Jewish Ritual Murder.pdf
196.4 KB
Jewish Ritual Murder
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jewish Ritual Murder
This is one of the most important documentaries ever made
This is one of the most important documentaries ever made
🔥2
33rd degree knowledge: This ancient wisdom was reserved for the elite.
Duration: 00:22:44
Duration: 00:22:44
❤1
👍1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Michael Shellenberger in Australia | Misinformation laws and the censorship agenda
Duration: 00:35:32
Title: The Battle for Free Speech in the Digital Age
Introduction
In a world where misinformation is often cited as a plague to be eradicated, one journalist posed the question: "What are we going to do about all this misinformation?" This query was met with a simple yet profound response from Michael Shellenberger, a noted investigative journalist and advocate for free speech. Shellenberger, speaking at the Fullerton Hotel, introduced by John Storey, Director of Law and Policy at the Institute of Public Affairs, emphasized that the antidote to misinformation isn't more control, but rather more speech.
The Essence of Free Speech
- Historical Context: Shellenberger highlighted that free speech has been the cornerstone of addressing misinformation for hundreds of years. This tradition began when societies moved away from needing royal permissions to voice opinions.
- Current Challenges: Today, the digital landscape presents new challenges with platforms like Twitter and Facebook having the power to censor content. Shellenberger recounts his experience in 2020 when he was censored by Facebook for discussing UN projections on future food production, arguing against the narrative of an impending climate change apocalypse.
The Censorship Industry
- Discovery of Bias: His investigation into the Twitter files revealed a significant left-wing bias among its employees, with over 95% of political donations from Twitter staff going to Democrats. This bias, he argues, influenced content moderation, creating an environment where certain viewpoints were systematically suppressed.
- The Role of Government: Shellenberger also touched on the involvement of government agencies like the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security in content removal requests, indicating a deeper layer of control over speech that goes beyond mere corporate decisions.
The Fight Against Censorship
- The Case of Jay Bhattacharya: An example of this censorship was the blacklisting of Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford epidemiologist, for advocating for a balanced approach during the COVID-19 pandemic, which contradicted the prevailing lockdown strategies.
- Elon Musk's Intervention: The acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk was described by Shellenberger as a pivotal moment for free speech, likening it to the liberation of a modern-day digital printing press from the control of those who would limit discourse.
Societal Implications
- Totalitarian Tendencies: Shellenberger warns of the totalitarian implications of widespread censorship, where politics invades every aspect of life, from social interactions to family gatherings, creating a society where political alignment dictates social acceptance.
- The Hope of Counter-Revolution: Despite these challenges, he finds hope in the technological revolution and the commitment of individuals like Musk to uphold free speech principles. This, he suggests, might fortify the pillars of Western civilization which include free speech, equal justice, and the meritocratic values that have historically driven progress.
Conclusion
In his concluding remarks, Shellenberger reflects on the broader implications of these issues for civilization. He posits that while civilizations might historically cycle through phases of rise and decline, the unique commitment to free speech in Western societies could be its saving grace. The ongoing battle for free speech, therefore, isn't merely about maintaining an open discourse but is crucial in defending the foundational elements that have allowed for the flourishing of democratic societies. Through this lens, the fight against censorship is not just a political or technological battle but a cultural and existential one for the future of freedom itself.
Duration: 00:35:32
Title: The Battle for Free Speech in the Digital Age
Introduction
In a world where misinformation is often cited as a plague to be eradicated, one journalist posed the question: "What are we going to do about all this misinformation?" This query was met with a simple yet profound response from Michael Shellenberger, a noted investigative journalist and advocate for free speech. Shellenberger, speaking at the Fullerton Hotel, introduced by John Storey, Director of Law and Policy at the Institute of Public Affairs, emphasized that the antidote to misinformation isn't more control, but rather more speech.
The Essence of Free Speech
- Historical Context: Shellenberger highlighted that free speech has been the cornerstone of addressing misinformation for hundreds of years. This tradition began when societies moved away from needing royal permissions to voice opinions.
- Current Challenges: Today, the digital landscape presents new challenges with platforms like Twitter and Facebook having the power to censor content. Shellenberger recounts his experience in 2020 when he was censored by Facebook for discussing UN projections on future food production, arguing against the narrative of an impending climate change apocalypse.
The Censorship Industry
- Discovery of Bias: His investigation into the Twitter files revealed a significant left-wing bias among its employees, with over 95% of political donations from Twitter staff going to Democrats. This bias, he argues, influenced content moderation, creating an environment where certain viewpoints were systematically suppressed.
- The Role of Government: Shellenberger also touched on the involvement of government agencies like the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security in content removal requests, indicating a deeper layer of control over speech that goes beyond mere corporate decisions.
The Fight Against Censorship
- The Case of Jay Bhattacharya: An example of this censorship was the blacklisting of Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford epidemiologist, for advocating for a balanced approach during the COVID-19 pandemic, which contradicted the prevailing lockdown strategies.
