Jewish Ritual Murder.pdf
196.4 KB
Jewish Ritual Murder
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jewish Ritual Murder
This is one of the most important documentaries ever made
This is one of the most important documentaries ever made
🔥2
33rd degree knowledge: This ancient wisdom was reserved for the elite.
Duration: 00:22:44
Duration: 00:22:44
❤1
👍1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Michael Shellenberger in Australia | Misinformation laws and the censorship agenda
Duration: 00:35:32
Title: The Battle for Free Speech in the Digital Age
Introduction
In a world where misinformation is often cited as a plague to be eradicated, one journalist posed the question: "What are we going to do about all this misinformation?" This query was met with a simple yet profound response from Michael Shellenberger, a noted investigative journalist and advocate for free speech. Shellenberger, speaking at the Fullerton Hotel, introduced by John Storey, Director of Law and Policy at the Institute of Public Affairs, emphasized that the antidote to misinformation isn't more control, but rather more speech.
The Essence of Free Speech
- Historical Context: Shellenberger highlighted that free speech has been the cornerstone of addressing misinformation for hundreds of years. This tradition began when societies moved away from needing royal permissions to voice opinions.
- Current Challenges: Today, the digital landscape presents new challenges with platforms like Twitter and Facebook having the power to censor content. Shellenberger recounts his experience in 2020 when he was censored by Facebook for discussing UN projections on future food production, arguing against the narrative of an impending climate change apocalypse.
The Censorship Industry
- Discovery of Bias: His investigation into the Twitter files revealed a significant left-wing bias among its employees, with over 95% of political donations from Twitter staff going to Democrats. This bias, he argues, influenced content moderation, creating an environment where certain viewpoints were systematically suppressed.
- The Role of Government: Shellenberger also touched on the involvement of government agencies like the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security in content removal requests, indicating a deeper layer of control over speech that goes beyond mere corporate decisions.
The Fight Against Censorship
- The Case of Jay Bhattacharya: An example of this censorship was the blacklisting of Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford epidemiologist, for advocating for a balanced approach during the COVID-19 pandemic, which contradicted the prevailing lockdown strategies.
- Elon Musk's Intervention: The acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk was described by Shellenberger as a pivotal moment for free speech, likening it to the liberation of a modern-day digital printing press from the control of those who would limit discourse.
Societal Implications
- Totalitarian Tendencies: Shellenberger warns of the totalitarian implications of widespread censorship, where politics invades every aspect of life, from social interactions to family gatherings, creating a society where political alignment dictates social acceptance.
- The Hope of Counter-Revolution: Despite these challenges, he finds hope in the technological revolution and the commitment of individuals like Musk to uphold free speech principles. This, he suggests, might fortify the pillars of Western civilization which include free speech, equal justice, and the meritocratic values that have historically driven progress.
Conclusion
In his concluding remarks, Shellenberger reflects on the broader implications of these issues for civilization. He posits that while civilizations might historically cycle through phases of rise and decline, the unique commitment to free speech in Western societies could be its saving grace. The ongoing battle for free speech, therefore, isn't merely about maintaining an open discourse but is crucial in defending the foundational elements that have allowed for the flourishing of democratic societies. Through this lens, the fight against censorship is not just a political or technological battle but a cultural and existential one for the future of freedom itself.
Duration: 00:35:32
Title: The Battle for Free Speech in the Digital Age
Introduction
In a world where misinformation is often cited as a plague to be eradicated, one journalist posed the question: "What are we going to do about all this misinformation?" This query was met with a simple yet profound response from Michael Shellenberger, a noted investigative journalist and advocate for free speech. Shellenberger, speaking at the Fullerton Hotel, introduced by John Storey, Director of Law and Policy at the Institute of Public Affairs, emphasized that the antidote to misinformation isn't more control, but rather more speech.
The Essence of Free Speech
- Historical Context: Shellenberger highlighted that free speech has been the cornerstone of addressing misinformation for hundreds of years. This tradition began when societies moved away from needing royal permissions to voice opinions.
- Current Challenges: Today, the digital landscape presents new challenges with platforms like Twitter and Facebook having the power to censor content. Shellenberger recounts his experience in 2020 when he was censored by Facebook for discussing UN projections on future food production, arguing against the narrative of an impending climate change apocalypse.
The Censorship Industry
- Discovery of Bias: His investigation into the Twitter files revealed a significant left-wing bias among its employees, with over 95% of political donations from Twitter staff going to Democrats. This bias, he argues, influenced content moderation, creating an environment where certain viewpoints were systematically suppressed.
- The Role of Government: Shellenberger also touched on the involvement of government agencies like the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security in content removal requests, indicating a deeper layer of control over speech that goes beyond mere corporate decisions.
The Fight Against Censorship
- The Case of Jay Bhattacharya: An example of this censorship was the blacklisting of Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford epidemiologist, for advocating for a balanced approach during the COVID-19 pandemic, which contradicted the prevailing lockdown strategies.
- Elon Musk's Intervention: The acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk was described by Shellenberger as a pivotal moment for free speech, likening it to the liberation of a modern-day digital printing press from the control of those who would limit discourse.
Societal Implications
- Totalitarian Tendencies: Shellenberger warns of the totalitarian implications of widespread censorship, where politics invades every aspect of life, from social interactions to family gatherings, creating a society where political alignment dictates social acceptance.
- The Hope of Counter-Revolution: Despite these challenges, he finds hope in the technological revolution and the commitment of individuals like Musk to uphold free speech principles. This, he suggests, might fortify the pillars of Western civilization which include free speech, equal justice, and the meritocratic values that have historically driven progress.
Conclusion
In his concluding remarks, Shellenberger reflects on the broader implications of these issues for civilization. He posits that while civilizations might historically cycle through phases of rise and decline, the unique commitment to free speech in Western societies could be its saving grace. The ongoing battle for free speech, therefore, isn't merely about maintaining an open discourse but is crucial in defending the foundational elements that have allowed for the flourishing of democratic societies. Through this lens, the fight against censorship is not just a political or technological battle but a cultural and existential one for the future of freedom itself.
👍1