We have entered the early stage of the late stage of the cycle
Biggest gains coming toward the end of this year
Prepare now
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Biggest gains coming toward the end of this year
Prepare now
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯9🔥4
DoomPosting
We have entered the early stage of the late stage of the cycle Biggest gains coming toward the end of this year Prepare now 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Welcome to the early stage of the late stage of the 4-year cycle
Anyone saying the cycle is ending within a couple months — has either been mislead
Or is trying to mislead you, for some strategic reason
But, at the same time, no time to waste
Drop what you’re doing and get in now
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Anyone saying the cycle is ending within a couple months — has either been mislead
Or is trying to mislead you, for some strategic reason
But, at the same time, no time to waste
Drop what you’re doing and get in now
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀5💯4🏆2
Why are few willing to admit that the cycle top occurs at nearly an identical time each cycle?
I.e. Nov/Dec later this year?
— Many of the influencers trying to somehow sell you this insight, as if it’s a huge thing
Not exactly a big secret
Nov/Dec 2025 cycle top
Be ready
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
I.e. Nov/Dec later this year?
— Many of the influencers trying to somehow sell you this insight, as if it’s a huge thing
Not exactly a big secret
Nov/Dec 2025 cycle top
Be ready
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
❤🔥6👀4💯2
DoomPosting
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
American culture is prototypical "guilt culture" = fairness under threat of punishment
while Japanese is prototypical "shame culture" = social honor & threat of social ostracism
i.e. US thinking essentially independent of the question of whether huge boobs are bad, being irrelevant to questions of fairness, and not considering social factors
Japan thinking, though, could directly judge huge boobs negatively, for social reasons, not caring much at all about what’s fair
So, the Japanese man’s theory that it was socially unacceptable in the past, is in line with the latter values system
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
while Japanese is prototypical "shame culture" = social honor & threat of social ostracism
i.e. US thinking essentially independent of the question of whether huge boobs are bad, being irrelevant to questions of fairness, and not considering social factors
Japan thinking, though, could directly judge huge boobs negatively, for social reasons, not caring much at all about what’s fair
So, the Japanese man’s theory that it was socially unacceptable in the past, is in line with the latter values system
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4👀3
DoomPosting
Asian man’s research and theorizing on Asian lying: “Europeans are generally more honest than Asians, despite the fact that honesty and intelligence correlate.” “I ran a BMA a year ago to detect which variables were the most robustly associated with honesty…
See also previous post this is a reply to,
about the asian man’s research and theories about a biological lack of “conscience”, in the western sense.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
about the asian man’s research and theories about a biological lack of “conscience”, in the western sense.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4😨1
$Butthole, cheap $Fartcoin derivative or sufficiently novel?
Let’s consider some others,
$Fartcoin -> $Pisscoin
= Cheap derivative
$Pisscoin was equal or worse to $Fartcoin in essentially all ways.
Superior in no ways.
= Strictly-dominated
$Fartcoin -> $Butthole
= NOT a cheap derivative, despite being in the same theme.
Whereas $Fartcoin had one area where it really excelled = being a maximally funny name to try to force tradfi and MSM to say, without being censored, i.e. exactly one joke.
But $Butthole, unlike $Fartcoin, lends itself to a big range many off-color jokes, not just one.
In fact, you’d struggle to find a coin name that lends itself to a greater range of off-color jokes than $Butthole.
In this way, $Butthole is arguably better in at least one area than $Fartcoin was.
= NOT strictly-dominated
See also the range of pet coins, MEW, Doge, Shiba, Popcat — which are not cheap strictly-inferior clones of each other, and instead rather arguably have at least one arguably superior, or very distinct feature.
I.e.,
As they say in game theory, none of the top coins in a category can be “strictly-dominating” any of the other top coins in the same category.
None can be better at everything than any other of the top ones, or else the strictly-dominated ones get crushed.
See also Dexscreener’s Moonshot vs Pumpfun — Moonshot is essentially strictly-dominated by Pumpfun, better at absolutely nothing, equal or worse at everything.
Must be arguably better at at least SOMETHING.
Analogies, not copies.
Just say no to strictly-dominated derivative copycat coins.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Let’s consider some others,
$Fartcoin -> $Pisscoin
= Cheap derivative
$Pisscoin was equal or worse to $Fartcoin in essentially all ways.
Superior in no ways.
= Strictly-dominated
$Fartcoin -> $Butthole
= NOT a cheap derivative, despite being in the same theme.
Whereas $Fartcoin had one area where it really excelled = being a maximally funny name to try to force tradfi and MSM to say, without being censored, i.e. exactly one joke.
But $Butthole, unlike $Fartcoin, lends itself to a big range many off-color jokes, not just one.
In fact, you’d struggle to find a coin name that lends itself to a greater range of off-color jokes than $Butthole.
In this way, $Butthole is arguably better in at least one area than $Fartcoin was.
= NOT strictly-dominated
See also the range of pet coins, MEW, Doge, Shiba, Popcat — which are not cheap strictly-inferior clones of each other, and instead rather arguably have at least one arguably superior, or very distinct feature.
I.e.,
As they say in game theory, none of the top coins in a category can be “strictly-dominating” any of the other top coins in the same category.
None can be better at everything than any other of the top ones, or else the strictly-dominated ones get crushed.
See also Dexscreener’s Moonshot vs Pumpfun — Moonshot is essentially strictly-dominated by Pumpfun, better at absolutely nothing, equal or worse at everything.
Must be arguably better at at least SOMETHING.
Analogies, not copies.
Just say no to strictly-dominated derivative copycat coins.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5😁2🫡1
Visually,
Red ones = Category leaders = NOT strictly-dominated
— Having some tradeoff that makes it superior in at least one way, versus all the others
Grey ones = Category losers = Strictly-dominated
— Being best at nothing derivative copycats. These you can expect to fade to zero, unless there’s somewhere that they excell that you missed.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Red ones = Category leaders = NOT strictly-dominated
— Having some tradeoff that makes it superior in at least one way, versus all the others
Grey ones = Category losers = Strictly-dominated
— Being best at nothing derivative copycats. These you can expect to fade to zero, unless there’s somewhere that they excell that you missed.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5👀3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Zuckerberg:
"We're going to get rid of fact-checkers and replace them with community notes, similar to X."
"Fact-checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they've created."
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
"We're going to get rid of fact-checkers and replace them with community notes, similar to X."
"Fact-checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they've created."
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀6😐3💯2