(1/2)
First, I would like to start with this— appeals to authority are not scientific evidence. Because “insert expert says so” is not evidence. Logical fallacies do not take the place of scientific evidence that strictly adheres to the scientific method. I don’t care about your credentials— evidence that adheres to the scientific method is what matters.
When I ask for *one* paper in which a virus was isolated, purified, characterized, and sequenced directly from the fluids of sick host and not as a result of a cell culture, understand I’m asking for foundational evidence for the existence of a virus.
Virolgists presuppose that there is a virus present in the fluids that are presented to the cell culture (alongside DMEM, fetal bovine serum, amphotericin/gentamicin, etc.), and assume that the virus in the snot is causing the cell to experience the cytopathic effect.
They have never established that a virus is present inside the fluids of a sick host, first, and second, have never taken said virus from the fluids and presented it to a healthy host to see if it causes disease.
Every electron micrograph image of what virologists refer to as a virus is a result of a cell culture experiment.
When asked to provide one single paper that shows a virus isolated, purified, characterized and sequenced directly from the fluids of a sick host (which they cannot provide), virologists, immunologists, etc. respond with some of the following answers:
1. “The virus is too weak to isolate/purify directly from the fluids.”
Okay… but also you say a virus is able to travel freely through the air, survive on a surface for hours, make it into the body, make it to a cell and break in, hijack the cell’s machinery and begin replicating?
2. “You’re not a virologist, you don’t get to determine what isolation is.”
Okay, but why can’t you provide one piece of foundational evidence to validate your claim that a virus is present in the fluids of a sick host and is the cause of disease?
3. “A virus needs a host in order to replicate, so that’s why we use the cell culture.”
But it *is* in the fluids of a sick person, right? So why can’t it be taken directly from fluids? And how do you know for certain the other cell culture ingredients aren’t causing the CPE? Further, how do you know that a “virus needs a host to replicate” if you’ve never isolated, purified, characterized, and sequenced one directly from the fluids of a sick host? How do you know how one behaves in nature if you haven’t even found it in nature? And what is the human body if not a giant cell culture?
4. “There’s not enough virus present in the fluids to isolated/purify it.”
Excuse me— what? I thought we were talking about a pathogenic disease causing agent that overwhelms the body and produces high “viral loads” in really sick people. Not enough present in the fluids? How many people would it take for there to be “enough virus” present? How can you assign attributes to something you haven’t first shown to exist in nature (in the fluids of a sick host)?
Pseudoscience is anything that doesn’t follow the scientific method but claims to be scientific. Virology has never validated the foundational claim of a pathogenic virus existing inside the fluids of a sick host and has never done control experiments. Virology is pseudoscience.
If you hypothesize “X exists and causes Y”, then you need to show that X exists and directly observe X causing Y.
You can’t say “if X exists, then Y. Y, therefore X exists” if you have never shown that X exists, and seen it causing Y. An affirming the consequent logical fallacy.
The claim is: “a pathogenic virus exists in the fluids of a sick host.” The natural and logical response to that claim is “please provide proof that a pathogenic virus exists in the fluids of a sick host.” That’s what we’re asking for. It is simple, and this evidence has *never* been shown.
Additionally, if everyone in the world understood the implications of this, this whole charade would be over:
First, I would like to start with this— appeals to authority are not scientific evidence. Because “insert expert says so” is not evidence. Logical fallacies do not take the place of scientific evidence that strictly adheres to the scientific method. I don’t care about your credentials— evidence that adheres to the scientific method is what matters.
When I ask for *one* paper in which a virus was isolated, purified, characterized, and sequenced directly from the fluids of sick host and not as a result of a cell culture, understand I’m asking for foundational evidence for the existence of a virus.
Virolgists presuppose that there is a virus present in the fluids that are presented to the cell culture (alongside DMEM, fetal bovine serum, amphotericin/gentamicin, etc.), and assume that the virus in the snot is causing the cell to experience the cytopathic effect.
They have never established that a virus is present inside the fluids of a sick host, first, and second, have never taken said virus from the fluids and presented it to a healthy host to see if it causes disease.
Every electron micrograph image of what virologists refer to as a virus is a result of a cell culture experiment.
When asked to provide one single paper that shows a virus isolated, purified, characterized and sequenced directly from the fluids of a sick host (which they cannot provide), virologists, immunologists, etc. respond with some of the following answers:
1. “The virus is too weak to isolate/purify directly from the fluids.”
Okay… but also you say a virus is able to travel freely through the air, survive on a surface for hours, make it into the body, make it to a cell and break in, hijack the cell’s machinery and begin replicating?
