"Bobby you goddamn mthrfckr, I'm reporting your account to Twitter now. This thread is racist!"

Ok, sorry, you are right.

https://twitter.com/Bobby_Network/status/1471958918305918979

[Thx 2 Nikita Visuals & R 79 4 pointing out]

Meme-Remix by Nikita Visuals

That was my letter to the "organizer" Miriam Stein today: Okay, case closed, Miriam Stein makes the Ballweg. Dear Miriam, no, you are not the extended arm of the police, and you don't have the right to tell people to leave Pariser Platz when they are there exercising their fundamental right to freedom of assembly. You have already cancelled your demo, moreover, you are no longer responsible for what happened at Pariser Platz. If you still act here as a hobby police spokesperson, I must unfortunately doubt your credibility, and will no longer follow any further demo call from you. We don't need you "actor national heroes" for our demos - and please learn better acting. 👋

Part 1 of 3 - Reiner Fuellmich's Primary Goal is to Gatekeep the PCR Realm - especially the Irregularities concerning the Corman Drosten Protocol:

The 5 primary points coming from Fuellmich's mouth directly that instantly guarantee court case failure & rejection at any court worldwide.

Actual goal: Crash'N'Burn + Big Fail.

1. Fuellmich: "It is called Drosten-PCR worldwide"

Answer: ❌ false.

2. Fuellmich: "It's the gold standard for everything qPCR / SARS-CoV 2-related."

Answer: ❌ false.

3. Fuellmich: "Fauci asked Charité for Drosten primers

Answer:❌ false.
CDC had their own primers.

4. Fuellmich: "Drosten invented something in silico and it was almost pure fantasy!"

Answer: ❌ false.
He had received the consensus genome much earlier - either fragmented or end-2-end, sequenced by Dr. Zhang and then later forwarded by Eddie C Holmes to the Virologists-Community (online).

Drosten aligned SARs1 with the consensus genome from China - which he had received for sure some days earlier, that's how he determined matching primers for a first rather sloppy prototype - which in hindsight didn't work out anyway because 2 genes within the protocol were faulty in the first place.

5. Fuellmich: "Drosten has defined a too high Cut-off value."

Answer: ❌ false.
Drosten solely defined "45x" as PCR Cycles in the WHO doc, but no Cut-off had been defined (which is called earlier).

With this shitty line of arguments every court will insta-dismiss any actual court case or in other words: Fuellmich is doomed to fail a priori due to Gatekeeping & deliberate Sabotage of the scientific arguments.

In truth Fuellmich has still no clue about the Science he is trying to gatekeep, after almost 2 years he hasn't still managed to fix his alleged "facts" or adjust his Science Lingo for the cause (he still mixes up almost every aspect involved).

Part 2:

https://news.1rj.ru/str/bobbynetwork/1008

Part 3:

https://news.1rj.ru/str/bobbynetwork/1009