Every single claim of "debunk" or "duplication" to date -- after a period of predictable media hype -- has later been exposed (by scientists, not the Church) as shoddy science -- or at least been credibly challenged by other experts and rendered inconclusive
1. There are neither paint, nor oil, nor scorch marks anywhere on the shroud. The source of the image, which only affects the tippy-top microns of the fibers, remains of unknown and inexplicable origin.
2. All attempts at replication -- even with modern technologies and even on just on a small scale -- have failed.
3. The blood on the shroud is real -- type AB with the DNA of a male human.
4. The pattern of the blood stains is consistent with those of a man who was crowned with thorns and flogged mercilessly by two men with spiked whips -- one taller than the other.
5. Some of the blood which stained the shroud had previously bled out onto the body from a still-living man -- and some of the blood oozed out after death.
6. The properties of the blood samples reveal the presence of a trauma-induced chemical released from the liver -- indicative of someone who had been tortured and terrorized. (here)
7. There are dirt remnants on the face area -- consistent with a man falling down face first, perhaps while carrying the heavy cross to his place of execution.
8. In 2019, it required a lawsuit and a court-order (here) for a team of secular Oxford scientists to finally access the original 1988 data compiled by an earlier team of scientists whose work led to the publication of a much-publicized "debunking" article in the journal, Nature. After the British Museum was forced to release the data, the Oxford team scientifically ruled out the 1988 findings.
9. The carbon-dating "debunk" of 1988 turned out to be hasty (if not rigged) conclusion based on contaminated and repaired (from the 1592 fire) samples of the cloth (here). We have learned of many cases of erroneous carbon-dating -- such as a known 1000-year old Viking artifact dating back only to the 1980s.
10. In 2013, a more advanced procedure known as spectroscopic dating confirmed that parts of the shroud could indeed be dated back to the days of Christ.
2. All attempts at replication -- even with modern technologies and even on just on a small scale -- have failed.
3. The blood on the shroud is real -- type AB with the DNA of a male human.
4. The pattern of the blood stains is consistent with those of a man who was crowned with thorns and flogged mercilessly by two men with spiked whips -- one taller than the other.
5. Some of the blood which stained the shroud had previously bled out onto the body from a still-living man -- and some of the blood oozed out after death.
6. The properties of the blood samples reveal the presence of a trauma-induced chemical released from the liver -- indicative of someone who had been tortured and terrorized. (here)
7. There are dirt remnants on the face area -- consistent with a man falling down face first, perhaps while carrying the heavy cross to his place of execution.
8. In 2019, it required a lawsuit and a court-order (here) for a team of secular Oxford scientists to finally access the original 1988 data compiled by an earlier team of scientists whose work led to the publication of a much-publicized "debunking" article in the journal, Nature. After the British Museum was forced to release the data, the Oxford team scientifically ruled out the 1988 findings.
9. The carbon-dating "debunk" of 1988 turned out to be hasty (if not rigged) conclusion based on contaminated and repaired (from the 1592 fire) samples of the cloth (here). We have learned of many cases of erroneous carbon-dating -- such as a known 1000-year old Viking artifact dating back only to the 1980s.
10. In 2013, a more advanced procedure known as spectroscopic dating confirmed that parts of the shroud could indeed be dated back to the days of Christ.
11. The blood stained the fabric first. The superficial image of a tortured man happened afterwards. This is known because there are no lines of imagery beneath the blood stains. Why would -- and how could -- an alleged artist create real blood stains before creating the image of a body?
12. The image was not drawn by strokes nor by dotted art techniques.
13. The image is extremely superficial -- yet, when photographed, the negative comes into full focus with much more detailed realism. An artist would have had to anticipate the invention of photography -- many centuries later -- for viewers to fully appreciate the artwork.
14. The embedding of this image -- one theory posits -- could be consistent with a burst of intensely bright UV light. A divine Polaroid picture? The location of the tomb was measured to have unusual levels of electromagnetic activity. (here)
15. The image -- when photographed -- has 3-dimenional properties.
16. Pollen samples (pollen gets into everything!) -- removed from the fabric by tape -- indicate that the shroud contains pollen types indigenous to Europe, Turkey (Constantinople) and Jerusalem.
17. Advanced technology used to analyze negative images revealed the presence of ancient Roman coins used to weigh down the body's eyelids. (*This particular point is disputed)
18. The particular weave of the shroud is consistent with a weaving pattern popular in Egypt and Judea 2000 years ago -- but not known in Europe.
19. The experts on the "debunk" side of the case -- as well as the media -- clearly manifest an emotional bias, and hostility toward the hypothesis that the shroud could be the result of something supernatural. The negativity is so strong that it has driven them to manipulate and then hide data. What Satanists have not been able to accomplish by arson, the debunkers have sought to achieve by Fake Science instead. Why?
20. The scientifically-based believers (many of them non-religious and some Jewish) as well as the "still undecideds" -- on the other hand -- do not reveal any such dogmatic prejudice or cognitive bias.
