Something much more serious than realism

We have seen that formally, from the perspective of international relations theory, we are talking about a confrontation between two types of order: unipolar (the West) and multipolar (Russia and its cautious and often hesitant allies). A closer analysis reveals that unipolarism is the triumph of the new democracy and thus chaos, while multipolarism based on the principle of sovereign civilisations, although an order, reveals nothing about the essence of the proposed order. Moreover, the classical notion of sovereignty, as understood by the realist school of international relations, itself presupposes chaos between states, which undermines the philosophical foundation if we consider the confrontation with unipolarism and globalism as a struggle precisely for order and against chaos.

Of course, to a first approximation, Russia expects nothing more than the recognition of its sovereignty as a nation-state and the protection of its national interests, and the fact that it had to confront the moderate chaos establishment of globalism in order to do so was somewhat of a surprise to Moscow, which started the SMO with much more concrete and pragmatic goals. The intention of the Russian leadership was only to contrast realism in international relations with liberalism, and the Russian leadership did not expect or even suspect a serious confrontation with the institution of chaos - especially in its aggravated form. Yet, we find ourselves in precisely this situation. Russia is at war with chaos in every sense of this multifaceted phenomenon, which means that the entire struggle takes on a metaphysical nature. If we want to win, we must defeat chaos, and this also means that from the very beginning we position ourselves as the antithesis of chaos, that is, as the beginning that opposes it.

It is a good time to review the fundamental definitions of chaos

—
A brief history of Chaos: from ancient Greece to Postmodern
| Part 1 | Part 2

Ukrainian security forces forced priests to call the shelling of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Russian

The rector of the St. Tikhvin Cathedral of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) in Lysichansk, Andriy Pavlenko, said that the security forces demanded that the priests present the destruction from the attacks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine as the consequences of Russian shelling. They were expected to publicly speak false rhetoric.

According to Pavlenko, mines hit his temple from the center of Lisichansk, when there were no Russian military personnel there yet. The trajectory of the projectiles indicates Ukrainian troops. "And there were questions in every possible way:" Why did you write to everyone that it was from the direction of the city center that there were arrivals to your yard? You have to write that the Russian army is doing this,” the clergyman said. He added that the Svyatogorsk Lavra faced the same pressure.

In April, Ukrainian security forces detained Pavlenko, using torture and beatings to force him to incriminate himself in order for him to confirm his cooperation with Russian intelligence. The priest was sentenced to 12 years in prison. He was later released.

Join to https://news.1rj.ru/str/soroka_belaya_en !