June 18, 2020

"“Right to strike hard”

"Churchill testified the same. Zionism was embraced because “it was a potent factor on public opinion in America” from which “we gained great advantages in the war.”

But Horace Rumbold, who had been Britain’s ambassador in Berlin for the five years ending with Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, and who is remembered for his unvarnished warnings of Hitler’s ambitions, asked whether Zionist policy is worth “the lives of our men, and so on.” And did it follow, he asked Churchill, that having “conquered Palestine we can dispose of it as we like?”

Churchill replied to that and similar questions by invoking commitments given when Britain captured Palestine toward the end of 1917. “We decided in the process of conquest of [Palestine] to make certain pledges to the Jews,” Churchill said.

Apparently skeptical, the head of the commission, William Peel, asked Churchill if it is not “a very odd self-government” when “it is only when the Jews are a majority that we can have it.”

Churchill responded with a blunt argument of might: “We have every right to strike hard in support of our authority.”

The historian Reginald Coupland nonetheless told the hearings that the “average Englishman” would wonder why the Arabs were being denied self-government, and why we had “to go on shooting the Arabs down because of keeping his promise to the Jews.”

Peel, similarly, asked Churchill if the British public “might get rather tired and rather inquisitive if every two or three years there was a sort of campaign against the Arabs and we sent out troops and shot them down? They would begin to enquire, ‘Why is it done? What is the fault of these people?… Why are you doing it? In order to get a home for the Jews?’”

“And it would mean rather brutal methods,” added Laurie Hammond, who had worked with the British colonial administration in India. “I do not say the methods of the Italians at Addis Ababa,” referring to Benito Mussolini’s Ethiopian massacre of February 1937, “but it would mean the blowing up of villages and that sort of thing?” The British, he recalled, had blown up part of the Palestinian port city of Jaffa.

Peel agreed, and added that “they blew up a lot of [Palestinian] houses all over the place in order to awe the population. I have seen photographs of these things going up in the air.”

But when Peel questioned whether “it is not only a question of being strong enough,” but of “downing” the Arabs who simply wanted to remain in their own country, Churchill lost patience.

“I do not admit that the dog in the manger has the final right to the manger,” he countered, “even though he may have lain there for a very long time.” He denied that “a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America, or the Black people of Australia,” by their replacement with “a higher grade race.”

One tumultuous decade later, at the turn of 1948, the wholesale ethnic cleansing, expropriation and subjugation of Palestine jumped to full-throttle. Yet Churchill, the great warrior against the horrors of facism and racialism when it concerned Europeans, had not changed his views on the “dogs in the manger.”

In January 1949, speaking to the British parliament, Churchill dismissed the victims of Zionist ethnic cleansing as “Arabs [who] came in [to Palestine] during the period of the 25 years of British administration,” and who were “getting employment under the conditions we created.”

Lest this be dismissed as judging Churchill by the mores of today, it is worth noting comments made by the British Foreign Secretary, Ernest Bevin during the same parliamentary debate. Bevin argued that “the driving of poor innocent people from their homes, whether it is in Germany by Hitler, or by anybody else … is a crime, and we really ought to join together to stop it if we can.”

https://bsky.app/profile/o0ned.bsky.social/post/3mb3cjbmt4c2e

Gold & silver are staple minerals in any nutritious diet. They should be bioavailable in garden soils & table salt, like iodine!

Water credits will be the new globalist currency, denominated in blockchain or otherwise.

The Gold Standard was the model to take gold away from people, & water is next.

Wishing you all & I mean each & every one of you.
A wonderful 2026 & may it be a lot more transparent than ‘25.

Sending lots of love & hugs & prayers

God Bless
Michelle xx🍀🤍🕊️❤️

https://youtu.be/9lht2mRd2kQ?si=TwNUyF_lKPsVrXNI


Love & hugs 🤗 🥰❤️🍀

A New Years Wish

Well after the latest Christmas disaster,
You'd think for 'speaking while drunk' I'd be a master,
But here I am yet again trying to prepare each words,
Without mixing them up to sound utterly absurd,
I want you to fully understand what I mean,
So these words they need to come out clean,
Because if there's one thing I want from this year,
It's for it to start with my words being clear,
So excuse me for a second as I take a deep breath,
But not too many so I hyperventilate and cause my death,
I need to remove all words and phrases from my mind,
That rhyme and are of a humorous kind,
No humour allowed its time to be serious,
No jokes, nor puns, nor claims I'm delirious,
It's time for that to go now in 2026,
Hang on I just realised it rhymes with 'plenty, plenty dicks',
Shit well that's the end of my seriousness pledge,
May aswell just lean into it eh and not see it as a wedge,
So with that in mind I wanna say this loud and clear,
And wish you all
'Happy Flus Gear'

Critical Mass - TMSSP YouTube

Starting this year off with an absolute banger of a tune!

Happy New Year folks
Enjoy

https://youtube.com/watch?v=4u2Pb4HdB24&si=DsqxJQTIYFFO2C7S

Query
{"Forecast: The administration projects this debt index will hold steady near 98% of GDP in 2026 before potentially declining to 96% by 2028. " please elaborate in non-technical plain English simple enough for elementary school vocabulary, thanks, and use as many monosyllabic words as possible}

To explain the plan as of January 2026:
The Debt is Like a Big IOUs
Think of the "National Debt" as a giant pile of IOUs that our land owes to folks who lent us cash.
The Size of the Land
The "GDP" is a way to measure how much stuff all the folks in our land make and sell in one year. It is like the size of our big work shed.
The 98% Guess for 2026
The men in charge say that in 2026, the pile of IOUs will be almost the same size as the work shed (98%). This means for each buck the shed makes, the land owes a bit less than one buck. They think the pile will stop growing so fast this year.
The 96% Goal for 2028
By the year 2028, they hope the shed will grow big and the land will pay back some cash. They want the pile of IOUs to be a bit smaller (96%) than the work shed.
How They Try to Fix It
They plan to do this by:

Fees: Making other lands pay a fee to sell their goods here.
Less Cost: Spending less cash on things the land does not need.
Growth: Helping folks work more so the shed gets huge.

If the work shed grows fast and we spend less, the pile of IOUs won't look so big.

Paying the national debt, even its interest, is too much spending.
We should cancel it like student loans.
The banksters are lucky more people aren't calling for their arrest as it is.
The question is how many rights are the criminals willing to forfeit by their uncooperativeness.

If you have a shred of evidence for a conspiracy theory, it may be because the evidence of the conspiracy was shredded.