I am not in the camp that blindly asserts:

•“EVERY major event is completely staged and faked.”
•“EVERY health or freedom figure with a platform is controlled op.”
•“EVERY celebrity is a Freemason.”
•“EVERY sporting event is rigged.”
•“EVERY out-of-context image of someone scratching their eye is proof of a Masonic hand signal.”

…all without evidence.

If that’s your worldview, that’s fine. But I hope you seriously examine your foundational assumptions and ask yourself how you actually know what you claim to know.

And if you’re in that camp and you shame, mock, or attack others who aren’t, I want nothing to do with you. That posture is antithetical to real, open truth-seeking.

I didn’t arrive at the “no virus” position by default or by parroting the idea that everything is fake. I got there by deeply analyzing virology’s own definitions, claims, and methods—and finding that none of it holds up under the scientific method.

That conclusion just happens to overlap with the “everything is fake” crowd, many of whom landed there not through investigation, but by reflex.

I’d agree it’s safe to assume the media lies, and that we should question everything we’re shown. But the real question is: which parts of any given event are lies? And how do you discern that—what’s your method?

So when I apply that same level of scrutiny to the Charlie Kirk situation, and currently think he was assassinated based on the footage and context I’ve seen (while remaining open to changing my mind), I’m immediately called a “shill,” “puppet,” or “controlled op.” And I also want to be clear: I think he WAS killed, but other than that I don’t blindly trust a lick of what the mainstream is saying about who did it, why they did it, how it was done, etc.

That reveals the exact same logical failure I see in mainstream thinking.

Many “normies” say:
“Trust the experts. Don’t question.”

Many “truthers” say:
“Everything is fake. Don’t question.”

Both are allergic to inquiry.

Here’s where I stand:

I’m not loyal to conclusions.
I’m loyal to the process of truth-seeking.

Sometimes that leads me to overlap with the mainstream. Other times with the contrarians. But the consistent thread is method, not ideology.

I expected the Charlie Kirk situation would be used to inflame tensions between the political left and right.

It did.

What I didn’t expect is that it would spark just as much division among those who already see beyond the left/right illusion—among those who say they’re “questioning everything.”

Within this very crowd—which I’d like to think I’m a part of—I’ve watched a wave of accusations and hostility arise, simply because there are differing perspectives on what happened. Many who believe with certainty that the event was staged are now labeling anyone who disagrees as “controlled opposition,” “shills,” and worse.

Where is the humility?
Where is the genuine truth-seeking?

Do you truly know, with certainty, what happened that day? Was it staged? Was it real? Was it some combination of both? Is it possible he really died but there are other incredibly questionable details? Can a psyop involve a real death? Can something real be manipulated after the fact?

I’m not claiming to know. I’ve said repeatedly: I currently think he was killed, based on the footage, but I’m fully open to being wrong.

And yet, when I laid out clear points and my current perspective focused only on the footage of the shot, I’m not met with counterpoints—I’m met with mockery, personal attacks, and more, ironically the very same behavior I’ve seen for years from those blindly defending mainstream narratives.

Maybe this was the ultimate goal of this event. Not just to stir division between left and right, but to fragment the very people who are waking or have woken up.

To divide and conquer those who already stepped outside thee box.

And if that’s the case, is it working?

Hypothetical:

An event occurs.

Either:
X happened
or
Y happened

But nobody knows with 100% certainty which one it was. At this point, it’s all speculation.

In response, some say:
“I think X happened, but I’m open to being wrong,”
or
“I think Y happened based on the information I’ve seen, but I’m willing to change my mind if better evidence comes along.”

And others say:
“I think X happened, and anyone who doesn’t think X is a brainwashed idiot who’s fallen off the deep end,”
or
“I think Y happened, and anyone who doesn’t think Y is controlled opposition working to mislead you.”

Which of these ways of speaking indicates openness? Which indicates critical thinking? Which indicates genuine truth-seeking? Which shows humility in the face of uncertainty? Which fosters dialogue and growth? Which shuts down inquiry and hardens into dogma?

This is the last thing I’ll say on this.
I’ve given this too much energy, and it IS absolutely because I’ve become frustrated at the countless people who’ve asserted I and others are CO for simply giving my/our honest opinion(s). I acknowledge I was triggered by that.

From my IG stories yesterday.

Was the killing completely staged? Just another trauma-inducing psyop meant to manipulate perception?

Was it real, but wrapped in layers of deception, with the “it was all fake” narrative itself designed to distract us from exposing the forces behind it?

