Happy Tuesday Everyone!
The Court will release an order list from last Friday’s conference at 9:30amET. Since they released a grant on Friday, we likely won’t see one this morning.
Following that, the justices will sit for two cases this morning:
Bowe v. United States- A case involving the procedure of habeas corpus.
Ellingburg v. United States - A case involving the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act and the Ex Post Facto Clause.
In layman’s terms: Unless you are a legal enthusiast, today’s cases will be quite boring, to put it bluntly.
If you’re interested in listening to oral arguments this morning, here’s a link to listen live: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
The Court will release an order list from last Friday’s conference at 9:30amET. Since they released a grant on Friday, we likely won’t see one this morning.
Following that, the justices will sit for two cases this morning:
Bowe v. United States- A case involving the procedure of habeas corpus.
Ellingburg v. United States - A case involving the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act and the Ex Post Facto Clause.
In layman’s terms: Unless you are a legal enthusiast, today’s cases will be quite boring, to put it bluntly.
If you’re interested in listening to oral arguments this morning, here’s a link to listen live: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
👍36❤6👀5🙏2😁1
Happy Wednesday Everyone!
The justices plan to tackle a very important election related case this morning, so let’s jump right in.
Louisiana v. Callais
Robinson v. Callais - A case involving the Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which is a provision that allows judicial review, prompted by voters, who believe that their state or local government has limited their voting rights on the basis of their race, color, or association with a language-based minority group. The justices will decide whether to officially strike down the section on the basis of the equal protections principle.
Case v. Montana - A case involving the fine line between probable cause during emergency situations, and whether law enforcement may forego a search warrant to enter a home in such circumstances.
If you are interested in listening to either of the cases, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
The justices plan to tackle a very important election related case this morning, so let’s jump right in.
Louisiana v. Callais
Robinson v. Callais - A case involving the Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which is a provision that allows judicial review, prompted by voters, who believe that their state or local government has limited their voting rights on the basis of their race, color, or association with a language-based minority group. The justices will decide whether to officially strike down the section on the basis of the equal protections principle.
Case v. Montana - A case involving the fine line between probable cause during emergency situations, and whether law enforcement may forego a search warrant to enter a home in such circumstances.
If you are interested in listening to either of the cases, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
2❤30👍15🙏3🔥2✍1🏆1
BREAKING - On October 18, the Supreme Court, without additional funding, will run out of funds and thereby be closed to the public. While the justices will still continue their normal operations of hearing/deciding cases and other such essential functions, the building will otherwise be closed to the general public, according to a spokesperson for the SCOTUS.
1👀102👏39❤26😁9🙏4
Monday Orders - Today the Supreme Court added three new cases to its 25-26 docket, including a case about whether an individual under the influence of a controlled substance has the second amendment right to possess a firearm.
Also, as we stated last Friday, the Court is closed, the public, for now, is not allowed into the building. This will remain the case during the course of the government shutdown. All Supreme Court business operations will continue.
Also, as we stated last Friday, the Court is closed, the public, for now, is not allowed into the building. This will remain the case during the course of the government shutdown. All Supreme Court business operations will continue.
👍49🔥17🙏7🤔6❤3
Don’t worry, we’re still here! The two week hiatus between monthly sittings feels like an eternity sometimes. For those curious, here’s a look at the November sitting which will begin a week from Monday. Some big cases, including the uncertainty regarding the President’s authority to implement tariffs.
Reminder: Since we are still in the midst of a government shutdown, the court will be closed to the public at all times, including oral arguments. The moment more funds are allocated, the court will reopen to the public.
Reminder: Since we are still in the midst of a government shutdown, the court will be closed to the public at all times, including oral arguments. The moment more funds are allocated, the court will reopen to the public.
👍50❤14🖕4
It’s Halloween season and what’s scarier than an abandoned house with ghosts? An unsigned order from the justices on the shadow docket.
According to the order, the justices are asking more clarification on the term “regular forces” when it comes to the deployment of the National Guard in Illinois. This could signal a cue from the Court that it is considering taking up the case.
According to the order, the justices are asking more clarification on the term “regular forces” when it comes to the deployment of the National Guard in Illinois. This could signal a cue from the Court that it is considering taking up the case.
1👍62🔥18❤8🙏6
Good Monday Morning Everyone!
It’s the start of a new sitting at the Supreme Court and they have a jam packed week, so let’s roll right into it!
Today the justices will hear two cases for oral arguments:
Rico v. United States - A case which involves the fugitive-tolling, a doctrine that pauses the timer of supervised release when a releasee is missing.
