GameStop fumbled the bag for 2 reasons :
1/ They raised $1.3bn through a convert in March but did not deploy them immediately into BTC despite already holding $4bn in cash. They only bought $500M and at a price much higher than what they could have when they received the convert proceeds. There is a reason Saylor "apes local tops" instead of trying to outsmart the market.
2/ They are completely opaque on their strategy. Do they want to follow the MSTR playbook ? Do they not ? It's unclear. Why would they raise twice through convertible bonds if they are not deploying all their cash into BTC ? No clarity in their plan = no trust from investors
1/ They raised $1.3bn through a convert in March but did not deploy them immediately into BTC despite already holding $4bn in cash. They only bought $500M and at a price much higher than what they could have when they received the convert proceeds. There is a reason Saylor "apes local tops" instead of trying to outsmart the market.
2/ They are completely opaque on their strategy. Do they want to follow the MSTR playbook ? Do they not ? It's unclear. Why would they raise twice through convertible bonds if they are not deploying all their cash into BTC ? No clarity in their plan = no trust from investors
❤30👍15🤔1
I haven't looked at it in detail but this SBET dump makes zero sense imo
Prob a buy but I am not taking the trade fyi
Prob a buy but I am not taking the trade fyi
👍11
Crypto Narratives
I haven't looked at it in detail but this SBET dump makes zero sense imo Prob a buy but I am not taking the trade fyi
Why a buy ? Because funds bought $425M worth of shares around $6 and SBET should have used the proceeds to buy $425M worth of ETH
So mNAV should be close to 1
But they are way less transparent than MSTR and did not disclose if they bought so it's completely opaque and favors insiders...
So mNAV should be close to 1
But they are way less transparent than MSTR and did not disclose if they bought so it's completely opaque and favors insiders...
👍20❤7🤔4
Crypto Narratives
Why a buy ? Because funds bought $425M worth of shares around $6 and SBET should have used the proceeds to buy $425M worth of ETH So mNAV should be close to 1 But they are way less transparent than MSTR and did not disclose if they bought so it's completely…
X (formerly Twitter)
SharpLink (SBET) (@SharpLink) on X
#sharplinkgaming is pleased to announce that we have acquired 176,271 ETH for $463 Million,officially becoming largest publicly-traded ETH holder (Nasdaq: SBET). https://t.co/rS1ORyv6KT
🔥8👍2
I don't have a strong opinion on the market right now
Bullish on $BTC but it did not dip enough on LTF to be a screaming lev long (I'm long BTC but moderate size)
Bearish on altcoins but OTHERS/BTC is already very depressed and reached new lows again yesterday, and I don't think we'll get an additional liq cascade on the WE
I don't have any edge on the Middle-East stuff other than the chud mantra "nothing ever happens", especially nothing that would justify a massive market impact
Bullish on $BTC but it did not dip enough on LTF to be a screaming lev long (I'm long BTC but moderate size)
Bearish on altcoins but OTHERS/BTC is already very depressed and reached new lows again yesterday, and I don't think we'll get an additional liq cascade on the WE
I don't have any edge on the Middle-East stuff other than the chud mantra "nothing ever happens", especially nothing that would justify a massive market impact
👍53❤9
Crypto Narratives
Be aware of this on $SUI Last time we lost the 50d MA was the beginning of a downtrend on the coin
This indicator has been working well again on $SUI
👍26👏7🤔6❤2
Crypto Narratives
Is Lagrange $LA worth $1bn FDV ? I am not so sure...
$LA is down another -20% from this tweet
The risk is that a short-squeeze can easily bring it up +50%, while the down bleeding is much slower
The risk is that a short-squeeze can easily bring it up +50%, while the down bleeding is much slower
🤔7
Crypto Narratives
I still haven't found an evergreen way to express the long $BTC / short altcoins trade without taking the risk of a substantial drawdown on these moves
I setup a long BTC / short alts strategy on a small sub-account as an experiment and it looked like that
- Long BTC leg around 2x larger than the shorts => I started with 1.5x but that's clearly too low imo
- Short more than 100 alts (so very diluted shorts), with almost all of them being sub $1bn FDV
- I doubled down on some of the shorts when the alts started moving up in early May, which is probably not a good idea because I often doubled down way too early on altcoins that ended up being the top performers (ex: GOAT, PENGU, PNUT). This means that the shorts with the most size were also the shorts pumping the most, increasing the negative uPnL a lot on these.
- This previous point leads me to think that keeping equal size (or close to) on most shorts and not adding on the ones that pumped the most is probably a better strategy. Losers remain losers.
- You can see that the drawdown in May was pretty brutal, but it's been very smooth since then. Finding how to reduce this drawdown is key.
- Long BTC leg around 2x larger than the shorts => I started with 1.5x but that's clearly too low imo
- Short more than 100 alts (so very diluted shorts), with almost all of them being sub $1bn FDV
- I doubled down on some of the shorts when the alts started moving up in early May, which is probably not a good idea because I often doubled down way too early on altcoins that ended up being the top performers (ex: GOAT, PENGU, PNUT). This means that the shorts with the most size were also the shorts pumping the most, increasing the negative uPnL a lot on these.
- This previous point leads me to think that keeping equal size (or close to) on most shorts and not adding on the ones that pumped the most is probably a better strategy. Losers remain losers.
- You can see that the drawdown in May was pretty brutal, but it's been very smooth since then. Finding how to reduce this drawdown is key.
❤25🔥11👍5
Crypto Narratives
I setup a long BTC / short alts strategy on a small sub-account as an experiment and it looked like that - Long BTC leg around 2x larger than the shorts => I started with 1.5x but that's clearly too low imo - Short more than 100 alts (so very diluted shorts)…
I put $100k in the sub-account for this experiment and here is also the current size of the long and short exposure.
👍32🔥13👏11❤4
Crypto Narratives
Just a reminder that FDV is the real price you pay $BICO
Just a reminder that FDV is the real price you pay
$ATH
$ATH
🔥16❤4👍3🤔1