Bibliography on Orgonomy

A Complete Chronological Listing of Published Books and Research Articles, with searchable keywords.

•Part I: c.1920 through 1957, Research Covering Wilhelm Reich's Lifetime
http://www.orgonelab.org/bibliography.htm
•Part II: 1958 to 1999: Research After Reich
http://www.orgonelab.org/bibliography2.htm
•Part III: 2000 to Present: Research After Reich (Continued)
http://www.orgonelab.org/bibliography3.htm

Additional Information and Resources:
•Click here for more information on the
background, structure and organization of this Bibliography on Orgonomy.*
http://www.orgonelab.org/bibliogINFO.htm
•University Dissertations and Theses, on the Subject of Reich and Orgonomy
http://www.orgonelab.org/bibliogDISS.htm
•Short List of Major Books by Wilhelm Reich, M.D., in the English Language
http://www.orgonelab.org/bibliogWR.htm
•Short List of Major Publications by Various Authors, on the Subject of Reich and Orgonomy
http://www.orgonelab.org/bibliogOTHERS.htm
•Wilhelm Reich Legal Documents & Court Records
http://www.orgonelab.org/bibliogLEGAL.htm
•Emotional Plague Bibliography
http://www.orgonelab.org/bibliography.htm

*Information on the Bibliography on Orgonomy
http://www.orgonelab.org/bibliogINFO.htm

This Bibliography on Orgonomy had its beginnings, and was built upon the main citation list of my Bibliography on Orgone Biophysics (Natural Energy Works, 1986) which is now out-of-print. The goal of the current effort is to have a complete listing of Wilhelm Reich's voluminous publications, along with all those by his associates and co-workers, and others who took up the subject of his research over subsequent decades. On many occasions, research scientists have asked me where they could find information on one or another aspect of Reich's work, or if something had been replicated or not, and it was a constant difficulty to provide assistance to those honest inquiries. Also, the "skeptics" have continued to misrepresent this large body of work, as if it did not exist. With the coming of global internet, a new possibility opened up for making these materials available, world-wide. This Bibliography on Orgonomy should be a helpful tool for researchers, allowing name, noscript and keyword searches using ordinary internet browsers. It should also finally put to rest the chronic misrepresentations that "only Reich" made observations [of] the various orgone energy phenomena under discussion. ...

Since this is a scientific bibliography, I have included research publications which yield both positive and negative findings, though it must be said, the number of honestly-undertaken research efforts which obtained wholly negative results on Reich's work are extremely rare. By contrast, the malicious attacks against Reich, his associates and contemporary research scientists and physicians investigating this subject, disinformation smear articles as appearing in the popular press and occasionally spilling over as commentary in a few scientific journals (but without research support) are far more abundant. Due to their patently unscientific nature, such materials have been segregated into a separate Emotional Plague Bibliography which also includes published rebuttals against them. I also have made a separate listing of university theses and dissertations focused upon Reich and orgonomy, as these will be of special interest for students. Most contain excellent support for orgonomic research. Similarly, a separate list has been made of various court documents and records of the Reich legal case, as many of them are in book form, and contain materials of both scientific and historical importance. The rebuttal-materials, university theses and dissertations, and the Reich legal-case materials are all included within this main Bibliography on Orgonomy making it the most comprehensive source.

James DeMeo, Ph.D.
Director, Orgone Biophysical Research Lab
Greensprings, Ashland, Oregon, USA

The New Chronology by Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy, Et al. is one of few scholarly works to take Grazian Quantavolution seriously. Among its criticisms of Quantavolution, The New Chronology, naturally, rebukes some of Alfred De Grazia's chronology, though both share some accord in criticisms of conventional dating methodology.

I hope this is helpful for you?