Hencely v. Fluor Corp. - A case which involves the Federal Torts Claim Act and the expansion of the Boyle v United Technologies Corp. (1988) to include “federal interests” related to militarily state tort claims against the government.
Oral arguments begin at 10amET, and due to the government shutdown, the Supreme Court remains closed to the public, so here is a link to listen live to oral arguments if you have the inclination: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
It’s the start of a new sitting at the Supreme Court and they have a jam packed week, so let’s roll right into it!
Today the justices will hear two cases for oral arguments:
Rico v. United States - A case which involves the fugitive-tolling, a doctrine that pauses the timer of supervised release when a releasee is missing.
Hencely v. Fluor Corp. - A case which involves the Federal Torts Claim Act and the expansion of the Boyle v United Technologies Corp. (1988) to include “federal interests” related to militarily state tort claims against the government.
Oral arguments begin at 10amET, and due to the government shutdown, the Supreme Court remains closed to the public, so here is a link to listen live to oral arguments if you have the inclination: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
1🙏36👍8❤5🫡4
Happy Tuesday Everyone!
While millions of Americans head to the polls on this Election Day, the justices head back to the bench to hear two cases for oral argument this morning.
Coney Island Auto Parts, Inc. v. Burton - A more technical case involving the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, and the issue of whether there is a “time limit” on when a court must vacate a judgment that is voided.
Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist - Another technical case, this time involving a district court’s decision in a diverse parties case.
Arguments for the cases start at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
While millions of Americans head to the polls on this Election Day, the justices head back to the bench to hear two cases for oral argument this morning.
Coney Island Auto Parts, Inc. v. Burton - A more technical case involving the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, and the issue of whether there is a “time limit” on when a court must vacate a judgment that is voided.
Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist - Another technical case, this time involving a district court’s decision in a diverse parties case.
Arguments for the cases start at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
👍26🥱4❤1🙏1
Good Wednesday Morning Everyone!
It’s a big day at the Supreme Court, a blockbuster case is on the docket for oral argument this morning, so let’s dive in.
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of U.S. / Trump, President of U.S. v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc. - two cases, consolidated, involving tariffs and Presidential authority. The justices will hear whether the IEEP (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) authorizes the President to impose tariffs, w/out legislative intervention.
This case holds dire importance with regard to international economics and separation of powers.
Arguments begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
If the link doesn’t work or you wish to listen on another platform, there are plenty of options available on YouTube.
It’s a big day at the Supreme Court, a blockbuster case is on the docket for oral argument this morning, so let’s dive in.
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of U.S. / Trump, President of U.S. v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc. - two cases, consolidated, involving tariffs and Presidential authority. The justices will hear whether the IEEP (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) authorizes the President to impose tariffs, w/out legislative intervention.
This case holds dire importance with regard to international economics and separation of powers.
Arguments begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
If the link doesn’t work or you wish to listen on another platform, there are plenty of options available on YouTube.
🙏69❤11✍3👍1🤩1
JUST IN - Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, allows a Trump administration policy, which requires all new passports to display the respective individual’s biological gender, to remain in effect while the appeals process continues.
Justices Jackson issued a dissent, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan.
Link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a319_i4dj.pdf
Justices Jackson issued a dissent, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan.
Link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a319_i4dj.pdf
👍85❤40👏24🙏14❤🔥5😁3🎉1
BREAKING - Justice Jackson issues an administrative stay, putting a district court order that required the Trump administration to begin processing SNAP payments, on hold, pending further review.
Here is a link to Justice Jackson’s order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/110725zr_pnk0.pdf
Here is a link to Justice Jackson’s order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/110725zr_pnk0.pdf
❤57👍34🤔19😱5🙏1
Happy Monday Everyone!
Today the Supreme Court will hear two cases for oral argument.
Landor v. LA DOC - A case in involving protective religious exercise and RLUIPA, including seeking remedy against damages caused by the government in relation to such.
The Geo Group Inc. v. Menocal - A procedural case involving government contractor claim of sovereign immunity and its appealability under the collateral-order doctrine.
A somewhat of a calm day today at the Supreme Court, if you’d like to listen to either case, here is a link to do so, arguments begin at 10amET: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Today the Supreme Court will hear two cases for oral argument.
Landor v. LA DOC - A case in involving protective religious exercise and RLUIPA, including seeking remedy against damages caused by the government in relation to such.
The Geo Group Inc. v. Menocal - A procedural case involving government contractor claim of sovereign immunity and its appealability under the collateral-order doctrine.
