Woke is totally against friend-enemy, they criminalise and neutralise foes, individuals - private rather than public enemies. This is a liberal norm: negation of state and the political. The chaotic spread follows dissolution of law and state, neutralising force is then left to individuals, society.
This is why it appears mad. The individual who was 'left to be his own priest, poet, philosopher, and king' is now left to be his own state. The 'cathedral of his personality' grows monstrously. Man is a state to another man.
Otherwise, it is an elemental force of anti-colonialism.
This is why it appears mad. The individual who was 'left to be his own priest, poet, philosopher, and king' is now left to be his own state. The 'cathedral of his personality' grows monstrously. Man is a state to another man.
Otherwise, it is an elemental force of anti-colonialism.
The political and the philosophical are the maelstrom of myth.
"If you think about what propositional identity entails, you can see why the left thinks that words are violence. If you just existentially are your beliefs, they are."
I don't think this works. The woke left don't have existential beliefs, something they would die for. The defense of microaggressions are against confronting anything dangerous, whether opposed beliefs or simply having to struggle in the world.
Often their beliefs were only a political lever used as and against the ruling naive political legalism.
The will to equality is at least a thousand years old. And it was taken up by so many different people, classes, ideologies, and governments it cannot be propositional. Or at the least the proposition has become an undeniable force.
At the same time, the number of Nietzschean thinkers has grown alongside the complete abandonment of the poetic mind. Total opposition to everything but the will does not push them towards poetic thought, but instead to other types of rationalism and physicalism. What is behind this?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ImperiumPressOfficial/1740
I don't think this works. The woke left don't have existential beliefs, something they would die for. The defense of microaggressions are against confronting anything dangerous, whether opposed beliefs or simply having to struggle in the world.
Often their beliefs were only a political lever used as and against the ruling naive political legalism.
The will to equality is at least a thousand years old. And it was taken up by so many different people, classes, ideologies, and governments it cannot be propositional. Or at the least the proposition has become an undeniable force.
At the same time, the number of Nietzschean thinkers has grown alongside the complete abandonment of the poetic mind. Total opposition to everything but the will does not push them towards poetic thought, but instead to other types of rationalism and physicalism. What is behind this?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ImperiumPressOfficial/1740
Telegram
Imperium Press
If you think about what propositional identity entails, you can see why the left thinks that words are violence. If you just existentially are your beliefs, they are.
Just a note that the will to equality is an important idea in Tocqueville's political philosophy. It does not imply support for equality.
Even if the sleeping king awakes he may not remember his role until he overcomes the intoxication of his dreams.
Men can struggle to find eternity. Women have it, in monstrous form, by nature of birth.
Socrates was killed because in decadent times great men are feared as titans.
No one would ever cry out, "Dare to be comedic men!" It just doesn't have the same ring to it. Every age and war has its own aesthetic. Tragedy outside of its time could only be catastrophe, life-denial.
Lessing's prophecy of a third, silent Testament is something other than second-religiousness. This is the ground that confronts Nietzsche, and every nihilist, every theologian.
Quantus tremor est futurus - Actaeon Journal
Let's strip away the bullshit. A hairless and near senseless animal has no fear-inducing physiological power. Being able to lift 10% of an ape and having 1% of its natural killing power will never be an achievement. Take the Epimethean Pill.
Anyone who disputes this just needs to read the ancient training manuals for war. They trained through hunting because animals present natural danger, higher instincts. Man training against man can only be an art form or decadence.
Two-hundred years of war and America could not generate a better theorist than a surrender-monkey who visited their country for a few weeks.
When one hears the American there is little more than an accounting of ammunition stockpiles, off on some horizon. He accumulates ammunition to the same degree that he would never bring the stockpile to use.
The American will-to-power can only be understood in this context.
When one hears the American there is little more than an accounting of ammunition stockpiles, off on some horizon. He accumulates ammunition to the same degree that he would never bring the stockpile to use.
The American will-to-power can only be understood in this context.
Well-deserved. And the most honest thing said about America since Tocqueville.
Tocqueville retroactively refuted Nuremberg 2.0.
Extreme: A million monkeys on a million computers.
Sensible centre: A million monkeys on one computer.
Sensible centre: A million monkeys on one computer.
Extreme: Conservatism has conserved nothing.
Sensible centre: 'Insert Token To Play Again' YES!
Sensible centre: 'Insert Token To Play Again' YES!
In Schmittean terms, free speech is the legal form of public opinion, the expression of active constitution-making power. The public must be present, not merely represented.
Whether or not free speech has power depends on real political struggle. As private or business calculations it has little power - even less if there is mediation and representation. What can freedom of speech be if all right to assembly has ended?
Whether or not free speech has power depends on real political struggle. As private or business calculations it has little power - even less if there is mediation and representation. What can freedom of speech be if all right to assembly has ended?