Was going through old videos with my wife yesterday. Forgot I made this on February 29, 2020. I called it (as did many others).

Charles Eisenstein posting a little graphic I made about how we lose our sanity. https://charleseisenstein.substack.com/p/sanity

Christine here. I’ll be hosting a voice chat again tomorrow, October 19th, at 3pm Pacific, 5pm Central, 6pm Eastern or whatever time it converts to in your time zone. For those who haven’t attended one before they’re an informal chance to say hi, connect, acknowledge where we’re at and explore whatever topics or themes feels most relevant for us. The banner at the top of the channel shows the countdown to it and you can click on that banner at the time of to join. Looking forward to it.

Bad ass.

From Montanans for Vaccine Choice
(Just as many of us predicted, they are caving under public pressure).
(Because we are being COLLECTIVELY LOUD. I really don’t believe they expected this backlash.
😌
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/19/southwest-vaccine-mandate-unpaid-leave-exemptions.html

https://news.1rj.ru/str/MTvaccinechoice

THIS SUNDAY THE 23RD BEAUTIFUL BEINGS IN LOS ANGELES!!

MY LAST 3 HOUR DIMENSIONAL BREATHWORK BEFORE MICHELLE GOES TO THE JUNGLE AND RECIEVES MILLIONS OF YEARS OF ANCIENT WISDOM VIA DNA ACTIVATIONS IN THE JUNGLE😂😝😝😝😇💙👽👽👽👽👽👽 EMAIL ME OR DM ME ON INSTA TO RESERVE YOUR SPACE! 😇💙🙏🌬🌬

www.andrewgenovesehealing.com

Dr. Ben Tapper and Alec Zeck will be speaking in Huntington Beach, CA at Billy Demoss’s Freedom Crusade event on November 3rd. A percentage of profits from ticket sales will be donated to Health Freedom for Humanity and Dr. Tapper’s upcoming documtary, The Time Is Now. Click here for tickets: https://store.californiajam.org/events/dcs/

When I ask for *one* paper in which a virus was isolated, purified, characterized, and sequenced directly from the fluids of sick host and not as a result of a cell culture, understand I’m asking for foundational evidence for the existence of a virus.

Virolgists presuppose that there is a virus present in the fluids that are presented to the cell culture (alongside DMEM, fetal bovine serum, amphotericin/gentamicin, etc.), and assume that the virus in the snot is causing the cell to experience the cytopathic effect.

They have never established that a virus is present inside the fluids of a sick host, first, and second, have never taken said virus from the fluids and presented it to a healthy host to see if it causes disease.

Every electron micrograph image of what virologists refer to as a virus is a result of a cell culture experiment.

When asked to provide one single paper that shows a virus isolated, purified, characterized and sequenced directly from the fluids of a sick host (which they cannot provide), virologists, immunologists, etc. respond with some of the following answers:

1. “The virus is too weak to isolate/purify directly from the fluids.”

Okay… but also you say a virus is able to travel freely through the air, survive on a surface for hours, make it into the body, make it to a cell and break in, hijack the cell’s machinery and begin replicating?

2. “You’re not a virologist, you don’t get to determine what isolation is.”

Okay, but why can’t you provide one piece of foundational evidence to validate your claim that a virus is present in the fluids of a sick host and is the cause of disease?

3. “A virus needs a host in order to replicate, so that’s why we use the cell culture.”

But it *is* in the fluids of a sick person, right? So why can’t it be taken directly from fluids? And how do you know for certain the other cell culture ingredients aren’t causing the CPE? Further, how do you know that a “virus needs a host to replicate” if you’ve never isolated, purified, characterized, and sequenced one directly from the fluids of a sick host? How do you know how one behaves in nature if you haven’t even found it in nature?

4. “There’s not enough virus present in the fluids to isolated/purify it.”

Excuse me— what? I thought we were talking about a pathogenic disease causing agent that overwhelms the body and produces high “viral loads” in really sick people. Not enough present in the fluids?

Pseudoscience is anything that doesn’t follow the scientific method but claims to be scientific. Virology has never validated the foundational claim of a pathogenic virus existing inside the fluids of a sick host and has never done control experiments. Virology is pseudoscience.

As my good friend Jordan has explained to me, if you hypothesize “X exists and causes Y”, then you need to show that X exists and directly observe X causing Y.

You can’t say “if X exists, then Y. Y, therefore X exists” if you have never shown that X exists, and seen it causing Y. An affirming the consequent logical fallacy.

Could there be a pathogenic disease causing virus? Absolutely. Has the existence of one been scientifically established? No. The evidence is severely lacking at best and completely pseudoscientific and fraudulent at worst, especially given we’ve flipped the entire world upside down over it.