2. “You’re not a virologist, you don’t get to determine what isolation is.”
Okay, but why can’t you provide one piece of foundational evidence to validate your claim that a virus is present in the fluids of a sick host and is the cause of disease?
3. “A virus needs a host in order to replicate, so that’s why we use the cell culture.”
But it *is* in the fluids of a sick person, right? So why can’t it be taken directly from fluids? And how do you know for certain the other cell culture ingredients aren’t causing the CPE? Further, how do you know that a “virus needs a host to replicate” if you’ve never isolated, purified, characterized, and sequenced one directly from the fluids of a sick host? How do you know how one behaves in nature if you haven’t even found it in nature? And what is the human body if not a giant cell culture?
4. “There’s not enough virus present in the fluids to isolated/purify it.”
Excuse me— what? I thought we were talking about a pathogenic disease causing agent that overwhelms the body and produces high “viral loads” in really sick people. Not enough present in the fluids? How many people would it take for there to be “enough virus” present? How can you assign attributes to something you haven’t first shown to exist in nature (in the fluids of a sick host)?
Pseudoscience is anything that doesn’t follow the scientific method but claims to be scientific. Virology has never validated the foundational claim of a pathogenic virus existing inside the fluids of a sick host and has never done control experiments. Virology is pseudoscience.
If you hypothesize “X exists and causes Y”, then you need to show that X exists and directly observe X causing Y.
You can’t say “if X exists, then Y. Y, therefore X exists” if you have never shown that X exists, and seen it causing Y. An affirming the consequent logical fallacy.
The claim is: “a pathogenic virus exists in the fluids of a sick host.” The natural and logical response to that claim is “please provide proof that a pathogenic virus exists in the fluids of a sick host.” That’s what we’re asking for. It is simple, and this evidence has *never* been shown.
Additionally, if everyone in the world understood the implications of this, this whole charade would be over:
👍25
(2/2)
Stefan Lanka, a virologist, has conducted the first ever *proper* control experiments of both virology’s vero cell culture virus isolation experiments and the so-called genomic sequencing of SARS-COV-2— the foundational evidence for all of COVID19.
First, for context, I will explain the procedure used by all virologists to “isolate” a virus.
If you read the methodology of any “SARS-COV-2 virus isolation paper”, you will find that the procedure is as follows:
Minimally filtered snot from a sick host is added to a vero cell culture (monkey kidney cell) alongside cytotoxic antibiotics like gentamicin/amphotericin (usually at 3x normal concentration). They also add “minimal nutrient medium,” which is the minimal amounts of nutrients— DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium) and fetal bovine serum— to keep the cell alive. They also sometimes add trypsin. The cell breaks down into a bunch of fragments— called the cytopathic effect. They then stain and heat the fragments to prepare them for electron microscopy, take pictures of them and call them “viruses.”
In phase 1 of Stefan’s control experiment, he followed the exact same procedure except that he did not introduce a sample from a sick host (which virologists presuppose contains the virus, but never validate) to the culture, but used all of the other same ingredients. The exact same cytopathic effect happened, thus proving that the foundational evidence used by virologists to claim the existence of a pathogenic virus is pure pseudoscience.
In phase 2 of the control experiment, Stefan used all of the same ingredients as in the control (antibiotics, minimal nutrient medium, etc.), except that he added yeast to take the place of the snot that supposedly contains the virus and the supposed virus RNA that is uploaded into a computer program to generate a so-called “viral genome.” As Dr. Cowan describes in his recent book, Breaking the Spell, “the reason for adding the yeast RNA is because of the way that the genome of a ‘virus’ is found, a computerized process called ‘alignment.’ The alignment process starts with fragments of RNA and constructs a theoretical genome—one that never exists at any point in the actual sample. This genome never exists in any person, and it never exists intact even in the culture results; it exists only inside the computer, based on an alignment process that arranges these short pieces into an entire ‘genome.’ It is for this reason that every complete genome of SARS-CoV-2 is referred to as an ‘in silico’ genome, meaning a genome that exists only in the computer. As long as you have enough of these RNA fragments and provide the template, the computer can recreate any genome.”
Stefan was able to recreate 100% of the so-called SARS-Cov-2 genome without any clinical sample from a sick person present, but rather a random sample of yeast.
Could there be a pathogenic disease causing virus? Absolutely. Has the existence of one been scientifically established? No. The evidence is severely lacking at best and completely pseudoscientific and fraudulent at worst, especially given we’ve flipped the entire world upside down over it.
