🇮🇳 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧’𝗦 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗚𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗢𝗡 𝗜𝗡 𝗜𝗡𝗗𝗜𝗔 - 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘄𝗶𝗿𝗲

As mainstream media proclaims a second huge surge of #Covid19 in India over a year into the pandemic, many are questioning these stories.

Charity United president, William Tucker, spent the last year in the slums of Delhi and has the inside story you aren’t hearing about the devastating effects the initial lockdowns had on tens of millions in India and insight into what is really happening there right now.

#India #CovidDeaths #WilliamTucker #CharityUnited #Lockdowns #Starvation #Delhi #Ganges #Variants #TheHighwire #DelBigtree
#StopTheDepopShot
POSTED: May 24, 2021


#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

🇬🇧 UK - Why do the magnets stick? An update...

Not On The Beeb

Premiere in progress. Started 9 minutes ago

An update on our current understanding of 'The Magnet challenge' phenomena. Have people been chipped? What about the blu tooth story? Have you seen the metal objects sticking to people's arms? And an appraisal of the BBC reality check programme and fact-checkers...

🔗 SEE initial posts with full links

#StopTheDepopShot
#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

🇬🇧 UK - Julie Colquhoun, asks "Do our children need saving from this?"

🔗 Source: Julie Colquhoun

#StopTheDepopShot

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

🇮🇳 INDIA - Absolutely brilliant. The Indians lead at setting fire to Big Pharma and now 5G masts

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

🇺🇸 USA NEWS - 𝗙𝗹𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗮 𝗕𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝟮𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗘𝗻𝗱 $𝟯𝟬𝟬 𝗨𝗻𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗶𝘁 𝗕𝗼𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗘𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗛𝗶𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗪𝗼𝗲𝘀
UPDATED 26/05/2021

🔗 𝗖𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁: 𝗘𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀

Florida officials announced an end to the $300 weekly federal pandemic unemployment compensation supplement on May 24, making the Sunshine State the 23rd state to opt out of the jobless boost in a bid to encourage people to get back to work amid a labor shortage and a booming economy.

The Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO), the state’s employment agency, made the announcement in a release, with people no longer eligible to receive the $300 weekly supplemental Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation payment starting June 27.

While Florida is ending the $300 supplement, it is maintaining its participation in other federal unemployment programs— such as the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation, and Mixed Earners Unemployment Compensation—which expire in September. An early end may be in store for Florida’s participation in these programs, too, the employment agency suggested, as officials “carefully” monitor job posting and industry hiring trends.

The decision to withdraw from the jobless boost was in part prompted by April labor market data, which showed that total private-sector employment in Florida increased by 18,800 jobs, with nearly half a million job postings available in the state for job seekers.

“Florida’s economy has bounced back tremendously with over 460,000 jobs available throughout our state and the strongest economic conditions in the nation,” Dane Eagle, DEO secretary, said in a statement. “Florida’s employers are also seeing employment growth, as more Floridians, including some who completely left the workforce, are now eagerly reentering the workforce.

“Transitioning away from this benefit will help meet the demands of small and large businesses who are ready to hire and expand their workforce.”
Florida business leaders have been sounding the alarm on hiring difficulties.

“Even though our industry is open for business, we are facing a dire labor shortage,” Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association President and CEO, Carol Dover, said in a statement. “Strong demand, coupled with this staffing shortage, has left many businesses forced to limit operating days and hours in addition to reducing capacity in both food service and lodging.

“Ending the supplemental $300 FPUC payment will help the industry regain pre-COVID levels.”

With the move, Florida joins 22 other Republican-led states in dropping the $300 weekly federal jobless benefit boost sometime this summer—all in a bid to encourage employment amid sky-high levels of job openings and business hiring woes.

Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming all plan to end the $300 boost, while 19 of the states also plan to opt out of the other federal unemployment benefit programs.

The degree to which the federal weekly unemployment boost is creating a disincentive for people to take jobs has become a matter of heated debate.

Business groups and Republican leaders argue that the payments are having a substantial impact, while members of the Biden administration—including President Joe Biden and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen—argue that their impact is negligible.

