This email was just sent to the offices of the inspector general of the department of Health & Human Services (HHS).
It relates to the issue of HUGE variability, lot-to-lot, of outcomes after vaccination with any of the covid19 vaccines (in USA).
There’s no doubt that a very serious crime is taking place.
Even if you believed everything that government is telling you, we have a MAJOR problem. It’s impossible that they don’t know about this. The extent of variability is so large, very different from flu vaccines, that an idle scroll through the VAERS database (imported into XL & subjected to the simplest filter, numbers of serious adverse events against lot number) has the main finding leaping at you.
Roughly once in every hundred lines, you come across a lot number with which is associated an incredibly high number of SAEs, spread across the majority of US states.
It can be stated with certainty that, whatever is in the vials of those lot numbers, IT IS NOT THE SAME MATERIAL AS IN THE OTHER LOTS OF THE SAME VACCINE.
Additionally, the manufacturers & all the regulatory agencies ALSO KNOW ABOUT THIS.
The reason(s) for this extraordinary degree of variability is not immediately relevant to the next steps.
There is in the code of federal regulations, a CFR number relating to the legal obligation to produce only consistent product. A failure to adhere to the requirements results in product which is deemed ADULTERATED. It’s a very serious crime. Not only is it an issue for FDA , but it’s a legal matter for everyone involved in administering these products.
If it turns out that FDA, under the guise of EUA, has waived the consistency requirements, this in no way absolves the manufacturers from this crime. Note that the indemnities they’ve secured from governments (that alleged injured parties cannot sue) are of absolutely no relevance. They CAN be sued for deviation from federal regulations relating to adulterated product (independent of the consequences of product variability ).
I’m reminded that certain Mafia bosses were jailed for years, not because of murders, but because of tax fraud.
This lot-to-lot variability MUST be told to the public & to vaccinators.
They should be horrified at what is happening in real time.
Best wishes,
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon



 Just FYI, I went online to the Office of Inspector General for HHS  

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Office of Inspector General)

I filed the following report online:

As I also used Sasha's and Craig's work, I provided them your emails in case they wish to contact you.

============================

Gentlemen:

I work in Medicare sales as a licensed agent, licensed in 50 states and DC.  I have taken the AHIP a dozen times since 2009 with 99% average score, lowest score 98, highest score 100.  Previously, I've worked in the medical field since 1979, and this is the most outrageous fraud I've ever seen, and much greater of a fraud than any I've read about in our Medicare training via either AHIP or the 30+ insurance carriers I am appointed with.  I formerly worked in the regulatory field as a Medical Physicist, having NRC oversight of our radioisotope biomedical tracers, radio-pharmaceuticals, radio-diagnostics and radioisotope therapies, at a major medical research facility (Veterans Administration, partnered with the University of California).

Part of our licensing requirement in Medicare is to be aware of frauds and the requirement to report them if observed.  I have never had to report frauds previously (in Medicare; occasionally minor ones at the hospital decades ago).

A few weeks ago I came across information that not all of the Pfizer, Moderna and J&J batches are of the same consistency/quality.  About 1% of the batches, for each of those companies, represent about 99.5% of the Adverse Events (AE) in our VAERS adverse event reporting system.  

This is statistically impossible unless there is an underlying cause creating those 1% of the batches as inconsistent (and deadly).

This is a fraud, because they were required to show to FDA that they had a consistent manufacturing process, which would yield essentially similar product for distribution to Americans.  In fact, their product is highly adulterated in about 1% of the batches, for some kind of unauthorized/unapproved test/experiment using Americans as guinea pigs.  This has caused thousands to tens of thousands of AE in those batches, including thousands of deaths, whereas the bulk of the batches typically have 0-3 AE, most of those at the 0-1 AE range.

This was first detailed to me in a video prepared by Dr. Paardekooper, in which he analyzed the VAERS data for the 50 states, creating an Excel data spreadsheet, showing the number of AE in each state, for each particular batch number (10s of thousands of batches).  This was displayed horizontally for each state, spread across the sheet alphabetically.

