Forwarded from LeakyVax
The Fire Blanket Theory
The ratio of synonymous to non-synonymous mutations* in the Omicron genome is highly suspect. You would expect a variant with as many mutations as Omicron to have "rolled the dice" many times, and accumulated many synonymous mutations of no consequence, however it appears Omicron has not only won the lottery many times more than any other variant, it has won the lottery near every time it has bought a ticket. On top of this oddity, its most recent common ancestor is from all the way back in early last year toward the beginning of the pandemic. This has happened before with the Russian flu in 1977, which is now believed to be have started with a lab leak as the H1N1 virus that caused the pandemic was found to be closely related to human influenza viruses that circulated in 1949-1950. Since viruses evolve continuously, gaining many of the synonymous mutations described, this discovery, made in 1978, convinced many scientists that a preserved sample of the virus from mid-20th century found its way out of a lab.
With all this being said:
🦠The denoscription of Project Number 2R01AI110964-06, lead by Peter Daszak, explains that Wuhan scientists were specifically creating novel coronaviruses “with the highest possible infectivity for human cells".
💉Confidential documents reveal Moderna was developing an mRNA coronavirus vaccine before it was widely know there was a novel coronavirus pandemic.
💉There was plentiful pre-pandemic literature on leaky vaccines and vaccine-driven virus evolution.
I propose a conspiracy theory; if the evolutionary map of SARS-CoV-2 was characterized, and the effects of leaky vaccines were understood, could Omicron be the known end-point of this highest possible infectivity project? A variant that would either be brought into existence by this evolutionary environment, or could be released when necessary, like a fire blanket, to end or calm down this global operation?
Could Omicron be the end-point variant of the Wuhan-1 starting genome? Could the virus population have been allowed to stochastically tumble through leaky-assisted virus evolution that was known and characterized before the pandemic had begun, and at the point they saw fit deploy this attenuated variant as an exit strategy?
To be clear; this is wild speculation that may be completely invalidated by new information and does not account for: vaccine contracts and supply lasting many more years, talk of Omicron-specific vaccines, ongoing financial incentives to prolong this situation, etc. But there are of course costs to prolonging this state of things, like key institutions in the power structure rapidly bleeding credibility and prestige, and a population under prolonged parasite stress is not a population that shares their universalist values - there has been an aggressive rise in localism and their astroturfed vaccine tribalism is fragile in comparison, the high prevalence of infectious disease creates personality changes in the precise reverse direction they have been grooming people toward.
*(Genomes are made of units of information called nucleobases, these are the building blocks of genetic information, there are a total of four nucleobases (A, T/U, C, G). In protein translation, a codon is a unit of three nucleobases (eg. AAA), so there are 64 different codons as there are 64 different combinations of 4 different elements in an array that is 3 units long. However the code only needs to include 20 possible amino acids and instructions to start and stop, so there is some redundancy. Some codons are synonymous, meaning they code for the same thing. For example, if a replacement mutation occurs that changes AAA to AAG these will both still be translated as Lysine, this would be a synonymous mutation. As mutations inevitably accumulate many of them will be of this nature, a roll of the dice having no consequence. However if a mutation is non-synonymous, for example AAA to AAC, it will be translated as Asparagine rather than Lysine.)
The ratio of synonymous to non-synonymous mutations* in the Omicron genome is highly suspect. You would expect a variant with as many mutations as Omicron to have "rolled the dice" many times, and accumulated many synonymous mutations of no consequence, however it appears Omicron has not only won the lottery many times more than any other variant, it has won the lottery near every time it has bought a ticket. On top of this oddity, its most recent common ancestor is from all the way back in early last year toward the beginning of the pandemic. This has happened before with the Russian flu in 1977, which is now believed to be have started with a lab leak as the H1N1 virus that caused the pandemic was found to be closely related to human influenza viruses that circulated in 1949-1950. Since viruses evolve continuously, gaining many of the synonymous mutations described, this discovery, made in 1978, convinced many scientists that a preserved sample of the virus from mid-20th century found its way out of a lab.