Follow Tom on Twitter: @OZImekTOM

#Jobs
#Florida
#Republicans

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

🇺🇸 𝗨𝗦𝗔 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 - 𝗩𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗦 & 𝗦𝗔𝗙𝗘𝗧𝗬
𝗙𝗮𝘂𝗰𝗶: 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗-𝟭𝟵 𝗕𝗼𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘁𝘀 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗕𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘀 𝗨𝗻𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿
𝗕𝗬 𝗜𝗦𝗔𝗕𝗘𝗟 𝗩𝗔𝗡 𝗕𝗥𝗨𝗚𝗘𝗡
𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝟮𝟳, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭

🔗 𝗖𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁: 𝗘𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀

Infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci said on Wednesday that Americans vaccinated against COVID-19 will most likely need a booster shot at some point in the future to guarantee continued protection but that the timing remains unclear.

“I don’t anticipate that the durability of the vaccine protection is going to be infinite—it’s just not. So, I imagine we will need, at some time, a booster. What we’re figuring out right now is what that interval is going to be,” Fauci said during a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing while testifying about the state of medical research and the National Institutes of Health’s budget for fiscal 2022.

Fauci said that a possible timeline for a booster is being studied by public health experts.
“We know from studies following people from the original clinical trials that the protection goes out at least six months and likely a year,” he later added. “I believe we will need a booster. I’m not exactly sure when.”

Last week, the CEOs of vaccine makers Pfizer and Moderna suggested that a booster shot for COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, may be needed roughly eight to 12 months after Americans are fully vaccinated.

“People at highest risks [elderly, healthcare workers] were vaccinated in December/January. So I would do [a] September start for those at highest risk,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel told Axios in an email.

“The data that I see coming, they are supporting the notion that likely there will be a need for a booster somewhere between eight and 12 months,” Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said during an Axios event.


Fauci, the head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said during the same event last week that a booster shot will “almost certainly” be required “sometime within a year or so.”
Scientists still do not know how long the COVID-19 vaccines will confer immunity, and what portion of those vaccinated do not transmit the virus, although data suggests that the vaccines should provide up to six months of immunity from at least symptomatic disease.

For people who have recovered from COVID-19, a study funded by the National Institutes of Health found that many of the participants developed a strong immunity against the disease for up to eight months after infection. Some doctors have shared on social media that they still had antibodies a year after they were infected with the CCP virus.

According to data published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Tuesday, half of American adults are now fully vaccinated against COVID-19.
President Joe Biden has set a vaccination goal of delivering at least one shot to 70 percent of adult Americans by July 4.

Several states have ramped up efforts to incentivise Americans to get vaccinated, offering cash prizes for doing so.

On Tuesday, Colorado became the latest state to roll out a lottery program to encourage residents to get vaccinated against COVID-19.
Five randomly selected Coloradans above the age of 18 who have received at least one dose of the vaccine by the end of June will be selected to win $1 million each, Gov. Jared Polis announced.
In Ohio, the COVID-19 vaccination rate surged after Gov. Mike DeWine said that five residents will win $1 million each as a monetary incentive for getting inoculated.

New York and Maryland on May 20 also announced that they will be rolling out similar vaccine incentive programs.

Meiling Lee contributed to this report.

#StopTheDepopShot
#TheirMotiveIsNotYourBenefit
#DoNotBeConnedByFreebies
#RemoveFraudFauci
#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

𝗨𝗦𝗔 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 - 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗦
𝗦𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗛𝗮𝘄𝗹𝗲𝘆, 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗻 𝗕𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗕𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗳𝘆 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹 𝗼𝗻 𝗪𝘂𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗟𝗮𝗯

🔗 𝗕𝗬 𝗘𝗣𝗢𝗖𝗛 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗠
𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝟮𝟲, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭 𝗨𝗽𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱: 𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝟮𝟳, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭

The U.S. Senate has unanimously passed a bill that seeks to require President Joe Biden’s administration declassify all intelligence relating to the origin of COVID-19, including information about what happened at the Wuhan laboratory at the start of the pandemic.

Republican Sens. Josh Hawley (Miss.) and Mike Braun (Ind.) submitted their proposal, known as the COVID-19 Origin Act of 2021, to require that the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) declassify to Americans U.S. intelligence on the alleged links between China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and the origins of the CCP virus last month. The bill was passed by unanimous consent.

Hawley told the Senate floor on Wednesday that the bill gives an opportunity to the American public to evaluate the evidence for themselves, adding that this is only the first step.
“They deserve it. Their government owes it to them, and it’s time to act,” Hawley said. “And the American people deserve something else. They deserve to have this government hold accountable that nation which started this virus, whose lies about this virus turned it into a global pandemic, whose lies about this virus prevented our country and many others from being able to address it effectively in time—of course I’m talking about China.”

