“An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” – Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.” –Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows: The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is, in reality, no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
“Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it…A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” – 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 177
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it. The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is, in reality, no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW, in legal contemplation, IS AS INOPERATIVE AS IF IT HAD NEVER BEEN PASSED.“ – 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 256
Yet with all these examples and with the day-to-day running of the Corporation of the UNITED STATES, they want you to believe differently. The railroad act clearly violates the constitution. I personally do not recognize it as a law and have had many fights trying to convince those who are not awake that indeed it is an illegal manipulation by the government meant to protect the railroad from wage increases and lawful forming of duties by the union to protect their members. The question thus becomes why is it that I and a very few numbers of others know this. Is it the reach around the union and the company now share? This is just food for thought for you on Labor Day. The more you know, the more you can help others who are embattled in the fight with their own labor issues.
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.” –Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows: The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is, in reality, no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
“Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it…A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” – 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 177
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it. The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is, in reality, no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW, in legal contemplation, IS AS INOPERATIVE AS IF IT HAD NEVER BEEN PASSED.“ – 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 256
Yet with all these examples and with the day-to-day running of the Corporation of the UNITED STATES, they want you to believe differently. The railroad act clearly violates the constitution. I personally do not recognize it as a law and have had many fights trying to convince those who are not awake that indeed it is an illegal manipulation by the government meant to protect the railroad from wage increases and lawful forming of duties by the union to protect their members. The question thus becomes why is it that I and a very few numbers of others know this. Is it the reach around the union and the company now share? This is just food for thought for you on Labor Day. The more you know, the more you can help others who are embattled in the fight with their own labor issues.
Forwarded from The Real Kim Shady (The Real Kim Shady)
⛈
ARE YOU READY TO MAKE IT RAIN?
🔥We will be making a SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT on LABOR DAY.
🔥Stop by and find out how you can be part of … The PAIN. ☠️
Join👉@TheRealKimShady
ARE YOU READY TO MAKE IT RAIN?
🔥We will be making a SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT on LABOR DAY.
🔥Stop by and find out how you can be part of … The PAIN. ☠️
Join👉@TheRealKimShady
Forwarded from Nicholas Veniamin
Bitchute
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT PROVES OBAMA'S HAWAII BIRTH CERTIFICATE WAS A FRAUD (VIDEO)
On the day of Obama's inauguration in 2009, it was leaked by an Obama family member that Barrack was born in Kenya, Africa. In 2011, Obama's own brother Malik is the one that shared Obama's original birth certificate from Kenya, Africa. The FBI have KNOWN…
This is true. Being that I have always preferred bigger women, their is nothing sexier than a woman with an appetite.
Forwarded from The Real Kim Shady (The Real Kim Shady)
Remember guys, if you don’t tell her she’s sexy after unbuttoning her pants to wolf down that second plate of spaghetti & meatballs, someone else will!
❤️❤️❤️
❤️❤️❤️
Forwarded from The Real Kim Shady (The Real Kim Shady)
🔥🔥🔥
“This covenant must NEVER, EVER be known to exist.”
🔥Well here it is, I’m posting it.
JOIN👉@TheRealKimShady
“This covenant must NEVER, EVER be known to exist.”
🔥Well here it is, I’m posting it.
JOIN👉@TheRealKimShady
Forwarded from The Real Kim Shady (The Real Kim Shady)
Telegram
EstherSpeaksTruth
Forwarded from TheStormHasArrived17 (TheStormHasArrived17)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
People are definitely waking up.
This guy has 1.5 million followers on TikTok.
(Language warning)
This guy has 1.5 million followers on TikTok.
(Language warning)
Forwarded from 💊 ℝ𝕖𝕕.ℙ𝕚𝕝𝕝.ℙ𝕙𝕒𝕣𝕞𝕒𝕔𝕚𝕤𝕥 💊 (Red.Pill.Pharmacist)
🔥🔥🔥
—
Oregon Gov. Brown Sued by Police, Firefighters Over Vaccine Mandate
A group of Oregon firefighters and police officers have filed a lawsuit against Gov. Kate Brown (D). A coalition of state police officers and firefighters is suing Oregon’s governor over a mandate requiring the coronavirus vaccine for state workers.
KOIN in Oregon was the first to report the complaint. According to a spokesperson for Brown, the governor is “responding to a public health crisis.”
H/T: @insiderpaper
Source: https://cutt.ly/UWRclq2
@RedPillPharmacist
—
Oregon Gov. Brown Sued by Police, Firefighters Over Vaccine Mandate
A group of Oregon firefighters and police officers have filed a lawsuit against Gov. Kate Brown (D). A coalition of state police officers and firefighters is suing Oregon’s governor over a mandate requiring the coronavirus vaccine for state workers.
KOIN in Oregon was the first to report the complaint. According to a spokesperson for Brown, the governor is “responding to a public health crisis.”
H/T: @insiderpaper
Source: https://cutt.ly/UWRclq2
@RedPillPharmacist
Forwarded from Selah
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Dave Oneegs Aussie chat 💬
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😅Massive Greenbush, a spot in Indo.
Surfer; Nic Von Rupp….
When u just wanna leave this prison, live on a boat and live the endless summer 🌊
Surfer; Nic Von Rupp….
When u just wanna leave this prison, live on a boat and live the endless summer 🌊
Forwarded from God Wins! (Original) (OneOfSevenBillionOnEarth)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
Get the word out now. Spread this EVERYWHERE!!
We DEMAND Answers!
#PFIZER IS ALLEGEDLY EXTORTING GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE WORLD!
💉💀💉
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
Get the word out now. Spread this EVERYWHERE!!
We DEMAND Answers!
#PFIZER IS ALLEGEDLY EXTORTING GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE WORLD!
💉💀💉
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