A somewhat of a calm day today at the Supreme Court, if you’d like to listen to either case, here is a link to do so, arguments begin at 10amET: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
2👍29❤10🔥6
JUST IN - Supreme Court extends administrative stay, over the dissent of Justice Jackson, blocking the order that required the Trump administration to pay out the full balance of November SNAP benefits. The stay expires on Thursday at midnight, presumably after the government shutdown is set to end.
👀44👍16❤10🌭4🙏3
Good Wednesday Morning Everyone!
Today the justices will hear two cases (one single and two consolidated) for oral argument:
Fernandez v. United States - A case involving the reduction of imprisonment and extra-textual limitations.
Rutherford v United States & Carter v United States - A case involving the First Step Act and reduction of sentence for drug and firearm offenses, a multi circuit split case.
Arguments for the first case begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as it unfolds: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Today the justices will hear two cases (one single and two consolidated) for oral argument:
Fernandez v. United States - A case involving the reduction of imprisonment and extra-textual limitations.
Rutherford v United States & Carter v United States - A case involving the First Step Act and reduction of sentence for drug and firearm offenses, a multi circuit split case.
Arguments for the first case begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live as it unfolds: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
👍21🙏8❤4
Some people might not be ready for the New Year but the Supreme Court sure is. They have officially posted the January sitting, which included two closely watched cases. One involves the Trump administration/fed commission and the other involves transgender athletes.
In addition, following the conclusion of the government shutdown, the Supreme Court is officially reopened to the public. According to the website, Court lectures will be held again very soon. If you’re someone who is interested in the Supreme Court, live in the area of it and have nothing to do tomorrow, head on over and take a tour.
Here is a link to where the lecture schedules are available: https://www.supremecourt.gov/visiting/courtroomlectures.aspx#Calendar
Here is a link to the January calendar: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalJanuary2026.pdf
In addition, following the conclusion of the government shutdown, the Supreme Court is officially reopened to the public. According to the website, Court lectures will be held again very soon. If you’re someone who is interested in the Supreme Court, live in the area of it and have nothing to do tomorrow, head on over and take a tour.
Here is a link to where the lecture schedules are available: https://www.supremecourt.gov/visiting/courtroomlectures.aspx#Calendar
Here is a link to the January calendar: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalJanuary2026.pdf
👍32❤13🙏8
It's Thanksgiving week, but that won't stop the Supreme Court, or the shadow docket that is. No matter the day, no matter the time, no matter the circumstance, we are here to cover it all. There are still a handful of cases pending on the emergency docket, ranging from birthright citizenship to redistricting in Texas. Stay tuned!
❤80👍38🙏27🥱3
Happy Monday Everyone! We hope you enjoyed your long weekend!
It’s officially December, which means a new set of cases to be argued. This week the justices will hear four cases over the next three days. They will start out with two this morning.
Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment - A case involving copyright infringement and how different circuit courts have interpreted this courts decision in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster (2005).
Urias Orellana v. Bondi - A case involving the INA “Immigration and Nationality Act”, judicial review for asylum seekers with the BIA “Board of Immigration Appeals” and court of appeals deference with such cases.
You know the drill, arguments begin at 10amET, if you wish to listen to the arguments, you can do so using the following link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
It’s officially December, which means a new set of cases to be argued. This week the justices will hear four cases over the next three days. They will start out with two this morning.
Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment - A case involving copyright infringement and how different circuit courts have interpreted this courts decision in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster (2005).
Urias Orellana v. Bondi - A case involving the INA “Immigration and Nationality Act”, judicial review for asylum seekers with the BIA “Board of Immigration Appeals” and court of appeals deference with such cases.
You know the drill, arguments begin at 10amET, if you wish to listen to the arguments, you can do so using the following link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
1🙏31👍9❤4👌1
Rise and Shine SCOTUS Fans!
Today’s a very technical day at the Supreme Court with a very important but complex case.
First Choice Women’s Research Center - A case involving a first amendment issue with regard to the privacy of the charity’s donors’ names and about non interference from federal courts on a federally protected right.
If you are interested in this case, or want to try and make sense of it yourself, here’s a link to where oral arguments will be played live: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Today’s a very technical day at the Supreme Court with a very important but complex case.
First Choice Women’s Research Center - A case involving a first amendment issue with regard to the privacy of the charity’s donors’ names and about non interference from federal courts on a federally protected right.
If you are interested in this case, or want to try and make sense of it yourself, here’s a link to where oral arguments will be played live: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
👍32❤9🏆3🙏1