"Now it is obvious that in function of a mere will to power, all distinctions vanish: there are no more supermen or sheep-men, neither affirmers nor negators of life. There is only a variety of techniques, of means (far from being reducible to sheer physical force), tending to make one human class or another prevail; means that are indiscriminately called good in proportion to their success. If in life and the history of civilization there exist phases of rise and decline, phases of creation and destruction and decadence, what authorizes us to ascribe value to one rather than to the others? Why should decadence be an evil? It is all life, and all justifiable in terms of life, if this is truly taken in its irrational, naked reality, outside any theology or teleology, as Nietzsche would have wished. Even “anti-nature” and “violence against life” enter into it. Once again, all firm ground gives way." From Ride the Tiger.

"Evidently we are as far removed from the realm of Pluto as we are from all those beautiful children's games of Cupid and Psyche, Luna and Endymion, unless we clothe them in purer, higher truth; and Christianity has, as it were, opened the door to this."
~ Herder

"We all go by the name of all Christians. By this we confess: We accept a revelation of God through Jesus; we cannot understand anything very deeply with the mere light of nature; we regard the Bible as a fulfillment, a supplement, of this light; we consider what the Bible says to be altogether divine and thus believe it and bear witness to it; and through the promises this divine book shares about this life and a future one, we expect to be certainly and truly happy. All of these things are included in the name "Christian," for Christ based his revelation on the Old Testament and established the New Testament through his disciples. We would be unchristian, we would be pagans, if we did not accept this divine revelation. We would be Jews, if we accepted the Old Testament alone. We would be naturalists and freethinkers, if we believed to know all necessary truths from the light of reason alone. We only become Christians when we take the Bible to be the language of God to human beings, the ground of knowledge about our religious truths, religious duties, and religious hopes, according to which we believe, live, and await the future."
~ Herder

"Because I am a red man. If the Great Spirit had desired me to be a white man, he would have made me so in the first place. He put in your heart certain wishes and plans; in my heart he put other and different desires. Each man is good in the sight of the Great Spirit. It is not necessary that eagles should be crows."

— Sitting Bull

If, then, there is any affinity between the two literatures, a knowledge of them should be useful to us in our search for truth; if not, the comparison, by emphasizing the contrast, will be of no small service in strengthening our regard for the better one. With what now may we compare these two kinds of education to obtain a simile? Just as it is the chief mission of the tree to bear its fruit in its season, though at the same time it puts forth for ornament the leaves which quiver on its boughs, even so the real fruit of the soul is truth, yet it is not without advantage for it to embrace the pagan wisdom, as also leaves offer shelter to the fruit, and an appearance not untimely. That Moses, whose name is a synonym for wisdom, severely trained his mind in the learning of the Egyptians, and thus became able to appreciate their deity. Similarly, in later days, the wise Daniel is said to have studied the lore of the Chaldaeans while in Babylon, and after that to have taken up the sacred teachings.


— Saint Basil the Great, Address to young men on the right use of Greek literature

"The race of the man who keeps his oath is better afterward."
~ Herodotus, Oracle

We have lost such a moral view of race. Today race is seen as an inheritance one is due, something one owns that nobody can take, even oneself. Far from being so deterministic, our own actions are continually destroying our races and creating new ones for better or worse. If we remain blind to its moral essence, we remain subject to the rule of one-eyed tyrants and lost to the reality of race. If we see moral race again, we will learn how to see true races wherein there was only a single color before.

Theologians may quarrel, but the mystics of the world speak the same language.

— Meister Eckhart

"He remained silent, thinking like the seed he was, thinking with the race consciousness he had first experienced as terrible purpose. ... They were all caught up in the need of their race to renew its scattered inheritance, to cross and mingle and infuse their bloodlines in a great new pooling of genes. And the race knew only one sure way for this—the ancient way, the tried and certain way that rolled over everything in its path: jihad."

- Frank Herbert, Dune

“The individual in the framework and in the service of his race, the race in the framework and in the service of God and of the laws of the divinity: those who will understand these things will win even though they are alone. Those who will not understand will be defeated.”

— Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, For My Legionaries

This is not a return to activity, merely a short polemic I thought would benefit a larger audience.

The Nationalists say that the nation is the family writ large, some talk of "the folk" as merely the utmost extent of the kin or clan community. However, as any etymologist would know, this sense is, at least in english, barely 300 years old. Prior to that point, the folk is more often than not the common mass of people, indiscriminate and general in its usage, and nearly just as often a military term of mobilization as it is a social one. It is, appropriately so in my opinion, also directly related to the Latin word "plebes".

The actual word for family in Old English is "cynn", the direct ancestor of the contemporary word "kin", which is (probably) also related (through "cyning") to the word "king". Kingdom is in this understanding quite literally "the dominion or rule of a family". Kin (compare: Genus) is also an originally discriminatory term, whereas "folk" does not have to be, the former indicating not only ones racial stock, but also ones classhood and gender (womankind, etc). It stems from the hypothetical PIE root-word for begetting and giving birth, and has a direct connection with, among others, the german word for child "Kind".

The Folk and The Kin are different species on a conceptual level. It is good to remember the original meaning of the word "tyrant", as the servants of the same can never know the difference between childrapist and childrearer. Being a Greek could not possibly ever mean more than being an Athenian or Theban, being a German could not possibly ever mean more than being a Bavarian or Saxon, or in my own case, being a Norwegian could not possibly mean more than being a Grenlander. When one looks at the Roman Familia, the Scottish Clann, etc. the absurdity of what we can call rigid nationalism in a historical time-frame stretching past the 1400s becomes clear.

Kinship and parochiality, not nationalism and imperialism.

Hyperboreans:
Celts/Germans?
Tocarians?
Paleolithic Siberian Golden Age?
Aryan wizards?
Divine archetype?
Interdimensional aliens?

https://youtu.be/JmHKjzZ9Kuc?si=WI-OYtfpvlCHn8E9

"If you had gone to Buddha and asked him: 'Are you the son of Brahma?' he would have said, 'My son, you are still in the vale of illusion.' If you had gone to Socrates and asked, 'Are you Zeus?' he would have laughed at you. If you had gone to Mohammed and asked, 'Are you Allah?' he would first have rent his clothes and then cut your head off. If you had asked Confucius, 'Are you Heaven?' I think he would have probably replied, 'Remarks which are not in accordance with nature are in bad taste.' The idea of a great moral teacher saying what Christ said is out of the question. In my opinion, the only person who can say that sort of thing is either God or a complete lunatic suffering from that form of delusion which undermines the whole mind of man."

— CS Lewis