Gee, I wonder if this could have something to do with a certain obese brown man who treats online commentary like professional wrestling.

Nope, can’t possibly be.

"This is what a fully compliant population looks like. Think about how many people that is and how the System that directs them would be absolutely powerless to do anything if even a fraction of them just refused to comply, much less revolted."

Even if they wanted to revolt — and many do now in the face of such insane tyranny — they simply can't because their population is too disarmed. If they attempted some sort of mass non-compliance, they know that their system wouldn't be powerless in dealing with them, it would just be another Tiananmen Square massacre, with the PLA gunning them down if non-lethal means failed to end the non-compliance. That's why the ruling class want to eliminate our Second Amendment, because it's gun rights or no rights.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AltSkull48/5456

In China, protesting and non-compliance doesn't work, and it will never work. All the military officers that complied with the martial law orders and ordered PLA troops to shoot at civilians in 1989 got promotions, while the ones that didn't obey the CCP order to kill found themselves incarcerated, court martialed and/or executed. So if anything, the Tiananmen Square Massacre strengthened the CCP and gave them the opportunity to purge military officers that didn't mindlessly follow orders to kill their own people.

This is what our ruling class want for our countries. Trudeau and many others admire the “efficient” totalitarianism of China, all of which ultimately stems from an absolute monopoly on violence, which starts with denying the gun rights of your people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army_at_the_1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre

I think this kind obey-or-die brutality is coming to the West. Once the ruling class can eliminate their fear of real revolution (armed revolt) from the population, they will have absolutely no reason to ever give into the demands of their people or allow any non-compliance — why would they? This is what they want, they want more power, unchecked and absolute power.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/7897

Nicholas R. Jeelvy on the fact that the masses always back the strong horse — and how the Dissident Right can come to terms with the fact that it is the weak horse. https://counter-currents.com/2022/09/strong-horseism/

>Cursed images.

This Bolshebitch was invited to give the opening speech at the United Nations High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development, where she stated that Agenda 30 “is not a negotiation. That’s why it’s called an agenda, and not a wishlist…We will take these actions.”

Every time I see protests around the world, they always amount to absolutely nothing, especially in countries where the population is relatively disarmed compared to their military — whether it’s the Dutch Farmer protests, the Freedom Convoy, or even the Sri Lankans against their establishment. When I see the futility of protests, it serves as a constant reminder of the wisdom from this quote (pictured) by Mao. I don’t even like Mao, and I don’t like communists at all, but he was absolutely right about this, and he proved it against a militarily stronger foe. When a disarmed population tries to use any kind of soft power against the establishment, it’s just another form of negotiating from a position of weakness. It usually fails.

I’m NOT saying “armed revolution right now” is the answer, that would obviously be a fed post. What I’m saying is that all peaceful (disarmed) means of trying to get our countries back are probably doomed to failure in the current political climate. It’s not the 1930s...

Don’t take this as a black pill, take the prepper pill.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/7902

“Based Putin”

https://news.1rj.ru/str/EternalMuscovite/27878

This sort of thinking will just lead to a White Boxer Rebellion somewhere in Europe someday. I can see it already.

The Chinese Boxer rebels during the Boxer Rebellion believed their fighting spirit and king fu would be enough to stop the “evil westerners” and their guns. Despite having all the will power in the world, they were slaughters by a well armed foreign coalition. If will power alone was enough, I think the Boxer Rebellion would have been successful.

All I’ve been trying to say is that our gun rights matter, and that peaceful protest and non-compliance won’t be enough to bring about any major changes to the ruling class’s agenda. That’s it. And I’m not implying anyone should do anything illegal, I’m just talking about rights and making a prediction based off of the pattern: peaceful protests against the establishment’s agenda never work.

But idiots want to come in here and tell me “gun rights are a cope, it doesn’t matter, it gives you a false sense of security dude! Where there’s a will there’s a way!”

Who’s the one coping here? It’s not me.

Your belief that gun rights don’t matter is what’s giving you the false sense of hope and security. It’s pure sour grapes in a lot of cases.

I’m in this weird position where I have to talk to the dissident right about gun rights and the gun rights people about race, which can be insanely difficult in either case.

Anyone who claims that America is responsible for the so-called ‘GAE’ needs to explain how it is London was for centuries and still remains the global center of finance.

Or shut the fuck up already.

I am continually baffled by people on the Right who think Putin is some based anti-imperialist fighting for Western Civilization.

In his recent speech, he didn't just criticize the West for where we've gone wrong in the past several decades, he literally went back to the middle ages in his critiques.

He went on to claim that we Westerners (He specifically blamed Anglo-Saxons) are uniquely evil for our colonialism, racism and exploitation of brown people. Meanwhile everyone ignores that the guy bombed the shit out of Chechenia when they tried to gain independence in the 90s.

I am NOT defending the American regime, but I refuse to pretend that Putin is something he isn't, just because he says some obvious things about sex and gender.

Back to our discussion about gun rights, I want to make it clear (again) that I never suggested that just having gun rights is some sort of golden ticket (or magic bullet) in any resistance against the establishment; because nothing is. I just find it necessary to talk about gun rights because it’s the most overlooked and underappreciated aspect of in discussions about survival and resistance against the system — everyone else in the DR talks about the importance of culture, freedom of speech, strong families, spirituality, health, race and nation, and etc... Do you hear anyone saying that any these things are “just a cope” or “give us false sense of security”? You never do. you never hear anyone saying “spirituality and a healthy family give you a false sense of security!” No one would make such a stupid argument in this entire movement, but for some reason gun rights are singled out as useless and brushed off, which makes no sense to me. You know, logic isn’t supposed to applied that selectively.

There is no one-thing-will-solve-all-of-our-problems solution. The fact that some people think I’ve been suggesting that the 2A is the one solution, the only thing we need to solve all of our problems is projection on their part, they’re projecting their linear thought process onto gun rights, because they’re fixated on “this one thing” or “this one person” will save us; these people then viciously criticize anything outside of what they identify as the one solution in our struggle against the system.

There is no one solution or one thing that we can depend on for victory or survival, you have to have options, and the more options the better.

Having a healthy family is a cope, being strong and lifting weights is a cope, having religion in your life is a cope, intellectualism is a cope, reading books is a cope, networking with like minded people is a cope, living in a White community is a cope... all of these things could theoretically give you “a false sense of security.”

Do you see where I’m going with this? Selectively applying this kind of logic to gun rights is clown-logic on its face.

The whole concept of a false sense of security is inverted by the very people claiming that having access to guns — which would give you control over your own security — somehow gives you a false sense of security. As if you should rely on someone else or the government, and then you wouldn’t have a false sense of security?

It’s just so ludicrous, so preposterous, only autistic NazBols and shitlibs would genuinely believe this line of logic and apply it selectively to gun rights.

I understand the argument that “muh guns” makes some people feel comfortable enough not to see the race issue, but if defenseless against tyranny is your solution to this problem, then RIP. Again, the same could be said about reading books or lifting weights.

There’s a much greater argument to be made that intellectualism has given the Dissident Right a false sense of security, but it’s not one I want make or promote. I think the Dissident Right should be intellectual movement, but it should also include survivalism and embracing martial virtues and martial potential (gun rights).

Twitter thread summarizing Putin’s annexation speech. Could have easily been given by a president of Zimbabwe.

https://twitter.com/KonstantinKisin/status/1575853684852150272