With all this being said:
🦠The denoscription of Project Number 2R01AI110964-06, lead by Peter Daszak, explains that Wuhan scientists were specifically creating novel coronaviruses “with the highest possible infectivity for human cells".
💉Confidential documents reveal Moderna was developing an mRNA coronavirus vaccine before it was widely know there was a novel coronavirus pandemic.
💉There was plentiful pre-pandemic literature on leaky vaccines and vaccine-driven virus evolution.
I propose a conspiracy theory; if the evolutionary map of SARS-CoV-2 was characterized, and the effects of leaky vaccines were understood, could Omicron be the known end-point of this highest possible infectivity project? A variant that would either be brought into existence by this evolutionary environment, or could be released when necessary, like a fire blanket, to end or calm down this global operation?
Could Omicron be the end-point variant of the Wuhan-1 starting genome? Could the virus population have been allowed to stochastically tumble through leaky-assisted virus evolution that was known and characterized before the pandemic had begun, and at the point they saw fit deploy this attenuated variant as an exit strategy?
To be clear; this is wild speculation that may be completely invalidated by new information and does not account for: vaccine contracts and supply lasting many more years, talk of Omicron-specific vaccines, ongoing financial incentives to prolong this situation, etc. But there are of course costs to prolonging this state of things, like key institutions in the power structure rapidly bleeding credibility and prestige, and a population under prolonged parasite stress is not a population that shares their universalist values - there has been an aggressive rise in localism and their astroturfed vaccine tribalism is fragile in comparison, the high prevalence of infectious disease creates personality changes in the precise reverse direction they have been grooming people toward.
*(Genomes are made of units of information called nucleobases, these are the building blocks of genetic information, there are a total of four nucleobases (A, T/U, C, G). In protein translation, a codon is a unit of three nucleobases (eg. AAA), so there are 64 different codons as there are 64 different combinations of 4 different elements in an array that is 3 units long. However the code only needs to include 20 possible amino acids and instructions to start and stop, so there is some redundancy. Some codons are synonymous, meaning they code for the same thing. For example, if a replacement mutation occurs that changes AAA to AAG these will both still be translated as Lysine, this would be a synonymous mutation. As mutations inevitably accumulate many of them will be of this nature, a roll of the dice having no consequence. However if a mutation is non-synonymous, for example AAA to AAC, it will be translated as Asparagine rather than Lysine.)
Forwarded from Battleground (Jerm)
Corporate journalists are trying to target Odysee because videos like mine aren’t removed (like on YouTube).
Odysee’s reply is top drawer trolling. 🤣
Odysee’s reply is top drawer trolling. 🤣
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Open letter from The BMJ to Mark Zuckerberg
Dear Mark Zuckerberg,
We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, editors of The BMJ, one of the world’s oldest and most influential general medical journals. We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta.
In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company helping carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial, began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites.
The BMJ commissioned an investigative reporter to write up the story for our journal. The article was published on 2 November, following legal review, external peer review and subject to The BMJ’s usual high level editorial oversight and review.[1]
But from November 10, readers began reporting a variety of problems when trying to share our article. Some reported being unable to share it. Many others reported having their posts flagged with a warning about “Missing context ... Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people.” Those trying to post the article were informed by Facebook that people who repeatedly share “false information” might have their posts moved lower in Facebook’s News Feed. Group administrators where the article was shared received messages from Facebook informing them that such posts were “partly false.”
Readers were directed to a “fact check” performed by a Facebook contractor named Lead Stories.[2]
We find the “fact check” performed by Lead Stories to be inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.
-- It fails to provide any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong
-- It has a nonsensical noscript: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials”
-- The first paragraph inaccurately labels The BMJ a “news blog”
-- It contains a screenshot of our article with a stamp over it stating “Flaws Reviewed,” despite the Lead Stories article not identifying anything false or untrue in The BMJ article
-- It published the story on its website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert”
We have contacted Lead Stories, but they refuse to change anything about their article or actions that have led to Facebook flagging our article.
