also, it is usually when you think all hope is lost and people stop yelling "buy the dip" that the market moves
came across this post mentioning that recently the social volume mentions of "buy the dip" has faded as people are slowly exiting the market and losing hope
horrible macro conditions currently tho
the only plus side I see so far for this year is that things are overly bearish (too exaggerated) such that slight hints of improvements or subsiding of these bearish events would possibly lead to a more than proportionate bullish sentiment
just my take of course
for now just keeping my head down and educating myself more
came across this post mentioning that recently the social volume mentions of "buy the dip" has faded as people are slowly exiting the market and losing hope
horrible macro conditions currently tho
the only plus side I see so far for this year is that things are overly bearish (too exaggerated) such that slight hints of improvements or subsiding of these bearish events would possibly lead to a more than proportionate bullish sentiment
just my take of course
for now just keeping my head down and educating myself more
👍5
anyw, rain or shine, bull or bear market
I'll still be here and I hope to see you around too :-)
cheers
I'll still be here and I hope to see you around too :-)
cheers
really agree w this
if btc can show a strong move up despite what's going on rn, it'll possibly spark a new narrative that btc can truly act as "digital gold" in uncertain times such as rn and it is NOT just speculations
if there's a time to decouple from equities I think now would be a really great time
https://twitter.com/gametheorizing/status/1496859073991438336?s=20&t=o0DOC9YrUq7o-h1t3KDAWw
if btc can show a strong move up despite what's going on rn, it'll possibly spark a new narrative that btc can truly act as "digital gold" in uncertain times such as rn and it is NOT just speculations
if there's a time to decouple from equities I think now would be a really great time
https://twitter.com/gametheorizing/status/1496859073991438336?s=20&t=o0DOC9YrUq7o-h1t3KDAWw
Twitter
Jordi “PlanC” Alexander
BTC took the punch well. We avoided the abyss. Good start. Now its counterpunch time- If a whale steps up here and starts a $1bn TWAP to send us green on the day, it will be a powerful, lasting narrative shift. BTC can and should behave more like gold here…
"So it’s not a huge leap in logic to think that he sees this invasion as a win-win for him: if the US cuts Russia from SWIFT, and Russia uses cryptocurrencies to get around it, the US has less influence politically. If the US doesn’t cut them off, and doesn’t take some kind of forceful action to compensate, Putin demonstrates to the world that the US is in decline and is too weak to stop him."
https://drewestes.substack.com/p/putin-is-attacking-more-than-just?r=itwb7&utm_source=url
https://drewestes.substack.com/p/putin-is-attacking-more-than-just?r=itwb7&utm_source=url
Substack
Putin is attacking more than just Ukraine
As Russia invades Ukraine, it's a direct challenge to US economic power, too.
Russia's POV for a more balanced view
US is putting missiles at Russia's doorstep and Russia has to defend itself
+ the continuous eastward expansion of NATO which made Russia feel betrayed
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSe3CbuVR/
US is putting missiles at Russia's doorstep and Russia has to defend itself
+ the continuous eastward expansion of NATO which made Russia feel betrayed
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSe3CbuVR/
TikTok
plug on TikTok
Must watch!!! The entire video #putin #russia #usa #politics #funny #news #war #ukraine
always looking for good reads, if any to share you can send them over in the discord general chat as well
if you're not in:
https://discord.gg/Zd7JftdDWD
no restriction on reading topics 👌🏼
if you're not in:
https://discord.gg/Zd7JftdDWD
no restriction on reading topics 👌🏼
"Russia's sensitivities over NATO's possible eastward expansion were well known. "No matter how nuanced, if NATO adopts a policy which envisions expansion into Central and Eastern Europe without holding the door open to Russia, it would be universally interpreted in Moscow as directed against Russia," US diplomat James Collins wrote in a State Department cable in 1993.
