Sam Fisher (Data Drops) – Telegram
Sam Fisher (Data Drops)
1.12K subscribers
7.31K photos
4.95K videos
10.9K files
12.4K links
All the files that're in my file archive, it's like the library, but not! (you can keep these and there's no fines!)
Download Telegram
Forwarded from ZeroHedge
Hersh: CIA Knows Zelensky & Top Generals Are Skimming Hundreds Of Millions In US Aid

👉 Read full
🔥1
https://www.zerohedge.com/crypto/analyzing-ethereums-big-week Personally even though I use ETH for its ability regarding contracts and bought it back in the day I hate it and the whole POS concept. I will admit to being bearish on the fork .. But it looks as though it is here to stay for a while longer.
🔥1
Forwarded from Working Brother
🧿Техас Донбасс (aka Russell Bentley) is back for the most controversial Talk with the WB yet.

Other than chemical weapons and depleted uranium shells, we discuss the drone wars, the protests in France, Epstein and Trump, as well as the expectations of offensives on Donetsk.

➡️ https://youtu.be/tKLBvCDkQZY ⬅️

Likewise, we reflect on the passing of Maxim Fomiin in the terrorist attack in SPB

@WorkingBrother 😎
I get more confused by the day, I mean WTF is going on????
🔥2👍1
Forwarded from The Rio Times
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A typical California school board

At these sabbaths, they actively promote gender change, and also put pressure on teachers to hide the fact of medical intervention in the bodies of children from their parents

The speaker on the video is the most ordinary "lawyer" of Western values

Watch this (and thousands of other) alternative narrative video(s) on our new Rumble channel
🤮3
Every single claim of "debunk" or "duplication" to date -- after a period of predictable media hype -- has later been exposed (by scientists, not the Church) as shoddy science -- or at least been credibly challenged by other experts and rendered inconclusive
1. There are neither paint, nor oil, nor scorch marks anywhere on the shroud. The source of the image, which only affects the tippy-top microns of the fibers, remains of unknown and inexplicable origin.

2. All attempts at replication -- even with modern technologies and even on just on a small scale -- have failed.

3. The blood on the shroud is real -- type AB with the DNA of a male human.

4. The pattern of the blood stains is consistent with those of a man who was crowned with thorns and flogged mercilessly by two men with spiked whips -- one taller than the other.

5. Some of the blood which stained the shroud had previously bled out onto the body from a still-living man -- and some of the blood oozed out after death.

6. The properties of the blood samples reveal the presence of a trauma-induced chemical released from the liver -- indicative of someone who had been tortured and terrorized. (here)

7. There are dirt remnants on the face area -- consistent with a man falling down face first, perhaps while carrying the heavy cross to his place of execution.

8. In 2019, it required a lawsuit and a court-order (here) for a team of secular Oxford scientists to finally access the original 1988 data compiled by an earlier team of scientists whose work led to the publication of a much-publicized "debunking" article in the journal, Nature. After the British Museum was forced to release the data, the Oxford team scientifically ruled out the 1988 findings.

9. The carbon-dating "debunk" of 1988 turned out to be hasty (if not rigged) conclusion based on contaminated and repaired (from the 1592 fire) samples of the cloth (here). We have learned of many cases of erroneous carbon-dating -- such as a known 1000-year old Viking artifact dating back only to the 1980s.

10. In 2013, a more advanced procedure known as spectroscopic dating confirmed that parts of the shroud could indeed be dated back to the days of Christ.
11. The blood stained the fabric first. The superficial image of a tortured man happened afterwards. This is known because there are no lines of imagery beneath the blood stains. Why would -- and how could -- an alleged artist create real blood stains before creating the image of a body?

12. The image was not drawn by strokes nor by dotted art techniques.

13. The image is extremely superficial -- yet, when photographed, the negative comes into full focus with much more detailed realism. An artist would have had to anticipate the invention of photography -- many centuries later -- for viewers to fully appreciate the artwork.

14. The embedding of this image -- one theory posits -- could be consistent with a burst of intensely bright UV light. A divine Polaroid picture? The location of the tomb was measured to have unusual levels of electromagnetic activity. (here)

15. The image -- when photographed -- has 3-dimenional properties.

16. Pollen samples (pollen gets into everything!) -- removed from the fabric by tape -- indicate that the shroud contains pollen types indigenous to Europe, Turkey (Constantinople) and Jerusalem.

17. Advanced technology used to analyze negative images revealed the presence of ancient Roman coins used to weigh down the body's eyelids. (*This particular point is disputed)

18. The particular weave of the shroud is consistent with a weaving pattern popular in Egypt and Judea 2000 years ago -- but not known in Europe.

19. The experts on the "debunk" side of the case -- as well as the media -- clearly manifest an emotional bias, and hostility toward the hypothesis that the shroud could be the result of something supernatural. The negativity is so strong that it has driven them to manipulate and then hide data. What Satanists have not been able to accomplish by arson, the debunkers have sought to achieve by Fake Science instead. Why?

20. The scientifically-based believers (many of them non-religious and some Jewish) as well as the "still undecideds" -- on the other hand -- do not reveal any such dogmatic prejudice or cognitive bias.

21. Every single claim of "debunk" or "duplication" to date -- after a period of predictable media hype -- has later been exposed (by scientists, not the Church) as shoddy science -- or at least been credibly challenged by other experts and rendered inconclusive.

22. In April, 2022, the film producer David Rolfe publicly offered the British Museum a $1 million reward if they can successfully fake this iconic artifact. Rolfe:

“They said it was created by a medieval fraudster, and I tell them, well, if he could do it, you should be able to do it too. And if you can, I have a $1 million reward for you. I encourage them to repeat this thing by creating something similar today. Because of all the evidence that I have seen, if it is a fake, it is the most ingenious fake in history."

So far, no takers for the reward.
Move one match to form a square. If you worked it out well done 👍 or Join Sam Fisher Data Drops for the answer 😄