Happy Monday Everyone!
It is officially back to work for the justices as they begin their first day of oral arguments for the 2025-2026 Supreme Court term. This is set to be another blockbuster term, so let’s jump right in.
Starting at 9:30amET, the Court will release its order list from the “long conference” held last week. Following that, they will convene to hear two cases for oral arguments this morning.
Villarreal v. Texas - A case involving the sixth amendment right to counsel, including the defendant’s discussing their testimony with defending counsel.
Berk v. Choy - A case involving the implications of a state law being applied in federal court.
Arguments begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen to oral arguments as they begin: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
P.S. If you enjoy our work and want to support what we do here, we now have optional star reactions enabled. Every little bit helps, and we truly appreciate your continued support. Let’s make this term a great one!
It is officially back to work for the justices as they begin their first day of oral arguments for the 2025-2026 Supreme Court term. This is set to be another blockbuster term, so let’s jump right in.
Starting at 9:30amET, the Court will release its order list from the “long conference” held last week. Following that, they will convene to hear two cases for oral arguments this morning.
Villarreal v. Texas - A case involving the sixth amendment right to counsel, including the defendant’s discussing their testimony with defending counsel.
Berk v. Choy - A case involving the implications of a state law being applied in federal court.
Arguments begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen to oral arguments as they begin: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
P.S. If you enjoy our work and want to support what we do here, we now have optional star reactions enabled. Every little bit helps, and we truly appreciate your continued support. Let’s make this term a great one!
5👍44❤13🙏7🤣2🏆2👏1
Here’s the order list from the Supreme Court’s long conference last week: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/100625zor_5368.pdf
3👍18❤9
Happy Tuesday Morning Everyone!
Today the Supreme Court is diving into some controversial issues with two cases on their docket for arguments this morning.
Chiles v. Salazar - A case involving the practice of conversion therapy and whether a law that bans the practice is regulating conduct or violating the first amendment free speech clause.
Barrett v United States - A case involving the double jeopardy clause and the Hobbs Act.
Arguments for the first case start at 10amET, here is a link to listen live to the arguments as they proceed: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Today the Supreme Court is diving into some controversial issues with two cases on their docket for arguments this morning.
Chiles v. Salazar - A case involving the practice of conversion therapy and whether a law that bans the practice is regulating conduct or violating the first amendment free speech clause.
Barrett v United States - A case involving the double jeopardy clause and the Hobbs Act.
Arguments for the first case start at 10amET, here is a link to listen live to the arguments as they proceed: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
👍22❤8👏4🙏3✍1🔥1
It’s Wednesday Morning Everyone! (in case you didn’t know 🙂)
Yesterday the justices heard arguments in a case about conversion therapy, today they are tackling an issue involving elections.
Bost v. Illinois Board of Elections - This case involves the issue of a law in Illinois that allows ballots to be received up to two weeks after the day of an election.
USPS v. Konan- This case involves an issue with the Postal Service and the FTCA, the waiver of immunity for “[a]ny claim arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter”.
Arguments begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live when they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Yesterday the justices heard arguments in a case about conversion therapy, today they are tackling an issue involving elections.
Bost v. Illinois Board of Elections - This case involves the issue of a law in Illinois that allows ballots to be received up to two weeks after the day of an election.
USPS v. Konan- This case involves an issue with the Postal Service and the FTCA, the waiver of immunity for “[a]ny claim arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter”.
Arguments begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live when they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
3👍29🙏10❤6🔥3
REMINDER - If you ever wanted to attend a Supreme Court argument but you didn’t want to sit in a long line outside in the cold all night to reserve a spot? Well you’re in luck, the Supreme Court has tickets for reserved seats. It’s works the same way as the lottery, if you’re selected, you will have a seat reserved for one oral argument. In order to reserve a ticket for an argument, you must do it four weeks in advance. This means that the next round of tickets will be available for the November sitting. If you have any questions, feel free to ask or visit the FAQ section on the website.