But since 1990, NATO has gone through five rounds of enlargement to include former parts of the Soviet Union and several former Warsaw Pact states. "
https://www.dw.com/en/nato-why-russia-has-a-problem-with-its-eastward-expansion/a-60891681
But since 1990, NATO has gone through five rounds of enlargement to include former parts of the Soviet Union and several former Warsaw Pact states. "
https://www.dw.com/en/nato-why-russia-has-a-problem-with-its-eastward-expansion/a-60891681
DW
NATO: Why Russia has a problem with its eastward expansion
After its Soviet enemy crumbled, NATO kept growing. Whether that helped ensure peace or constitutes a threat is still debated today — and plays into Russian actions towards Ukraine.
Crypto Mumbles
thread on Mars Protocol https://twitter.com/ZeMariaMacedo/status/1490714332589658118
some analytics on the users that have locked up their UST/duration/wallet age etc. in Mars Protocol
https://share.streamlit.io/incioman/mars_lockdrop
https://share.streamlit.io/incioman/mars_lockdrop
from this clip
if Russia allows Ukraine to join NATO,
1. missiles at Russia's doorstep which is a security threat
2. breaking of promise in the eastward expansion of NATO
3. puts Russia in a losing position should Ukraine take back Crimea by force AFTER joining NATO
on point 3, I think he refers to invoking the NATO Article 5 (instead of treaty of Rome) where it mentions collective defence i.e. an attack on an ally country = an attack against all allies
and in this case all the other countries in NATO will be unwillingly dragged into a conflict w Russia, leading to a much larger scale war and possibly nuclear fall out
worse case scenario MAD (mutually assured destruction) which is a global scale nuclear war as we were taught in secondary school history
imo there's no good guys or bad guys in this conflict
western media will keep pushing the narrative that Russia is bad and US/NATO are the good guys, but from what I've gathered thus far I think US is fanning the flames from outside, while Russia is protecting her own security interests, and Ukraine is unfortunately stuck in the middle
and ofc war is bad without a doubt
just my take and sharing of course
if Russia allows Ukraine to join NATO,
1. missiles at Russia's doorstep which is a security threat
2. breaking of promise in the eastward expansion of NATO
3. puts Russia in a losing position should Ukraine take back Crimea by force AFTER joining NATO
on point 3, I think he refers to invoking the NATO Article 5 (instead of treaty of Rome) where it mentions collective defence i.e. an attack on an ally country = an attack against all allies
and in this case all the other countries in NATO will be unwillingly dragged into a conflict w Russia, leading to a much larger scale war and possibly nuclear fall out
worse case scenario MAD (mutually assured destruction) which is a global scale nuclear war as we were taught in secondary school history
imo there's no good guys or bad guys in this conflict
western media will keep pushing the narrative that Russia is bad and US/NATO are the good guys, but from what I've gathered thus far I think US is fanning the flames from outside, while Russia is protecting her own security interests, and Ukraine is unfortunately stuck in the middle
and ofc war is bad without a doubt
just my take and sharing of course
👍4
sorry for the slight deviation from crypto to updates about the Russian-Ukraine conflict
but I think that's more important as of where we are rn
Putin has escalated by putting nukes on alert
when one party standbys the nukes, opposing parties will ready their nukes in response
tbh idt it'll be used but the entire situation is just sad to see w this war
have we really not learned from history?
but I think that's more important as of where we are rn
Putin has escalated by putting nukes on alert
when one party standbys the nukes, opposing parties will ready their nukes in response
tbh idt it'll be used but the entire situation is just sad to see w this war
have we really not learned from history?
anyw, since the invasion the market has priced in (imo) that it's a civil conflict rather than a global scale war hence the recovery
but if this escalates further w more countries getting involved in the war then do expect markets to tank further
as long as the war is contained then we should remain ranging in this area
pending rate hikes in march next
but if this escalates further w more countries getting involved in the war then do expect markets to tank further
as long as the war is contained then we should remain ranging in this area
pending rate hikes in march next