Most of the lines (one line for each batch number) would have 1 or 2 AE in 1 or 2 States.  Every hundred or so lines, that batch number would have upwards of thousands of AE, with many States having 100s of AE (usually larger states).

As I did not wish to rely solely on his research, I replicated his results, by downloading the VAERS data available form our VAERS website, utilized the Pivot function, and related the batch number to the States where the VAERS report was generated.  I obtained the exact same data he had obtained, and wrote/spoke about on his first video on the topic, here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6xIYPZBkydsu/

If you email me, I will email you my VAERS spreadsheet which is nearly identical to the one he prepared.

You can generate your own data spreadsheet if you follow his tutorial, here:  
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EPQPrWBQzi6d/

Since, then, he's gone on to do further analysis, and in particular with the Moderna batches which have some of them (about 1%) with a letter inserted in the middle of a string of numbers, A, B, C ... and so forth.  In the Moderna alphabetic batches, there are a staggeringly large number of AE for each of those batches, which he describes in these videos:

Batch Codes and Toxicity:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/3RtUTid1XCqi/

Breaking the Code:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/g62gcJrOuOYu/

Moderna Alphabet Coding: https://www.bitchute.com/video/vImdZ7WsV9iW/

Death by Alphabet: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OG1NLvZQ4JFu/

Death by Alphabet - Part 3:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/R3Q9jHu1BG0Y/

Disability by Alphabet:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/C4UJNsiH82sR/

Which Pfizer Batch Codes are Toxic:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/km7HOyzguuK6/

In addition, another investigator (Alexandra Latypova) with strong biomedical background has analyzed the overall anomalous characteristic of the batches as being highly inconsistent, compared to all prior Flu vaccines, here.  This is because of the 1% anomalous batches mixed in with the 99% regular batches:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4HlIyBmOEJeY/

This is a developing scandal that needs immediate investigation.  I'm not certain if our FDA will be investigating, though I have asked them to do so.  

This information is being spread broadly to many scientists, and it would be nice to know that you are taking this seriously, and developing an immediate investigation.

After viewing those videos, you should immediately contact FDA and direct them to stay, or halt, the EUA approval that has been granted for those problem vaccines, until it can be determined how this came about.

No prior vaccine program ever had this kind of problem, not even remotely similar, with the possible exception of a bad vaccine that was immediately recalled after a few tens of deaths [not after thousands, like here, all coming from the 1% bad ("toxic") batches.]

Please email me immediately to verify that you received this and are initiating an investigation.

Best regards,
Walter Wagner

The hospital payments include:

A “free” required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.

Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.

Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.

A 20 percent “boost” bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.

Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.

More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.

A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.

CMS implemented “value-based” payment programs that track data such as how many workers at a healthcare facility receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Now we see why many hospitals implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They are paid more.

https://aapsonline.org/bidens-bounty-on-your-life-hospitals-incentive-payments-for-covid-19/

❗️Russia: Car disappears down roadworks hole

A Monday feeling video from the city of Kursk, as a vehicle drops into a hole dug for repair works.

The driver wasn't injured. The company "Quadra - Power Generation” reported that a dilapidated heating main was being repaired.

Subscribe to RT t.me/rtnews

The Fire Blanket Theory

The ratio of synonymous to non-synonymous mutations* in the Omicron genome is highly suspect. You would expect a variant with as many mutations as Omicron to have "rolled the dice" many times, and accumulated many synonymous mutations of no consequence, however it appears Omicron has not only won the lottery many times more than any other variant, it has won the lottery near every time it has bought a ticket. On top of this oddity, its most recent common ancestor is from all the way back in early last year toward the beginning of the pandemic. This has happened before with the Russian flu in 1977, which is now believed to be have started with a lab leak as the H1N1 virus that caused the pandemic was found to be closely related to human influenza viruses that circulated in 1949-1950. Since viruses evolve continuously, gaining many of the synonymous mutations described, this discovery, made in 1978, convinced many scientists that a preserved sample of the virus from mid-20th century found its way out of a lab.