Christine here. The voice chat I’m hosting today is starting in 5 minutes. You can click on the banner at the top of the channel to join. For those who haven’t attended one before they’re an informal chance to say hi, connect, acknowledge where we’re at and explore whatever topics or themes feels most relevant for us.

People will read this and ask, “yea, but how do 2+ people get sick with the same symptoms if it’s not a virus?”

More research needs to be done, but our focus has been *solely* on microbes/“viruses”, but here’s a few:

-exposure to similar toxins
-energy
-bioresonance
-pheromones
-mirror neurons
-some other phenomena we haven’t explored because our sole focus has been on the presupposition of a virus in the fluids

Via my friend John Blaid:

When you also consider that RNA/DNA can change because of its environment then sequencing something from a tissue culture where the tissue is starved and exposed to toxins then how much of the RNA/DNA in the culture is changed from its original state due to this experiment alone? Nobody knows because nobody has done the proper isolation and purification of a "virus" directly from a diseased patient. I would even argue that to claim that a "virus" has a genome is still an unproven idea, to assert that you would have to isolate and purify the alleged "virus" directly from a diseased patient, then and only then could you begin to find out IF it even has genetic material to begin with.

Thank you to everyone who was on the voice chat today. I appreciate being with you, hearing your voices and feeling your presence. So much love and wisdom is emerging! I wonder what new potentials and possibilities can land or arrive to support us in finding the way forward, powerfully unique and strong together.

I’ll be hosting another voice chat at the same time next week, Tuesday at 3pm Pacific, 5pm Central, 6pm Eastern.

~Christine

If you want to learn about Vaccine Adverse events and Deaths here in the U.S, read below! And share! 👇

Let's look at some Updated U.S Covid 19 Vaccine Adverse event and Death statistics, these numbers are of Domestic/Non-Domestic Vaers data, of the Continental U.S (Domestic) and U.S Territories/U.S Military bases and U.S Manufacturers (Non-Domestic):

(Through October 8th, 2021) Of the 798,634 reports: 16,766 Deaths, 79,669 Hospitalizations, 89,923 Urgent Care visits, 124,398 Doctor Office Visits, 7,336 Anaphylaxis events, 9,787 Bells Palsey Events, 2,508 Miscarriages, 8,136 Heart Attacks, 9,470 Myocarditis and Pericarditis events, 24,805 Permanently Disabled, 3,735 Events of Thrombocytopenia and Low Platelet count, 18,239 Life Threatening Events, 31,196 Severe Allergic Reactions, and 9,472 events of a Shingles like illness. (https://openvaers.com/covid-data)

75.64% (604,159) of all reports are of the Domestic U.S, meanwhile the Domestic U.S only makes up 45.77% (7,674) of all the Covid Vaers Deaths. Which shows you how underreported and flip flopped all of this reporting is, why does the entire U.S make up the majority of the adverse events and less then half of all the deaths, meanwhile the Non-Domestic U.S has MORE deaths and significantly less adverse events? This speaks to how many don't know about this system, and how little it is used. In fact, how many DO actually know about this System in the Medical Field? Only 17% of Health Care Professionals that identified a Vaccine Adverse reaction, had reported to VAERs. (https://PubMed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23597717/)

So, how underreported are these adverse events and deaths? Well, let's look at this Study: Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institution with Harvard Medical School, submitted to HHS. Doctors involved: Michael Klompas (Prof. at Harvard Medical School) and Lazarus ross (11 year Harvard Medical School Professor). (6th page under "Results": "Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3%< of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine Adverse events are reported". (https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system)

So, fewer then 1% of all Adverse events are reported, what would then (using the numbers supplied from Vaers) be the actual numbers here in the United States? Well: That would be 1,676,600 deaths related to the Covid-19 Vaccinations. On top of that, 79,863,400 Adverse events have occurred due to Covid-19 Vaccinations. (Using Vaers Data and 1% estimation)

So, why is there no uproar from Government officials about the numbers we are seeing on Vaers? Well, not counting the constant idiotic gaslighting of the very system they created, and the lives they have destroyed, the FDA actually doesn't use Vaers to keep track of Covid 19 Vaccine Injury or Deaths. On October 22nd, 2020 the FDA published an internal document relating to the Covid-19 Vaccine and how they will evaluate the reports of Vaccine injuries. In this 25 Slide Presentation, they highlight what agency they will use to make a report of Vaccine safety, every 7 days. On slide 16, they list the top 22 different diseases/side effects they expect to see from these Vaccines. (The list of expected diseases from the shots, was 110).

