Forwarded from 🔥Embers from Ash🌻
LOL apparently now there are pages questioning everyone who is questioning this movie theatre anomaly 😂🙄 anything to sew division.
Maybe we are truthers and when we see a real world anomaly we are curious about WTF is happening?
I mean isn't that how we all got here?
Of course use discretion where needed. But asking questions is certainly not a bad thing in my books 🤷🏼♀️
Maybe we are truthers and when we see a real world anomaly we are curious about WTF is happening?
I mean isn't that how we all got here?
Of course use discretion where needed. But asking questions is certainly not a bad thing in my books 🤷🏼♀️
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
Pfizer reported that its vaccine shows a 95% efficacy. That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, right? But that’s not actually what that number means. That 95% refers to the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR), but it doesn’t tell you how much your overall risk is reduced by vaccination. For that, we need Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR).
During the Pfizer trial, 0.88% of the placebo group got covid-19 and 0.04% of the vaccinated group got covid-19. So the ARR or net benefit that you’re being offered with the Pfizer vaccine is 0.84%. That 95% number refers to the relative difference between 0.88% and 0.04%. That’s what they call 95% RRR.
Relative Risk Reduction is well known to be a misleading number, which is why the FDA recommends using Absolute Risk Reduction instead, which begs the question of how many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit❓
https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/the-powerful-pfizer-presentation
During the Pfizer trial, 0.88% of the placebo group got covid-19 and 0.04% of the vaccinated group got covid-19. So the ARR or net benefit that you’re being offered with the Pfizer vaccine is 0.84%. That 95% number refers to the relative difference between 0.88% and 0.04%. That’s what they call 95% RRR.
Relative Risk Reduction is well known to be a misleading number, which is why the FDA recommends using Absolute Risk Reduction instead, which begs the question of how many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit❓
https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/the-powerful-pfizer-presentation
Forwarded from 🔥Embers from Ash🌻
☝️ the answer?
Too many
Too many would've taken it. Because too many took it to prevent loss of freedoms.
Only a handful of people I know who took it actually took it because they believed it reduced their risk.
Most got it to prevent things like travel restrictions or being "allowed" to work without a mask or keep their job.
Too many
Too many would've taken it. Because too many took it to prevent loss of freedoms.
Only a handful of people I know who took it actually took it because they believed it reduced their risk.
Most got it to prevent things like travel restrictions or being "allowed" to work without a mask or keep their job.
Forwarded from Timmy17SeventySix
This little movie anomaly may just be about licensing agreements. It could be by design, or just a coincidence. Could it be tied to Trump’s EO?
It’s definitely not a normal occurrence. Just keep your heads on a swivel this month, but continue to live without fear.
IMHO, Patriots are in control!
It’s definitely not a normal occurrence. Just keep your heads on a swivel this month, but continue to live without fear.
IMHO, Patriots are in control!
And isn’t Digital World Acquisition Corp working on a whole lot more than just a social media site? 😉
I think we’ve all noticed an increase in disclosure type shows and movies coming out lately. I do not feel that those are predictive programming anymore. I really don’t. I think they’re soft disclosure.
That’s just my theory, but it sits well.
That’s just my theory, but it sits well.
Forwarded from ℭ𝔬𝔪𝔟𝔞𝔱𝔩𝔳𝔩™ (COMBATLVL™)
Forwarded from Insider Paper
JUST IN 🚨 Jury finds Elizabeth Holmes guilty of conspiracy at her former blood-testing startup Theranos. - AP
Forwarded from TR HQ
Have you all read the book, Bad Blood? Or seen the movie about the Silicon Valley company, Theranos? It was founded by a woman (with a very strange low voice, now that I think about it) named Elizabeth Holmes. The company was a complete fraud and the story is quite intriguing. What’s even more interesting is who sat in its board — Mad Dog Mattis, George Shultz and none other than Henry Kissinger.
I shit you not.
The book is by John Carreyrou and is incredibly well researched. The movie is good, too if you’re not the reading type. The story completely captured my attention much like some other documentaries have. The ones about Scientology and NXIVM, come to mind. Same vibe. Same sense that there’s something much more sinister going on.
Now that I see Mattis’ name coming up again, I think, “Holy crap! What’s the REST of that story? There’s gotta be more to it.” Methinks the fact that they were messing about with people’s BLOOD is no coincidence.