Here is the link to enter, remember, you can’t win if you don’t enter, and it’s free, can’t beat that: https://ticket.supremecourt.gov/onlineticketing/Request
Here is the link to enter, remember, you can’t win if you don’t enter, and it’s free, can’t beat that: https://ticket.supremecourt.gov/onlineticketing/Request
👏30❤14🎉3👍2
Happy Tuesday Everyone!
The Court will release an order list from last Friday’s conference at 9:30amET. Since they released a grant on Friday, we likely won’t see one this morning.
Following that, the justices will sit for two cases this morning:
Bowe v. United States- A case involving the procedure of habeas corpus.
Ellingburg v. United States - A case involving the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act and the Ex Post Facto Clause.
In layman’s terms: Unless you are a legal enthusiast, today’s cases will be quite boring, to put it bluntly.
If you’re interested in listening to oral arguments this morning, here’s a link to listen live: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
The Court will release an order list from last Friday’s conference at 9:30amET. Since they released a grant on Friday, we likely won’t see one this morning.
Following that, the justices will sit for two cases this morning:
Bowe v. United States- A case involving the procedure of habeas corpus.
Ellingburg v. United States - A case involving the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act and the Ex Post Facto Clause.
In layman’s terms: Unless you are a legal enthusiast, today’s cases will be quite boring, to put it bluntly.
If you’re interested in listening to oral arguments this morning, here’s a link to listen live: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
👍36❤6👀5🙏2😁1
Happy Wednesday Everyone!
The justices plan to tackle a very important election related case this morning, so let’s jump right in.
Louisiana v. Callais
Robinson v. Callais - A case involving the Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which is a provision that allows judicial review, prompted by voters, who believe that their state or local government has limited their voting rights on the basis of their race, color, or association with a language-based minority group. The justices will decide whether to officially strike down the section on the basis of the equal protections principle.
Case v. Montana - A case involving the fine line between probable cause during emergency situations, and whether law enforcement may forego a search warrant to enter a home in such circumstances.
If you are interested in listening to either of the cases, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
The justices plan to tackle a very important election related case this morning, so let’s jump right in.
Louisiana v. Callais
Robinson v. Callais - A case involving the Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which is a provision that allows judicial review, prompted by voters, who believe that their state or local government has limited their voting rights on the basis of their race, color, or association with a language-based minority group. The justices will decide whether to officially strike down the section on the basis of the equal protections principle.
Case v. Montana - A case involving the fine line between probable cause during emergency situations, and whether law enforcement may forego a search warrant to enter a home in such circumstances.
If you are interested in listening to either of the cases, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
2❤30👍15🙏3🔥2✍1🏆1
BREAKING - On October 18, the Supreme Court, without additional funding, will run out of funds and thereby be closed to the public. While the justices will still continue their normal operations of hearing/deciding cases and other such essential functions, the building will otherwise be closed to the general public, according to a spokesperson for the SCOTUS.
1👀102👏39❤26😁9🙏4
Monday Orders - Today the Supreme Court added three new cases to its 25-26 docket, including a case about whether an individual under the influence of a controlled substance has the second amendment right to possess a firearm.
Also, as we stated last Friday, the Court is closed, the public, for now, is not allowed into the building. This will remain the case during the course of the government shutdown. All Supreme Court business operations will continue.
Also, as we stated last Friday, the Court is closed, the public, for now, is not allowed into the building. This will remain the case during the course of the government shutdown. All Supreme Court business operations will continue.
👍49🔥17🙏7🤔6❤3
Don’t worry, we’re still here! The two week hiatus between monthly sittings feels like an eternity sometimes. For those curious, here’s a look at the November sitting which will begin a week from Monday. Some big cases, including the uncertainty regarding the President’s authority to implement tariffs.
Reminder: Since we are still in the midst of a government shutdown, the court will be closed to the public at all times, including oral arguments. The moment more funds are allocated, the court will reopen to the public.
