Forwarded from Patrick Lancaster News Today
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⚡️📣 Exclusive ⚡️📣 Interview With Russia war correspondent Semyon Pegov
of Project @wargonzo!! ⚡️📣
We talk about the situation on the frontline of the Warzone, how Finland joining NATO affects Russia and the War, the situation in the Republic of Artsakh and MUCH more.
This is a must see
of Project @wargonzo!! ⚡️📣
We talk about the situation on the frontline of the Warzone, how Finland joining NATO affects Russia and the War, the situation in the Republic of Artsakh and MUCH more.
This is a must see
🔥1
https://www.zerohedge.com/crypto/analyzing-ethereums-big-week Personally even though I use ETH for its ability regarding contracts and bought it back in the day I hate it and the whole POS concept. I will admit to being bearish on the fork .. But it looks as though it is here to stay for a while longer.
ZeroHedge
Analyzing Ethereum's Big Week
...how did crypto markets react to Shapella?
🔥1
Forwarded from Working Brother
🧿Техас Донбасс (aka Russell Bentley) is back for the most controversial Talk with the WB yet.
Other than chemical weapons and depleted uranium shells, we discuss the drone wars, the protests in France, Epstein and Trump, as well as the expectations of offensives on Donetsk.
➡️ https://youtu.be/tKLBvCDkQZY ⬅️
Other than chemical weapons and depleted uranium shells, we discuss the drone wars, the protests in France, Epstein and Trump, as well as the expectations of offensives on Donetsk.
➡️ https://youtu.be/tKLBvCDkQZY ⬅️
Likewise, we reflect on the passing of Maxim Fomiin in the terrorist attack in SPB
@WorkingBrother 😎YouTube
Drones over Donetsk, OPCW and DU, Epstein and Fomin - WB Talks (51) to Russell 'Texac' Bentley
Russell Bentley (aka Texas Donbass) is back for a Talk with the WB. This could be the most R-rated Talk yet. The mute OPCW chemical weapons watchdog is the lightest of subjects in this intensely funny routine.
Links from Texas:
1. http://www.russel…
Links from Texas:
1. http://www.russel…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
White cells attacking a splinter ..
I get more confused by the day, I mean WTF is going on????
🔥2👍1
Forwarded from The Rio Times
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A typical California school board
At these sabbaths, they actively promote gender change, and also put pressure on teachers to hide the fact of medical intervention in the bodies of children from their parents
The speaker on the video is the most ordinary "lawyer" of Western values
Watch this (and thousands of other) alternative narrative video(s) on our new Rumble channel
At these sabbaths, they actively promote gender change, and also put pressure on teachers to hide the fact of medical intervention in the bodies of children from their parents
The speaker on the video is the most ordinary "lawyer" of Western values
Watch this (and thousands of other) alternative narrative video(s) on our new Rumble channel
🤮3
Every single claim of "debunk" or "duplication" to date -- after a period of predictable media hype -- has later been exposed (by scientists, not the Church) as shoddy science -- or at least been credibly challenged by other experts and rendered inconclusive
1. There are neither paint, nor oil, nor scorch marks anywhere on the shroud. The source of the image, which only affects the tippy-top microns of the fibers, remains of unknown and inexplicable origin.
2. All attempts at replication -- even with modern technologies and even on just on a small scale -- have failed.
3. The blood on the shroud is real -- type AB with the DNA of a male human.
4. The pattern of the blood stains is consistent with those of a man who was crowned with thorns and flogged mercilessly by two men with spiked whips -- one taller than the other.
5. Some of the blood which stained the shroud had previously bled out onto the body from a still-living man -- and some of the blood oozed out after death.
6. The properties of the blood samples reveal the presence of a trauma-induced chemical released from the liver -- indicative of someone who had been tortured and terrorized. (here)
7. There are dirt remnants on the face area -- consistent with a man falling down face first, perhaps while carrying the heavy cross to his place of execution.
8. In 2019, it required a lawsuit and a court-order (here) for a team of secular Oxford scientists to finally access the original 1988 data compiled by an earlier team of scientists whose work led to the publication of a much-publicized "debunking" article in the journal, Nature. After the British Museum was forced to release the data, the Oxford team scientifically ruled out the 1988 findings.
9. The carbon-dating "debunk" of 1988 turned out to be hasty (if not rigged) conclusion based on contaminated and repaired (from the 1592 fire) samples of the cloth (here). We have learned of many cases of erroneous carbon-dating -- such as a known 1000-year old Viking artifact dating back only to the 1980s.
10. In 2013, a more advanced procedure known as spectroscopic dating confirmed that parts of the shroud could indeed be dated back to the days of Christ.
2. All attempts at replication -- even with modern technologies and even on just on a small scale -- have failed.
3. The blood on the shroud is real -- type AB with the DNA of a male human.
4. The pattern of the blood stains is consistent with those of a man who was crowned with thorns and flogged mercilessly by two men with spiked whips -- one taller than the other.
5. Some of the blood which stained the shroud had previously bled out onto the body from a still-living man -- and some of the blood oozed out after death.
6. The properties of the blood samples reveal the presence of a trauma-induced chemical released from the liver -- indicative of someone who had been tortured and terrorized. (here)
7. There are dirt remnants on the face area -- consistent with a man falling down face first, perhaps while carrying the heavy cross to his place of execution.
8. In 2019, it required a lawsuit and a court-order (here) for a team of secular Oxford scientists to finally access the original 1988 data compiled by an earlier team of scientists whose work led to the publication of a much-publicized "debunking" article in the journal, Nature. After the British Museum was forced to release the data, the Oxford team scientifically ruled out the 1988 findings.
9. The carbon-dating "debunk" of 1988 turned out to be hasty (if not rigged) conclusion based on contaminated and repaired (from the 1592 fire) samples of the cloth (here). We have learned of many cases of erroneous carbon-dating -- such as a known 1000-year old Viking artifact dating back only to the 1980s.
10. In 2013, a more advanced procedure known as spectroscopic dating confirmed that parts of the shroud could indeed be dated back to the days of Christ.