I’m in this weird position where I have to talk to the dissident right about gun rights and the gun rights people about race, which can be insanely difficult in either case.

Anyone who claims that America is responsible for the so-called ‘GAE’ needs to explain how it is London was for centuries and still remains the global center of finance.

Or shut the fuck up already.

I am continually baffled by people on the Right who think Putin is some based anti-imperialist fighting for Western Civilization.

In his recent speech, he didn't just criticize the West for where we've gone wrong in the past several decades, he literally went back to the middle ages in his critiques.

He went on to claim that we Westerners (He specifically blamed Anglo-Saxons) are uniquely evil for our colonialism, racism and exploitation of brown people. Meanwhile everyone ignores that the guy bombed the shit out of Chechenia when they tried to gain independence in the 90s.

I am NOT defending the American regime, but I refuse to pretend that Putin is something he isn't, just because he says some obvious things about sex and gender.

Back to our discussion about gun rights, I want to make it clear (again) that I never suggested that just having gun rights is some sort of golden ticket (or magic bullet) in any resistance against the establishment; because nothing is. I just find it necessary to talk about gun rights because it’s the most overlooked and underappreciated aspect of in discussions about survival and resistance against the system — everyone else in the DR talks about the importance of culture, freedom of speech, strong families, spirituality, health, race and nation, and etc... Do you hear anyone saying that any these things are “just a cope” or “give us false sense of security”? You never do. you never hear anyone saying “spirituality and a healthy family give you a false sense of security!” No one would make such a stupid argument in this entire movement, but for some reason gun rights are singled out as useless and brushed off, which makes no sense to me. You know, logic isn’t supposed to applied that selectively.

There is no one-thing-will-solve-all-of-our-problems solution. The fact that some people think I’ve been suggesting that the 2A is the one solution, the only thing we need to solve all of our problems is projection on their part, they’re projecting their linear thought process onto gun rights, because they’re fixated on “this one thing” or “this one person” will save us; these people then viciously criticize anything outside of what they identify as the one solution in our struggle against the system.

There is no one solution or one thing that we can depend on for victory or survival, you have to have options, and the more options the better.

Having a healthy family is a cope, being strong and lifting weights is a cope, having religion in your life is a cope, intellectualism is a cope, reading books is a cope, networking with like minded people is a cope, living in a White community is a cope... all of these things could theoretically give you “a false sense of security.”

Do you see where I’m going with this? Selectively applying this kind of logic to gun rights is clown-logic on its face.

The whole concept of a false sense of security is inverted by the very people claiming that having access to guns — which would give you control over your own security — somehow gives you a false sense of security. As if you should rely on someone else or the government, and then you wouldn’t have a false sense of security?

It’s just so ludicrous, so preposterous, only autistic NazBols and shitlibs would genuinely believe this line of logic and apply it selectively to gun rights.

I understand the argument that “muh guns” makes some people feel comfortable enough not to see the race issue, but if defenseless against tyranny is your solution to this problem, then RIP. Again, the same could be said about reading books or lifting weights.

There’s a much greater argument to be made that intellectualism has given the Dissident Right a false sense of security, but it’s not one I want make or promote. I think the Dissident Right should be intellectual movement, but it should also include survivalism and embracing martial virtues and martial potential (gun rights).

Twitter thread summarizing Putin’s annexation speech. Could have easily been given by a president of Zimbabwe.

https://twitter.com/KonstantinKisin/status/1575853684852150272

"Guns wont save you but demanding UBI gibs from our anti-White masters will, trust the plan!" -skinny dysgenic nazbol parasites

There will come a day when you realize that all the pain and suffering, all the loss and fighting, was worth it. Whether we triumph or not, our victory was having been free men, warriors, who chose to fight for what is righteous and good in this world than falling for slavery in golden chains.

"COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility"

...and there we have it. The WEF article goes on to boast that the last 5-7 years (in reality, the last 2-3) has seen a sharp rise in technology which tracks or minimizes carbon, and in behavioural changes among citizens.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/my-carbon-an-approach-for-inclusive-and-sustainable-cities/

Tonight on the Writers’ Bloc, we’ll be having another two guest extravaganza, hosting Pox Populi and American Krogan to discuss the Italian election results.

Tune in to our Dlive and Odysee channels at 22:00 CET, 4pm EST, 1pm PST. Send your questions, comments and donations through Entropy.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/MorgothsReview/3300

1. “USA blew up Nord Stream” is still conjecture at this point, whereas Putin’s speech is official communication from a head of state.
2. Even if USA did blow up Nord Stream, the Washington regime has done this and worse in the past, and everybody already agrees they’re an enemy. We already know 100% that the Washington regime is evil and anti-white. Washington trampling on white nations is what we expect them to do. No self-proclaimed nationalists are trying to tell me that they’re actually on our side.
3. Every time the head of a nuclear state uses SJW-tier anti-white and anti-colonial rhetoric, it’s cause for concern, especially in light of the aforementioned claims that Putin is a nationalist, pro-white, not as bad as America, etc.

I'd be happy to debate Mike Peinovich on this topic any time. Frodi of Guide to Kulchur would be an ideal moderator.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/mpeinovich/2011

I wonder what percentage of the global population is actually White.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmericanKrogan/3013

Read this thread before all this stuff gets shoved under a rug. 2020-21 was truly an awful and discombobulating time.

https://twitter.com/mandavejobgood/status/1576230949435498497?s=21&t=X99BxgjQpY2UoujGLpbFBg

I just don’t see how the Russophile Putin simps are any different from the Trump-worshipping Qanon believers that “trust the plan.” With Putin they “trust the plan” no matter how blatantly he condemns Nationalism and western Whites. It’s not too surprising however, because a lot of these same people remained on the Trump train far longer than the rest of us, some right up to the end of Trump’s term.

Assuming they aren’t being bought by the Kremlin, these are the “we need a leader” people. They’re just natural followers that need a master with a plan to trust, and they’re willing to overlook anything and put up massive blindspots in order to have it.

This brown man is right. I think he’s basically describing how modern civilization and technology have facilitated the world of the modern left — a point I’ve been making for a very long time.

The reason why a lot of the LGBTQ+ garbage and kumbaya-race-mixing propaganda has been as successful as it has is at least partially due to most people living in an unnatural, urban environments with modern technology — the you-know-who influence just takes advantage of and accelerates this inevitable decline.

The goal for our people shouldn’t be to abandon technology, because it’s still necessary to maintain a competitive edge against other groups; rather, our goal should be to live in more natural, rural environments that can attune our people to the natural world, which can limit or offset the corrupting influence of technology.

This is yet another reason why you should consider living in the countryside if you have the option to do so.

If you get a message from someone impersonating me, you know the drill.