“The demographics in the USA are beyond fucked bro!!!” — some Telegroid.

So what country would you like to live in that doesn’t have bad demographics, or won’t have bad demographics in the near future? I think your best bet would be EE countries, preferably the ones that are too poor to attract any migrants.

Yes, regarding this issue, all sides of the Atlantic have engaged in crab bucket nationalism.

https://radicaldose.com/crab-bucket-nationalism/

Here’s the reality: many US states (all the size of European countries) are as White or even Whiter than some countries in Europe.

This isn’t presented as any sort of flex, but to make a point about how huge the USA is and the truth about the racial demographics here. At this point, seeing the USA as a single country is only nominally accurate but criminally disingenuous when discussing the racial-demographic issues here.

This is why I speak favorably about balkanization.

Trump is such an idiot. There are good reasons for the US to expand their influence over Greenland (keeping Russia and China out of the Arctic is the big one) but this is a terrible argument that Trump is making, one that will totally backfire.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/The_Course_of_Empire/43610

I would love to see Europe control Greenland and the Arctic, it’s closer to their area of the world. But I also understand that keeping Russia and China out of the arctic requires military resources (nuclear submarines and aircraft carrier fleets) that only the USA has enough of at the moment.

The resources in Greenland are also likely necessary for the advancement of AI and win the technological-economic race — which will determine who gets to be a world power in the near future. So the question is, which world power will get those resources first and gain the unfair advantage from it? China or the USA? This is all part of a technological arms race between the East and the West.

As much as I dislike US imperialism (which comes at the expense of the American nation) I think Chinese supremacy over the region (and its resources) is a far worse outcome for Europe and the wider West. The Chinese want to become a world power so that they can exact revenge over the entire west for their century of humiliation.

If the USA taking over Greenland means China won’t have access to it, as well as less power in the Arctic, that’s the better outcome.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/18401

World War 3 will most likely be between China and the USA, with all allies/proxies involved. But the victor of that conflict will most likely be determined by whichever side has the most advanced AI, and that requires resources from places like Greenland.

Can we trust Denmark to protect Greenland from China?

The Danish administration certainly isn’t the least bit supportive of Taiwan, which is another sign that they’re more in bed with Beijing.

https://thediplomat.com/2025/10/how-denmark-has-adopted-chinas-language-on-taiwan-and-why-it-matters/

https://youtu.be/G22fa3u2RIs?

It’s still baffling to me why White Nationalists would care so much about the USA taking over Greenland, it’s not like Greenland is even a White European country. It would only make sense if they’re secretly working for the Russians/Chinese.

The only thing about Greenland that matters is who doesn’t have access to it: China and Russia. That includes indirect access via “free trade.”

There’s no point in defending Greenland from the “big mean USA” if Denmark is just going to sell Greenland’s land and resources to Chinese companies.

Patriots in control.

@AltSkull48

All in all, I'd much prefer a Danish Greenland, but if it's not Danish, and the Danes have no plans to actually settle it with more Danes, then what exactly is the reason America can't have it? Denmark can't develop it without Colonial settlement, the Eskimos are worthless 80 IQ child-abusing Drug Addicts. Any money pumped into it as is, might as well be thrown into the sea, or lit on fire instead.

The Iron Philologist argues that as information becomes instant and bite-sized, people put less work into understanding it—weakening attention spans, shrinking language, and replacing real, internal knowledge with shallow consumption. https://radicaldose.com/the-effort-inversion-of-information-accessibility-paradox/