21. Every single claim of "debunk" or "duplication" to date -- after a period of predictable media hype -- has later been exposed (by scientists, not the Church) as shoddy science -- or at least been credibly challenged by other experts and rendered inconclusive.
22. In April, 2022, the film producer David Rolfe publicly offered the British Museum a $1 million reward if they can successfully fake this iconic artifact. Rolfe:
“They said it was created by a medieval fraudster, and I tell them, well, if he could do it, you should be able to do it too. And if you can, I have a $1 million reward for you. I encourage them to repeat this thing by creating something similar today. Because of all the evidence that I have seen, if it is a fake, it is the most ingenious fake in history."
So far, no takers for the reward.
12. The image was not drawn by strokes nor by dotted art techniques.
13. The image is extremely superficial -- yet, when photographed, the negative comes into full focus with much more detailed realism. An artist would have had to anticipate the invention of photography -- many centuries later -- for viewers to fully appreciate the artwork.
14. The embedding of this image -- one theory posits -- could be consistent with a burst of intensely bright UV light. A divine Polaroid picture? The location of the tomb was measured to have unusual levels of electromagnetic activity. (here)
15. The image -- when photographed -- has 3-dimenional properties.
16. Pollen samples (pollen gets into everything!) -- removed from the fabric by tape -- indicate that the shroud contains pollen types indigenous to Europe, Turkey (Constantinople) and Jerusalem.
17. Advanced technology used to analyze negative images revealed the presence of ancient Roman coins used to weigh down the body's eyelids. (*This particular point is disputed)
18. The particular weave of the shroud is consistent with a weaving pattern popular in Egypt and Judea 2000 years ago -- but not known in Europe.
19. The experts on the "debunk" side of the case -- as well as the media -- clearly manifest an emotional bias, and hostility toward the hypothesis that the shroud could be the result of something supernatural. The negativity is so strong that it has driven them to manipulate and then hide data. What Satanists have not been able to accomplish by arson, the debunkers have sought to achieve by Fake Science instead. Why?
20. The scientifically-based believers (many of them non-religious and some Jewish) as well as the "still undecideds" -- on the other hand -- do not reveal any such dogmatic prejudice or cognitive bias.
21. Every single claim of "debunk" or "duplication" to date -- after a period of predictable media hype -- has later been exposed (by scientists, not the Church) as shoddy science -- or at least been credibly challenged by other experts and rendered inconclusive.
22. In April, 2022, the film producer David Rolfe publicly offered the British Museum a $1 million reward if they can successfully fake this iconic artifact. Rolfe:
“They said it was created by a medieval fraudster, and I tell them, well, if he could do it, you should be able to do it too. And if you can, I have a $1 million reward for you. I encourage them to repeat this thing by creating something similar today. Because of all the evidence that I have seen, if it is a fake, it is the most ingenious fake in history."
So far, no takers for the reward.
VERY GOOD .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNkAPdEcUBg XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
YouTube
Dark Journalist X Steganography UFO File Elon and The Space Secret!
#DarkJournalist #UFO
DARK JOURNALIST SPECIAL LIVESTREAM REPORT:
X-STEGANOGRAPHY UFO FILE ELON & THE SPACE PRESIDENT!
SATURDAY NIGHT APRIL 15, 8:00 PM ET
FEATURING LIVE Q & A WITH DJ & MISS OLIVIA!
SUPPORT DARK JOURNALIST NOW!
We are 100 Percent Independent…
DARK JOURNALIST SPECIAL LIVESTREAM REPORT:
X-STEGANOGRAPHY UFO FILE ELON & THE SPACE PRESIDENT!
SATURDAY NIGHT APRIL 15, 8:00 PM ET
FEATURING LIVE Q & A WITH DJ & MISS OLIVIA!
SUPPORT DARK JOURNALIST NOW!
We are 100 Percent Independent…
🔥1
Forwarded from mRNA DEATH TOLL (mikhail orlov)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trump sold Jerusalem and Palestinians, by breaking UN laws, in exchange for dirt on Hilary to win the election!!
💩2😁1
Dane Wigington (geoengineeringwatch.org) red flags:
> Claims hurricanes are being manipulated and weaponized, but are hurricanes truly worse now than previously? For example, in Florida, from 2020 to 2022, there were 3 hurricanes of categories 1, 2, and 4. From 1948 to 1950, there were 5 hurricanes of categories 2, 3, 4, 4, and 4, ie more hurricanes and higher average severity.
> Makes many fear-promoting claims, but often fails to provide evidence.
> Claims climate events are "unprecedented", which is usually found to be false on researching.
