This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Леонид Ильич Байден не оставил после себя добрую память
😁2
Но вот он, перегиб и парадокс: качество записи ухудшается, но чудесному машинному обучению все нипочем
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41551-024-01297-1
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41551-024-01297-1
Nature
Enhanced control of a brain–computer interface by tetraplegic participants via neural-network-mediated feature extraction
Nature Biomedical Engineering - A convolutional neural network that maps electrical signals from a brain–computer interface to neural features improved the performance of three participants...
🔥3
Clinical trials for implantable neural prostheses: understanding the ethical and technical requirements
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(24)00222-X/fulltext
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(24)00222-X/fulltext
🔥4👍2
Hebbian Optocontrol of Cross-Modal Disruptive Reading in Increasing Acoustic Noise in an Adult with Developmental Coordination Disorder
Acoustic noise is known to perturb reading for good readers, including children and adults. This external acoustic noise interfering at the multimodal areas in the brain causes difficulties reducing reading and writing performances. Moreover, it is known that people with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and dyslexia have reading deficits even in the absence of acoustic noise. The goal of this study is to investigate the effects of additional acoustic noise on an adult with DCD and dyslexia. Indeed, as vision is the main source of information for the brain during reading, a noisy internal visual crowding has been observed in many cases of readers with dyslexia, as additional mirror or duplicated images of words are perceived by these observers, simultaneously with the primary images. Here, we show that when the noisy internal visual crowding and an increasing external acoustic noise are superimposed, a reading disruptive threshold at about 50 to 60 dBa of noise is reached, depending on the type of acoustic noise for a young adult with DCD and dyslexia but not for a control. More interestingly, we report that this disruptive noise threshold can be controlled by Hebbian mechanisms linked to a pulse-modulated lighting that erases the confusing internal crowding images. An improvement of 12 dBa in the disruptive threshold is then observed with two types of acoustic noises, showing the potential utility of Hebbian optocontrol in managing reading difficulties in adults with DCD and dyslexia
Acoustic noise is known to perturb reading for good readers, including children and adults. This external acoustic noise interfering at the multimodal areas in the brain causes difficulties reducing reading and writing performances. Moreover, it is known that people with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and dyslexia have reading deficits even in the absence of acoustic noise. The goal of this study is to investigate the effects of additional acoustic noise on an adult with DCD and dyslexia. Indeed, as vision is the main source of information for the brain during reading, a noisy internal visual crowding has been observed in many cases of readers with dyslexia, as additional mirror or duplicated images of words are perceived by these observers, simultaneously with the primary images. Here, we show that when the noisy internal visual crowding and an increasing external acoustic noise are superimposed, a reading disruptive threshold at about 50 to 60 dBa of noise is reached, depending on the type of acoustic noise for a young adult with DCD and dyslexia but not for a control. More interestingly, we report that this disruptive noise threshold can be controlled by Hebbian mechanisms linked to a pulse-modulated lighting that erases the confusing internal crowding images. An improvement of 12 dBa in the disruptive threshold is then observed with two types of acoustic noises, showing the potential utility of Hebbian optocontrol in managing reading difficulties in adults with DCD and dyslexia
MDPI
Hebbian Optocontrol of Cross-Modal Disruptive Reading in Increasing Acoustic Noise in an Adult with Developmental Coordination…
Acoustic noise is known to perturb reading for good readers, including children and adults. This external acoustic noise interfering at the multimodal areas in the brain causes difficulties reducing reading and writing performances. Moreover, it is known…
✍1
“Microstimulation in V1 evokes a higher firing rate in both V1 and V2 when delivered at specific phases of the LFP.”
С ТМС и фосфенами, скорее всего, то же самое.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2552/ada828
С ТМС и фосфенами, скорее всего, то же самое.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2552/ada828
👀1
Ничего не понял, но очень интересно
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-01-basis-voluntary-movements-monkey-classical.html
A study published in Science reveals new mechanisms through which the brain controls natural actions. The results challenge some of the classical views about how the motor system works and open up possible new applications in neurorehabilitation and robotics.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-01-basis-voluntary-movements-monkey-classical.html
A study published in Science reveals new mechanisms through which the brain controls natural actions. The results challenge some of the classical views about how the motor system works and open up possible new applications in neurorehabilitation and robotics.
Вот сама статья:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adq6510
Что-то подобное уже было сделано на самом деле
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adq6510
Что-то подобное уже было сделано на самом деле
Science
Neuroethology of natural actions in freely moving monkeys
The current understanding of primate natural action organization derives from laboratory experiments in restrained contexts (RCs) under the assumption that this knowledge generalizes to freely moving contexts (FMCs). In this work, we developed a ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/bci_ru/4184
Здесь еще стоит вспомнить премоторную теорию внимания того же самого Риззолатти
Здесь еще стоит вспомнить премоторную теорию внимания того же самого Риззолатти
Telegram
Нейроинтерфейсы
Обзор по движениям глаз при мысленном представлении (воображении) движений
Our eyes do not only respond to visual perception but also to internal cognition involving visual imagery, which can be referred to as internal coupling. This review synthesizes evidence…
Our eyes do not only respond to visual perception but also to internal cognition involving visual imagery, which can be referred to as internal coupling. This review synthesizes evidence…
❤1👍1
Чип нейралинка у третьего пациента
https://thetechportal.com/2025/01/11/neuralink-implants-brain-chip-in-third-patient-musk-says-its-working-well/
https://thetechportal.com/2025/01/11/neuralink-implants-brain-chip-in-third-patient-musk-says-its-working-well/
The Tech Portal
Neuralink implants brain chip in third patient, Musk says all three 'working well' - The Tech Portal
Neuralink has completed its third human patient brain-chip implant. Neuralink Corp., which performed its first human brain chip
🔥2🙈1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Новости от буржуазных охотников за наживой любой ценой
🤣3👍1