If enacted, the documents that could be declassified could pertain to activities performed by the Wuhan Institute of Virology with or on behalf of the People’s Liberation Army, coronavirus research or other related activities performed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology prior to the outbreak of COVID–19, and information about researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology who fell ill in Autumn 2019.

The DNI will then be required to present a report to Congress containing the declassified information within 90 days of the bill’s potential enactment.

The DNI’s press office did not immediately respond to The Epoch Times’ request for comment.

Sen. Braun added, “President Biden must declassify all U.S. intel related to the Wuhan lab and COVID-19 pandemic, so the American people and independent researchers can get answers.”
This comes as calls for a new probe into the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus ramps up amid widespread concerns that the pandemic may have stemmed from a laboratory accident.
Earlier this week, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, in remarks to the virtual 74th World Health Assembly, called for the WHO to launch a “transparent” second phase to the investigation.
“Phase 2 of the COVID origins study must be launched with terms of reference that are transparent, science-based, and give international experts the independence to fully assess the source of the virus and the early days of the outbreak,” he said.

The comments come after The Wall Street Journal reported on May 23 that three researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were hospitalized in November 2019 with symptoms consistent with seasonal flu and COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus. The newspaper cited unnamed U.S. government sources familiar with a previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki, when asked about the matter on May 24, said that the Biden administration has “repeatedly called for the WHO to support an expert-driven evaluation of the pandemic’s origins that is free from interference or politicization.”

“Now, there were phase one results that came through. We were not—during that first phase of the investigation, there was not access to data, there was not information provided. And now, we’re hopeful that WHO can move into a more transparent, independent phase two investigation,” Psaki said.

Janita Kan and Mimi Nguyen-Ly contributed to this report.

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

🇬🇧 𝗨𝗞 - 𝗠𝗘𝗗𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗻...

𝗘𝗠𝗣𝗢𝗪𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗖𝗛𝗜𝗟𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗡 𝗧𝗢 𝗠𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗘𝗗 𝗠𝗘𝗗𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗗𝗘𝗖𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗦

🔗 𝗦𝗢𝗨𝗥𝗖𝗘: 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 - ✔️ full article laid out here below 6 pages


Introduction
It is an established legal principle in the UK that children can make their own healthcare decisions (within certain limitations) if they are considered competent, that is, mentally and emotionally mature enough. Such a child is called Gillick competent, after the court case that established this law.

Following media reports that children of secondary school age may be offered the Covid-19 vaccination in school from September 2021, this subject has found renewed interest. As with HPV and teenage booster vaccinations, schools should notify parents of scheduled vaccination dates and send consent forms. However, a competent child can override parents’ decision to consent or to refuse consent.

This document aims to give parents and others with parental responsibility practical guidance on empowering children to make informed decisions around consent and to help prepare them for the consequences of this decision.

As a charity we work for respect for parental healthcare decisions. We do not tell parents what to do and we rarely take a position for or against any particular healthcare measure. However, we do consider it reasonable for parents to decline vaccinations. Declining a prophylactic medication when a child isn’t ill would not normally sound controversial, was it not for the polarised and emotive debate surrounding vaccinations.

At the time of writing (May 2021) there is considerable opposition to vaccinating children against SARS-CoV-2 among scientists. See for example the BMJ here and here and the Lancet here and here.


What follows in this document should be read in this context.

Consent and Gillick competence in the context of school vaccinations.

The law courts in the UK accept that children become more mature and autonomous as they get older and that this gives them the right to make their own medical decisions in certain circumstances. Young persons aged 16 or 17 are assumed to have that maturity and they can decide for themselves, except in some extreme cases. Below that age, each case is judged on its merits. How mature is the child? How serious is the decision they are making and what are the consequences?

Vaccinations are not considered a serious intervention and it has to be expected that the courts will see Covid-19 vaccines in the same light. This sets the level of competence needed to make that decision relatively low.

When Gillick competence was established as a legal test, its application was fairly narrow. Over the years, however, the child’s competence to decide for themselves has become a factor in all sorts of areas, including school vaccinations, disagreement between parents themselves, disagreement between parents and doctors and disagreement between parents and state authorities.