On slide 15, they highlight which data base they will review every week. The database (Of vaccine Adverse reporting systems) chosen, was Centers of Medicare and Medicaid services. In 10 months since the roll out of the vaccinations, there hasn't been 1 report published by the FDA using this data, the same data they stated they would use to monitor the safety of the shots. Only, covering the age group of 65 and older. (https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/97349)

Dr Bryan Ardus has worked closely with Attorney Thomas Renz, in aggregating all the deaths and Adverse events from the shots, using the CMS data base the FDA neglected to used even though they say they would make a report every 7-10 days.

Attorney Thomas Renz, is allied with a Whistle Blower within CMS, that has access and populated data, showing within Medicare alone, after 3 days of getting the shot, 45,000 people were confirmed to have died. Sidenote, Medicare reports are no voluntary like Vaers, these reports are done through intuitive systems by Medical Doctors. (Doctors are aware of this system and don't neglect it like Vaers). The CMS whistle blower input the Top 22 Side effects expected from the shot, into the Medicare/Medicaid database, for patients 65 years and older, and made sure the patients did not have ANY of the 22 Side effects listed in their respective preexisting conditions from January 1st 2020, till the date they received the shot. This aggregation has been done in only 9 states so far, with 31,000 plus confirmed dead within 28 days of receiving the vaccination.

Using Texas stats, there were 501 instances of Heart Attacks in people that never had a history of such health issues within the Medicare system, until After the shot. 2,755 people who never had a history of Myocarditis, experienced it after the shot. Cerebral Vascular event, 1,082. How many in Texas never "had Covid" in the year 2020, and "tested positive" within 28 days of the shot,8,324 Medicare patients. Paralysis experienced in 1,703 patients and 6,558 Texans died within 28 days of vaccination. (These are only Texas numbers of 65 years and older of Medicare patients, which shows you how underreported Vaers is, being that Vaers only has 9,470 cases of Myocarditis reported) This is Thomas Renz Legal Document asserting the accuracy of the CMS whistle Blower reports:
(https://renz-law.com/45k-whistleblower-suit)

Dr Bryan Ardus podcast episode breaking down his project with Thomas Renz and the CMS Whistle Blower: (https://rumble.com/vnge19-is-hospital-protocol-harming-covid-patients.html)

This is Steve Kirsch, is head of the Covid 19 early treatment fund, speaking out against his own research on the Covid-19 vaccines at an FDA panel. He states, for Pfizer during a 6 month trial period, for every 1 "life saved" you kill 5 in return. Vaers data showed killing 2 for every 1 life saved, and the Boosters given in nursing homes showed killing 6 for every 1 person. He starts speaking at 4:20:20 (https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M)

Steve's sources all in one websites where he estimates 150,000 Americans have died from the Shots (https://www.skirsch.io/vaccine-resources/)

Lastly, here is a Peer Reviewed and Unbiased, Article/Study, ennoscriptd: The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations, we should rethink the policy. (https://bit.ly/3A5k7Ty)
So in the very Best case scenario, you must vaccinate 3,030 people in order to prevent 1 "Covid death". (100,000/33) However, their result was 8 deaths prevented from 100,000 vaccinations, so you'd need to vaccinate 12,500 to prevent "a covid death". They blatantly state their results as: We kill 1 to save 8 or kill 2 to save 3 or we kill 2 to save 1 (which is based off real life data). Which results in twice as high a risk to die if the vaccine then of "covid". Their final results stand at: We need to vaccinate 200-700 people in order to prevent 1 "case of covid" and we need to vaccinate 9,000-50,000 In order to prevent "a covid death" with an average of 16,000 to prevent a "covid death". For every 3, people they "save" we kill 2 in the process. My issue with this study is not the outcome, because I completely agree with it. My issue is that it relies on the reported data of vaccination deaths and adverse events which are Estimated to be 1-10% reporting rate. The number of "fatal side effects" from the vaccines and any "severe reactions" are EXTREMELY underreported, regardless of wether or not it's VAERs or EUADR.

We know through the risk Reduction/Absolute Numbers that the benefit of Pfizer and Moderna stand at 0.6 and 0.7, both less than 1% effective. This study effectively exposes what we've all been saying, this is genocide for something that doesn't exist. They also include, "covid cases or deaths' ' which are confirmed by a PCR test that is not a diagnostic and was developed by a team with no clinical samples of any viral Isolate/diseased person. Side note, this also does not take into account the presumed, large number of placebos given out to lessen the number of adverse/deadly outcomes.

These shots need to be stopped. Hundreds of Thousands to Millions, on the U.S alone, have died. This is genocide. -JD