Our car drew up beside the other. The house door opened sharply, several officers rushed out and tried to hide. [...] I could see the end of the table covered with bottles and tinned things. At the side two young women were seated, who sprang up at the appearance of the General. I could hear the hoarse voice of Baron Ungern pronouncing sharp, short, stern phrases.
"Your native land is perishing. ... The shame of it is upon all you Russians. ... And you cannot understand it. ... Nor feel it. ... You need wine and women. ... Scoundrels! Brutes! ... One hundred fifty tashur for every man of you."
The voice fell to a whisper.
"And you, Mesdames, do you not realize the ruin of your people? No? For you it is of no moment. And have you no feeling for your husbands at the front who may even now be killed? You are not women. ... I honor woman, who feels more deeply and strongly than man; but you are not women! ... Listen to me, Mesdames. Once more and I will hang you."

- Ferdinand Ossendowski, Beasts, Men, and Gods

"The nihilistic outer skin – hygiene, shallow cults of the Sun, sport, cultivation of the body, in brief: an ethos of sterility unworthy of consideration."
~ Ernst Jünger

Testosterone has become a stand-in for general health and wellbeing, and even worse, it has been substituted as the source of the masculine principle itself. But it is neither the key to health nor masculine values. In the end testosterone is a hormone in the body, and as such on its own it can only be hoped to bestow a most Titanic power. That may seem promising, but one cannot expect a race of autochthones to develop out of the hypertrophy of testosterone as if it were a universal panacea—it was neither the source of nor the goal of any previous civilization which one could seek to restore, emulate, or surpass. No race can arise from hormonal cultivation alone, indeed, one could only possibly cultivate testosterone in such a decadent and dying society as that in which we find ourselves today.

The assumption is that once enough young men have natural and healthy (if not higher) levels of testosterone, only then we will see the proliferation of higher values that will allow healthy individuals to create a new healthy race. This goes against the very nature of transcendent values as being primary potentials, with physical manifestations as secondary realities contingent to those values. One cannot force the body "below" to bring into being values that really come from "above." By relying on bodily hormones instead of true values one will always ultimately remain nihilistic.

"Now it is obvious that in function of a mere will to power, all distinctions vanish: there are no more supermen or sheep-men, neither affirmers nor negators of life. There is only a variety of techniques, of means (far from being reducible to sheer physical force), tending to make one human class or another prevail; means that are indiscriminately called good in proportion to their success. If in life and the history of civilization there exist phases of rise and decline, phases of creation and destruction and decadence, what authorizes us to ascribe value to one rather than to the others? Why should decadence be an evil? It is all life, and all justifiable in terms of life, if this is truly taken in its irrational, naked reality, outside any theology or teleology, as Nietzsche would have wished. Even “anti-nature” and “violence against life” enter into it. Once again, all firm ground gives way." From Ride the Tiger.

"Evidently we are as far removed from the realm of Pluto as we are from all those beautiful children's games of Cupid and Psyche, Luna and Endymion, unless we clothe them in purer, higher truth; and Christianity has, as it were, opened the door to this."
~ Herder

"We all go by the name of all Christians. By this we confess: We accept a revelation of God through Jesus; we cannot understand anything very deeply with the mere light of nature; we regard the Bible as a fulfillment, a supplement, of this light; we consider what the Bible says to be altogether divine and thus believe it and bear witness to it; and through the promises this divine book shares about this life and a future one, we expect to be certainly and truly happy. All of these things are included in the name "Christian," for Christ based his revelation on the Old Testament and established the New Testament through his disciples. We would be unchristian, we would be pagans, if we did not accept this divine revelation. We would be Jews, if we accepted the Old Testament alone. We would be naturalists and freethinkers, if we believed to know all necessary truths from the light of reason alone. We only become Christians when we take the Bible to be the language of God to human beings, the ground of knowledge about our religious truths, religious duties, and religious hopes, according to which we believe, live, and await the future."
~ Herder

"Because I am a red man. If the Great Spirit had desired me to be a white man, he would have made me so in the first place. He put in your heart certain wishes and plans; in my heart he put other and different desires. Each man is good in the sight of the Great Spirit. It is not necessary that eagles should be crows."