It is right that children’s views are taken into account. A school environment poses problems, however.

Our charity has written to NHS trusts and Public Health England to highlight these issues and we believe that obtaining valid consent from a child in such a setting is unrealistic. However this hasn’t been tested in court and parents are therefore best advised to assume that their consent or refusal of consent is not going to be the final word.

Gillick Competence and Valid Consent.

In most situations no medical intervention may be administered without valid consent. In order for it to be valid, i.e. lawful, consent must be:
▪️ given voluntarily and freely, without pressure or undue influence being exerted on the person either to accept or refuse treatment.

▪️ informed, which means your child needs to be given age-appropriate information to understand the nature and purpose of the vaccination as well as any relevant information pertaining to risk.

Page 1 of 6

▪︎ given by a child who has the ability and sufficient maturity to understand what is involved and weigh up the options.

See also Understanding Valid Consent in Medicine and Consent Process Check List

Although the Care Quality Commission expects Health Care Professionals to be trained in Gillick competence assessments, we have not found any evidence of any consistently applied training or even an assessment framework. We have asked NHS trusts, Public Health England and care commissioning groups about any training given to school immunisation teams but have not had a response at the time of writing.

The Process of Empowering our Children

A multi focus approach is needed to empower children to make an informed decision which will stand up to possible scrutiny and judgement by peers and teachers. Putting our emotions aside, we can equip our children to anticipate and manage the consequences of standing by the decisions they may have to make in our absence.

Listening and being child-led are key to this process. It is vital to keep communication open and non-judgemental, regardless of the direction the child is taking. It is hard to support your child in their choice if communication breaks down and you subsequently don’t know the entire picture.

▪︎ Be mindful of how difficult it is for a child to juggle the expectations of other people in positions of authority, peer pressure, and the wishes and beliefs of parents. Your child will respond to what you do, not what you say. They will either follow what you do or do the opposite, depending on how they feel about you and their own sense of what is right.

▪︎ Regardless of how difficult this process is for you, come alongside your child to build a foundation of knowledge as a solid basis for future critical thinking, rather than avoiding the issue in the hope that it does not exist or doesn’t affect you, and them.

▪︎ Every child is different and will have different motivators. You know your child better than anybody. A child driven by performance, or by being “good”, will respond differently to a child motivated by acceptance, for example. Use your unique knowledge of your child and what drives them to enlighten, prepare and empower them.

Take your time. Plan for several sessions and discussions. Prepare beforehand.

Why the Parent’s Respect for the Child’s Choice is Important

Parenting the decision-making process built on free will is far more powerful than imposing your point of view on your child. The reality is that your children will have to make decisions increasingly by themselves as they get older and they may have to communicate their choice independently and robustly in a situation where their right to privacy may not be honoured.

Understanding the Decision-Making Process using Identity Aspects

Guiding your child through a sound decision-making process, by allowing them to deconstruct and analyse the issue against key aspects of their own identity provides them with a vital life skill. It will also add to their development and understanding of who they are in this world. Consider gradually introducing concepts you wish them to consider, pacing the effort so as not to overwhelm. You may start by selecting topics of interest to them as research subjects first.

▪︎ Mind: Prepare the process by discussing your child’s own perceived strengths. Keep age and level of independence as your guides and be child-led in terms of pace and scope. Find examples where they were able to firmly stand their ground on issues important to them.

▪︎ Free Will: A child communicating a decision made of their own free will is more robust and confident when faced with scrutiny from peers and authority figures. A child acting from a place of obedience or compliance is more easily influenced by others and can become distressed. It is important that you and your child understand, without judgement, where they are on this spectrum of independence and work out how best to support them.

Page 2 of 6 🔗 Go-to page 1

▪︎ Knowledge: Discuss with your child the importance of having a broad-spectrum knowledge base from which to begin the process of making an informed choice. Explore their current level of knowledge, have them ask questions and plan how to acquire the information lacking.

Constructing the Decision-Making Process

Don’t be afraid to discuss the science behind the illness and the vaccine. We make science-based decisions about all sorts of things on a daily basis: foods we eat, medical interventions we choose, etc. Use a variety of reputable resources. If you find inconsistencies over time or across agencies, compose questions about these together.

