While I sympathise, the reality is that your congressman is unlikely to listen to you, spamming remigration memes on twitter will not influence them. The political system based on discourse is dead, and what they are planning is simply to make use of the immigration crisis, give it direction. (This is why Trump says on the one hand they will seal the border, and on the other that they will let the people back in. Immigration cannot be confronted as a political problem anymore, it is greater than this. This is apart from the problem that the political no longer exists.)

If you want to stop immigration then other methods of influence will be necessary, most likely this is limited to preparing for another crisis or limiting migrant camps in some areas, as the Irish are attempting. Just remember that millions of people protested the Iraq War and it was not enough.
Maybe you can speak with a few minor figures in government, but most likely your congressman thinks in the same way as an intelligence agent, or the emergency services worker who enforced Covid lockdowns.

You can't vote out the homunculus.

"Homunculus, as a being to whom actuality is absolutely clear and transparent, beholds the inner being of the sleeping Faust. But because everything is transparent to his spirit, the spirit has no point for him. He does not reason; he wants to act."
~ Goethe

Heine perfectly addressed the anti-intellectual problem we face today.

"When one saw such depressing idiocy sprouting out of philosophy and growing into such harmful blossoms; when one indeed noted that German youth, sunk in metaphysical abstractions, was forgetting its nearest temporal interests and becoming unfit for practical life; indeed, patriots and friends of liberty must have felt a justified annoyance with philosophy, and some went so far as to condemn it out of hand as pointless and useless hot air.
We will not be foolish enough to refute these malcontents all too seriously. German philosophy is an important matter affecting the entire humanrace, and only our most distant descendants will be able to decide whether we should be praised or reproached for first working out our philosophy before working out our revolution. It seems to me that a methodical people like us had to begin with the Reformation, could only on that basis occupy itself with philosophy, and solely after its completion be able to pass over to political revolution. I find this order to be eminently rational. After philosophy has used its heads for contemplation, the revolution can cut them off for whatever purposes it wants."

https://news.1rj.ru/str/thewanderingspartan/1640

The question for us is not so simple as beginning from an anti-intellectual revolution, a condition that one must adapt to or be forgotten. This is capitulation, a thoughtless revolution which can only be strengthened by a retreat into the senses, a revolution with the goal that no one would be able to distinguish victory from defeat.

The nationalist response to intellectual weakness cannot only be negative, it must propose its own ideas and forms. In any case, pure action would still give rise to new intellectual efforts and even revitalise current intellectual groupings.

"The intellectual speaks and writes "I." He feels no connectedness. He causes disintegration, the disintegration of the mass of individual beings into the particularized individual being, who henceforth stands not under and not over the people, but at their side. The means by which this is accomplished is the misunderstood concept of "education." Education in the German sense (Bi/dung) means giving form, both inner and outer. Form, however, can only be given where there is content, and content comes only from an idea. An idea always manifests a connectedness. A thought stands alone and is produced in a brain. An idea is something mutual. It grows out of the tensions between one individual and another. Where there is tension, there is also connectedness. For the intellectual, education is at most a highly developed acrobatics of thought and always only the property of the "I." The arrogance attached to the concept of education could only have arisen in the intellectual's conception, and this conception could only flourish in the empty space in which the intellectual lives. The emphatic "we" of the new generation is a clear renunciation of intellectualism. The "we" of the young, nationalistic generation comes about consciously. We-that is the still small group of men and, in the broad sense, masculine youth-have gone beyond mere renunciation to establish values in place of the old ones or in the empty space."
~ Ernst von Salomon

As van Salomon says, it is a misconceived education that the nationalist struggles against, an intellectualism without responsibility to the whole. The nationalist wants an intellectualism of service which stands above or below the mass, not at its side. It cannot be the state or one of its separate powers, instead it acts as the responsible arm of the state – and where the state is fallen it acts in the sense of the fatherland, as an inner inheritance. The thinking man must bring together connectedness and tension, then one may speak of an intellectualist "Gestalt", an education as the property of dominion and form. The blood which refuses education altogether is merely another type of disintegration and disconnection. Blood must have content, organs, "Bildung", otherwise it falls to that oldest of martial rules, as told by Menenius in his speech to the plebs.

New political compass just dropped.

1985 BC - Deucalion! We're going to Based Island!

“Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more.”

"NO TAX ON TIPS!"

You guys may have missed my anti-election memes.

I hate having to enter the discourse, but there are certain lines you do not cross.

On Myron’s Cow

"That you are most splendid and could be the jewel of Admetos’ herd;
That you seem to come from the drove of the sungod himself:—
All that fills me with wonder and moves me to praise of the artist.
But that you can also show motherly feelings—that touches my soul."

"It was certainly not Myron's goal to achieve a realism that vies with nature."
Goethe's essay on Myron's Cow. How does one interpret a lost work? The poetic epigrammes so often failed at this. That nature is drawn to it is not enough, the artist had loftier expectations – just as his depictions of athletes were dedications to Zeus the realist nature serves other subjects than base movements, expressions; the cow's lowing which is hardly distinguishable except to the ear of the herder or the calf.
Then too the poet's voice is distinguished from the hand of the sculptor.

Carl Schmitt noted the various “deficiencies and mistakes” which had led to the crisis of parliamentary democracy a century ago: "the dominance of parties, their unprofessional politics of personalities, "the government of amateurs," continuing governmental crises, the purposelessness and banality of parliamentary debate, the declining standard of parliamentary customs, the destructive methods of parliamentary obstruction, the misuse of parliamentary immunities and privileges by a radical opposition which is contemptuous of parliamentarism itself, the undignified daily order of business, the poor attendance in the House."