With all this being said:

🦠The denoscription of Project Number 2R01AI110964-06, lead by Peter Daszak, explains that Wuhan scientists were specifically creating novel coronaviruses “with the highest possible infectivity for human cells".

💉Confidential documents reveal Moderna was developing an mRNA coronavirus vaccine before it was widely know there was a novel coronavirus pandemic.

💉There was plentiful pre-pandemic literature on leaky vaccines and vaccine-driven virus evolution.

I propose a conspiracy theory; if the evolutionary map of SARS-CoV-2 was characterized, and the effects of leaky vaccines were understood, could Omicron be the known end-point of this highest possible infectivity project? A variant that would either be brought into existence by this evolutionary environment, or could be released when necessary, like a fire blanket, to end or calm down this global operation?

Could Omicron be the end-point variant of the Wuhan-1 starting genome? Could the virus population have been allowed to stochastically tumble through leaky-assisted virus evolution that was known and characterized before the pandemic had begun, and at the point they saw fit deploy this attenuated variant as an exit strategy?

To be clear; this is wild speculation that may be completely invalidated by new information and does not account for: vaccine contracts and supply lasting many more years, talk of Omicron-specific vaccines, ongoing financial incentives to prolong this situation, etc. But there are of course costs to prolonging this state of things, like key institutions in the power structure rapidly bleeding credibility and prestige, and a population under prolonged parasite stress is not a population that shares their universalist values - there has been an aggressive rise in localism and their astroturfed vaccine tribalism is fragile in comparison, the high prevalence of infectious disease creates personality changes in the precise reverse direction they have been grooming people toward.

*(Genomes are made of units of information called nucleobases, these are the building blocks of genetic information, there are a total of four nucleobases (A, T/U, C, G). In protein translation, a codon is a unit of three nucleobases (eg. AAA), so there are 64 different codons as there are 64 different combinations of 4 different elements in an array that is 3 units long. However the code only needs to include 20 possible amino acids and instructions to start and stop, so there is some redundancy. Some codons are synonymous, meaning they code for the same thing. For example, if a replacement mutation occurs that changes AAA to AAG these will both still be translated as Lysine, this would be a synonymous mutation. As mutations inevitably accumulate many of them will be of this nature, a roll of the dice having no consequence. However if a mutation is non-synonymous, for example AAA to AAC, it will be translated as Asparagine rather than Lysine.)

Corporate journalists are trying to target Odysee because videos like mine aren’t removed (like on YouTube).

Odysee’s reply is top drawer trolling. 🤣

Open letter from The BMJ to Mark Zuckerberg

Dear Mark Zuckerberg,
We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, editors of The BMJ, one of the world’s oldest and most influential general medical journals. We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta.
In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company helping carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial, began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites.
The BMJ commissioned an investigative reporter to write up the story for our journal. The article was published on 2 November, following legal review, external peer review and subject to The BMJ’s usual high level editorial oversight and review.[1]
But from November 10, readers began reporting a variety of problems when trying to share our article. Some reported being unable to share it. Many others reported having their posts flagged with a warning about “Missing context ... Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people.” Those trying to post the article were informed by Facebook that people who repeatedly share “false information” might have their posts moved lower in Facebook’s News Feed. Group administrators where the article was shared received messages from Facebook informing them that such posts were “partly false.”
Readers were directed to a “fact check” performed by a Facebook contractor named Lead Stories.[2]
We find the “fact check” performed by Lead Stories to be inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.
-- It fails to provide any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong
-- It has a nonsensical noscript: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials”
-- The first paragraph inaccurately labels The BMJ a “news blog”
-- It contains a screenshot of our article with a stamp over it stating “Flaws Reviewed,” despite the Lead Stories article not identifying anything false or untrue in The BMJ article
-- It published the story on its website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert”
We have contacted Lead Stories, but they refuse to change anything about their article or actions that have led to Facebook flagging our article.
We have also contacted Facebook directly, requesting immediate removal of the “fact checking” label and any link to the Lead Stories article, thereby allowing our readers to freely share the article on your platform.
There is also a wider concern that we wish to raise. We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence.[3] Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task. Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies on sources such as The BMJ.
We hope you will act swiftly: specifically to correct the error relating to The BMJ’s article and to review the processes that led to the error; and generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall.
Best wishes,
Fiona Godlee, editor in chief
Kamran Abbasi, incoming editor in chief
The BMJ