Reminder: Since we are still in the midst of a government shutdown, the court will be closed to the public at all times, including oral arguments. The moment more funds are allocated, the court will reopen to the public.
👍50❤14🖕4
It’s Halloween season and what’s scarier than an abandoned house with ghosts? An unsigned order from the justices on the shadow docket.
According to the order, the justices are asking more clarification on the term “regular forces” when it comes to the deployment of the National Guard in Illinois. This could signal a cue from the Court that it is considering taking up the case.
According to the order, the justices are asking more clarification on the term “regular forces” when it comes to the deployment of the National Guard in Illinois. This could signal a cue from the Court that it is considering taking up the case.
1👍62🔥18❤8🙏6
Good Monday Morning Everyone!
It’s the start of a new sitting at the Supreme Court and they have a jam packed week, so let’s roll right into it!
Today the justices will hear two cases for oral arguments:
Rico v. United States - A case which involves the fugitive-tolling, a doctrine that pauses the timer of supervised release when a releasee is missing.
Hencely v. Fluor Corp. - A case which involves the Federal Torts Claim Act and the expansion of the Boyle v United Technologies Corp. (1988) to include “federal interests” related to militarily state tort claims against the government.
Oral arguments begin at 10amET, and due to the government shutdown, the Supreme Court remains closed to the public, so here is a link to listen live to oral arguments if you have the inclination: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
It’s the start of a new sitting at the Supreme Court and they have a jam packed week, so let’s roll right into it!
Today the justices will hear two cases for oral arguments:
Rico v. United States - A case which involves the fugitive-tolling, a doctrine that pauses the timer of supervised release when a releasee is missing.
Hencely v. Fluor Corp. - A case which involves the Federal Torts Claim Act and the expansion of the Boyle v United Technologies Corp. (1988) to include “federal interests” related to militarily state tort claims against the government.
Oral arguments begin at 10amET, and due to the government shutdown, the Supreme Court remains closed to the public, so here is a link to listen live to oral arguments if you have the inclination: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
1🙏36👍8❤5🫡4
Happy Tuesday Everyone!
While millions of Americans head to the polls on this Election Day, the justices head back to the bench to hear two cases for oral argument this morning.
Coney Island Auto Parts, Inc. v. Burton - A more technical case involving the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, and the issue of whether there is a “time limit” on when a court must vacate a judgment that is voided.
Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist - Another technical case, this time involving a district court’s decision in a diverse parties case.
Arguments for the cases start at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
While millions of Americans head to the polls on this Election Day, the justices head back to the bench to hear two cases for oral argument this morning.
Coney Island Auto Parts, Inc. v. Burton - A more technical case involving the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, and the issue of whether there is a “time limit” on when a court must vacate a judgment that is voided.
Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist - Another technical case, this time involving a district court’s decision in a diverse parties case.
Arguments for the cases start at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
👍26🥱4❤1🙏1
Good Wednesday Morning Everyone!
It’s a big day at the Supreme Court, a blockbuster case is on the docket for oral argument this morning, so let’s dive in.
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of U.S. / Trump, President of U.S. v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc. - two cases, consolidated, involving tariffs and Presidential authority. The justices will hear whether the IEEP (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) authorizes the President to impose tariffs, w/out legislative intervention.
This case holds dire importance with regard to international economics and separation of powers.
Arguments begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
If the link doesn’t work or you wish to listen on another platform, there are plenty of options available on YouTube.
It’s a big day at the Supreme Court, a blockbuster case is on the docket for oral argument this morning, so let’s dive in.
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of U.S. / Trump, President of U.S. v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc. - two cases, consolidated, involving tariffs and Presidential authority. The justices will hear whether the IEEP (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) authorizes the President to impose tariffs, w/out legislative intervention.
This case holds dire importance with regard to international economics and separation of powers.
Arguments begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
If the link doesn’t work or you wish to listen on another platform, there are plenty of options available on YouTube.
