Dull Academic Incessant Liturgical Yapping: Philosophical Orations on Order & Reaction – Telegram
Dull Academic Incessant Liturgical Yapping: Philosophical Orations on Order & Reaction
1.86K subscribers
4.31K photos
802 videos
14 files
195 links
Posts written by a pseudointellectual moron.
Download Telegram
100%. Deodorant is for insecure people who care too much what others think, and they're so insecure that they hurt themselves. It's sad.
Forwarded from Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Every new generation, in this century, comes in shouting that has something new to do and goes out saying it only has something new to regret.
Let's check in on Illinois:

According to court records, Will County Judge Derek Ewanic informed Rodriguez on Thursday that she would not be kept in the jail because her criminal charges related to accusations of spitting on multiple police officers are not detainable crimes under the SAFE-T-Act.
People gonna be talking about this one for years
Using these six rules and natural deduction, prove that [C > (C > C] entails C > C
Dull Academic Incessant Liturgical Yapping: Philosophical Orations on Order & Reaction
Using these six rules and natural deduction, prove that [C > (C > C] entails C > C
Here's another one. Use any rule system you like:

1. (W ∨ X) ∨ (Y ∨ Z)
2. X → Y
3. ¬Z
∴ W v Y

A solution using a Frege-Hilbert system:

01. (W ∨ X) ∨ (Y ∨ Z)
02. X → Y
03. ¬Z
04. | ~(W v Y) - Assume
05. | ~W & ~Y - 4 DeMorgan's Theorem
06. | ~Y & ~W - 5 Commutation
07. | ~Y - 6 Simplification
08. | ~X - 2,7 Modus Tollens
09. | ~W - 5 Simplification
10. | ~W & ~ X - 8,9 Conjunction
11. | ~(W v X) - 10 DeMorgan's Theorem
12. | Y v Z - 1,11 Disjunctive Syllogism
13. | Z - 7,12 Disjunctive Syllogism
14. | Z & ~Z - 3,13 Conjunction
15. ~~(W v Y) - 4-14 Reductio ad Absurdhum/Indirect Proof
16. - W v Y - 15 Double Negation


A solution using a Fitch system:

01. (W v X) v (Y v Z)
02. X → Y
03. ¬Z
04. | ~(W v Y) - Assume
05. | | W - Assume
06. | | W v Y - 5 vI
07. | | ⊥ - 4,6 ⊥I
08. | ~W - 5-7 ~I
09. | | Y - Assume
10. | | W v Y - 9 vI
11. | | ⊥ - 4,10 ⊥I
12. | ~Y - 9-11 ~I
13. | | W v X - Assume
14. | | | W - Assume
15. | | | ⊥ - 8,14 ⊥I
16. | | | X - Assume
17. | | | Y - 2,16 →E
18. | | | ⊥ - 12,17 ⊥I
19. | | ⊥ - 13,14-15,16-18 vE
20. | | Y v Z - Assume
21. | | | Y - Assume
22. | | | ⊥ - 12,21 ⊥I
23. | | | Z - Assume
24. | | | ⊥ - 3,23 ⊥I
25. | | ⊥ - 20,21-22,23-24 vE
26. | ⊥ - 1,13-19,20-25 vE
27. ~~(W v Y) - 4-26 ~I
28. W v Y - 27 ~E
Dull Academic Incessant Liturgical Yapping: Philosophical Orations on Order & Reaction
Tomorrow maybe we do FOL problems
Here's an easy set for y'all niggas:

Problem #1: ∀x(Fx → Gx), ∃xFx ⊢ ∃xGx
Problem #2: ⊢ ∀xFx v ~∀xFx
Problem #3: ∀x∀yGxy ⊢ ∃xGxx