Shitlibs will see this and say “see, this is why we need more gun control in America…” which always translates to taking guns away from White people because negroes have a habit of shooting each other.

I honestly believe negroes primarily exist within our society simply to provide the establishment the pretext to disarm us all.

I sometimes think about how the psychological phenomenon known as status anxiety is further proof that all complex, large scale societies are fundamentally unnatural and unhealthy. In other words, humans (especially Whites) were made to live in rural communities of no more than a few hundred people, where anyone that worked was respected as a valued member of that society, regardless of their specific occupation.

I also think about how social anxiety in complex societies directly and indirectly pushes people towards becoming shitlibs. For example, it amplifies the virtue signaling impulse to an unhealthy degree, because moral/political status becomes an alternative or secondary path for social status — moral status as a social status.

Frustrated urban dwellers who are anxious about their own social status may assert themselves over people they see as rivals by associating them with ‘dumb, racist hicks in West Virginia,’ thereby lowering those rivals’ status.

So what I’m getting at here is that some shitlibs, deep down, don’t genuinely believe in all their virtue signals; they don’t all genuinely want to welcome refugees or protect the LGBTQ community, it’s just a means to an end. It’s a poor, suicidal attempt at a solution to an artificial problem, created by living under unnatural conditions.

This pajeet thinks Western women are in his DMs.

In reality, it's just other Indian men in his DMs.

I wonder how many Indian males would empty their savings for an AI-generated White woman on X that says she likes Indian men.

Just putting that out there, do what you want with that idea :)

Edit: If it isn’t too time consuming, I might try this and then post the results for everyone’s entertainment. It might be an amusing side hustle.

So is this an elbows up moment?

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AltSkull48/21463

https://x.com/afpost/status/1989860458086768822?

Crazy conspiracy theory (but we’ll also say it’s happening yet it’s a good thing it is then)

Some things never change.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/wVnJGJoUXNM

I hate it when people bash on Americans. I think Americans are some of the kindest more generous people I have met. It has been drilled into British people's heads that Americans are loud and obnoxious through years of propaganda.

One undeniable sign that we live in a world of female privilege is that it’s still socially acceptable for women to openly insult and denigrate men. Women can even get away with open displays of racism when it’s against certain types of men, whereas the opposite is absolutely prohibited.

Ronald Lauder:
"The world hates us, we have to imprison the world".
(Paraphrased).

new Whiteness map update

If we didn’t have the Second Amendment, the epidemic of black on White violence and rape would be so much worse in the US. It’s bad now, but it could be a million times worse.

I know that in my state, a lot of White women carry a handgun.

Universalism, individualism, and egalitarianism are not Christian imports. They are endogenous to white people and predate the advent of Christianity. Our inner character, built on reason and empathy, is what allowed us to build the best civilizations—not a religion rooted in Judaism. https://radicaldose.com/universalism-individualism-and-egalitarianism-what-are-they-and-where-do-they-come-from/

I didn’t write this post, but I don’t think it should be offensive to any pro-White Christians. The author is actually taking blame away from Christianity when it comes to the egalitarianism and individualistic nature of Whites. He writes about how these characteristics are ultimately racial and thus pre-Christian.

It’s not an anti-Christian or a pro-Christian post. It’s more about race realism.

I still see the McMichael’s case from 2020 being brought up as some sort of proof that “Whites can’t legally defend themselves against negroes!” And it’s also absurdly used to suggest that the 2A is therefore useless — it’s all black pilled brain slop coming from people that refuse to read the basic details of the case.

You have to know the basic details of the McMichaels case — how the crime transpired, what laws were broken — before you can make any credible claims about the legal ramifications.

To make a long story short, the McMichaels facilitated a deadly encounter by pursuing and cornering a fleeing thief that was not initially threatening anyone — I’m not trying to defend Arbery here, but Arbery wasn’t technically a threat. Put this in contrast to other cases where a White guy used lethal force to defend himself (or someone else) from a negro, like Ian Cranston, who recently had his conviction overturned. We also have the popular case of Daniel Penny on the NYC subway.

The point here: the McMichaels were not simply screwed by an anti-White judicial system, they legitimately fucked up by being the aggressors and assuming the responsibilities of law enforcement.

It’s also important to know the laws in your area, and that self-defense is a legal claim that only has merit when you are not the aggressor. The McMichaels were not defending themselves or anyone else, which is why they are in prison for killing a negro, regardless of additional hate crime charges.