Was the distraction meant to distract us from the distraction that was a distraction?

Was the entire point to keep us glued to our screens, spiraling through footage, theories, and outrage—so endlessly consumed by trying to “figure it all out” that we forget to live?

So caught up in mental loops, so fractured into ideological tribes by algorithmic design, that we lose sight of our humanness and stop seeing the humanness in each other?

Amandha is upset here (which is understandable) but listen to what she’s saying. I agree with a lot of what she’s saying here.

Join us tonight at 7pm ET for the premiere of episode Ep 190: Your Life Is Your Medicine with Dr. Cassie Wuthrich

Dr. Cassie Wuthrich joins Alec for a deep conversation on her journey from conventional medicine to holistic healing, guided by personal health struggles and a commitment to living outside the medical system. From her upbringing on a farm in West Texas to working within both allopathic and naturopathic systems, Cassie’s story shows how personal experience can reveal gaps in modern healthcare and open the door to deeper truths about healing.

Dr. Wuthrich is a Naturopathic Physician and founder of Grit Inc. She supports patients seeking freedom from the medical system by weaving together ancient wisdom and quantum medicine with lived experience. Through one-on-one work and online education, she helps people understand the language of their bodies and step into true health sovereignty.

Youtube: https://youtu.be/1iAeTpu28TA

For timestamps, visit our website: https://thewayfwrd.com/content/

I was an evangelical Christian from basically age 16 until 23ish. I then went through a period of rejecting all forms of Christianity. And yet, throughout that time, and especially now, I’ve felt deeply called to Christ. Not in a new-agey “Christ Consciousness” way, but also not in what I was taught in religious circles. Fitting, as I’m 33 years old—my “Jesus Year.” This book came highly recommended, so I’m diving in:

I went hard against Israel during the first 6 months after October 7. Did multiple podcasts on it. Then I started noticing that everyone and their momma was turning on Israel, and Israel and its bedfellows seemed to be doing things overtly to piss everyone off.

Something felt “off” about it back then (and it didn’t feel right in my soul nor productive to consume daily videos/images of innocent adults and children being blown up), and I don’t remember where I saw it, but someone said it was likely intentional on Israel’s part. This is a good summary of it.

And just to be clear, I DO NOT subscribe to any belief that says “all Jews are evil.” That is absurd. Nor do I subscribe to the belief that what’s discussed here represents all of those who practice Judaism. I am not anti-Semitic either, and that term has been weaponized to mean literally any criticism of Israel.

Watch the full video before commenting—take what resonates and leave what doesn’t.

Greetings! 👋

I'm working on a project in which I'm looking to compile a list of all the perceived tragedies and/or supposed false flag events in our recent history... anything that caused a stir amongst the collective.

This is not something that I typically give the energy of my attention to, but I think it's important to point out the pattern that I suspect will emerge.

If anyone has a list of these events...or knows of any resources that I might find useful...please offer them in the comments below.

I know that I could just ask ChatGPT...but I thought I'd lean on my fellow humans, first! 😇

Thanks in advance!

Cheers,
Pete

The Texas Equity Gathering presented by The Way Forward, Central Texas Agora & Rainbow Heart Healing Collective

There is only 100 tickets available for this event. It will sell out. Don’t wait until the last minute to purchase tickets. They’re only $45!

Come gather with like-minds for a powerful day of truth, coherence, healing, and connection at The Equity Gathering, a unique experience bridging ancient law, natural wellness, and conscious community.

At the heart of the event is a 90-minute Equity Lecture + Live Q&A led by Michael Joseph, Phil Mederi, and Daniel Mentz of Sacred Honor Educational Fellowship—an organization devoted to educating people about natural law, trust law, and the deeper path of equity. This lecture offers a grounded, accessible doorway into equity as the jurisdiction of substance, conscience, and honor—a framework often forgotten in modern legal systems, but essential for those reclaiming true standing and sovereignty.

https://brushfire.com/thewayforward/theequitygathering/614939

Such an important video:

YES vaccines are unnecessary and only carry the inherent potential for harm, but NO, there is no evidence for the “nano-bots” in shots narrative:

https://youtu.be/DhDIXsponIQ?si=5HsjA3Wv8CDHhqec

Launching today for members of The Way Forward!

Registration closes October 6th.

Group experience begins October 13th!

100% free for members—all that’s required is a membership at TheWayFwrd.com

Register here!: https://thewayfwrd.com/groups/coherence-collective/