— Sitting Bull

If, then, there is any affinity between the two literatures, a knowledge of them should be useful to us in our search for truth; if not, the comparison, by emphasizing the contrast, will be of no small service in strengthening our regard for the better one. With what now may we compare these two kinds of education to obtain a simile? Just as it is the chief mission of the tree to bear its fruit in its season, though at the same time it puts forth for ornament the leaves which quiver on its boughs, even so the real fruit of the soul is truth, yet it is not without advantage for it to embrace the pagan wisdom, as also leaves offer shelter to the fruit, and an appearance not untimely. That Moses, whose name is a synonym for wisdom, severely trained his mind in the learning of the Egyptians, and thus became able to appreciate their deity. Similarly, in later days, the wise Daniel is said to have studied the lore of the Chaldaeans while in Babylon, and after that to have taken up the sacred teachings.


— Saint Basil the Great, Address to young men on the right use of Greek literature

"The race of the man who keeps his oath is better afterward."
~ Herodotus, Oracle

We have lost such a moral view of race. Today race is seen as an inheritance one is due, something one owns that nobody can take, even oneself. Far from being so deterministic, our own actions are continually destroying our races and creating new ones for better or worse. If we remain blind to its moral essence, we remain subject to the rule of one-eyed tyrants and lost to the reality of race. If we see moral race again, we will learn how to see true races wherein there was only a single color before.

Theologians may quarrel, but the mystics of the world speak the same language.

— Meister Eckhart

"He remained silent, thinking like the seed he was, thinking with the race consciousness he had first experienced as terrible purpose. ... They were all caught up in the need of their race to renew its scattered inheritance, to cross and mingle and infuse their bloodlines in a great new pooling of genes. And the race knew only one sure way for this—the ancient way, the tried and certain way that rolled over everything in its path: jihad."

- Frank Herbert, Dune

“The individual in the framework and in the service of his race, the race in the framework and in the service of God and of the laws of the divinity: those who will understand these things will win even though they are alone. Those who will not understand will be defeated.”

— Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, For My Legionaries

This is not a return to activity, merely a short polemic I thought would benefit a larger audience.

The Nationalists say that the nation is the family writ large, some talk of "the folk" as merely the utmost extent of the kin or clan community. However, as any etymologist would know, this sense is, at least in english, barely 300 years old. Prior to that point, the folk is more often than not the common mass of people, indiscriminate and general in its usage, and nearly just as often a military term of mobilization as it is a social one. It is, appropriately so in my opinion, also directly related to the Latin word "plebes".

The actual word for family in Old English is "cynn", the direct ancestor of the contemporary word "kin", which is (probably) also related (through "cyning") to the word "king". Kingdom is in this understanding quite literally "the dominion or rule of a family". Kin (compare: Genus) is also an originally discriminatory term, whereas "folk" does not have to be, the former indicating not only ones racial stock, but also ones classhood and gender (womankind, etc). It stems from the hypothetical PIE root-word for begetting and giving birth, and has a direct connection with, among others, the german word for child "Kind".

The Folk and The Kin are different species on a conceptual level. It is good to remember the original meaning of the word "tyrant", as the servants of the same can never know the difference between childrapist and childrearer. Being a Greek could not possibly ever mean more than being an Athenian or Theban, being a German could not possibly ever mean more than being a Bavarian or Saxon, or in my own case, being a Norwegian could not possibly mean more than being a Grenlander. When one looks at the Roman Familia, the Scottish Clann, etc. the absurdity of what we can call rigid nationalism in a historical time-frame stretching past the 1400s becomes clear.

Kinship and parochiality, not nationalism and imperialism.

Hyperboreans:
Celts/Germans?
Tocarians?
Paleolithic Siberian Golden Age?
Aryan wizards?
Divine archetype?
Interdimensional aliens?

https://youtu.be/JmHKjzZ9Kuc?si=WI-OYtfpvlCHn8E9