Maybe your path is harder because your calling is higher.

Not my screenshot here, but how does anyone take these sort of tweets seriously? The gang rape situation is far worse in Britain than in the entire USA. There is no equivalent of something like Rotherham grooming gangs here in the entire USA that I’m aware of. Black on White rape and violence is a problem in the US, but not at the massive, organized industrial scale as what has been well documented in Britain.

Most likely, having an armed population in the US has helped deter this industrial-scale grooming and rape, like what we’ve seen in Britain.

So It seems like to me that the original poster here just has a bone to pick with Americans and the Second Amendment for some odd reason — perhaps ressentiment. The solution to that problem (if you see it as a problem) is very simple: live in England instead of America.

Also, what the OP fails to mention is that Americans didn’t have the internet in the 1960s, so most of them had no idea what was really going on outside of their neighborhoods. White flight from the cities wasn’t always a conscious reaction to black violence, but a subconscious instinct to be in areas where Whites were a thriving majority — not in the inner city.

:)

If the Second Amendment is in fact holding us all back, you can help save the White race by moving your ass to a place where you don’t have gun rights.

Very few conservatives/libertarians types make this argument that the Second Amendment prevents tyranny or oppression, no one says “we’re all okay just because we have guns over here.” they don’t talk like that, and I know this because I watch all the major guntube channels religiously. This idea that conservatives/libertarians actually think this is just another Dissident Rightoid strawman argument to convince you that your gun rights aren’t beneficial, because we’re all just supposed to be helpless, suffering peasants waiting for some counter elites (from somewhere) to save us.

Guns are a tool, a very useful tool, and a very necessary tool. That’s it. And that’s how conservatives/libertarians look at it. Despite all their flaws, they are right about guns and gun rights.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/15730

A lot of the disingenuous, strawman arguments that Dissident Rightoids make against gun rights can also be used to strawman freedom of speech.

Has freedom of speech prevented anti-White tyranny? NO.

What do most people do with when they have freedom of speech? Nothing good or useful.

Does having freedom of speech protect Whites from being replaced? No, it doesn’t.

Does that make freedom of speech useless and unimportant? No.

Of course, very few Dissident Rightoids will ever criticize freedom of speech as harshly and as disdainfully as they criticize gun rights, because their movement-careers depend on the former.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/15731

Well that’s weird AF. Btw, Tim Kennedy is one of the glowiest glow-niggas of all time.

Edit: If you have the time, search “Tim Kennedy Stolen Valor” on YouTube to see what a fraud he is. He works for the DOD while lying about his service and credentials, pushing for gun control, and he got away with it for a while thanks to the vetbro culture.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/ghostofrisky/4351

"Woke-right" would want the king of England to be White, English able bodied and male. "Woke-right" is a word constructed by a Gramscian academic who spent years as a leftist activist and is a homosexual. James Lindsay 's definition of " Woke-right" is a normal White guy from Moncton, NB circa 1989

What’s the opposite of the “Woke Right”?

The Asleep-Right.

The Founding Fathers were very “Woke Right,” since none of them considered blacks to be fully human, and certainly not equal to Whites. Racial segregation by law was the norm for most of American history. Citizenship was for Whites only, with a “woke right” immigration policy that preferenced NW Europeans up to the 1960s.

That should be a checkmate against all these conservatives labeling us “Woke Right.”

It’s become clear to me that most people around here really don’t understand the reality in America, for most Americans, because their entire map of reality comes from the internet. Their arguments for what ordinary Americans should be doing or should have been doing make assumptions about Americans that are actually ludicrous.

Most Americans don’t spend as much time as we do on political content and monitoring everything that happens. They’re normal people, focused more on their immediate surroundings, keeping their job, paying bills, and time with friends family — things that are objectively more important for them. Their problem is the opposite of “you need to touch grass.” That’s why they seem so oblivious to people in our movement.

Just like most people anywhere else, most Americans are normies. Instead of understanding that, people in our movement continuously get mad at Americans because they assume that everyone (especially Americans for some odd reason) should be as hyper informed and fixated on racial politics as we are.

I’m not going to tell people to touch grass or “get out of your room,” but bro, we need to stop projecting our worldview and perspective onto ordinary people. That’s no way to actually understand the majority of the population here or anywhere else.

This is what I mean about the movement projecting its worldview onto normies.

Most Americans still don’t know about the Hart-Celler act. The OP assumes every American is as well informed on politics and race as we are, therefore he can place doubt on gun rights since “Americans didn’t do anything when they should have known in the 60s.”

They aren’t totally checked out of politics either, they’re just not as politically hyper focused and well informed as you are. At least not yet.

The movement doesn’t need more philosophy, what we need to learn is psychology and how normal people actually live and think.

Hey conservatives, I’m really against Jewish identity politics. What about you?

Hey conservatives, If you call us “Woke Right,” what does that make Zionists?

Stepping into the mind of a Based Jeet.

The USPS gets it: Blacks are the real Jews, not those Ashkenazi imposters. Make Israel Black Again! ✊🏿

They had their reasons. Good reasons.

https://youtu.be/85zMbNZLlvA?si=dUZQz3x1vJFhPBRc

Radical Dose presents Pan e Vin, the ancient Venetian winter ritual associated with the feast of Epiphany.

https://radicaldose.com/pan-e-vin-an-ancient-ritual-endures/

Radical Dose

I believe group behavior matters. The existence of a decent Jew or black does not undermine our views. And admitting this does not either.

I can say on the whole Jews and blacks and Indians are not compatible with us in a shared society. I see no point in pretending exceptions don’t exist when it’s part of our argument that they necessarily are going to exist as much as bad white people exist.