпост североатлантического альянса. Все это делается под аккомпанемент заверений Осло в заинтересованности в поддержании региональной стабильности.
Данное предложение в лучших традициях западных политтехнологов уже получило поддержку местных властей, обеспокоенных тем, что жители региона «не чувствуют себя в безопасности», будучи обделены присутствием союзников.
В связи с этим хотелось бы отметить, что милитаризация норвежского севера не приведет к повышению его безопасности, а будет иметь ровно противоположный эффект, провоцируя эскалацию напряженности.
Россия не угрожает Норвегии. Уверены, что жители приграничного Восточного Финнмарка, который без малого 80 лет назад освободила от немецко-фашистских захватчиков Красная Армия, осознают это как никто другой.
https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/1962807/
Вопрос: В конце июня с.г. руководством оперативного командования «Финнмарк» Вооруженных сил Норвегии озвучена очередная инициатива, направленная на размывание норвежской политики самоограничений на иностранное военное присутствие и деятельность на территории страны. Предлагается, в частности, «для начала» отодвинуть границу ограничений на военную активность и учения НАТО на 65 км на восток, чтобы использовать для военно-тренировочной деятельности альянса более выгодные со стратегической точки зрения районы. Как Вы могли бы это прокомментировать?
Ответ: Мы неоднократно комментировали данную тему в контексте наращивания Норвегией собственных военных приготовлений, повышения интенсивности учений и оперативных мероприятий с подключением союзников, усиления присутствия НАТО в Арктике. Отмечали постепенное превращение северных регионов Норвегии, прилегающих к российско-норвежской границе, в хорошо вооруженный и укрепленный форпост североатлантического альянса. Все это делается под аккомпанемент заверений Осло в заинтересованности в поддержании региональной стабильности.
Данное предложение в лучших традициях западных политтехнологов уже получило поддержку местных властей, обеспокоенных тем, что жители региона «не чувствуют себя в безопасности», будучи обделены присутствием союзников.
В связи с этим хотелось бы отметить, что милитаризация норвежского севера не приведет к повышению его безопасности, а будет иметь ровно противоположный эффект, провоцируя эскалацию напряженности.
Россия не угрожает Норвегии. Уверены, что жители приграничного Восточного Финнмарка, который без малого 80 лет назад освободила от немецко-фашистских захватчиков Красная Армия, осознают это как никто другой.
https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/1962807/
Forwarded from МИД России 🇷🇺
🎙 Ответ официального представителя МИД России М.В.Захаровой на вопрос СМИ о пересмотре в Норвегии самоограничений на иностранную военную деятельность вблизи границы с Россией
❓ Вопрос: В конце июня руководством оперативного командования «Финнмарк» Вооруженных сил Норвегии озвучена очередная инициатива, направленная на размывание норвежской политики самоограничений на иностранное военное присутствие и деятельность на территории страны. Предлагается, в частности, «для начала» отодвинуть границу ограничений на военную активность и учения НАТО на 65 км на восток, чтобы использовать для военно-тренировочной деятельности альянса более выгодные со стратегической точки зрения районы. Как Вы могли бы это прокомментировать?
💬 М.В.Захарова: Мы неоднократно комментировали данную тему в контексте наращивания Норвегией собственных военных приготовлений, повышения интенсивности учений и оперативных мероприятий с подключением союзников, усиления присутствия НАТО в Арктике. Отмечали постепенное превращение северных регионов Норвегии, прилегающих к российско-норвежской границе, в хорошо вооружённый и укреплённый форпост Североатлантического альянса. Всё это делается под аккомпанемент заверений Осло в заинтересованности в поддержании региональной стабильности.
Данное предложение в лучших традициях западных политтехнологов уже получило поддержку местных властей, обеспокоенных тем, что жители региона «не чувствуют себя в безопасности», будучи обделены присутствием союзников.
В связи с этим хотелось бы отметить, что милитаризация норвежского севера не приведет к повышению его безопасности, а будет иметь ровно противоположный эффект, провоцируя эскалацию напряженности.
Россия не угрожает Норвегии. Уверены, что жители приграничного Восточного Финнмарка, который без малого 80 лет назад освободила от немецко-фашистских захватчиков Красная Армия, осознают это как никто другой.
❓ Вопрос: В конце июня руководством оперативного командования «Финнмарк» Вооруженных сил Норвегии озвучена очередная инициатива, направленная на размывание норвежской политики самоограничений на иностранное военное присутствие и деятельность на территории страны. Предлагается, в частности, «для начала» отодвинуть границу ограничений на военную активность и учения НАТО на 65 км на восток, чтобы использовать для военно-тренировочной деятельности альянса более выгодные со стратегической точки зрения районы. Как Вы могли бы это прокомментировать?
💬 М.В.Захарова: Мы неоднократно комментировали данную тему в контексте наращивания Норвегией собственных военных приготовлений, повышения интенсивности учений и оперативных мероприятий с подключением союзников, усиления присутствия НАТО в Арктике. Отмечали постепенное превращение северных регионов Норвегии, прилегающих к российско-норвежской границе, в хорошо вооружённый и укреплённый форпост Североатлантического альянса. Всё это делается под аккомпанемент заверений Осло в заинтересованности в поддержании региональной стабильности.
Данное предложение в лучших традициях западных политтехнологов уже получило поддержку местных властей, обеспокоенных тем, что жители региона «не чувствуют себя в безопасности», будучи обделены присутствием союзников.
В связи с этим хотелось бы отметить, что милитаризация норвежского севера не приведет к повышению его безопасности, а будет иметь ровно противоположный эффект, провоцируя эскалацию напряженности.