▪︎ Before broaching the issue: Decide on a topic they are interested in and compare the results of a Google search against a different search engine or the coverage of one media outlet against another. Using this skill, look at research on a topic of their choosing and examine who commissioned/funded each item and why. Explain what conflicts of interest are. Examine information sources, their ‘community standards’ and how they influence our perceptions. Highlight vague or propaganda language and the fact that sometimes it’s not what is said but what is left out that causes distortion of facts. Give examples of media stories with a slant. Before examining the facts that are presented, unpack information sources and question with your child how reliable they are and whom they represent.

▪︎ Vaccination Risk/Benefit Analysis: Look up and discuss what the media and school say are the benefits and risks of choosing to have this vaccination. Regardless of your parental viewpoint, don’t gloss over the benefits. Transparency and authenticity are pivotal to your child trusting you on the issue. Your child will be deluged with the benefits of vaccinations at school, so the importance of unpacking the risk/benefit ratio is essential for them to be able to develop a sound decision-making process.

The next step is to explore official documentation on risk. Once you have the data, you can prepare a risk/benefit analysis. This can be a table or a pair of lists of pros and cons. Be sure to weight the items according to how important they are to your child by prioritising them. Depending on your child, it may be appropriate to have factual references next to each of those points so they can then count or discount certain points depending on the evidence they have researched.

Social, Emotional and Societal Pressure.

▪︎ Consequences of making the decision: Be mindful of your child’s personality and their confidence in standing up in situations where they are in a minority. Be sensitive to how difficult this prospect may be for them and how that could influence their decision. It is important they realise that agreeing to have the vaccine because they don’t want people to be mean to them is not consent. Discuss the concept of being a leader and a follower and the consequence of being either. It is important that they know they have the right to say if they are being made to feel uncomfortable.

▪︎ People in Position of Authority: Help your child to identify when people in a position of authority are voicing opinion rather than fact and to recognise this in other life situations.

▪︎ Standing Strong: If your child’s opinion is different from the one being presented by the school, empower them to challenge this in a way that shows they are critically thinking rather than being rebellious. They may want to ask about the danger Covid-19 poses to their age group or seek their teacher’s opinion on any of the reserch they have done with you.

▪︎ A Right to Privacy: Ensure your child understands that they have the right to make their decision without having to justify it. Their medical choices shouldn’t have to be discussed with teachers, strangers or in front of their school friends. If your child has made their decision with you and is being challenged at school to justify their choice, they can simply refuse to engage in debate.

Page 3 of 6 🔗 Go-to page 1

It is when going against a parent’s decision that a child should be assessed for competence and prove they have the required knowledge, not otherwise.

▪︎ Logistics: Prepare your child for the logistics of how vaccines are likely to be administered in a school environment and discuss coping strategies based on their decision. Having prior notice of vaccine administration day is important and there may be a build-up in conversations at the school. They may feel singled out on the day if they have chosen not to have the vaccine.

You could discuss scenario-based coping strategies to help them through. Consideration may be given to missing school on the day of the vaccine administration. If your child is anxious about the whole situation, then this tactic could be used as an avoidance strategy. Be aware that catch-up days are often not announced in advance, so it is possible that the school vaccination clinic may be set up again, without notice, to ‘mop up’ those who have not yet received the vaccine. In the long term the decision will still have to be made.

▪︎ Coping Strategies: Discuss how to conduct or avoid the discussion by using avoidance, abstinence or measured responses. If the children are asked to put their hand up in class to identify their vaccination choice, they may choose not to participate. In a conversation, they can bring up a new topic. If they wish to discuss the issue, they can carry an item that exemplifies their decision, e.g. their risk/benefit analysis. This will help reinforce that theirs was a thoughtful decision-making process, although it is important they know that they are under no obligation to do this. They could simply smile and walk away. Let your child know that you are a team and that you will support them in their choices.

Acknowledging your child’s feelings about what is going on with class mates on a daily basis is important to avoid your child becoming anxious or even depressed about it. Encourage your child to maintain friendships with those who have made different decisions from theirs. They are not enemies all of a sudden just because they have different views. Also, that when they are ready and, on their terms, then a discussion between them is healthy and can even strengthen their friendship through mutual respect.

Body Autonomy and changing one’s mind.

If a child consents to receiving a vaccine, this is not irrevocable. They can change their mind at any time, up to the moment the vaccine is about to be administered. All they need to say is “I have changed my mind, I don’t want it”. Talk to your child about what words they would use should they ever find themselves in that situation. They may feel confident and say they are withdrawing their consent, or they may want to express that they are really not sure about it and would prefer to delay. The wording is secondary. What matters is that they decline having the vaccine at that time.

