Steven Clark on The Secret of My Success, a forgotten black comedy from the 1960s about the dangers of being too trusting. https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/the-secret-of-my-success/

Greg Johnson's review of John Cleese of Monty Python fame's book Creativity: A Short and Cheerful Guide, a guidebook on how to cultivate one's own creativity, has been paroled from the paywall. https://counter-currents.com/2022/12/cleese-on-creativity/

Gunnar Alfredsson on increasing crime in Canada's public transit systems as the country's cities become more and more diverse. https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/public-transit-in-multicultural-hell/

The trannoscript and video of the lecture Bowden gave on Stewart Home to the New Right in February 2010 has been added to The Jonathan Bowden Archive. https://jonathanbowden.org/speeches/stewart-home/

Jim Goad on why blacks aren't all descended from kings — or if in fact they are, why they have some serious explaining to do. https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/no-you-wasnt-kings/

The trannoscript and video of the lecture Bowden gave on George Orwell’s Nineteen-Eighty-Four to the New Right in September 2009 has been added to The Jonathan Bowden Archive. https://jonathanbowden.org/speeches/george-orwells-nineteen-eighty-four/

James Edwards and Sam Dickson briefly spoke about their experiences with trying to move White Nationalism forward in American electoral politics at the 2022 Counter-Currents fall retreat, and the video is now online. https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/james-edwards-sam-dickson-on-white-nationalism-in-electoral-politics/

Alain de Benoist critiques the ideas of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, who contend that the new globalist empire is not embodied by any specific country and that it is in fact a positive development. https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/the-populist-moment-chapter-11-part-1/

The Counter-Currents Radio broadcast where Greg Johnson and Jim Goad discussed Jim’s newly-reissued zine Answer Me! and the zine culture of the 1990s has been paroled from the paywall. https://counter-currents.com/2022/12/counter-currents-radio-podcast-no-512-jim-goad-on-answer-me/

Greg Johnson replies to Asier Abadroa's call for white unionism with a defense of ethnonationalism for all peoples. https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/against-white-unionism/

Everyone should go check out this rant by our lad Gaddius Maximus (and also sub to his channel). I agree with him that the driver behind WEF denialism is the hipster thing - you don’t want to be a normie-con, so you focus on more esoteric stuff. However, nothing stops you from being a hipster while at the same time refraining from interrupting healthful redpilling processes of the normie cons.

You fellas may have noticed that I did not speak a lot about vaccines, lockdowns and agenda 21. The reason is that I saw that populists, conservatives and others had it covered and let them pursue it, while offering my quiet support and crucially, not getting in their way. Myself, I have other, more interesting fish to fry. The only times I spoke on it was to prevent normies from losing the plot and getting sidetracked.

It’s never a good idea to let someone else define your positions. We mock people who support the current thing, as well as contrarians who never support the current thing. Always taking the position opposite of normie conservatives simply means that you have no agency and do not reason through issues yourself. This makes you predictable and not very useful in political discourse.

Derek Hawthorne makes his triumphal return by comparing and contrasting two classic films which deal about the problem of reconciling the ideal of beauty with the real world: Alfred Hitchcock's Vertigo and Luchino Visconti's Death in Venice. https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/hitchcock-vs-visconti/

https://youtu.be/pE12iC0Iu3k

Premiering at 17:30 CET/11:30 EST

Pox Populi in conversation with Spencer J. Quinn, author of ‘The No College Club’.

Everybody knows Tony Blair's diatribe at the WEF yesterday demanding endless vaccines and Digital IDs to monitor who is or who isn't compliant was insane, yet the discourse in our scene is whether it should even be discussed at all.

Fundamentally, the dispute is on whether 2017 talking points still hold up in 2023. And this depends on how many Jews are involved with this or that policy.
To take Blair's vaccine surveillance grid as an example, then, the ''stakeholders'' would be (off the top of my head):

The W.H.O
Corporations gathering data
Local Governments who can now track their population
Central Banks shifting towards digital money

All of the above are bad news for any dissident political scene, but in ours we're arguing about whether it's even important based on the criteria of how Jewish each part of the network is.

In other words, a policy proposal's importance is not weighed on what is or what is not beneficial to Europeans and dissident right-wingers, but on how Jewish it is.

Surely people can see the problem here.