Россия не угрожает Норвегии. Уверены, что жители приграничного Восточного Финнмарка, который без малого 80 лет назад освободила от немецко-фашистских захватчиков Красная Армия, осознают это как никто другой.
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Russia's Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova’s answer to a media question about Norway revising its self-imposed restriction on foreign military activities near its border with Russia
❓ Question: In late July, the Finnmark Command of the Armed Forces of Norway announced yet another initiative directed at diluting Norway’s self-imposed limit on foreign military presence and activities in its territory. Among other things, it is proposed to push the border of limitations on military activities and NATO exercises 65 km east so that to use strategically more advantageous areas for NATO’s military activities and drills. What is your comment?
💬 Maria Zakharova: We have repeatedly commented on this in the context of Norway building up its own military preparations, intensifying exercises and operational procedures with allied involvement, and strengthening NATO presence in the Arctic. We stated that Norway’s northern regions adjoining the Russian-Norwegian border were gradually turning into a well-armed and fortified forward position of the North-Atlantic alliance. All of this is accompanied by Oslo’s assurances that it is committed to maintaining regional stability.
In keeping with the best traditions of Western spin doctors, this proposal has been supported by the local authorities concerned that residents in the region “feel insecure,” being deprived on the allied presence.
In this connection, I would like to say that the militarisation of the Norwegian north will not lead to greater security. Rather, it will have an opposite effect, triggering an escalation of tensions.
☝️ Russia is not threatening Norway.
We are confident that the residents of East Finnmark, which the Red Army liberated from the German and Finnish invaders 80 years ago, are aware of this as no one else.
❓ Question: In late July, the Finnmark Command of the Armed Forces of Norway announced yet another initiative directed at diluting Norway’s self-imposed limit on foreign military presence and activities in its territory. Among other things, it is proposed to push the border of limitations on military activities and NATO exercises 65 km east so that to use strategically more advantageous areas for NATO’s military activities and drills. What is your comment?
💬 Maria Zakharova: We have repeatedly commented on this in the context of Norway building up its own military preparations, intensifying exercises and operational procedures with allied involvement, and strengthening NATO presence in the Arctic. We stated that Norway’s northern regions adjoining the Russian-Norwegian border were gradually turning into a well-armed and fortified forward position of the North-Atlantic alliance. All of this is accompanied by Oslo’s assurances that it is committed to maintaining regional stability.
In keeping with the best traditions of Western spin doctors, this proposal has been supported by the local authorities concerned that residents in the region “feel insecure,” being deprived on the allied presence.
In this connection, I would like to say that the militarisation of the Norwegian north will not lead to greater security. Rather, it will have an opposite effect, triggering an escalation of tensions.
☝️ Russia is not threatening Norway.
We are confident that the residents of East Finnmark, which the Red Army liberated from the German and Finnish invaders 80 years ago, are aware of this as no one else.
❤2
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
#KievRegimeCrimes
❗️ The Foreign Ministry's Ambassador-at-Large on the Kiev Regime's War Crimes, Rodion Miroshnik continues to record the most heinous crimes of the Kiev regime.
▪️ In the first six months of 2024, at least 2,547 civilians suffered from the actions of the Kiev regime, prone to taking out its anger on them. As many as 2,082 civilians received wounds of varying severity and 465 were killed.
The number of shells that were fired by the Ukrainian militants at Russian purely civil facilities in 11 Russian territories adjacent to the frontline over half a year approaches the mark of 42,000 – there were 41,706 of them – 230 hits per day.
🔺 It is noteworthy that the second quarter of this year saw a qualitative change in the types of the weapons that the Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF) use against Russian civil facilities. More and more often artillery shells are replaced by explosive missiles of longer range and UAVs of various types. This has entailed an increase in the number of victims and the scale of destruction.
Nonetheless, the shells of NATO’s 155mm caliber that the UAF use are still in the lead in terms of how many civilians were killed and injured and civil facilities were fired at with them. These are the very shells that the Czech Republic is so diligently collecting across the world right now, allegedly to enhance Ukraine’s defence.
📖 Read the digest of April-June 2024, which includes photographic evidence and informational materials on the most brutal and cynical crimes committed by the Kiev regime in Russian regions.
📹 Watch Rodion Miroshnik's briefing, during which facts about the most high-profile violations of international humanitarian law by the Kiev regime and its sponsors in the first half of 2024 were presented.
❗️ The Foreign Ministry's Ambassador-at-Large on the Kiev Regime's War Crimes, Rodion Miroshnik continues to record the most heinous crimes of the Kiev regime.
▪️ In the first six months of 2024, at least 2,547 civilians suffered from the actions of the Kiev regime, prone to taking out its anger on them. As many as 2,082 civilians received wounds of varying severity and 465 were killed.
The number of shells that were fired by the Ukrainian militants at Russian purely civil facilities in 11 Russian territories adjacent to the frontline over half a year approaches the mark of 42,000 – there were 41,706 of them – 230 hits per day.
🔺 It is noteworthy that the second quarter of this year saw a qualitative change in the types of the weapons that the Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF) use against Russian civil facilities. More and more often artillery shells are replaced by explosive missiles of longer range and UAVs of various types. This has entailed an increase in the number of victims and the scale of destruction.
Nonetheless, the shells of NATO’s 155mm caliber that the UAF use are still in the lead in terms of how many civilians were killed and injured and civil facilities were fired at with them. These are the very shells that the Czech Republic is so diligently collecting across the world right now, allegedly to enhance Ukraine’s defence.
📖 Read the digest of April-June 2024, which includes photographic evidence and informational materials on the most brutal and cynical crimes committed by the Kiev regime in Russian regions.
📹 Watch Rodion Miroshnik's briefing, during which facts about the most high-profile violations of international humanitarian law by the Kiev regime and its sponsors in the first half of 2024 were presented.