𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝔸𝕖𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕞 – Telegram
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝔸𝕖𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕞
374 subscribers
14.4K photos
4.82K videos
80 files
19.8K links
The highest voltage takes on science, current events, and more!
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Andrew Bridgen
These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.

Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.

Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”

Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”

Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”

Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”

Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”

Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”

Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”

Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”

Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”

Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”

Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”

Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”

Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”

Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”

https://news.1rj.ru/str/ABridgen
🔥4
Forwarded from UNN
'Alien invasion' to cause financial crash.

This is in the Sunday Times lol.
🤔3😱1
Forwarded from Slavyangrad (J Asbery)
‼️🇺🇸👽"This will forever change humanity": Trump will announce the first contact with aliens at the 2026 World Cup

▪️This is claimed by British director Mark Christopher Lee, quoted by the Daily Star.

▪️Trump intends to make an announcement at the 2026 World Cup that "will forever change humanity", the director said.

▪️According to his information, the US president has already prepared a speech, which he will deliver on July 8: in this address, Trump will confirm humanity's first contact with an extraterrestrial civilization in history.

▪️Mark Christopher Lee is a British director and documentarian who makes films on topics related to UFOs, paranormal phenomena, and extraterrestrial contacts.

👀

@Slavyangrad
🤔4
Forwarded from Science Cringe
😳 Can't work? Too hard? 😳

"Congress warned that NASA’s current plan for Artemis 'cannot work'" - Eric Berger, Ars Technica, 04DEC2025

>In recent months, it has begun dawning on US lawmakers that, absent significant intervention, China will land humans on the Moon before the United States can "return" there with the Artemis Program.

>The most stringent criticism of the Artemis Program was offered by former NASA Administrator Mike Griffin. He has long been a critic of NASA’s approach toward establishing what the space agency views as a “sustainable” path back to the Moon, which relies on reusable lunar landers that are refueled in space.

>“The bottom line is that an architecture which requires a high number of refueling flights in low-Earth orbit, no one really knows how many, uses a technology that has not yet ever been demonstrated in space, is very unlikely to work—unlikely to the point where I will say it cannot work,” Griffin said.

https://archive.ph/5x1J0
(American Manned Moon Landings)
🤔1
This video is basically what is going on. The CIA began stealing the money of our enemies, in places like Laos. There Ted Shackley rolled in with a MAC-V-SOG group and took over the opium farms being run by some general and funding the VC in Vietnam. Shackley kept the farms running and the opium flowing, and pocketed the cash, and from there, CIA began to become a criminal organization of thieves. It was inevitable a sophisticated ring of thieves with limitless intel and capabilities would eventually realize the deepest pockets to steal from were those of the United States government and its taxpayers. Unfortunately the more they stole, the more powerful they became, the bigger the surveillance machine they could unleash on us in our neighborhoods to control us, and the more distracted Americans became as they suddenly had to work every waking moment just to survive, leaving no time to run for office, or notice the theft, or do anything about it. And that is where we are now.
🔥2
Forwarded from Today I Learned
TIL about the 3.5% rule, a theory that states that when 3.5% of the population of a country protest nonviolently against an authoritarian government, that government is likely to fall, and they tend to lead to more democratic regimes.
https://ift.tt/HCJY2i9
🤔2
Concept art from Paul Verhoeven's original vision for Starship Troopers which had to be scrapped after Warner Bros. refused to license the IP. [Kev Brockschmidt, Illustrator https://kevbrockschmidt.wordpress.com/tag/starship-troopers/]
🔥2
Great review of The Brave and the Bold, third book in The Hidden Truth series.
https://amzn.to/3SpMAPK

"Schantz’s world building is, I think the make or break aspect of the book, and really the whole series, for most people. He goes into great detail describing the secret history behind the development of many technologies we take for granted today, as well as recapping some of the physics that the Circle is trying to keep secret. The intent is both to help the reader understand on a base level what the Circle is up to and how they go about accomplishing their goals of containing technological development and disrupting Western Civilization. Some readers might find the level of detail excessive. On the other hand, I find it draws me in even further, making the book difficult to put down to say the least. Part of that is because the author does such a good job describing things in an accessible way and the other is that most of the details are actually true. It makes you realize that the free market has never really been free."

https://upstreamreviews.substack.com/p/review-the-brave-and-the-bold-by
👍1
Forwarded from Illusion of deception
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🖊 Sometimes our brain can ignore familiar details
🔥1