> Claimed "we are mathematically certain to lose all sea life" (https://youtu.be/0zv1GSkOPNM?t=580)
> Claimed no food or life will be left by 2025 (https://stewpeters.com/video/2022/11/uncensored-geoengineering-expert-says-by-2025-there-will-be-no-food-or-life-left-dane-wigington/)
> Claimed no wildlife will be left by 2026 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyxmrwbTKoM&t=5844s)
> Published 2015 article "The Big Unchill" claiming walruses and polar bears were losing their icy habitat. Many question the validity of such claims.
> Claimed unprecedented wildfires, yet data shows far higher acreage burned in the early 1900s. The long term data trend is a significant decline in US wildfires.
> Claims extreme drought conditions, yet 1934 had worse droughts.
> Promotes "peak oil" theory, which states crude oil is running out, which many believe to be false.
> Promotes CO2 "greenhouse gas" theory, which many believe is false.
> James W Lee (aka Jamie Lee) of "aplanetruth.info" exposes Dane here:
https://www.brighteon.com/a546d326-a0f8-4b9c-90fe-20251bd62a85
The above video contains various valid points, however whether James Lee is genuine/credible generally would be a separate discussion.
> Aligned with Albert Stubblebine (deceased 2017), commanding general of US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), 1981-4, ie senior intelligence role. Some consider Stubblebine a pioneer in the field of psychological operations (psyops).
(https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dr-rima-laibow-and-general-bert-stubblebine-cover-climate-engineering-threat-with-guest-dane-wigington/)
> Appeared in videos with Mel K, David Nino Rodriguez, Mike Adams, Alex Jones, Nicholas Veniamin, Del Bigtree, which many would consider questionable.
> Some have coined him the "Alex Jones of chemtrails".
Ultimately, he's helping support the establishment's climate change narrative as he's supporting the idea that we're having climate disasters. He's doing that in a way that's designed to appeal to "truthers" who have rejected the mainstream climate change narrative. Having truthers claim there are climate disasters helps strengthen the overall impression that climate disasters are occurring, rather than just the usual climate cycles.
His role may also be to discredit valid geoengineering information.
More info:
https://themadtruther.com/2017/09/25/hurricane-maria-mike-adams-dane-wigington-interview-fraud/
https://labvirusthreepointoh.blogspot.com/2014/07/confirmed-dane-wigington-of.html
> Claims hurricanes are being manipulated and weaponized, but are hurricanes truly worse now than previously? For example, in Florida, from 2020 to 2022, there were 3 hurricanes of categories 1, 2, and 4. From 1948 to 1950, there were 5 hurricanes of categories 2, 3, 4, 4, and 4, ie more hurricanes and higher average severity.
> Makes many fear-promoting claims, but often fails to provide evidence.
> Claims climate events are "unprecedented", which is usually found to be false on researching.
> Claimed "we are mathematically certain to lose all sea life" (https://youtu.be/0zv1GSkOPNM?t=580)
> Claimed no food or life will be left by 2025 (https://stewpeters.com/video/2022/11/uncensored-geoengineering-expert-says-by-2025-there-will-be-no-food-or-life-left-dane-wigington/)
> Claimed no wildlife will be left by 2026 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyxmrwbTKoM&t=5844s)
> Published 2015 article "The Big Unchill" claiming walruses and polar bears were losing their icy habitat. Many question the validity of such claims.
> Claimed unprecedented wildfires, yet data shows far higher acreage burned in the early 1900s. The long term data trend is a significant decline in US wildfires.
> Claims extreme drought conditions, yet 1934 had worse droughts.
> Promotes "peak oil" theory, which states crude oil is running out, which many believe to be false.
> Promotes CO2 "greenhouse gas" theory, which many believe is false.
> James W Lee (aka Jamie Lee) of "aplanetruth.info" exposes Dane here:
https://www.brighteon.com/a546d326-a0f8-4b9c-90fe-20251bd62a85
The above video contains various valid points, however whether James Lee is genuine/credible generally would be a separate discussion.
> Aligned with Albert Stubblebine (deceased 2017), commanding general of US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), 1981-4, ie senior intelligence role. Some consider Stubblebine a pioneer in the field of psychological operations (psyops).
(https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dr-rima-laibow-and-general-bert-stubblebine-cover-climate-engineering-threat-with-guest-dane-wigington/)
> Appeared in videos with Mel K, David Nino Rodriguez, Mike Adams, Alex Jones, Nicholas Veniamin, Del Bigtree, which many would consider questionable.
> Some have coined him the "Alex Jones of chemtrails".
Ultimately, he's helping support the establishment's climate change narrative as he's supporting the idea that we're having climate disasters. He's doing that in a way that's designed to appeal to "truthers" who have rejected the mainstream climate change narrative. Having truthers claim there are climate disasters helps strengthen the overall impression that climate disasters are occurring, rather than just the usual climate cycles.
His role may also be to discredit valid geoengineering information.
More info:
https://themadtruther.com/2017/09/25/hurricane-maria-mike-adams-dane-wigington-interview-fraud/
https://labvirusthreepointoh.blogspot.com/2014/07/confirmed-dane-wigington-of.html