The Way Forward – Telegram
The Way Forward
20.8K subscribers
3.75K photos
879 videos
72 files
3.18K links
Charting the path towards health, liberty, and awareness for all of mankind.
Download Telegram
Forwarded from AttuningForksWellness
We are in the midst of the most serious and widespread mental health crisis of our lifetimes. And I am organizing freedom-minded mental health professionals for action and mutual support. Open to practitioners anywhere in the world.

If you’re in the field of clinical counseling / psychotherapy / social work / mental health, whether licensed or unlicensed, and you’d like information on how to join, please reach out now. We’d love to have you.

Likewise, if you know someone who might wish to join us, then please forward this info to them.

You / they may email me at angela@attuningforks.com.

Please note that we are in very early stages of organizing and can use all the insight and support we can get!

💖Angela
IG: attuningforks
Forwarded from Health Freedom for Humanity (Dr. Steph)
They call us “science deniers,” but in fact we are “hey let’s actually DO science-ers”

No control, no science.

They get around this by confusing everyone (including some of the scientists themselves) with their big fancy sequencing jargon and processes.

None of that is relevant when it is based on no controlled experiments.

There is a reason there are no controls, because when there are, there is nothing to find. The entire field would fall apart.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Was going through old videos with my wife yesterday. Forgot I made this on February 29, 2020. I called it (as did many others).
Charles Eisenstein posting a little graphic I made about how we lose our sanity. https://charleseisenstein.substack.com/p/sanity
Live stream scheduled for
Christine here. I’ll be hosting a voice chat again tomorrow, October 19th, at 3pm Pacific, 5pm Central, 6pm Eastern or whatever time it converts to in your time zone. For those who haven’t attended one before they’re an informal chance to say hi, connect, acknowledge where we’re at and explore whatever topics or themes feels most relevant for us. The banner at the top of the channel shows the countdown to it and you can click on that banner at the time of to join. Looking forward to it.
Bad ass.
From Montanans for Vaccine Choice
(Just as many of us predicted, they are caving under public pressure).
(Because we are being COLLECTIVELY LOUD. I really don’t believe they expected this backlash.
😌
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/19/southwest-vaccine-mandate-unpaid-leave-exemptions.html

https://news.1rj.ru/str/MTvaccinechoice
🔥1
Forwarded from Andrew Genovese
THIS SUNDAY THE 23RD BEAUTIFUL BEINGS IN LOS ANGELES!!

MY LAST 3 HOUR DIMENSIONAL BREATHWORK BEFORE MICHELLE GOES TO THE JUNGLE AND RECIEVES MILLIONS OF YEARS OF ANCIENT WISDOM VIA DNA ACTIVATIONS IN THE JUNGLE😂😝😝😝😇💙👽👽👽👽👽👽 EMAIL ME OR DM ME ON INSTA TO RESERVE YOUR SPACE! 😇💙🙏🌬🌬

www.andrewgenovesehealing.com
Forwarded from Health Freedom for Humanity (Alec Zeck)
Dr. Ben Tapper and Alec Zeck will be speaking in Huntington Beach, CA at Billy Demoss’s Freedom Crusade event on November 3rd. A percentage of profits from ticket sales will be donated to Health Freedom for Humanity and Dr. Tapper’s upcoming documtary, The Time Is Now. Click here for tickets: https://store.californiajam.org/events/dcs/
When I ask for *one* paper in which a virus was isolated, purified, characterized, and sequenced directly from the fluids of sick host and not as a result of a cell culture, understand I’m asking for foundational evidence for the existence of a virus.

Virolgists presuppose that there is a virus present in the fluids that are presented to the cell culture (alongside DMEM, fetal bovine serum, amphotericin/gentamicin, etc.), and assume that the virus in the snot is causing the cell to experience the cytopathic effect.

They have never established that a virus is present inside the fluids of a sick host, first, and second, have never taken said virus from the fluids and presented it to a healthy host to see if it causes disease.

Every electron micrograph image of what virologists refer to as a virus is a result of a cell culture experiment.

When asked to provide one single paper that shows a virus isolated, purified, characterized and sequenced directly from the fluids of a sick host (which they cannot provide), virologists, immunologists, etc. respond with some of the following answers:

1. “The virus is too weak to isolate/purify directly from the fluids.”

Okay… but also you say a virus is able to travel freely through the air, survive on a surface for hours, make it into the body, make it to a cell and break in, hijack the cell’s machinery and begin replicating?

2. “You’re not a virologist, you don’t get to determine what isolation is.”

Okay, but why can’t you provide one piece of foundational evidence to validate your claim that a virus is present in the fluids of a sick host and is the cause of disease?

3. “A virus needs a host in order to replicate, so that’s why we use the cell culture.”

But it *is* in the fluids of a sick person, right? So why can’t it be taken directly from fluids? And how do you know for certain the other cell culture ingredients aren’t causing the CPE? Further, how do you know that a “virus needs a host to replicate” if you’ve never isolated, purified, characterized, and sequenced one directly from the fluids of a sick host? How do you know how one behaves in nature if you haven’t even found it in nature?

4. “There’s not enough virus present in the fluids to isolated/purify it.”

Excuse me— what? I thought we were talking about a pathogenic disease causing agent that overwhelms the body and produces high “viral loads” in really sick people. Not enough present in the fluids?

Pseudoscience is anything that doesn’t follow the scientific method but claims to be scientific. Virology has never validated the foundational claim of a pathogenic virus existing inside the fluids of a sick host and has never done control experiments. Virology is pseudoscience.

