The thing about universal gimmedats is that it's going to be paid for by taxes in one form or another and the actual quantity of goods isn't being altered so the price of everything will just go up. No-one will actually be better off for it. Everyone thinking it's free money are assuming nothing else about the economy changes in response to it.

Literally all it does is allow them to impoverish whoever they don't like and open the door for complete control of our spending habits.

Americans are poorly served by a regime that calls itself American or of the American people.

Back when the leftists took the anti American stance (before trump), they were right, but for the wrong reason, and aimed at the wrong places.

Give the system an inch of your rights and it’ll take a mile.
Also, it’s worth noticing that because of Republican representatives surrendering to the left on gun control legislation, even more conservatives are giving up on the Republican Party.

https://youtu.be/gjPs2542db4

All the medical professionals transitioning children with irreversible surgery and hormone therapy, these people would be executed in a normal society. I don’t think these de-trans individuals should suicide themselves, instead, they should dedicate their lives to going after these medical professionals in whatever ways they see fit.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/3694

Some of you in my chatroom think I’m against the idea of the government giving White people money.

No.

My whole point was that you should expect the worst with UBI. It’ll probably be something like a digital Walmart/Amazon gift card with an expiration date, or some kind of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) that places its users under greater surveillance. I imagine that whatever financial privacy laws we enjoy now probably won’t apply with UBI, because it won’t technically be money.

That’s my prediction at least, and I hope I’m wrong.

Gee, I wonder if this could have something to do with a certain obese brown man who treats online commentary like professional wrestling.

Nope, can’t possibly be.

"This is what a fully compliant population looks like. Think about how many people that is and how the System that directs them would be absolutely powerless to do anything if even a fraction of them just refused to comply, much less revolted."

Even if they wanted to revolt — and many do now in the face of such insane tyranny — they simply can't because their population is too disarmed. If they attempted some sort of mass non-compliance, they know that their system wouldn't be powerless in dealing with them, it would just be another Tiananmen Square massacre, with the PLA gunning them down if non-lethal means failed to end the non-compliance. That's why the ruling class want to eliminate our Second Amendment, because it's gun rights or no rights.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AltSkull48/5456

In China, protesting and non-compliance doesn't work, and it will never work. All the military officers that complied with the martial law orders and ordered PLA troops to shoot at civilians in 1989 got promotions, while the ones that didn't obey the CCP order to kill found themselves incarcerated, court martialed and/or executed. So if anything, the Tiananmen Square Massacre strengthened the CCP and gave them the opportunity to purge military officers that didn't mindlessly follow orders to kill their own people.

This is what our ruling class want for our countries. Trudeau and many others admire the “efficient” totalitarianism of China, all of which ultimately stems from an absolute monopoly on violence, which starts with denying the gun rights of your people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army_at_the_1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre

I think this kind obey-or-die brutality is coming to the West. Once the ruling class can eliminate their fear of real revolution (armed revolt) from the population, they will have absolutely no reason to ever give into the demands of their people or allow any non-compliance — why would they? This is what they want, they want more power, unchecked and absolute power.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/7897

Nicholas R. Jeelvy on the fact that the masses always back the strong horse — and how the Dissident Right can come to terms with the fact that it is the weak horse. https://counter-currents.com/2022/09/strong-horseism/

>Cursed images.

This Bolshebitch was invited to give the opening speech at the United Nations High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development, where she stated that Agenda 30 “is not a negotiation. That’s why it’s called an agenda, and not a wishlist…We will take these actions.”

Every time I see protests around the world, they always amount to absolutely nothing, especially in countries where the population is relatively disarmed compared to their military — whether it’s the Dutch Farmer protests, the Freedom Convoy, or even the Sri Lankans against their establishment. When I see the futility of protests, it serves as a constant reminder of the wisdom from this quote (pictured) by Mao. I don’t even like Mao, and I don’t like communists at all, but he was absolutely right about this, and he proved it against a militarily stronger foe. When a disarmed population tries to use any kind of soft power against the establishment, it’s just another form of negotiating from a position of weakness. It usually fails.

I’m NOT saying “armed revolution right now” is the answer, that would obviously be a fed post. What I’m saying is that all peaceful (disarmed) means of trying to get our countries back are probably doomed to failure in the current political climate. It’s not the 1930s...

Don’t take this as a black pill, take the prepper pill.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/7902

“Based Putin”

https://news.1rj.ru/str/EternalMuscovite/27878

This sort of thinking will just lead to a White Boxer Rebellion somewhere in Europe someday. I can see it already.

The Chinese Boxer rebels during the Boxer Rebellion believed their fighting spirit and king fu would be enough to stop the “evil westerners” and their guns. Despite having all the will power in the world, they were slaughters by a well armed foreign coalition. If will power alone was enough, I think the Boxer Rebellion would have been successful.

All I’ve been trying to say is that our gun rights matter, and that peaceful protest and non-compliance won’t be enough to bring about any major changes to the ruling class’s agenda. That’s it. And I’m not implying anyone should do anything illegal, I’m just talking about rights and making a prediction based off of the pattern: peaceful protests against the establishment’s agenda never work.

But idiots want to come in here and tell me “gun rights are a cope, it doesn’t matter, it gives you a false sense of security dude! Where there’s a will there’s a way!”

Who’s the one coping here? It’s not me.

Your belief that gun rights don’t matter is what’s giving you the false sense of hope and security. It’s pure sour grapes in a lot of cases.

I’m in this weird position where I have to talk to the dissident right about gun rights and the gun rights people about race, which can be insanely difficult in either case.