А ведь этот пост мог прочитать и Илон Маск, который бредит демографией.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/itakblet/783

Выжал из gpt после нескольких раундов допроса. Что-то не склеивается история, которую поведал Энди Кларк.

In humans, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is known to have a complex network of connections, but specific percentages for afferent versus efferent connections can still vary across studies. Generally, research suggests that the DLPFC has a greater number of afferent connections compared to efferent ones.

While exact percentages can differ, some estimates suggest that:

- Afferent connections: Approximately 60-70%
- Efferent connections: Approximately 30-40%

These values reflect a trend rather than exact figures, as the connectivity can be influenced by factors such as individual variability, the specific subregions of the DLPFC being examined, and the methodologies employed in the studies.

To obtain more precise numbers, it would be beneficial to refer to specific neuroanatomical studies or connectomic research focusing on human DLPFC connectivity. If you have access to particular studies or data, I can help interpret them!

Илон Маск как Ленин — позволяет себе только дешевые напитки

Sunday 12PM PST Pythia & Lebedev will go LIVE with threadguy and special guests 👀

«Вы не глядите, что Сережа все кивает,
Он соображает, он все понимает.
А что молчит, так это от волненья,
От осознанья, так сказать, и просветленья».

Две собаки Павлова разговаривают:
— Я всё-таки думаю, что это рефлекс.
— Почему ты так решила?
— Смотри, вот сейчас загорится лампочка, и эти животные нам принесут еду.

🦀 Держи краба!

Картинка дня

Леонид Ильич Байден не оставил после себя добрую память

Шахматная доска — лучше всех для ретинального протеза

https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02084

Но вот он, перегиб и парадокс: качество записи ухудшается, но чудесному машинному обучению все нипочем

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41551-024-01297-1

Clinical trials for implantable neural prostheses: understanding the ethical and technical requirements

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(24)00222-X/fulltext

Немного Пушкина

Makes sense

https://neurosciencenews.com/false-memories-psychology-28326/

Hebbian Optocontrol of Cross-Modal Disruptive Reading in Increasing Acoustic Noise in an Adult with Developmental Coordination Disorder

Acoustic noise is known to perturb reading for good readers, including children and adults. This external acoustic noise interfering at the multimodal areas in the brain causes difficulties reducing reading and writing performances. Moreover, it is known that people with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and dyslexia have reading deficits even in the absence of acoustic noise. The goal of this study is to investigate the effects of additional acoustic noise on an adult with DCD and dyslexia. Indeed, as vision is the main source of information for the brain during reading, a noisy internal visual crowding has been observed in many cases of readers with dyslexia, as additional mirror or duplicated images of words are perceived by these observers, simultaneously with the primary images. Here, we show that when the noisy internal visual crowding and an increasing external acoustic noise are superimposed, a reading disruptive threshold at about 50 to 60 dBa of noise is reached, depending on the type of acoustic noise for a young adult with DCD and dyslexia but not for a control. More interestingly, we report that this disruptive noise threshold can be controlled by Hebbian mechanisms linked to a pulse-modulated lighting that erases the confusing internal crowding images. An improvement of 12 dBa in the disruptive threshold is then observed with two types of acoustic noises, showing the potential utility of Hebbian optocontrol in managing reading difficulties in adults with DCD and dyslexia

Bernard Baars has something else to say

https://youtu.be/rux1UzEZl90?si=hHFIDj1VVDsXCkAd

“Microstimulation in V1 evokes a higher firing rate in both V1 and V2 when delivered at specific phases of the LFP.”

С ТМС и фосфенами, скорее всего, то же самое.


https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2552/ada828

Ничего не понял, но очень интересно

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-01-basis-voluntary-movements-monkey-classical.html

A study published in Science reveals new mechanisms through which the brain controls natural actions. The results challenge some of the classical views about how the motor system works and open up possible new applications in neurorehabilitation and robotics.

Вот сама статья:

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adq6510

Что-то подобное уже было сделано на самом деле

https://news.1rj.ru/str/bci_ru/4184

Здесь еще стоит вспомнить премоторную теорию внимания того же самого Риззолатти

Предиктивный мозг (по Энди Кларку)

Зашел в «пятерочку» — и показалось, что там реклама Панчина