Stefan Lanka, a virologist, has conducted the first ever *proper* control experiments of both virology’s vero cell culture virus isolation experiments and the so-called genomic sequencing of SARS-COV-2— the foundational evidence for all of COVID19.
First, for context, I will explain the procedure used by all virologists to “isolate” a virus.
If you read the methodology of any “SARS-COV-2 virus isolation paper”, you will find that the procedure is as follows:
Minimally filtered snot from a sick host is added to a vero cell culture (monkey kidney cell) alongside cytotoxic antibiotics like gentamicin/amphotericin (usually at 3x normal concentration). They also add “minimal nutrient medium,” which is the minimal amounts of nutrients— DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium) and fetal bovine serum— to keep the cell alive. They also sometimes add trypsin. The cell breaks down into a bunch of fragments— called the cytopathic effect. They then stain and heat the fragments to prepare them for electron microscopy, take pictures of them and call them “viruses.”
In phase 1 of Stefan’s control experiment, he followed the exact same procedure except that he did not introduce a sample from a sick host (which virologists presuppose contains the virus, but never validate) to the culture, but used all of the other same ingredients. The exact same cytopathic effect happened, thus proving that the foundational evidence used by virologists to claim the existence of a pathogenic virus is pure pseudoscience.
In phase 2 of the control experiment, Stefan used all of the same ingredients as in the control (antibiotics, minimal nutrient medium, etc.), except that he added yeast to take the place of the snot that supposedly contains the virus and the supposed virus RNA that is uploaded into a computer program to generate a so-called “viral genome.” As Dr. Cowan describes in his recent book, Breaking the Spell, “the reason for adding the yeast RNA is because of the way that the genome of a ‘virus’ is found, a computerized process called ‘alignment.’ The alignment process starts with fragments of RNA and constructs a theoretical genome—one that never exists at any point in the actual sample. This genome never exists in any person, and it never exists intact even in the culture results; it exists only inside the computer, based on an alignment process that arranges these short pieces into an entire ‘genome.’ It is for this reason that every complete genome of SARS-CoV-2 is referred to as an ‘in silico’ genome, meaning a genome that exists only in the computer. As long as you have enough of these RNA fragments and provide the template, the computer can recreate any genome.”
Stefan was able to recreate 100% of the so-called SARS-Cov-2 genome without any clinical sample from a sick person present, but rather a random sample of yeast.
Could there be a pathogenic disease causing virus? Absolutely. Has the existence of one been scientifically established? No. The evidence is severely lacking at best and completely pseudoscientific and fraudulent at worst, especially given we’ve flipped the entire world upside down over it.
👍16
Started a substack. Really appreciate you helping me get the word out! https://aleczeck.substack.com/p/lets-get-to-the-root-there-is-no?s=w
The Way Forward with Alec Zeck
Let's get to the root: There is no proof of SARS-CoV-2
To the freedom-fighting virus pushers: If we don't start addressing the root of the lie, we will be playing this game forever
👍6
Forwarded from The Event (Alfa Warrior)
Happy Weekend Y'all! 🌼
👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UFb1GjMIXU&l
For those not aware, parts of Australia have been under seige of late with floods and federal overreach as the Agenda 2030 wishes are attempted to be played out and tested in that area. Fortunately the game is up and the people are waking up to their true power! Please enjoy this uplifting and deep convo by The Event co-host Mike Winner, Dr. Barre Lando and the great Tom Barnett on the power of our own free will and spirit over the weather, the 'deep state', and whoever else is trying to influence our lives. We have the agency to move mountains once we realize all is a reflection of our own internal desires and views of who we are... 💪
👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UFb1GjMIXU&l
For those not aware, parts of Australia have been under seige of late with floods and federal overreach as the Agenda 2030 wishes are attempted to be played out and tested in that area. Fortunately the game is up and the people are waking up to their true power! Please enjoy this uplifting and deep convo by The Event co-host Mike Winner, Dr. Barre Lando and the great Tom Barnett on the power of our own free will and spirit over the weather, the 'deep state', and whoever else is trying to influence our lives. We have the agency to move mountains once we realize all is a reflection of our own internal desires and views of who we are... 💪
YouTube
Weathering The Storm To Create The New w/ Tom Barnett
Alfacast friend Tom Barnett returns to share his recent adventures in the political swampland & on the front lines of weather manipulation in the Land of Oz.