As my good friend Jordan has explained to me, if you hypothesize “X exists and causes Y”, then you need to show that X exists and directly observe X causing Y.

You can’t say “if X exists, then Y. Y, therefore X exists” if you have never shown that X exists, and seen it causing Y. An affirming the consequent logical fallacy.

Could there be a pathogenic disease causing virus? Absolutely. Has the existence of one been scientifically established? No. The evidence is severely lacking at best and completely pseudoscientific and fraudulent at worst, especially given we’ve flipped the entire world upside down over it.
Christine here. The voice chat I’m hosting today is starting in 5 minutes. You can click on the banner at the top of the channel to join. For those who haven’t attended one before they’re an informal chance to say hi, connect, acknowledge where we’re at and explore whatever topics or themes feels most relevant for us.
People will read this and ask, “yea, but how do 2+ people get sick with the same symptoms if it’s not a virus?”

More research needs to be done, but our focus has been *solely* on microbes/“viruses”, but here’s a few:

-exposure to similar toxins
-energy
-bioresonance
-pheromones
-mirror neurons
-some other phenomena we haven’t explored because our sole focus has been on the presupposition of a virus in the fluids
👍1
Live stream started
Via my friend John Blaid:

When you also consider that RNA/DNA can change because of its environment then sequencing something from a tissue culture where the tissue is starved and exposed to toxins then how much of the RNA/DNA in the culture is changed from its original state due to this experiment alone? Nobody knows because nobody has done the proper isolation and purification of a "virus" directly from a diseased patient. I would even argue that to claim that a "virus" has a genome is still an unproven idea, to assert that you would have to isolate and purify the alleged "virus" directly from a diseased patient, then and only then could you begin to find out IF it even has genetic material to begin with.
Live stream finished (1 hour)
Thank you to everyone who was on the voice chat today. I appreciate being with you, hearing your voices and feeling your presence. So much love and wisdom is emerging! I wonder what new potentials and possibilities can land or arrive to support us in finding the way forward, powerfully unique and strong together.

I’ll be hosting another voice chat at the same time next week, Tuesday at 3pm Pacific, 5pm Central, 6pm Eastern.

~Christine
If you want to learn about Vaccine Adverse events and Deaths here in the U.S, read below! And share! 👇

Let's look at some Updated U.S Covid 19 Vaccine Adverse event and Death statistics, these numbers are of Domestic/Non-Domestic Vaers data, of the Continental U.S (Domestic) and U.S Territories/U.S Military bases and U.S Manufacturers (Non-Domestic):

(Through October 8th, 2021) Of the 798,634 reports: 16,766 Deaths, 79,669 Hospitalizations, 89,923 Urgent Care visits, 124,398 Doctor Office Visits, 7,336 Anaphylaxis events, 9,787 Bells Palsey Events, 2,508 Miscarriages, 8,136 Heart Attacks, 9,470 Myocarditis and Pericarditis events, 24,805 Permanently Disabled, 3,735 Events of Thrombocytopenia and Low Platelet count, 18,239 Life Threatening Events, 31,196 Severe Allergic Reactions, and 9,472 events of a Shingles like illness. (https://openvaers.com/covid-data)

75.64% (604,159) of all reports are of the Domestic U.S, meanwhile the Domestic U.S only makes up 45.77% (7,674) of all the Covid Vaers Deaths. Which shows you how underreported and flip flopped all of this reporting is, why does the entire U.S make up the majority of the adverse events and less then half of all the deaths, meanwhile the Non-Domestic U.S has MORE deaths and significantly less adverse events? This speaks to how many don't know about this system, and how little it is used. In fact, how many DO actually know about this System in the Medical Field? Only 17% of Health Care Professionals that identified a Vaccine Adverse reaction, had reported to VAERs. (https://PubMed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23597717/)

So, how underreported are these adverse events and deaths? Well, let's look at this Study: Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institution with Harvard Medical School, submitted to HHS. Doctors involved: Michael Klompas (Prof. at Harvard Medical School) and Lazarus ross (11 year Harvard Medical School Professor). (6th page under "Results": "Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3%< of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine Adverse events are reported". (https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system)

So, fewer then 1% of all Adverse events are reported, what would then (using the numbers supplied from Vaers) be the actual numbers here in the United States? Well: That would be 1,676,600 deaths related to the Covid-19 Vaccinations. On top of that, 79,863,400 Adverse events have occurred due to Covid-19 Vaccinations. (Using Vaers Data and 1% estimation)

So, why is there no uproar from Government officials about the numbers we are seeing on Vaers? Well, not counting the constant idiotic gaslighting of the very system they created, and the lives they have destroyed, the FDA actually doesn't use Vaers to keep track of Covid 19 Vaccine Injury or Deaths. On October 22nd, 2020 the FDA published an internal document relating to the Covid-19 Vaccine and how they will evaluate the reports of Vaccine injuries. In this 25 Slide Presentation, they highlight what agency they will use to make a report of Vaccine safety, every 7 days. On slide 16, they list the top 22 different diseases/side effects they expect to see from these Vaccines. (The list of expected diseases from the shots, was 110).

On slide 15, they highlight which data base they will review every week. The database (Of vaccine Adverse reporting systems) chosen, was Centers of Medicare and Medicaid services. In 10 months since the roll out of the vaccinations, there hasn't been 1 report published by the FDA using this data, the same data they stated they would use to monitor the safety of the shots. Only, covering the age group of 65 and older. (https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/97349)
👎1