🆃🅲🅽 ⸗Λʟᴘʜᴀ⸗ 🆂ᴏᴠᴇʀᴇɪɢɴ – Telegram
🆃🅲🅽 ⸗Λʟᴘʜᴀ⸗ 🆂ᴏᴠᴇʀᴇɪɢɴ
28 subscribers
88 photos
51 videos
118 links
Sov's custom post's channel.
Download Telegram
Twitter Files 3

33. "Could still mislead people... could still mislead people," the humor-averse group declares, before moving on from Huckabee

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

[He used the same number twice]
33. Roth suggests moderation even in this absurd case could depend on whether or not the joke results in “confusion.” This seemingly silly case actually foreshadows serious later issues:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

34. In the docs, execs often expand criteria to subjective issues like intent (yes, a video is authentic, but why was it shown?), orientation (was a banned tweet shown to condemn, or support?), or reception (did a joke cause “confusion”?). This reflex will become key in J6.

[Images connected to this post]
35. In another example, Twitter employees prepare to slap a “mail-in voting is safe” warning label on a Trump tweet about a postal screwup in Ohio, before realizing “the events took place,” which meant the tweet was “factually accurate”:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

36. “VERY WELL DONE ON SPEED” Trump was being “visibility filtered” as late as a week before the election. Here, senior execs didn’t appear to have a particular violation, but still worked fast to make sure a fairly anodyne Trump tweet couldn’t be “replied to, shared, or liked”:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

"VERY WELL DONE ON SPEED": the group is pleased the Trump tweet is dealt with quickly

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

37. A seemingly innocuous follow-up involved a tweet from actor @realJamesWoods, whose ubiquitous presence in argued-over Twitter data sets is already a #TwitterFiles in-joke.

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

38. After Woods angrily quote-tweeted about Trump’s warning label, Twitter staff – in a preview of what ended up happening after J6 – despaired of a reason for action, but resolved to “hit him hard on future vio.”

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

39. Here a label is applied to Georgia Republican congresswoman Jody Hice for saying, “Say NO to big tech censorship!” and, “Mailed ballots are more prone to fraud than in-person balloting… It’s just common sense.”

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

40. Twitter teams went easy on Hice, only applying “soft intervention,” with Roth worrying about a “wah wah censorship” optics backlash:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

41. Meanwhile, there are multiple instances of involving pro-Biden tweets warning Trump “may try to steal the election” that got surfaced, only to be approved by senior executives. This one, they decide, just “expresses concern that mailed ballots might not make it on time.”

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

42. “THAT’S UNDERSTANDABLE”: Even the hashtag #StealOurVotes – referencing a theory that a combo of Amy Coney Barrett and Trump will steal the election – is approved by Twitter brass, because it’s “understandable” and a “reference to… a US Supreme Court decision.”

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

43. In this exchange, again unintentionally humorous, former Attorney General Eric Holder claimed the U.S. Postal Service was “deliberately crippled,”ostensibly by the Trump administration. He was initially hit with a generic warning label, but it was quickly taken off by Roth:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

44. Later in November 2020, Roth asked if staff had a “debunk moment” on the “SCYTL/Smartmantic vote-counting” stories, which his DHS contacts told him were a combination of “about 47” conspiracy theories:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

45. On December 10th, as Trump was in the middle of firing off 25 tweets saying things like, “A coup is taking place in front of our eyes,” Twitter executives announced a new “L3 deamplification” tool. This step meant a warning label now could also come with deamplification:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

46. Some executives wanted to use the new deamplification tool to silently limit Trump’s reach more right away, beginning with the following tweet:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
👍1
Twitter Files 3

47. However, in the end, the team had to use older, less aggressive labeling tools at least for that day, until the “L3 entities” went live the following morning.

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