“It takes far more effort to call someone a liar. You have to prove that they knew something before hand.”
Absolutely not.
Or else their “oops I didn’t know” scam is perpetually unfalsifiable.
Classic commie scam to encourage the separation of control from all liability for abuse of control.
I.e
Gross negligence
= so extremely failing at the task at hand, that it must be considered intentional
= when they claimed something would work when it’s so extremely clear to any competent individual that it would not be
= “lies”
Stop using the commies language, adopting the left belief that strips all accountability in even the most extremely predictable cases.
Stop falling for the commies wordcel scams.
Absolutely not.
Or else their “oops I didn’t know” scam is perpetually unfalsifiable.
Classic commie scam to encourage the separation of control from all liability for abuse of control.
I.e
Gross negligence
= so extremely failing at the task at hand, that it must be considered intentional
= when they claimed something would work when it’s so extremely clear to any competent individual that it would not be
= “lies”
Stop using the commies language, adopting the left belief that strips all accountability in even the most extremely predictable cases.
Stop falling for the commies wordcel scams.
👏5💯2
“But you can’t call it lying if you can’t read their mind to prove intent”
Really?
You really want society to work that way?
Brb, starting my “hit-tards for hire” hitman and corporate frauds for hire group, always innocent of anything because they’re just too stupid to know that anything is illegal.
Too stupid, no intent, no lies.
Sure.
Commies have played you for absolute fools.
Really?
You really want society to work that way?
Brb, starting my “hit-tards for hire” hitman and corporate frauds for hire group, always innocent of anything because they’re just too stupid to know that anything is illegal.
Too stupid, no intent, no lies.
Sure.
Commies have played you for absolute fools.
💯6😨2🤣1
AHA
Ya commie lying fa66ots
Knew it
Turns our basically all the English dictionaries list BOTH as acceptable definitions of lies:
(a) involving intent AND
(b) definitions where INTENT IS IRRELEVANT
“calling something a lie requires proving intent”
= Was always a commie wordcel lie.
And anyone with a strong grasp of language already knew this to be true, no dictionary needed, since forever.
Idea of broad price controls being a plausible fix for inflation is an absolute “lie”, no intent proving necessary.
Who says so? Reality says so.
The commies have played you for absolute fools.
Ya commie lying fa66ots
Knew it
Turns our basically all the English dictionaries list BOTH as acceptable definitions of lies:
(a) involving intent AND
(b) definitions where INTENT IS IRRELEVANT
“calling something a lie requires proving intent”
= Was always a commie wordcel lie.
And anyone with a strong grasp of language already knew this to be true, no dictionary needed, since forever.
Idea of broad price controls being a plausible fix for inflation is an absolute “lie”, no intent proving necessary.
Who says so? Reality says so.
The commies have played you for absolute fools.
💯4
Wait, she spent her most formative years growing up in Canada,
And she admits that Canada had a huge influence on her life path
Commie Canada strikes again
And she admits that Canada had a huge influence on her life path
Commie Canada strikes again
😡4🤯3💯3