In the unlikely event that they are being ignored, they have every right to get up and leave or to physically resist. We do not expect this to ever become necessary but even without going to extremes, it can be helpful to get up or to leave the room as a gesture of finality and to show that no discussion is wanted.

Advocating for your Child

If you feel that your child is at risk of making a medical decision without fully understanding the consequences or due to pressure from others, consider writing a calm, measured letter to the school.

You could state that you do not believe your child understands the consequences of accepting or declining the vaccine and therefore lacks Gillick competence. Warn them that you will ask to see verbatim records of how such competence was assessed. You could also say that you do not believe their consent would be lawful due to pressure from others.

Page 4 of 6 🔗Go-to page 1

Cont: medical information with regards to children

Appendix 1 – Ways to identify undue influence:

The following points are adapted from Biderman’s Chart of Coercion (various versions are available online), originally published by Amnesty International in a report on torture. It has since been used for domestic abuse cases and can also help parents identify undue influence exerted on their child. Remember to check your own influence on your child as well.

▪︎Induced fear of losing social support or of being discredited or ridiculed

▪︎ Rejection of alternate information and separate opinions. Rules exist about permissible topics to discuss. Communication is highly controlled.

▪︎Negative consequences for any actions that show resistance or independence

▪︎ Wearing someone out
emotionally so that resistance becomes too costly; compliance in order to be left alone.

▪︎ Being singled out or publicly shamed

▪︎ Prolonged pressure to change one’s mind

▪︎Told or implied that bad things will happen if they don’t comply; implied blame for the suffering of others; non-compliance labelled “selfish”

▪︎ Not respecting body autonomy

▪︎Rules that are illogical or contradictory but have to be followed because they are rules

Appendix 2 – Quality of Information.

When performing research, it is important to assess the quality of information that is most readily accessible. These days, the first few pages of results from any online search are from sources that agree with government policy and may not reflect best science. Below are some examples allowing you to compare and assess data sources for independence and balance.

1. Look up the community guidelines if it is a social media site. For example YouTube community guidelines say: “YouTube doesn’t allow content that … contradicts local health authorities’ or the World Health Organization’s (WHO) medical information about COVID-19.“

2. Watch reporting from a mainstream news outlet  Do you find balanced information being broadcast?

3. Check the funding and collaboration patterns of the information source in questions. For example the UK medicines regulator MHRA has published its board members’ conflicts of interest or check the conflict of interest information included in any medical journal publications.

4. Pick out a leaflet or learning material from school and talk about whether it gives balanced information or reads like promotional material. For example, here is one that has been critiqued by a UK GP.

5. Compare the language of how dissenting voices are portrayed, for example here vs here.

6. Review these articles in the New York Times and the BMJ and consider the consequences on available information.

7. On 11th September 2019 a doctor from the Wellcome Trust appeared on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme blaming anti-vaxxers for the resurgence of Scarlet Fever. However, the UK has never had routine Scarlet Fever vaccinations. What does this mean and how does it affect their trustworthiness?

8. Compare internet searches for “children covid vaccination” to “bmj children covid vaccination” or “lancet children covid vaccination”. The BMJ and Lancet are world-leading medical journals. How do the results compare?

Appendix 3 – Data sources

Once you are ready to start looking at the actual data, you will need sources that are reliable and well referenced. It would not be right for us to tell you what information to look up or how much weight to give to each. However, if you don’t know where to start, some of the following points may be helpful.

Sources:

UK medicines regulator MHRA information on vaccines safety

Office of National Statistics Coronavirus data.

BMJ – a leading medical journal
The Lancet Infectious Diseases – a leading medical journal.

Pubmed – international database of medical research and scientific literature.

The Green Book – UK government immunisation manual.

VAERS – US based vaccines adverse events reporting system.

Some questions to challenge yourself:

1. How has official advice changed over time?

Page 5 of 6 🔗 Go-page 1

Cont: About Medical Consent and how to protect our children

2. What was official policy a year ago (e.g. on wearing masks, vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations)? What is the policy now?

3.How is vaccine efficacy measured?

