COVID scam falls apart; it’s over
by Jon Rappoport

"Since the beginning, I’ve been producing the evidence COVID is a scam. Now, official agencies are virtually admitting it.

On December 29, the head of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky, announced, in a White House press briefing, that the PCR test can register positive (meaning the person is “infected”) long AFTER infection is over.

Here’s Walensky’s money quote:

“…people can remain PCR positive for up to 12 weeks after infection and long after they are transmissible and infectious.”

That means MILLIONS of FALSE positive test results have been logged as REAL, in the past two years.

If you can’t trace the implications of THAT, I can’t help you.

“Dear Mr. Smith, We here at the CDC wish to inform to you that your positive PCR COVID test, administered in the spring of 2020, was misleading. There was no proof it meant you were infected. Therefore, your isolation, your hospitalization, during which your business closed and went into bankruptcy, your wife left home taking up residence with the children at her mother’s, your business partner committed suicide---all that was unnecessary. Thank you for your understanding.”

Of course, the blind following the blind following Fauci will say, “But…but…the CDC couldn’t have made a mistake that big…there must be some explanation…”

And yes, there is an explanation. The CDC and other public health officials have known all along they were running a scam. Committing a crime. A Nuremberg-type crime."

- from https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/01/03/covid-scam-falls-apart-its-over/

So, I’m watching my boys at the barber shop and as I wait I’m thinking about this movie thing.

It’s fascinating to me that there is this odd movie showing after the 6th and President Trump’s speech is scheduled for that day.
Can’t help but think about Steve Mnuchin when we talk about movies.
And popcorn
And seriously Wtf is going on?

Would love it to be something amazing. Really really would.
But I know none of us hold our breath anymore. We just observe.
Very wise.

Keep in mind, spiderman and the matrix JUST came out in the last couple of weeks. These are two blockbuster movies. Spiderman has obliterated records. Why on earth at the very least would these 2 movies not still have showings scheduled through February? Think of anytime a new marvel movie has ever come out before. It's usually in theatres 3-5 months.

It's not normal for so many theatres across the country to only be showing a single new movie (355) or have NO showings listed for several days all at the same time.

Not normal at all.

All I'm saying is, better to be prepared than to have to get prepared. Check your supplies and then check them twice ♥️

PS I can't help but think about how empty the store was when we went last night. So many bare shelves. More than I've seen this whole past year. Especially water. Was very weird..

What else is going down in the next week? Oh yea....

Verizon and AT&T are launching 5G on January 5th that has airlines concerned of interference...

https://news.yahoo.com/t-verizon-rebuff-us-request-222151854.html


Let's piece this together:
-No showings other than 355 from January 7-11 listed in most nationwide theaters, despite 2 blockbusters having just barely come out.
-Pilots allegedly being informed they are grounded pending medical exams if they got the covid vaccine
-Trump announcement Jan 6th
-Capital "attack" anniversary and Biden speech Jan. 6th
-Store shelves looking very depleated
-Verizon & AT&T launching 5g despite national concerns from all flight authorities

What else?

LOL apparently now there are pages questioning everyone who is questioning this movie theatre anomaly 😂🙄 anything to sew division.

Maybe we are truthers and when we see a real world anomaly we are curious about WTF is happening?

I mean isn't that how we all got here?

Of course use discretion where needed. But asking questions is certainly not a bad thing in my books 🤷🏼‍♀️

Pfizer reported that its vaccine shows a 95% efficacy. That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, right? But that’s not actually what that number means. That 95% refers to the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR), but it doesn’t tell you how much your overall risk is reduced by vaccination. For that, we need Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR).

During the Pfizer trial, 0.88% of the placebo group got covid-19 and 0.04% of the vaccinated group got covid-19. So the ARR or net benefit that you’re being offered with the Pfizer vaccine is 0.84%. That 95% number refers to the relative difference between 0.88% and 0.04%. That’s what they call 95% RRR.

Relative Risk Reduction is well known to be a misleading number, which is why the FDA recommends using Absolute Risk Reduction instead, which begs the question of how many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit❓

https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/the-powerful-pfizer-presentation

☝️ the answer?

Too many

Too many would've taken it. Because too many took it to prevent loss of freedoms.

Only a handful of people I know who took it actually took it because they believed it reduced their risk.

Most got it to prevent things like travel restrictions or being "allowed" to work without a mask or keep their job.

A little more on the movie thing …
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

This little movie anomaly may just be about licensing agreements. It could be by design, or just a coincidence. Could it be tied to Trump’s EO?

It’s definitely not a normal occurrence. Just keep your heads on a swivel this month, but continue to live without fear.

IMHO, Patriots are in control!

And isn’t Digital World Acquisition Corp working on a whole lot more than just a social media site? 😉

I think we’ve all noticed an increase in disclosure type shows and movies coming out lately. I do not feel that those are predictive programming anymore. I really don’t. I think they’re soft disclosure.
That’s just my theory, but it sits well.

⚔️⚖️⚡️📡

Subscribe to @RealCombatLVL ⚖️

Just cuz. 👆

JUST IN 🚨 Jury finds Elizabeth Holmes guilty of conspiracy at her former blood-testing startup Theranos. - AP

Have you all read the book, Bad Blood? Or seen the movie about the Silicon Valley company, Theranos? It was founded by a woman (with a very strange low voice, now that I think about it) named Elizabeth Holmes. The company was a complete fraud and the story is quite intriguing. What’s even more interesting is who sat in its board — Mad Dog Mattis, George Shultz and none other than Henry Kissinger.
I shit you not.

The book is by John Carreyrou and is incredibly well researched. The movie is good, too if you’re not the reading type. The story completely captured my attention much like some other documentaries have. The ones about Scientology and NXIVM, come to mind. Same vibe. Same sense that there’s something much more sinister going on.

Now that I see Mattis’ name coming up again, I think, “Holy crap! What’s the REST of that story? There’s gotta be more to it.” Methinks the fact that they were messing about with people’s BLOOD is no coincidence.
AT
ALL!

https://www.businessinsider.com/theranos-former-board-members-henry-kissinger-george-shultz-james-mattis-2019-3?r=US&IR=T

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/8/31/20839873/james-mattis-book-theranos

@TruthRascalHQ✨

"The prosecutor in the trial of one-time Silicon Valley star Elizabeth Holmes begins with heavy accusations: 'Her time was running out, she was running out of money, so Elizabeth Holmes decided to lie,' he addresses the twelve members of the jury in Courtroom 4 of the federal courthouse in San Jose."

Holmes allegedly defrauded investors of a total of $700 million by lying about having developed a revolutionary blood test, and deceived patients with the false test results of her faulty devices. In 2018, her company, Theranos, which investors at one point valued at $9 billion, collapsed. Now Holmes, who was once idolized on magazine covers as the "next Steve Jobs," faces up to 20 years in prison for fraud."

@auraxchan
https://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/industrie/bluttest-start-up-theranos-betruegerin-oder-gescheiterte-der-ex-milliardaerin-elizabeth-holmes-drohen-20-jahre-gefaengnis/27595466.html