We have also contacted Facebook directly, requesting immediate removal of the “fact checking” label and any link to the Lead Stories article, thereby allowing our readers to freely share the article on your platform.
There is also a wider concern that we wish to raise. We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence.[3] Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task. Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies on sources such as The BMJ.
We hope you will act swiftly: specifically to correct the error relating to The BMJ’s article and to review the processes that led to the error; and generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall.
Best wishes,
Fiona Godlee, editor in chief
Kamran Abbasi, incoming editor in chief
The BMJ
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80
Dear Mark Zuckerberg,
We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, editors of The BMJ, one of the world’s oldest and most influential general medical journals. We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta.
In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company helping carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial, began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites.
The BMJ commissioned an investigative reporter to write up the story for our journal. The article was published on 2 November, following legal review, external peer review and subject to The BMJ’s usual high level editorial oversight and review.[1]
But from November 10, readers began reporting a variety of problems when trying to share our article. Some reported being unable to share it. Many others reported having their posts flagged with a warning about “Missing context ... Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people.” Those trying to post the article were informed by Facebook that people who repeatedly share “false information” might have their posts moved lower in Facebook’s News Feed. Group administrators where the article was shared received messages from Facebook informing them that such posts were “partly false.”
Readers were directed to a “fact check” performed by a Facebook contractor named Lead Stories.[2]
We find the “fact check” performed by Lead Stories to be inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.
-- It fails to provide any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong
-- It has a nonsensical noscript: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials”
-- The first paragraph inaccurately labels The BMJ a “news blog”
-- It contains a screenshot of our article with a stamp over it stating “Flaws Reviewed,” despite the Lead Stories article not identifying anything false or untrue in The BMJ article
-- It published the story on its website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert”
We have contacted Lead Stories, but they refuse to change anything about their article or actions that have led to Facebook flagging our article.
We have also contacted Facebook directly, requesting immediate removal of the “fact checking” label and any link to the Lead Stories article, thereby allowing our readers to freely share the article on your platform.
There is also a wider concern that we wish to raise. We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence.[3] Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task. Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies on sources such as The BMJ.
We hope you will act swiftly: specifically to correct the error relating to The BMJ’s article and to review the processes that led to the error; and generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall.
Best wishes,
Fiona Godlee, editor in chief
Kamran Abbasi, incoming editor in chief
The BMJ
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80
Forwarded from Today I Learned
TIL that a study found that spoilers don’t ruin stories. In fact, “…subjects who had the story ‘spoiled’ enjoyed the story more than the subjects who didn't know the ending in advance.”
https://ift.tt/3ee4Ciw
https://ift.tt/3ee4Ciw
reddit
TIL that a study found that spoilers don’t ruin stories. In fact,...
Posted in r/todayilearned by u/blankblank • 244 points and 105 comments
Forwarded from Flat Earth Flicks (& more)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Andrew Kaufman Doctor, psychiatrist, forensic and molecular biologist from MIT explains why you should refuse to take any type of "covid test". (42 seconds)
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
The corporate media has attacked Steve Kirsch (@stkirsch) because he used his resources as a tech founder to fund clinical trials for off-patent early treatment protocols for covid-19.
Comcast blocked Steve from releasing a commercial telling the story of, Maddie De Garay, one of the child-victims of the mRNA shots.
Twitter recently permanently suspended Steve because he dives into the data and openly talks about the dangers of the mRNA shots.
Please consider following him on telegram❗️
t.me/stkirsch
@KanekoaTheGreat
Comcast blocked Steve from releasing a commercial telling the story of, Maddie De Garay, one of the child-victims of the mRNA shots.
Twitter recently permanently suspended Steve because he dives into the data and openly talks about the dangers of the mRNA shots.