Tom Barnet is an authentic modern-day warrior, and his straightforward solutions & insightful commentaries…
Tom Barnet is an authentic modern-day warrior, and his straightforward solutions & insightful commentaries…
👍8❤1
Reflecting back on one of my favorite podcast episodes I’ve been a part of:
https://youtu.be/fgvpHngxLOM
https://youtu.be/fgvpHngxLOM
YouTube
Aubert Bastiat on Trauma, Transformation, Sacred Masculinity - The Way Forward Podcast
Co-Founder of Sacred Sons Aubert Bastiat was interviewed on The Way Forward Podcast by Alec Zech. They speak about Aubert's journey with Sacred Sons, Transformation and Sacred Masculinity! Toon into this one for a deep drop in with Aubert.
Originally Aired…
Originally Aired…
I’m not a Christian, but I recognize the power of Yeshua’s name. I recognize the love that he embodied. I recognize the example that he set. I recognize that he balanced speaking truth boldly and unashamedly with wisdom and deep love. I recognize that, in my opinion, he was speaking to much deeper truths than were conveyed in taking his words alone at face value, and only those with hearts aligned to receive it could truly understand the message.
I have more love for Christ now than I ever did as a “Christian.”
I also recognize that, while many worship sessions and modern church services are void of truth and void of Christ’s message, there is tremendous power in coming together to praise our creator. That’s why I still love worship music even though I’m not a Christian.
https://youtu.be/Za-yGR3sbNw
I have more love for Christ now than I ever did as a “Christian.”
I also recognize that, while many worship sessions and modern church services are void of truth and void of Christ’s message, there is tremendous power in coming together to praise our creator. That’s why I still love worship music even though I’m not a Christian.
https://youtu.be/Za-yGR3sbNw
YouTube
Defender - UPPERROOM
Defender - UPPERROOM
This live stream is staffed and funded by Upperroom Global. Global is the prayer and worship movement that was birthed from the Upperroom Dallas church and exists to see God’s presence transform cities everywhere. Our Global partners…
This live stream is staffed and funded by Upperroom Global. Global is the prayer and worship movement that was birthed from the Upperroom Dallas church and exists to see God’s presence transform cities everywhere. Our Global partners…
❤18👍10👏1
How many times will I share this song here? No clue. Never gets old. Especially now knowing what the song is about. https://youtu.be/_1ab7lWDQmA
YouTube
MEMBA - For Aisha (Official Music Video)
Tickets: http://www.membamusic.com
Thank you all for the love on this song. It really means the world.
Special thanks to Dharmesh and Nikhil bahel for the edit
This is a collection of real family footage of the Chaudhary family as featured in "The Sky…
Thank you all for the love on this song. It really means the world.
Special thanks to Dharmesh and Nikhil bahel for the edit
This is a collection of real family footage of the Chaudhary family as featured in "The Sky…
❤3👍1
Forwarded from Health Freedom for Humanity (Alec Zeck)
Have you signed up for our newsletter? It’s freaking awesome. Dr. Vin Esposito is crushing it.
Sign up here: https://www.healthfreedomforhumanity.org/newsletter
Sign up here: https://www.healthfreedomforhumanity.org/newsletter
👍3
Love this commentary from my good friend Dr. Edith Ubuntu Chan:
“Thankful for all our friends around the world who are opting out of the technocratic-control timeline.
"Thx for the offer. No thank you." 🙏
We are birthing the more beautiful new earth that is free from coercion, a world of rich, soulful connection, collaboration, cocreation - a world where our children are free to play, explore, and blossom into their greatest possibilities. 🌳🌅🌳”
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/while-you-were-distracted-by-will-smith-the-international-elite-met-at-the-world-government-summit/?fbclid=IwAR1Ekm1Na4Hxcr7weqZ0WFBHUA3uBDUGgtaS4WdXhDDKJgy4xf3F4GphDBU
“Thankful for all our friends around the world who are opting out of the technocratic-control timeline.
"Thx for the offer. No thank you." 🙏
We are birthing the more beautiful new earth that is free from coercion, a world of rich, soulful connection, collaboration, cocreation - a world where our children are free to play, explore, and blossom into their greatest possibilities. 🌳🌅🌳”
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/while-you-were-distracted-by-will-smith-the-international-elite-met-at-the-world-government-summit/?fbclid=IwAR1Ekm1Na4Hxcr7weqZ0WFBHUA3uBDUGgtaS4WdXhDDKJgy4xf3F4GphDBU
The Last American Vagabond
While You Were Distracted by Will Smith, the International Elite Met at The World Government Summit
Guests included Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum and Kristalina Georgieva of the International Monetary Fund.
👍5❤4👏1