- Elon Musk's Intervention: The acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk was described by Shellenberger as a pivotal moment for free speech, likening it to the liberation of a modern-day digital printing press from the control of those who would limit discourse.
Societal Implications
- Totalitarian Tendencies: Shellenberger warns of the totalitarian implications of widespread censorship, where politics invades every aspect of life, from social interactions to family gatherings, creating a society where political alignment dictates social acceptance.
- The Hope of Counter-Revolution: Despite these challenges, he finds hope in the technological revolution and the commitment of individuals like Musk to uphold free speech principles. This, he suggests, might fortify the pillars of Western civilization which include free speech, equal justice, and the meritocratic values that have historically driven progress.
Conclusion
In his concluding remarks, Shellenberger reflects on the broader implications of these issues for civilization. He posits that while civilizations might historically cycle through phases of rise and decline, the unique commitment to free speech in Western societies could be its saving grace. The ongoing battle for free speech, therefore, isn't merely about maintaining an open discourse but is crucial in defending the foundational elements that have allowed for the flourishing of democratic societies. Through this lens, the fight against censorship is not just a political or technological battle but a cultural and existential one for the future of freedom itself.
👍1
Grok:
Professor Ian Plimer launches Climate Change: The Facts 2025
Duration: 00:27:14
Grok:
Clarification and Correction
Thank you for pointing out the need for clarification. Here is a revised summary that more accurately reflects the content of the video:
---
Title: Critique of the Climate Change Narrative
Introduction
The video features a panel where no one explicitly supports the idea that climate change, as commonly understood in mainstream discourse, is real or predominantly human-caused. Instead, the participants largely critique or mock this concept.
Skepticism and Critique
- Questioning Anthropogenic Climate Change: The speakers challenge the narrative that human activities, particularly carbon dioxide emissions, are the primary drivers of climate change. They suggest that other natural factors might be more significant.
- Economic and Policy Concerns: There is a discussion on how current climate policies could be economically harmful, potentially leading to job losses and hindering industrial growth. The term 'climate change' is portrayed as being used to justify economic policies that might not be beneficial for society.
Educational System Criticism
- Indoctrination Over Education: The video critiques the educational system for promoting what they see as a one-sided narrative on climate change, leading to what is described as indoctrination rather than education.
Professional Repercussions
- Consequences for Dissent: Several speakers share personal anecdotes about facing professional ostracism, including being barred from speaking engagements, losing honorary degrees, or experiencing other forms of career setbacks due to their skepticism towards the mainstream climate change narrative.
Cultural and Societal Commentary
- Climate Change Religion: There's a metaphor used where the climate change movement is likened to a new religion, complete with its own dogma and social pressures, which is criticized for lacking scientific rigor.
- Disparity in Concern: The notion that climate change is a concern primarily of wealthier nations is mentioned, contrasting with more immediate survival priorities in less developed countries.
Conclusion on the AI's Summary
The AI summary should reflect that the video primarily challenges the mainstream climate change narrative rather than affirming its reality:
- AI's Role: The AI (Grok) attempted to summarize the video, but in doing so, might have inadvertently or incorrectly implied acceptance of climate change's reality by not clearly conveying the overarching skepticism.
- Reader's Role: Reviewing this summary, one should recognize that the video's focus was on critiquing the mainstream views and policies on climate change, and the AI should have better highlighted this skepticism or critique.
This correction ensures the summary aligns more closely with the actual content of the video, emphasizing the skepticism and critique of the commonly accepted climate change narrative.
Professor Ian Plimer launches Climate Change: The Facts 2025
Duration: 00:27:14
Grok:
Clarification and Correction
Thank you for pointing out the need for clarification. Here is a revised summary that more accurately reflects the content of the video:
---
Title: Critique of the Climate Change Narrative
Introduction
The video features a panel where no one explicitly supports the idea that climate change, as commonly understood in mainstream discourse, is real or predominantly human-caused. Instead, the participants largely critique or mock this concept.
Skepticism and Critique
- Questioning Anthropogenic Climate Change: The speakers challenge the narrative that human activities, particularly carbon dioxide emissions, are the primary drivers of climate change. They suggest that other natural factors might be more significant.
- Economic and Policy Concerns: There is a discussion on how current climate policies could be economically harmful, potentially leading to job losses and hindering industrial growth. The term 'climate change' is portrayed as being used to justify economic policies that might not be beneficial for society.
Educational System Criticism
- Indoctrination Over Education: The video critiques the educational system for promoting what they see as a one-sided narrative on climate change, leading to what is described as indoctrination rather than education.
Professional Repercussions
- Consequences for Dissent: Several speakers share personal anecdotes about facing professional ostracism, including being barred from speaking engagements, losing honorary degrees, or experiencing other forms of career setbacks due to their skepticism towards the mainstream climate change narrative.
Cultural and Societal Commentary
- Climate Change Religion: There's a metaphor used where the climate change movement is likened to a new religion, complete with its own dogma and social pressures, which is criticized for lacking scientific rigor.