Please consider following him on telegram❗️
t.me/stkirsch
@KanekoaTheGreat
Telegram
Steve Kirsch Channel
Created due to Twitter censorship
Forwarded from Nick
time travel to 1530 and Geneva
"When the bubonic plague struck Geneva in 1530, everything was ready. They even opened a whole hospital for the plague victims. With doctors, paramedics and nurses. The traders contributed, the magistrate gave grants every month. The patients always gave money, and if one of them died alone, all the goods went to the hospital.
But then a disaster happened: the plague was dying out, while the subsidies depended on the number of patients. There was no question of right and wrong for the Geneva hospital staff in 1530. If the plague produces money, then the plague is good. And then the doctors got organized.
At first, they just poisoned patients to raise the mortality statistics, but they quickly realized that the statistics didn't have to be just about mortality, but about mortality from plague. So they began to cut the boils from the bodies of the dead, dry them, grind them in a mortar and give them to other patients as medicine. Then they started dusting clothes, handkerchiefs and garters. But somehow the plague continued to abate. Apparently, the dried buboes didn't work well. Doctors went into town and spread bubonic powder on door handles at night, selecting those homes where they could then profit. As an eyewitness wrote of these events, "this remained hidden for some time, but the devil is more concerned with increasing the number of sins than with hiding them."
In short, one of the doctors became so impudent and lazy that he decided not to wander the city at night, but simply threw a bundle of dust into the crowd during the day. The stench rose to the sky and one of the girls, who by a lucky chance had recently come out of that hospital, discovered what that smell was.
The doctor was tied up and placed in the good hands of competent “craftsmen.” They tried to get as much information from him as possible. However, the execution lasted several days. The ingenious hippocrats were tied to poles on wagons and carried around the city. At each intersection the executioners used red-hot tongs to tear off pieces of meat. They were then taken to the public square, beheaded and quartered, and the pieces were taken to all the districts of Geneva.
The only exception was the hospital director's son, who did not take part in the trial but blurted out that he knew how to make potions and how to prepare the powder without fear of contamination. He was simply beheaded "to prevent the spread of evil".
- François Bonivard, Chronicles of Geneva, second volume, pages 395 - 402
"When the bubonic plague struck Geneva in 1530, everything was ready. They even opened a whole hospital for the plague victims. With doctors, paramedics and nurses. The traders contributed, the magistrate gave grants every month. The patients always gave money, and if one of them died alone, all the goods went to the hospital.
But then a disaster happened: the plague was dying out, while the subsidies depended on the number of patients. There was no question of right and wrong for the Geneva hospital staff in 1530. If the plague produces money, then the plague is good. And then the doctors got organized.
At first, they just poisoned patients to raise the mortality statistics, but they quickly realized that the statistics didn't have to be just about mortality, but about mortality from plague. So they began to cut the boils from the bodies of the dead, dry them, grind them in a mortar and give them to other patients as medicine. Then they started dusting clothes, handkerchiefs and garters. But somehow the plague continued to abate. Apparently, the dried buboes didn't work well. Doctors went into town and spread bubonic powder on door handles at night, selecting those homes where they could then profit. As an eyewitness wrote of these events, "this remained hidden for some time, but the devil is more concerned with increasing the number of sins than with hiding them."
In short, one of the doctors became so impudent and lazy that he decided not to wander the city at night, but simply threw a bundle of dust into the crowd during the day. The stench rose to the sky and one of the girls, who by a lucky chance had recently come out of that hospital, discovered what that smell was.
The doctor was tied up and placed in the good hands of competent “craftsmen.” They tried to get as much information from him as possible. However, the execution lasted several days. The ingenious hippocrats were tied to poles on wagons and carried around the city. At each intersection the executioners used red-hot tongs to tear off pieces of meat. They were then taken to the public square, beheaded and quartered, and the pieces were taken to all the districts of Geneva.
The only exception was the hospital director's son, who did not take part in the trial but blurted out that he knew how to make potions and how to prepare the powder without fear of contamination. He was simply beheaded "to prevent the spread of evil".
