Counter-Currents – Telegram
The trannoscript and video of the lecture Bowden gave on Stewart Home to the New Right in February 2010 has been added to The Jonathan Bowden Archive. https://jonathanbowden.org/speeches/stewart-home/
🤔2
Forwarded from Nicholas R. Jeelvy
Everyone should go check out this rant by our lad Gaddius Maximus (and also sub to his channel). I agree with him that the driver behind WEF denialism is the hipster thing - you don’t want to be a normie-con, so you focus on more esoteric stuff. However, nothing stops you from being a hipster while at the same time refraining from interrupting healthful redpilling processes of the normie cons.

You fellas may have noticed that I did not speak a lot about vaccines, lockdowns and agenda 21. The reason is that I saw that populists, conservatives and others had it covered and let them pursue it, while offering my quiet support and crucially, not getting in their way. Myself, I have other, more interesting fish to fry. The only times I spoke on it was to prevent normies from losing the plot and getting sidetracked.

It’s never a good idea to let someone else define your positions. We mock people who support the current thing, as well as contrarians who never support the current thing. Always taking the position opposite of normie conservatives simply means that you have no agency and do not reason through issues yourself. This makes you predictable and not very useful in political discourse.
🤔2
Derek Hawthorne makes his triumphal return by comparing and contrasting two classic films which deal about the problem of reconciling the ideal of beauty with the real world: Alfred Hitchcock's Vertigo and Luchino Visconti's Death in Venice. https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/hitchcock-vs-visconti/
🤔2
Forwarded from Morgoth's Review
Everybody knows Tony Blair's diatribe at the WEF yesterday demanding endless vaccines and Digital IDs to monitor who is or who isn't compliant was insane, yet the discourse in our scene is whether it should even be discussed at all.

Fundamentally, the dispute is on whether 2017 talking points still hold up in 2023. And this depends on how many Jews are involved with this or that policy.
To take Blair's vaccine surveillance grid as an example, then, the ''stakeholders'' would be (off the top of my head):

The W.H.O
Corporations gathering data
Local Governments who can now track their population
Central Banks shifting towards digital money

All of the above are bad news for any dissident political scene, but in ours we're arguing about whether it's even important based on the criteria of how Jewish each part of the network is.

In other words, a policy proposal's importance is not weighed on what is or what is not beneficial to Europeans and dissident right-wingers, but on how Jewish it is.

Surely people can see the problem here.

At any rate, Tony Blair was trending all day on Twitter yesterday, that is where the populist energy is and will be in the future, and the choice is whether to tap into it or remain in a forgotten ghetto pretending it's still 2017.
🤔5
Counter-Currents is having a 40% off sale on selected books until February 1st! Find out the details at this link. https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/40-percent-off/
🤔6
Forwarded from Nicholas R. Jeelvy
Tonight on The Writers’ Bloc, we’ll be hosting Marko of Zentropa for a look inside Serbia, its internal politics, the current Kosovo crisis and the country’s geopolitical alignment.

Tune in to our Dlive and Odysee channels at 22:00 CET, 4pm EST, 1pm PST. Send your questions, comments and donations through Entropy.

Promo art by Atlas AI Art.