Sam Fisher (Data Drops) – Telegram
Sam Fisher (Data Drops)
1.12K subscribers
7.26K photos
4.94K videos
10.9K files
12.4K links
All the files that're in my file archive, it's like the library, but not! (you can keep these and there's no fines!)
Download Telegram
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⚡️📣 Exclusive ⚡️📣 Interview With Russia war correspondent Semyon Pegov
of Project @wargonzo!! ⚡️📣
We talk about the situation on the frontline of the Warzone, how Finland joining NATO affects Russia and the War, the situation in the Republic of Artsakh and MUCH more.
This is a must see
🔥1
Forwarded from SicilianGorillian
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This 5-year old, just nuked every gender studies prof in the world.

🔗 ЯΞD ᕈILL LΞD 🔎 (@Red_Pill_Led)
2👏1
Forwarded from ZeroHedge
Hersh: CIA Knows Zelensky & Top Generals Are Skimming Hundreds Of Millions In US Aid

👉 Read full
🔥1
https://www.zerohedge.com/crypto/analyzing-ethereums-big-week Personally even though I use ETH for its ability regarding contracts and bought it back in the day I hate it and the whole POS concept. I will admit to being bearish on the fork .. But it looks as though it is here to stay for a while longer.
🔥1
Forwarded from Working Brother
🧿Техас Донбасс (aka Russell Bentley) is back for the most controversial Talk with the WB yet.

Other than chemical weapons and depleted uranium shells, we discuss the drone wars, the protests in France, Epstein and Trump, as well as the expectations of offensives on Donetsk.

➡️ https://youtu.be/tKLBvCDkQZY ⬅️

Likewise, we reflect on the passing of Maxim Fomiin in the terrorist attack in SPB

@WorkingBrother 😎
I get more confused by the day, I mean WTF is going on????
🔥2👍1
Forwarded from The Rio Times
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A typical California school board

At these sabbaths, they actively promote gender change, and also put pressure on teachers to hide the fact of medical intervention in the bodies of children from their parents

The speaker on the video is the most ordinary "lawyer" of Western values

Watch this (and thousands of other) alternative narrative video(s) on our new Rumble channel
🤮3
Every single claim of "debunk" or "duplication" to date -- after a period of predictable media hype -- has later been exposed (by scientists, not the Church) as shoddy science -- or at least been credibly challenged by other experts and rendered inconclusive
1. There are neither paint, nor oil, nor scorch marks anywhere on the shroud. The source of the image, which only affects the tippy-top microns of the fibers, remains of unknown and inexplicable origin.

2. All attempts at replication -- even with modern technologies and even on just on a small scale -- have failed.

3. The blood on the shroud is real -- type AB with the DNA of a male human.

4. The pattern of the blood stains is consistent with those of a man who was crowned with thorns and flogged mercilessly by two men with spiked whips -- one taller than the other.

5. Some of the blood which stained the shroud had previously bled out onto the body from a still-living man -- and some of the blood oozed out after death.

6. The properties of the blood samples reveal the presence of a trauma-induced chemical released from the liver -- indicative of someone who had been tortured and terrorized. (here)

7. There are dirt remnants on the face area -- consistent with a man falling down face first, perhaps while carrying the heavy cross to his place of execution.

8. In 2019, it required a lawsuit and a court-order (here) for a team of secular Oxford scientists to finally access the original 1988 data compiled by an earlier team of scientists whose work led to the publication of a much-publicized "debunking" article in the journal, Nature. After the British Museum was forced to release the data, the Oxford team scientifically ruled out the 1988 findings.

9. The carbon-dating "debunk" of 1988 turned out to be hasty (if not rigged) conclusion based on contaminated and repaired (from the 1592 fire) samples of the cloth (here). We have learned of many cases of erroneous carbon-dating -- such as a known 1000-year old Viking artifact dating back only to the 1980s.

10. In 2013, a more advanced procedure known as spectroscopic dating confirmed that parts of the shroud could indeed be dated back to the days of Christ.