“Who benefits?”

Proving intent,

i.e. mind-reading

= modern scam

Stop allowing the communists to play dumb.

All they do is lie.

Predictability, not provability of mind-reading.

“But you can’t call it lying if you can’t read their mind to prove intent”

Really?

You really want society to work that way?

Brb, starting my “hit-tards for hire” hitman and corporate frauds for hire group, always innocent of anything because they’re just too stupid to know that anything is illegal.

Too stupid, no intent, no lies.

Sure.

Commies have played you for absolute fools.

AHA

Ya commie lying fa66ots

Knew it

Turns our basically all the English dictionaries list BOTH as acceptable definitions of lies:

(a) involving intent AND

(b) definitions where INTENT IS IRRELEVANT

“calling something a lie requires proving intent”

= Was always a commie wordcel lie.

And anyone with a strong grasp of language already knew this to be true, no dictionary needed, since forever.

Idea of broad price controls being a plausible fix for inflation is an absolute “lie”, no intent proving necessary.

Who says so? Reality says so.

The commies have played you for absolute fools.

Intent not needed for word sense 3.

Commies constantly lie.

Never let them convince you that mind-reading is required before you can just call it as it is, “lies”.

Communism hates real crypto

Fundamentally

Commie win = Crypto crash