The whole concept of a false sense of security is inverted by the very people claiming that having access to guns — which would give you control over your own security — somehow gives you a false sense of security. As if you should rely on someone else or the government, and then you wouldn’t have a false sense of security?

It’s just so ludicrous, so preposterous, only autistic NazBols and shitlibs would genuinely believe this line of logic and apply it selectively to gun rights.

I understand the argument that “muh guns” makes some people feel comfortable enough not to see the race issue, but if defenseless against tyranny is your solution to this problem, then RIP. Again, the same could be said about reading books or lifting weights.

There’s a much greater argument to be made that intellectualism has given the Dissident Right a false sense of security, but it’s not one I want make or promote. I think the Dissident Right should be intellectual movement, but it should also include survivalism and embracing martial virtues and martial potential (gun rights).

Twitter thread summarizing Putin’s annexation speech. Could have easily been given by a president of Zimbabwe.

https://twitter.com/KonstantinKisin/status/1575853684852150272

"Guns wont save you but demanding UBI gibs from our anti-White masters will, trust the plan!" -skinny dysgenic nazbol parasites

There will come a day when you realize that all the pain and suffering, all the loss and fighting, was worth it. Whether we triumph or not, our victory was having been free men, warriors, who chose to fight for what is righteous and good in this world than falling for slavery in golden chains.

"COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility"

...and there we have it. The WEF article goes on to boast that the last 5-7 years (in reality, the last 2-3) has seen a sharp rise in technology which tracks or minimizes carbon, and in behavioural changes among citizens.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/my-carbon-an-approach-for-inclusive-and-sustainable-cities/

Tonight on the Writers’ Bloc, we’ll be having another two guest extravaganza, hosting Pox Populi and American Krogan to discuss the Italian election results.

Tune in to our Dlive and Odysee channels at 22:00 CET, 4pm EST, 1pm PST. Send your questions, comments and donations through Entropy.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/MorgothsReview/3300

1. “USA blew up Nord Stream” is still conjecture at this point, whereas Putin’s speech is official communication from a head of state.
2. Even if USA did blow up Nord Stream, the Washington regime has done this and worse in the past, and everybody already agrees they’re an enemy. We already know 100% that the Washington regime is evil and anti-white. Washington trampling on white nations is what we expect them to do. No self-proclaimed nationalists are trying to tell me that they’re actually on our side.
3. Every time the head of a nuclear state uses SJW-tier anti-white and anti-colonial rhetoric, it’s cause for concern, especially in light of the aforementioned claims that Putin is a nationalist, pro-white, not as bad as America, etc.

I'd be happy to debate Mike Peinovich on this topic any time. Frodi of Guide to Kulchur would be an ideal moderator.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/mpeinovich/2011

I wonder what percentage of the global population is actually White.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmericanKrogan/3013

Read this thread before all this stuff gets shoved under a rug. 2020-21 was truly an awful and discombobulating time.

https://twitter.com/mandavejobgood/status/1576230949435498497?s=21&t=X99BxgjQpY2UoujGLpbFBg

I just don’t see how the Russophile Putin simps are any different from the Trump-worshipping Qanon believers that “trust the plan.” With Putin they “trust the plan” no matter how blatantly he condemns Nationalism and western Whites. It’s not too surprising however, because a lot of these same people remained on the Trump train far longer than the rest of us, some right up to the end of Trump’s term.

Assuming they aren’t being bought by the Kremlin, these are the “we need a leader” people. They’re just natural followers that need a master with a plan to trust, and they’re willing to overlook anything and put up massive blindspots in order to have it.

This brown man is right. I think he’s basically describing how modern civilization and technology have facilitated the world of the modern left — a point I’ve been making for a very long time.

The reason why a lot of the LGBTQ+ garbage and kumbaya-race-mixing propaganda has been as successful as it has is at least partially due to most people living in an unnatural, urban environments with modern technology — the you-know-who influence just takes advantage of and accelerates this inevitable decline.

The goal for our people shouldn’t be to abandon technology, because it’s still necessary to maintain a competitive edge against other groups; rather, our goal should be to live in more natural, rural environments that can attune our people to the natural world, which can limit or offset the corrupting influence of technology.

This is yet another reason why you should consider living in the countryside if you have the option to do so.

If you get a message from someone impersonating me, you know the drill.

Live now!

https://odysee.com/@countercurrents:6/ccradio:e

No science behind ‘mental illness’, it’s entirely abstract; “It’s a great marketing campaign, but not a science.”

https://www.cchr.org/quick-facts/real-disease-vs-mental-disorder.html

Mental illnesses are literally voted into existence by a board of psychiatrists. “They can manufacture enough diagnostic labels of normal variability of mood and thought to justify a continual sale of medication to you.”

https://www.cchr.org/quick-facts/disorders-voted-into-existence.html

Psychiatry admits it has no cures for ‘mental illness’:

https://www.cchr.org/quick-facts/psychiatry-admits-it-has-no-cures.html

No scientific evidence from brain-scans can confirm the existence of ‘mental illness’.
“…modern psychiatry has yet to convincingly prove the genetic/biologic cause of any single mental illness…Patients [have] been diagnosed with ‘chemical imbalances’ despite the fact that no test exists to support such a claim, and…there is no real conception of what a correct chemical balance would look like.”

https://www.cchr.org/quick-facts/no-brain-scans-for-mental-illness.html

Drugs prescribed to “treat” mental illness are neurotoxins. Common and well-documented side effects of psychiatric drugs include mania, psychosis, hallucinations, depersonalization, suicidal ideation, heart attack, stroke and sudden death.

https://www.cchr.org/quick-facts/psychiatric-drugs-side-effects.html

“In fourty years, ‘biological’ psychiatry has yet to validate a single psychiatric condition/diagnosis as an abnormality/disease, or as anything ‘neurological,’ ‘biological,’ ‘chemically-imbalanced’ or ‘genetic.’” —Dr. Fred Baughman Jr. child neurologist, Fellow of the American Academy of Neurology

https://www.cchr.org/quick-facts/no-genetic-proof-of-mental-illnesses.html

Western leaders: The west is racist, imperialist, everything we have was stolen from non-whites through slavery & colonialism

Putin: The west is racist, imperialist, everything they have was stolen from non-whites through slavery & colonialism

“Putin's new troops will suffer heavily in Ukraine as they will have basically no training, UK intel says.”

This article highlights yet another reason why having gun rights is so important: with gun rights, you have a gun culture and thus a much larger pool of military age males to draw from that have some experience with firearms, which means they’d require less training. The vast majority of these new Russian connoscripts probably have no significant experience operating firearms whatsoever; so they have no idea about things like: how to zero a rifle’s sights so that point of aim is point of impact, effective range, how to clear jams in a pinch, how to maintain the rifle, trigger control and etc... Their abject lack of experience with firearms, thanks to gay gun control laws, means they’ll have less time learning how to use radios, unit tactics, repairing and driving armored vehicles and etc...

You definitely don’t need any sort of “official military training” to learn how to use a rifle, you could learn in a couple days watching YouTube videos and a couple trips to the range — it’s not rocket science; that’s how I did it. But waiting until there’s a war to teach your men how to use a rifle is going to hinder their mobilization effort, and I think it’ll cost the Russian side many more lives.