This pajeet thinks Western women are in his DMs.

In reality, it's just other Indian men in his DMs.

I wonder how many Indian males would empty their savings for an AI-generated White woman on X that says she likes Indian men.

Just putting that out there, do what you want with that idea :)

Edit: If it isn’t too time consuming, I might try this and then post the results for everyone’s entertainment. It might be an amusing side hustle.

So is this an elbows up moment?

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AltSkull48/21463

https://x.com/afpost/status/1989860458086768822?

Crazy conspiracy theory (but we’ll also say it’s happening yet it’s a good thing it is then)

Some things never change.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/wVnJGJoUXNM

I hate it when people bash on Americans. I think Americans are some of the kindest more generous people I have met. It has been drilled into British people's heads that Americans are loud and obnoxious through years of propaganda.

One undeniable sign that we live in a world of female privilege is that it’s still socially acceptable for women to openly insult and denigrate men. Women can even get away with open displays of racism when it’s against certain types of men, whereas the opposite is absolutely prohibited.

Ronald Lauder:
"The world hates us, we have to imprison the world".
(Paraphrased).

new Whiteness map update

If we didn’t have the Second Amendment, the epidemic of black on White violence and rape would be so much worse in the US. It’s bad now, but it could be a million times worse.

I know that in my state, a lot of White women carry a handgun.

Universalism, individualism, and egalitarianism are not Christian imports. They are endogenous to white people and predate the advent of Christianity. Our inner character, built on reason and empathy, is what allowed us to build the best civilizations—not a religion rooted in Judaism. https://radicaldose.com/universalism-individualism-and-egalitarianism-what-are-they-and-where-do-they-come-from/

I didn’t write this post, but I don’t think it should be offensive to any pro-White Christians. The author is actually taking blame away from Christianity when it comes to the egalitarianism and individualistic nature of Whites. He writes about how these characteristics are ultimately racial and thus pre-Christian.

It’s not an anti-Christian or a pro-Christian post. It’s more about race realism.

I still see the McMichael’s case from 2020 being brought up as some sort of proof that “Whites can’t legally defend themselves against negroes!” And it’s also absurdly used to suggest that the 2A is therefore useless — it’s all black pilled brain slop coming from people that refuse to read the basic details of the case.

You have to know the basic details of the McMichaels case — how the crime transpired, what laws were broken — before you can make any credible claims about the legal ramifications.

To make a long story short, the McMichaels facilitated a deadly encounter by pursuing and cornering a fleeing thief that was not initially threatening anyone — I’m not trying to defend Arbery here, but Arbery wasn’t technically a threat. Put this in contrast to other cases where a White guy used lethal force to defend himself (or someone else) from a negro, like Ian Cranston, who recently had his conviction overturned. We also have the popular case of Daniel Penny on the NYC subway.

The point here: the McMichaels were not simply screwed by an anti-White judicial system, they legitimately fucked up by being the aggressors and assuming the responsibilities of law enforcement.

It’s also important to know the laws in your area, and that self-defense is a legal claim that only has merit when you are not the aggressor. The McMichaels were not defending themselves or anyone else, which is why they are in prison for killing a negro, regardless of additional hate crime charges.

The First Amendment has been used to destroy pronoun policies at schools — schools in Ohio (and soon throughout the US) can no longer force students to use preferred pronouns for trannies. This is a big win.

https://youtu.be/KTnZF51eAI4?

Spritz is not a trendy import but a living Venetian tradition — a daily ritual rooted in the Habsburg and Adriatic cultural space of Lombardy-Venetia. Long before global mixology discovered it, Spritz united ordinary Europeans in taverns, cafés, and bacari as a refreshment for conversation and community. From its origins as watered wine to the distinct Select, Aperol, and Campari variants, Spritz reflects the enduring identity of the Veneto and its people — a heritage now diffused worldwide through Prosecco and Venetian food culture. https://radicaldose.com/spritz/

There’s so much about human history that we just don’t know, especially pre-Younger Dryas. I already believe that there’s a greater conspiracy by the archeology establishment to cover it up, because the truth has racial undertones and political implications that completely undermine the current dogma regarding which groups get the “indigenous” card. I bet the establishment already has physical evidence that ancient White-Nordic-Caucasoid phenotypes built megaliths and burial mounds in a pre-Younger-Dryas North America, but of course it will stay hidden; because that would really call into question all the current mongoloid “first nations” groups claiming to be indigenous. And while we’re on this topic, you can just imagine how the establishment would treat any evidence regarding who actually built the pyramids, because the truth is probably too White. Why else would the archaeology establishment go to such absurd lengths to block and criticize all attempts to excavate further?

If someone like Dr. Zahi Hawass found evidence that the Egyptians didn’t build the pyramids (he most likely has this evidence) and are thus not even indigenous to Egypt, you think he’s going to share that with the public? Hell no.

That would explain why he hates alternative-archaeologists like Graham Hancock. It’s the only reason that makes any sense.