AT
ALL!
https://www.businessinsider.com/theranos-former-board-members-henry-kissinger-george-shultz-james-mattis-2019-3?r=US&IR=T
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/8/31/20839873/james-mattis-book-theranos
@TruthRascalHQ✨
I shit you not.
The book is by John Carreyrou and is incredibly well researched. The movie is good, too if you’re not the reading type. The story completely captured my attention much like some other documentaries have. The ones about Scientology and NXIVM, come to mind. Same vibe. Same sense that there’s something much more sinister going on.
Now that I see Mattis’ name coming up again, I think, “Holy crap! What’s the REST of that story? There’s gotta be more to it.” Methinks the fact that they were messing about with people’s BLOOD is no coincidence.
AT
ALL!
https://www.businessinsider.com/theranos-former-board-members-henry-kissinger-george-shultz-james-mattis-2019-3?r=US&IR=T
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/8/31/20839873/james-mattis-book-theranos
@TruthRascalHQ✨
Business Insider
How Elizabeth Holmes convinced powerful men like Henry Kissinger, James Mattis, and George Shultz to sit on the board of now disgraced…
Theranos at one point had a star-studded board of directors, including military leaders and former secretaries of state.
Forwarded from Aurax
"The prosecutor in the trial of one-time Silicon Valley star Elizabeth Holmes begins with heavy accusations: 'Her time was running out, she was running out of money, so Elizabeth Holmes decided to lie,' he addresses the twelve members of the jury in Courtroom 4 of the federal courthouse in San Jose."
Holmes allegedly defrauded investors of a total of $700 million by lying about having developed a revolutionary blood test, and deceived patients with the false test results of her faulty devices. In 2018, her company, Theranos, which investors at one point valued at $9 billion, collapsed. Now Holmes, who was once idolized on magazine covers as the "next Steve Jobs," faces up to 20 years in prison for fraud."
@auraxchan
https://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/industrie/bluttest-start-up-theranos-betruegerin-oder-gescheiterte-der-ex-milliardaerin-elizabeth-holmes-drohen-20-jahre-gefaengnis/27595466.html
Holmes allegedly defrauded investors of a total of $700 million by lying about having developed a revolutionary blood test, and deceived patients with the false test results of her faulty devices. In 2018, her company, Theranos, which investors at one point valued at $9 billion, collapsed. Now Holmes, who was once idolized on magazine covers as the "next Steve Jobs," faces up to 20 years in prison for fraud."
@auraxchan
https://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/industrie/bluttest-start-up-theranos-betruegerin-oder-gescheiterte-der-ex-milliardaerin-elizabeth-holmes-drohen-20-jahre-gefaengnis/27595466.html
Handelsblatt
Bluttest-Start-up Theranos: Betrügerin oder Gescheiterte? Der Ex-Milliardärin Elizabeth Holmes drohen 20 Jahre Gefängnis
Die Theranos-Gründerin wollte Bluttests revolutionieren und wurde zur Selfmade-Milliardärin – nun steht sie wegen Betrugs vor Gericht.
Forwarded from TR HQ
Here’s the story in English…
https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/theranos-founder-elizabeth-holmes-arrives-at-court-for-trial-start
https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/theranos-founder-elizabeth-holmes-arrives-at-court-for-trial-start
The Straits Times
'Failure is not a crime,' defence says in trial of Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes
Elizabeth Holmes is accused of making false claims about the now-defunct blood-testing startup once valued at US$9 billion.
. Read more at straitstimes.com.
. Read more at straitstimes.com.
Forwarded from Techno_Fog
Race-based COVID-19 treatment is now a reality.
It violates federal law.
And the Biden DOJ is silent, happy to let it continue.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/race-based-covid-19-treatment-violates
It violates federal law.
And the Biden DOJ is silent, happy to let it continue.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/race-based-covid-19-treatment-violates
The Reactionary
Race-Based COVID-19 Treatment Violates Federal Law
And the Biden DOJ is silent.
Is this how she’s gonna get Clintoned???
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10364845/Judge-orders-Ghislaine-Maxwell-booster-shot.htms
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10364845/Judge-orders-Ghislaine-Maxwell-booster-shot.htms
Mail Online
Judge approves Ghislaine Maxwell's request for Covid-19 booster as she awaits sentencing in 'hell hole' prison
Ghislaine Maxwell, who is facing 65 years in jail after a jury found her guilty last week, requested to get the shot after the verdict was read.