Elon, I was hoping you’d choose this as the new logo for twitter 🤣

Hey Elon, “have you considered that Twitter is blocking your offer because they are afraid you’d obtain documents proving they shadow ban and censor, which would contradict sworn testimony made before Congress?

This could be an Enron type scenario you’ve uncovered.”

Let’s get this to Elon. I want these bastards exposed for the corrupt smug arrogant thugs they are.

Why is the battle over Twitter meaningful? This is why. Read my substack posts on anti-social media and my wordpress post on Pandoras Box

https://news.1rj.ru/str/zerohedge/112963

The Twitter board collectively owns almost no shares... this is ridiculous.

Time to give big donations to the Firearms Policy Coalition to wage #lawfare
https://youtu.be/eVXqCeRZshA

"Directly or Indirectly". Musk knows how proxy voting works when Brokers are involved. If a broker holds shares "on behalf of" a Saudi, that broker votes on shareholder issues (like electing the board, who appoints officers.)

I have been chatting with @drawandstrike Brian Cates about this topic today. Here's an important thing to know. In a corporation, shareholders elect the members of the board (exactly who proposes slates of candidates and how is an excellent thing to go learn about. Here's one entry point for corruption. the process is somewhat analogous to the electoral college: you indirectly vote for President, not directly.) The board then appoints the officers (CEO, President, etc.) The officers serve at the pleasure of the board. The board *Directs* the officers to do certain actions, and *empowers* them to do certain other actions.

Now: if you hold shares of TWTR in your brokerage account, say Schwab...and you do NOT explicitly tell them that you intend to vote your shares, they will vote your shares for you, by proxy. So it is the entities who hold shares on behalf of others who potentially hold the power to elect board members and steer public companies by appointing new officers.

So the point that got all of this discussion started with @drawandstrike : Jack Dorsey has been tweeting some interesting things lately. He's perhaps not the super-villain we all thought he was. When he was serving as CEO, and Twitter suspended Trump's account: did Jack, on his own recognizance, give the direction to do that? Or was he, as CEO reporting to the board, given direction BY THE BOARD to take certain actions--since the board was, by definition, Jack's "bosses"? And who did those board members represent, exactly? How did they come to be on the board, and which powerful entities influenced their selections?

.... and as we learned here today, also public companies.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/zerohedge/112983

Elon Musk just tweeted ‘Love Me Tender’. Could this be his Plan B? 🤔

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1515405264740134918

@ChiefNerd

Entire lib media freaking out that DeSantis rejected math textbooks over critical race theory but no one asking why critical race theory was in math textbooks in the first place

Do Not Let Them Control You.

Want to help 45?
DRAIN THE SWAMP where you live!

Grassroots:
👉🏻VET YOUR CITY COUNCIL & MAYOR.
•Who are they doing business with?
•Do they pay accurate County property taxes at their home/s? 😏 (This is a big one.)
•Are their business partners assigned to City positions?

👉🏻GO to the City Council Meetings.
Do they censor you?
Do they represent you?
Do they allow you to see the books?🔥

💥ALL Municipal Financial information is to be provided to the Public as per Sunshine Laws.

Happy Easter 🌹🙏🏼🇺🇸