At any rate, Tony Blair was trending all day on Twitter yesterday, that is where the populist energy is and will be in the future, and the choice is whether to tap into it or remain in a forgotten ghetto pretending it's still 2017.

Alain de Benoist points out the flaws in Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's theory that the nature of capitalism has changed, and in fact has become emancipatory for workers, because labor has now become "immaterial" and "intellectual." https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/the-populist-moment-chapter-11-part-2/

ODYSEE LINK

https://odysee.com/@PoxPopuli:a/Spencer-Quinn-Interview:0

Counter-Currents is having a 40% off sale on selected books until February 1st! Find out the details at this link. https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/40-percent-off/

Tonight on The Writers’ Bloc, we’ll be hosting Marko of Zentropa for a look inside Serbia, its internal politics, the current Kosovo crisis and the country’s geopolitical alignment.

Tune in to our Dlive and Odysee channels at 22:00 CET, 4pm EST, 1pm PST. Send your questions, comments and donations through Entropy.

Promo art by Atlas AI Art.

Margot Metroland's essay on PK van der Byl — the actual politician who tried to save Rhodesia during its latter years, rather than Ian Smith — has been paroled from the paywall. https://counter-currents.com/2022/12/pk-van-der-byl-african-statesman/

> What tangible result has actually been delivered by the strategy of infiltrating the establishment right?

This is a dishonest framing of the question. These are our institutions. We are not the infiltrators. They are. We are not trying to "infiltrate the establishment"; we are trying to claw our institutions and nations back from the subversives who infiltrated them in the first place.

While we're reflecting on pragmatism...

What tangible result has actually been delivered from right-wingers emulating the left-wing color revolution tactics employed by Bolshevists, Islamists, and Third Worldists?

Are we better or worse off as a result of Charlottesville or January 6th?

Was Russia better or worse off as a result of the October Revolution?

Are fascists a dominant political force in Europe today?

Are third worldists not still living in mud huts and wiping their asses with their hands?

The West wasn't subverted through Islamo-Marxoid color revolutions. Cultural Marxism was invented because those tactics don't work in the West.

The West was subverted by the Long March Through the Institutions, and now these guys are practically saying:

"Surrender your institutions to the Trotskyite Jews who subverted them and attack center-right white people from a leftist economic angle!"

I'll file this one under "reward your enemy with the objective of their subversion."

To give a responsive answer to the original question (even though it isn't framed charitably or asked in good faith), the ongoing fight to retake control of right-wing political institutions has had some positive and important consequences:

- Stronger local protections for ownership of firearms

- Income tax relief for married couples who have kids

- Municipal and state-level prohibitions on critical theory

- The repeal of Roe v Wade, which will generally result in stronger protections against infanticide in less diverse states

- Increased daylight and visibility with regard to political corruption at all levels of government

- Increased demand to reform and repeal leftist, anti-white policy prenoscriptions

- The normalization of pro-white activism

- Increased right-wing grassroots engagement at all levels of politics and government

If we could have defeated the left by surrendering political power to it and attacking "the center right", we would have already won.

We aren't going to undo a 100 Year Long March through a multilateral democratic system in a single night or election cycle, or by retaking any single office -- especially not if we give up and join the left while redefining at as right-wing like Joel and Keith want us to do.

To restate their argument another way, they are basically saying:

"Promote left-wing economics and let communists and pedophiles control your school boards unless you're going to LARP as white Taliban while you do a second October Revolution!"

It would be hard to think of a better way to derail or marginalize the current of pro-white activism that has emerged in right-wing socio-political spaces.

Here's an idea, guys: multiple things can be true at the same time.

Jews have an outsized influence over societal power structures and virtually every area of public life and policy, to a degree that can't be ignored or really overstated.

And also, some of the elites are non-Jews who collaborate with the overrepresented elite Jews, because they all share many of the same interests and goals.

This entire power structure, Jewish or otherwise, is generally anti-White, anti-European, anti-nation, anti-tradition, and ultimately, anti-human. They are responsible for every social degeneration the world has seen in the past century and all of that social degeneration benefits them. If they're promoting a viewpoint or development, it's because that thing is anti-human.

All of these observations are simply true, but if you don't sufficiently fixate on Jews and only Jews, you will be accused by some in these circles of "misdirection," even as you observe the critical role of Jews in the global ethnic conflict we are experiencing.