4. Do all scientists agree that the measure is adequate?

5. Why is there a campaign asking that all clinical trial data should be made public, not just what pharmaceutical companies choose to publish; why does it matter?

6.Is there a scientific consensus that vaccinating children against Covid-19 is a good idea?

7.What does the government’s Green Book say?

8.Does the vaccine stop someone from contracting Covid-19 or from spreading it?

Appendix 4 – Consent process check list relating to children under 16

This list is based on UK regulatory guidelines and best practice (General Medical Council) and is aimed at most common situations. Its aim is to help parents and medical staff ensure that parental consent to any intervention has lawfully been obtained and to encourage best practice.

Children should be included in the process as appropriate to their level of maturity.
Has valid consent been obtained from the patient?

▪︎ Has required information been given in ways the parent/child can understand?

▪︎ This should include diagnosis & prognosis, any uncertainties, treatment options incl. option not to treat, purpose of each treatment, incl. any risks and likelihood of success, side-effects & complications, in particular serious adverse outcomes.

▪︎Has the information been given in a balanced way, disclosing any conflicts of interest?

▪︎ Has the parent / child been encouraged to ask questions?

▪︎Have staff checked if the information is understood and whether more information is wanted?

▪︎ Has the parent or child been told they can change their mind at any time?

▪︎ Have they been given time to decide?

▪︎ No pressure has been put on parents and their decision has been respected?

▪︎ Are the medical staff involved suitably trained, have sufficient knowledge of the proposed investigation or treatment, incl. risks involved, and understand the GMC guidelines?

▪︎ If consent is given by a competent minor, has all relevant information been provided and discussed before they were assessed as competent to understand such information?

Page 6 of 6 🔗 Go-to page 1

#SaveOurChildren
#ProtectOurChildren
#StopTheDepopShot
#ArrestAllComplicit

🔗 Source: Consent✔

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

🇺🇸 USA, USA 👍👍America is back! Thank you Grand Ole Opry for having me on the show tonight! I sure have missed you! 🇺🇸

🔗 Credit and Sourcr: Lee Greenwood

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

BREAKING: Facebook Whistleblowers Expose LEAKED INTERNAL DOCS Detailing New Effort to Secretly Censor Vaccine Concerns on a Global Scale

#ExposeFacebook

27/05/2021

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

🇺🇸Hi Patriotic Americans; please do your bit to put a stop to this outright evil.

The Biden Administration has incredibly given permission to U.S. embassies to fly the Black Lives Matter (BLM) flag alongside the American flag for the rest of the year.

This order is an outrageous and insulting affront to American identity and sovereignty, and must be rescinded immediately!

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to demand that U.S. embassies around the world fly the American flag ONLY!

🔗SIGN PETITION

The BLM organization and movement have been linked to the following radical actions and ideas:

• Violent protests and the general destabilization of our society
• Defunding of our police departments
• The overthrow of the nuclear family
• Perpetual marxist revolution
And, only a miniscule proportion of the American population supports the radical ideology and actions of the BLM organization and movement.

In fact, polling shows that a strong majority of Americans believe that "All Lives Matter.

Page 1 of 2

Cont: Americans believe that "All Lives Matter," rather than just the lives of just one race of Americans.

Of course, wishing to eliminate racism is something positive, but NOT by conflating that good desire with the offensive actions and ideology linked to the BLM organization and movement.

The United States should never send the signal that foreign governments should align themselves with the tenets of the BLM organization and movement in order to curry favor with our government.

Certainly, our foreign allies and partners will see this for the type of pernicious cultural imperialism which it is.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to the State Department to rescind permission to fly the BLM flag at U.S. embassies with immediate effect.

After signing, please consider CONTACTING the State Department directly to politely voice your dismay at this new directive. Contact details can be found at the bottom of the page after clicking on any link.

Thank you!

Yours faithfully,

Scott Schittl and the entire LifeSite Team

PS - CLICK HERE to SIGN this petition which urges the U.S. State Department to rescind the directive allowing the BLM flag to be flown at U.S. embassies around the world.

Thank you!

Page 2 of 2 🔗Go-to Page 1

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

Jeremy Hunt asks is it time to 'vaccinate' children?

Let's all get in touch with the publicly available details and tell him what you think?

Parliament number: 020 7219 6813

Constituency number: 01428 609416

Local constituency email: agent@swsca.co.uk

Parliamentary email: huntj@parliament.uk