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80

Dr. Andrew Kaufman Doctor, psychiatrist, forensic and molecular biologist from MIT explains why you should refuse to take any type of "covid test". (42 seconds)

The corporate media has attacked Steve Kirsch (@stkirsch) because he used his resources as a tech founder to fund clinical trials for off-patent early treatment protocols for covid-19.

Comcast blocked Steve from releasing a commercial telling the story of, Maddie De Garay, one of the child-victims of the mRNA shots.

Twitter recently permanently suspended Steve because he dives into the data and openly talks about the dangers of the mRNA shots.

Please consider following him on telegram❗️
t.me/stkirsch

@KanekoaTheGreat

time travel to 1530 and Geneva

"When the bubonic plague struck Geneva in 1530, everything was ready. They even opened a whole hospital for the plague victims. With doctors, paramedics and nurses. The traders contributed, the magistrate gave grants every month. The patients always gave money, and if one of them died alone, all the goods went to the hospital.

But then a disaster happened: the plague was dying out, while the subsidies depended on the number of patients. There was no question of right and wrong for the Geneva hospital staff in 1530. If the plague produces money, then the plague is good. And then the doctors got organized.

At first, they just poisoned patients to raise the mortality statistics, but they quickly realized that the statistics didn't have to be just about mortality, but about mortality from plague. So they began to cut the boils from the bodies of the dead, dry them, grind them in a mortar and give them to other patients as medicine. Then they started dusting clothes, handkerchiefs and garters. But somehow the plague continued to abate. Apparently, the dried buboes didn't work well. Doctors went into town and spread bubonic powder on door handles at night, selecting those homes where they could then profit. As an eyewitness wrote of these events, "this remained hidden for some time, but the devil is more concerned with increasing the number of sins than with hiding them."

In short, one of the doctors became so impudent and lazy that he decided not to wander the city at night, but simply threw a bundle of dust into the crowd during the day. The stench rose to the sky and one of the girls, who by a lucky chance had recently come out of that hospital, discovered what that smell was.

The doctor was tied up and placed in the good hands of competent “craftsmen.” They tried to get as much information from him as possible. However, the execution lasted several days. The ingenious hippocrats were tied to poles on wagons and carried around the city. At each intersection the executioners used red-hot tongs to tear off pieces of meat. They were then taken to the public square, beheaded and quartered, and the pieces were taken to all the districts of Geneva.

The only exception was the hospital director's son, who did not take part in the trial but blurted out that he knew how to make potions and how to prepare the powder without fear of contamination. He was simply beheaded "to prevent the spread of evil".

- François Bonivard, Chronicles of Geneva, second volume, pages 395 - 402

THIS ABSOLUTELY COULD BLOW UP THE VACCINE FRAUD.

Around 1% of batches are very much more toxic than all the rest, as much as 1000X more toxic.

A simple webapp allows to you to find out what you or a relative or friend was given.

Please share it widely. It links to batch codes in VAERS to which serious adverse events including deaths have been reported.

Best wishes
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon

Ps: I didn’t write it. Unable to do that. Independently verified that there is huge variability between batches (4 people at least arrived at same fundamental conclusions)

https://dailyexpose.uk/lotindex/

"We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta."

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80

📌 Follow and Share👇🏻
@RWMaloneMD

A Note to My Well-Credentialed Friends
BY THOMAS HARRINGTON DECEMBER 17, 2021

https://brownstone.org/articles/a-note-to-my-well-credentialed-friends/

📌 Follow and Share👇🏻
@RWMaloneMD