🙏69❤11✍3👍1🤩1
JUST IN - Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, allows a Trump administration policy, which requires all new passports to display the respective individual’s biological gender, to remain in effect while the appeals process continues.
Justices Jackson issued a dissent, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan.
Link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a319_i4dj.pdf
Justices Jackson issued a dissent, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan.
Link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a319_i4dj.pdf
👍85❤40👏24🙏14❤🔥5😁3🎉1
BREAKING - Justice Jackson issues an administrative stay, putting a district court order that required the Trump administration to begin processing SNAP payments, on hold, pending further review.
Here is a link to Justice Jackson’s order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/110725zr_pnk0.pdf
Here is a link to Justice Jackson’s order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/110725zr_pnk0.pdf
❤57👍34🤔19😱5🙏1
Happy Monday Everyone!
Today the Supreme Court will hear two cases for oral argument.
Landor v. LA DOC - A case in involving protective religious exercise and RLUIPA, including seeking remedy against damages caused by the government in relation to such.
The Geo Group Inc. v. Menocal - A procedural case involving government contractor claim of sovereign immunity and its appealability under the collateral-order doctrine.
A somewhat of a calm day today at the Supreme Court, if you’d like to listen to either case, here is a link to do so, arguments begin at 10amET: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Today the Supreme Court will hear two cases for oral argument.
Landor v. LA DOC - A case in involving protective religious exercise and RLUIPA, including seeking remedy against damages caused by the government in relation to such.
The Geo Group Inc. v. Menocal - A procedural case involving government contractor claim of sovereign immunity and its appealability under the collateral-order doctrine.
A somewhat of a calm day today at the Supreme Court, if you’d like to listen to either case, here is a link to do so, arguments begin at 10amET: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
2👍29❤10🔥6
JUST IN - Supreme Court extends administrative stay, over the dissent of Justice Jackson, blocking the order that required the Trump administration to pay out the full balance of November SNAP benefits. The stay expires on Thursday at midnight, presumably after the government shutdown is set to end.
👀44👍16❤10🌭4🙏3
Good Wednesday Morning Everyone!
Today the justices will hear two cases (one single and two consolidated) for oral argument:
Fernandez v. United States - A case involving the reduction of imprisonment and extra-textual limitations.
Rutherford v United States & Carter v United States - A case involving the First Step Act and reduction of sentence for drug and firearm offenses, a multi circuit split case.
Arguments for the first case begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as it unfolds: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Today the justices will hear two cases (one single and two consolidated) for oral argument:
Fernandez v. United States - A case involving the reduction of imprisonment and extra-textual limitations.
Rutherford v United States & Carter v United States - A case involving the First Step Act and reduction of sentence for drug and firearm offenses, a multi circuit split case.
Arguments for the first case begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as it unfolds: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
👍21🙏8❤4
Some people might not be ready for the New Year but the Supreme Court sure is. They have officially posted the January sitting, which included two closely watched cases. One involves the Trump administration/fed commission and the other involves transgender athletes.
In addition, following the conclusion of the government shutdown, the Supreme Court is officially reopened to the public. According to the website, Court lectures will be held again very soon. If you’re someone who is interested in the Supreme Court, live in the area of it and have nothing to do tomorrow, head on over and take a tour.
Here is a link to where the lecture schedules are available: https://www.supremecourt.gov/visiting/courtroomlectures.aspx#Calendar
Here is a link to the January calendar: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalJanuary2026.pdf
In addition, following the conclusion of the government shutdown, the Supreme Court is officially reopened to the public. According to the website, Court lectures will be held again very soon. If you’re someone who is interested in the Supreme Court, live in the area of it and have nothing to do tomorrow, head on over and take a tour.
Here is a link to where the lecture schedules are available: https://www.supremecourt.gov/visiting/courtroomlectures.aspx#Calendar
Here is a link to the January calendar: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalJanuary2026.pdf
👍32❤13🙏8