Denis Nikitin and the Russian Volunteer Corps: unwavering principles, defying social pressure, risking everything. https://radicaldose.com/denis-nikitin-and-geopolitics-my-personal-analysis/

I keep seeing Telegroids acting like the US is only 20% White and just “full of n!ggers and beaners everywhere!” If they have ever been here, these are the people that only set foot in a major city.

If you get out of the major cities, most areas of the US are still majority White. There’s several large towns with 10 minutes of me that are over 90 White, I don’t live in a super remote area by any stretch.

When Telegroids hear that the USA is 55% White (or less by people that are lying) they imagine it like a small country with demographics that are more evenly distributed throughout the whole geography. They don’t understand that the USA is a continent sized country with regions so large that each region could be a large, nearly all White country on its own.

I don’t think the racial-demographic situation in the USA is exceptionally worse than any other Western country, it’s certainly not as bad as Telegroids imagine it is. The USA’s gigantic size not only blunts the effect of diversity, but its facilitated region-size levels of auto-segregation — there’s many country sized regions here that are over 90% White.

But If you really must live in a country that is over 90% White, your only realistic option is somewhere in Eastern Europe.

“The demographics in the USA are beyond fucked bro!!!” — some Telegroid.

So what country would you like to live in that doesn’t have bad demographics, or won’t have bad demographics in the near future? I think your best bet would be EE countries, preferably the ones that are too poor to attract any migrants.

Yes, regarding this issue, all sides of the Atlantic have engaged in crab bucket nationalism.

https://radicaldose.com/crab-bucket-nationalism/

Here’s the reality: many US states (all the size of European countries) are as White or even Whiter than some countries in Europe.

This isn’t presented as any sort of flex, but to make a point about how huge the USA is and the truth about the racial demographics here. At this point, seeing the USA as a single country is only nominally accurate but criminally disingenuous when discussing the racial-demographic issues here.

This is why I speak favorably about balkanization.

Trump is such an idiot. There are good reasons for the US to expand their influence over Greenland (keeping Russia and China out of the Arctic is the big one) but this is a terrible argument that Trump is making, one that will totally backfire.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/The_Course_of_Empire/43610

I would love to see Europe control Greenland and the Arctic, it’s closer to their area of the world. But I also understand that keeping Russia and China out of the arctic requires military resources (nuclear submarines and aircraft carrier fleets) that only the USA has enough of at the moment.

The resources in Greenland are also likely necessary for the advancement of AI and win the technological-economic race — which will determine who gets to be a world power in the near future. So the question is, which world power will get those resources first and gain the unfair advantage from it? China or the USA? This is all part of a technological arms race between the East and the West.

As much as I dislike US imperialism (which comes at the expense of the American nation) I think Chinese supremacy over the region (and its resources) is a far worse outcome for Europe and the wider West. The Chinese want to become a world power so that they can exact revenge over the entire west for their century of humiliation.

If the USA taking over Greenland means China won’t have access to it, as well as less power in the Arctic, that’s the better outcome.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/18401

World War 3 will most likely be between China and the USA, with all allies/proxies involved. But the victor of that conflict will most likely be determined by whichever side has the most advanced AI, and that requires resources from places like Greenland.

Can we trust Denmark to protect Greenland from China?

The Danish administration certainly isn’t the least bit supportive of Taiwan, which is another sign that they’re more in bed with Beijing.

https://thediplomat.com/2025/10/how-denmark-has-adopted-chinas-language-on-taiwan-and-why-it-matters/

https://youtu.be/G22fa3u2RIs?

It’s still baffling to me why White Nationalists would care so much about the USA taking over Greenland, it’s not like Greenland is even a White European country. It would only make sense if they’re secretly working for the Russians/Chinese.

The only thing about Greenland that matters is who doesn’t have access to it: China and Russia. That includes indirect access via “free trade.”