Quote from quoted conversation "from here on only an informant who wants to remain anonymous" The [first meeting with him] was on February 16.

C: Why are you sharing your source with xxx? I think he would find that very unhip.
Why do you share information like the idea about China with xxx? I would have considered that confidential if someone had told me something like that, if you had really been told that.

A: xxx and I work together, I also informed our informant about this fact and he did not mind. I knew that xxx has the dedicated line to you, so I turned to him. As far as I know, he passed all the info concerning the paper to xxx. Everyone else will stay between us.

The informant got me involved in the first place because he specifically wanted something to happen with that document. The thought that he would probably have to publish it had probably just ripened in him. That was a big step for him.

Why he told me first of all - I can only speculate. He had probably seen me at Gunnar Kaiser and knew that I knew about the China Psyop. Since this coincided with his own observations, he probably wanted to discuss it with me.

I would like to add that he really celebrated our Twitter troll war against Mayer and the BMI, where we burst the info about the background paper with a network of different accounts. XXXX I then confronted Mayer. This allowed us to prove Mayer's cooperation. Perhaps the ambiguities could best be resolved if we all sat down together in a safe setting?

C: What is the action paper number 4?

A: Supposedly the document in question, which you now have. I don't know what it is actually noscriptd, but it supposedly contains a catalog of "measures" and is noscriptd No. 4 (in the version of 24.03.2020). I don't know any more than that, I just took a look at the cover page.

C: That sounds exciting.

A: Why are you asking me this? You have it.

C: I don't know any No. 4. That would be very interesting to see the No. 4.

A: xxx, I'm starting to worry about you. Are you a bot or has your signal been hacked?

C: What are you talking about? I just saw that you leaked the hardening stuff. I'm curious about that.

(2 weeks later, action paper has been "released").

A: Where is point 7?
It talks about a 7 point plan for Germany, not a six point plan.
I have SEEN 7 points.
He gave you everything.
So, where is point 7?

C: Is it customary for you to tweet publicly before first asking the person you are insinuating something? Do you think that leads to a good relationship with each other? Especially given the closeness connection of all of us from xxxx and me and xxx? I don't have a point 7. Maybe it's another document that you claim to have seen. We did not receive the document from anyone, it came to us through our whistleblower tool. It seemed incomplete to us, as you can read from the last paragraph in our article.

A: I know that you received it completely and personally, on Feb. 25, 2021, the day before I was with him.

What exactly do you actually do with a doc like that, XXX, for three weeks before you leak it? Twiddling your thumbs? Or maybe quickly remove the metadata of the PDF, create an _online-file in addition to the original file, remove point no. 7, clarify whether XXX and XXXX have it, no, they don't, well, then sell it 3 weeks later as a side note under a poorly presented article picture?

https://news.1rj.ru/str/ayawasgeht/1330

Are you pulling my leg, XXX?

And what was the point of all your cryptic communication with me the weeks before? Real allies in the movement deal with me differently. That's why I don't know how close we should be to each other.

And the fairy tales from your whistleblowing portal

- you can tell Christian Drosten.

C: Of course we create a file without metadata of documents that are transmitted via our portal. That goes without saying. You are welcome to send us a better article picture, if you have one at hand. That would make our work a lot easier. Like you, we are working hard around the clock for the recovery of our democracy. I did not mean that we both have a close relationship, but that XXX and XXX cooperate, you with XXX and I with XXX. Against the background it disconcerts me to carry things into the public, which one can clarify first of all internally. At any rate, that's how we handle it. And it is quite clear, I do not have point 7. It would be great if we did. If it comes up for you, let me know. I have a hope that it might be leaked after it's published.

A: Save your hope.
I don't believe a word you say after you keep lying to me here about your whistleblower access.
Why are you lying to me, XXX?
Why isn't anything happening in the committee?
XXX?
Why did it take three weeks with the leak?

Why did you remove item 7?

Why didn't you make a request to the BMI or RKI under the Freedom of Information Act to release the 210 pages of BMI emails that accompanied the development process of the BMI strategy paper of 23.03.2020 (note: it was 22.03.2020) AND the just published leak of 24.03.2020? You guys are lawyers, this would have been easy for you!
I got my material from a layman who made a simple request to the BMI via the portal FragdenStaaT, and he was successful.
Meanwhile, if you too have requested these papers (because you really can't be any stupider than a layman), why didn't you leak them immediately, and share them with everyone?
Why did I have to do that first, and then all you can think of later is:
"I'm curious about that!"
Excuse me?
Instead, you'd rather talk about XXXX and who else lost their grandma to the evil, evil vaccination. Once crying out education citizens, every Friday anew. You don't clear up anything at all.
You could have taken apart the most explosive papers of the FRG in the committee, XXX, and that already for weeks.
I'll tell you how it is:
Either you are complete failures as "Corona investigators
or controlled opposition.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/ayawasgeht/1339

Non sterilizing mRNA transfections with Spike-Only-Focus have been an indescribable success story so far, not?

"Muuuh Superimmunity":

→ https://bit.ly/3J0BUzI (LOL)

Answer: Nope:

→ https://bit.ly/3nxr1Nl
(Many LOLs in here, but the other way around)

I extended it a little 😄 (for our group, cause i don't know if this is legally ok)

NEW - Sweden-based Epicenter proudly presents an implanted chip that can "conveniently" hold your vaccination status "always accessible."

@disclosetv

"Bobby you goddamn mthrfckr, I'm reporting your account to Twitter now. This thread is racist!"

Ok, sorry, you are right.

https://twitter.com/Bobby_Network/status/1471958918305918979

[Thx 2 Nikita Visuals & R 79 4 pointing out]

Meme-Remix by Nikita Visuals