- François Bonivard, Chronicles of Geneva, second volume, pages 395 - 402
Forwarded from Today I Learned
TIL This is the 20th anniversary of the unsuccessful bombing attempt that led to people having to take their shoes off at airport security
https://ift.tt/3H5rAot
https://ift.tt/3H5rAot
reddit
TIL This is the 20th anniversary of the unsuccessful bombing...
Posted in r/todayilearned by u/davetowers646 • 535 points and 93 comments
Forwarded from Today I Learned
TIL Winnie the Pooh enters the public domain in the United States at midnight on New Year's Day, 2022 (i.e. nine days from now)
https://ift.tt/3mvNVDP
https://ift.tt/3mvNVDP
reddit
TIL Winnie the Pooh enters the public domain in the United States...
Posted in r/todayilearned by u/mnrqz • 45,154 points and 1,814 comments
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
THIS ABSOLUTELY COULD BLOW UP THE VACCINE FRAUD.
Around 1% of batches are very much more toxic than all the rest, as much as 1000X more toxic.
A simple webapp allows to you to find out what you or a relative or friend was given.
Please share it widely. It links to batch codes in VAERS to which serious adverse events including deaths have been reported.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
Ps: I didn’t write it. Unable to do that. Independently verified that there is huge variability between batches (4 people at least arrived at same fundamental conclusions)
https://dailyexpose.uk/lotindex/
Around 1% of batches are very much more toxic than all the rest, as much as 1000X more toxic.
A simple webapp allows to you to find out what you or a relative or friend was given.
Please share it widely. It links to batch codes in VAERS to which serious adverse events including deaths have been reported.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
Ps: I didn’t write it. Unable to do that. Independently verified that there is huge variability between batches (4 people at least arrived at same fundamental conclusions)
https://dailyexpose.uk/lotindex/
The Expose - Home
The Expose
Home
Forwarded from Robert W Malone, MD
"We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta."
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80
📌 Follow and Share👇🏻
@RWMaloneMD
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80
📌 Follow and Share👇🏻
@RWMaloneMD
Forwarded from Robert W Malone, MD
A Note to My Well-Credentialed Friends
BY THOMAS HARRINGTON DECEMBER 17, 2021
https://brownstone.org/articles/a-note-to-my-well-credentialed-friends/
📌 Follow and Share👇🏻
@RWMaloneMD
BY THOMAS HARRINGTON DECEMBER 17, 2021
https://brownstone.org/articles/a-note-to-my-well-credentialed-friends/
📌 Follow and Share👇🏻
@RWMaloneMD
Brownstone Institute
A Note to My Well-Credentialed Friends ⋆ Brownstone Institute
Are you as a member of the well-educated Western elite class prepared to explore the possibility that members of the sociological cohort to which you belong are capable of highly organized evil and deception rooted in a deep disdain for the core humanity…
Forwarded from Police frequency
If things didn't add up to you about the "insurrection" on Jan. 6, you're not alone. So a former police chief has pieced together the unanswered questions.. and all roads seem to lead to the feds.
Something seriously stinks here - this is a must-read.
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/new-info-comes-out-regarding-number-of-unindicted-jan-6-co-conspirators/
Something seriously stinks here - this is a must-read.