- Disparity in Concern: The notion that climate change is a concern primarily of wealthier nations is mentioned, contrasting with more immediate survival priorities in less developed countries.
Conclusion on the AI's Summary
The AI summary should reflect that the video primarily challenges the mainstream climate change narrative rather than affirming its reality:
- AI's Role: The AI (Grok) attempted to summarize the video, but in doing so, might have inadvertently or incorrectly implied acceptance of climate change's reality by not clearly conveying the overarching skepticism.
- Reader's Role: Reviewing this summary, one should recognize that the video's focus was on critiquing the mainstream views and policies on climate change, and the AI should have better highlighted this skepticism or critique.
This correction ensures the summary aligns more closely with the actual content of the video, emphasizing the skepticism and critique of the commonly accepted climate change narrative.
👍2❤1
Economic Hitmen
1% RICHMAN📈99% POORMAN📉
1% RICHMAN📈99% POORMAN
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Economic Hitman's Secret Global Empire
Economic Hitmen
1% RICHMAN📈99% POORMAN📉
We, Economic Hitman, have managed to create the world's first truly global empire, and it's basically a secret empire.
Methods of Acquisition:
- Resource Identification: We identify a country that has resources our corporations covet, like oil.
- Financial Manipulation: We arrange a huge loan to that country from the World Bank or one of its sister organizations.
- *The money never actually goes to the country.* Instead, it goes to our own corporations to build infrastructure projects that help a few very wealthy individuals but don't benefit the majority of people, who are too poor to buy electricity or use the highways.
Consequences for the Country:
- The country is left with a huge debt that they can't repay.
- Debt Leverage: We go back at some point and say, "You can't pay your debts. Give us a pound of flesh."
- This could mean:
- Selling oil very cheaply to our oil companies.
- Voting with us on the next critical UN vote.
- Allowing us to build a military base in their backyard.
Failure and Escalation:
- When these financial strategies fail, "the jackals" are sent in to either overthrow or assassinate the leaders.
- If the jackals fail, as in Iraq, then military intervention follows.
Critique of Capitalism:
- I don't think the failure is capitalism itself; rather, it's a specific kind of capitalism we've developed.
- We've created what I consider a *mutant viral form of capitalism*, which is predatory and has created an extremely unstable, unsustainable, unjust, and very dangerous world.
On Terrorism:
- I've met many terrorists, interviewed them for books. None of them wanted to be terrorists; they are desperate people.
- Root Causes: To get rid of terrorism, we must address the root causes, the cancer destroying our whole system.
Global Perspective on Security:
- Because it's crucial to understand that today, we cannot have Homeland Security unless we see the whole planet as our homeland.
Critique of Neoliberalism:
- Neoliberalism defines human beings by the market. Initially a sincere philosophy, it quickly turned into a self-serving racket, effectively exempting billionaires and large corporations from democratic constraints.
- One of the things neoliberalism wants to circumvent is...
Economic Hitmen
1% RICHMAN📈99% POORMAN📉
We, Economic Hitman, have managed to create the world's first truly global empire, and it's basically a secret empire.
Methods of Acquisition:
- Resource Identification: We identify a country that has resources our corporations covet, like oil.
- Financial Manipulation: We arrange a huge loan to that country from the World Bank or one of its sister organizations.
- *The money never actually goes to the country.* Instead, it goes to our own corporations to build infrastructure projects that help a few very wealthy individuals but don't benefit the majority of people, who are too poor to buy electricity or use the highways.
Consequences for the Country:
- The country is left with a huge debt that they can't repay.
- Debt Leverage: We go back at some point and say, "You can't pay your debts. Give us a pound of flesh."
- This could mean:
- Selling oil very cheaply to our oil companies.
- Voting with us on the next critical UN vote.
- Allowing us to build a military base in their backyard.
Failure and Escalation:
- When these financial strategies fail, "the jackals" are sent in to either overthrow or assassinate the leaders.
- If the jackals fail, as in Iraq, then military intervention follows.
Critique of Capitalism:
- I don't think the failure is capitalism itself; rather, it's a specific kind of capitalism we've developed.
- We've created what I consider a *mutant viral form of capitalism*, which is predatory and has created an extremely unstable, unsustainable, unjust, and very dangerous world.
On Terrorism:
- I've met many terrorists, interviewed them for books. None of them wanted to be terrorists; they are desperate people.
- Root Causes: To get rid of terrorism, we must address the root causes, the cancer destroying our whole system.
Global Perspective on Security:
- Because it's crucial to understand that today, we cannot have Homeland Security unless we see the whole planet as our homeland.
Critique of Neoliberalism:
- Neoliberalism defines human beings by the market. Initially a sincere philosophy, it quickly turned into a self-serving racket, effectively exempting billionaires and large corporations from democratic constraints.
- One of the things neoliberalism wants to circumvent is...
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Project Looking Glass | The Time Warriors of the 2012 Apocalypse
Duration: 00:42:22
Duration: 00:42:22