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/new-info-comes-out-regarding-number-of-unindicted-jan-6-co-conspirators/
Forwarded from Gab.com
Pastors/Christians I admire
Pastor Doug Wilson:
https://gab.com/dougwils
Canon Press (Pastor Wilson's publishing outlet)
https://gab.com/canonpress
Michael Foster
https://gab.com/thisisfoster
Adam Robles
https://gab.com/ADRobles
Pastor Brian Sauvé
https://gab.com/BrianSauve
Gary DeMar
https://gab.com/GaryDeMar
Seth Dillion (CEO of Babylon Bee)
https://gab.com/sethdillon
American Vision
https://gab.com/americanvision
Woke Preacher Clips (Both funny and sad at the same time lol)
https://gab.com/wokepreacherclips
Boniface Option
https://gab.com/BonifaceOption
Censored Covid/Vaccine Medical Doctors and Experts
Doctor Simone Gold
https://gab.com/DrSimoneGold
Doctor Robert Malone (Inventor of mRNA technology)
https://gab.com/RobertMaloneMD
Martin Kulldorff
https://gab.com/MartinKulldorff
Doctor Peter McCullough
https://gab.com/PeterMcCulloughMD
Dr. Joseph Mercola
https://gab.com/Mercola
Steve Kirsch
https://gab.com/stkirsch
Dr. Zelenko
https://gab.com/ZZ611
Dr. Jane Ruby
https://gab.com/drjaneruby
News/Information
Disclose TV
https://gab.com/disclosetv
The Babylon Bee (Christian Satire)
https://gab.com/TheBabylonBee
The National File
https://gab.com/NationalFile
Revolver News
https://gab.com/RevolverNews
ReclaimTheNet
https://gab.com/reclaimthenet
Breaking911
https://gab.com/Breaking911
LifeSiteNews
https://gab.com/LifeSiteNews
Stew Peters
https://gab.com/RealStewPeters
Members of Congress
Congressman Gosar
https://gab.com/DrPaulGosar
Congresswoman Greene
https://gab.com/RealMarjorieGreene
Congresswoman Boebert
https://gab.com/LaurenBoebert
Pastor Doug Wilson:
https://gab.com/dougwils
Canon Press (Pastor Wilson's publishing outlet)
https://gab.com/canonpress
Michael Foster
https://gab.com/thisisfoster
Adam Robles
https://gab.com/ADRobles
Pastor Brian Sauvé
https://gab.com/BrianSauve
Gary DeMar
https://gab.com/GaryDeMar
Seth Dillion (CEO of Babylon Bee)
https://gab.com/sethdillon
American Vision
https://gab.com/americanvision
Woke Preacher Clips (Both funny and sad at the same time lol)
https://gab.com/wokepreacherclips
Boniface Option
https://gab.com/BonifaceOption
Censored Covid/Vaccine Medical Doctors and Experts
Doctor Simone Gold
https://gab.com/DrSimoneGold
Doctor Robert Malone (Inventor of mRNA technology)
https://gab.com/RobertMaloneMD
Martin Kulldorff
https://gab.com/MartinKulldorff
Doctor Peter McCullough
https://gab.com/PeterMcCulloughMD
Dr. Joseph Mercola
https://gab.com/Mercola
Steve Kirsch
https://gab.com/stkirsch
Dr. Zelenko
https://gab.com/ZZ611
Dr. Jane Ruby
https://gab.com/drjaneruby
News/Information
Disclose TV
https://gab.com/disclosetv
The Babylon Bee (Christian Satire)
https://gab.com/TheBabylonBee
The National File
https://gab.com/NationalFile
Revolver News
https://gab.com/RevolverNews
ReclaimTheNet
https://gab.com/reclaimthenet
Breaking911
https://gab.com/Breaking911
LifeSiteNews
https://gab.com/LifeSiteNews
Stew Peters
https://gab.com/RealStewPeters
Members of Congress
Congressman Gosar
https://gab.com/DrPaulGosar
Congresswoman Greene
https://gab.com/RealMarjorieGreene
Congresswoman Boebert
https://gab.com/LaurenBoebert
Gab Social
Douglas Wilson (@dougwils) · Gab.com
The latest Gabs from Douglas Wilson (@dougwils). Christian minister, husband of Nancy, grandfather of minions, and resident of Idaho. - The Home of Free Speech and the Parallel Economy. Join our community where people who support family, faith and free speech…
Brief summary on why RFK Jr embraced anti-vaccine activism. https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-rfk-jr-went-from-a-good-guy-to
Steve Kirsch's newsletter
How RFK Jr. went from "a good guy" to an "anti-vaxxer"
I talked to him this morning about what led him down the anti-vax path nearly 20 years ago. Here's the story, condensed to make it a quick read.
Forwarded from Flat Earth Flicks (& more)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Andrew Kaufman Doctor, psychiatrist, forensic and molecular biologist from MIT explains why you should refuse to take any type of "covid test". (42 seconds)